We talked about this a bit when it came out on Friday. Not sure why nothing seems to have come of it. One issue: The claim is misleading. She did not propose rigging. She speaks in past tense, basically calling them idiots for giving votes to Palestine without having a way to control who wins. Very damning stuff, but there's no good source that explains it accurately.
Ethan Butler
Primetime media habbenings for America is Monday-Friday. The FBI investigation blew everything out of the water for the weekend so this was kind of forgotten.
Trump will bring it up during the week.
Oliver Flores
Trump doesn't want to hurt his image as a strong supporter of Israel.
Jack Sanchez
>trump has been gaining a large number of votes from the jewish community, he is probably not bringing it up because jews would see this as a good thing.
Easton Hall
How is it NOT damning?
It's damning for two reasons.
One, she didn't want to give the Palestinians democracy (probably harder to control.
Two, if they DID give elections, they should have rigged it somehow.
Seriously, only an idiot and/or a partisan hack would see it as not damning. Imagine if it was Bush or Trump?
Youtube link of the audio clip if anyone is interested:
well it doesn't count as an outright confession, it's too vague, but the implication in her words is pretty damning yes
Ethan Wilson
it's phrased very carefully. "something to determine who would win..." this could mean FIX IT (as it does) or "get intelligence in advance.." could argue either way in court, it's not as big as they are making. Thanks christ for the FBI thing because the Jews would not have touched this, esp to do with the Jews.
Joshua Cooper
a simple retweet would be more than enough desu
Ethan Stewart
He doesn't have to support the winner of the election. He could just say how disgraceful it was to have Hillary Clinton suggest the election should have been rigged, and how it's absurd that she now claims rigging an election is impossible.
Well I said it was "very damaging stuff." My only issue was that there is no good source to share that explains it. This Wikileaks Tweet is the best thing we have to share, but as I said, it's phrased a bit inaccurately.
Adrian Green
CTR false flags mean he has to be careful
Camden Torres
Wording is too vague.
Nathaniel Price
Might be worth pushing. Could shave maybe a point off from "Free Palestine" types.
Aiden Wright
There's nothing to confess to. She didn't rig anything in Palestine (at least at that point; who knows about later years after she suggested this). But there is nothing vague in what she says. Her anti-democratic view is clear.
Luke Anderson
Seriously, why this shit isn't trending?
Alexander Peterson
>mfw we now have previous intent to commit election fraud overseas It's not the same thing as influencing an election on your own soil, but it's pretty close.
Jace Diaz
He has to bring this up on a well thought out strike, it is a backbreaker for Clinton.
But I don't think you two realize how big this FBI investigation is. (((ABC WORLD NEWS))) and (((CNN))) actually reported on it without slant. That is unheard of.
Isaiah Mitchell
Veritas II was even more vague, to the point when Caesar Vargas stated he wasn't even talking about election, it was a bombshell nevertheless. Here it's Hillary herself saying how "we should have done something to determine who wins the election".
Alexander Foster
it basically nullifies Obongo and Shillary's claims that there is no possibility of rigging the election, and she was shilling this narrative very hard on her rallies in the past days.
well anyway I hope Trump just plays 12D chess again
Jaxson Parker
I really don't fucking know. Someone should edit a clip from where she claimed "democracy was the most important thing to her" and then show this audio clip behind it. I wish I was good at it, I'd do it myself.
But it IS a confession. "we should have done it" shows willingness to do it and a disregard to democracy.
True, I misquoted you. My bad.
We're not worried about the law or courts, we're trying to sway voters.