>Well, it is all rather unfathomable. I think there is an economic component to the support for Trump. For some of his supporters government has gotten in the way of their capacity to make a good living and to succeed financially, so they are against regulations, against government. And that can include paying taxes and workplace regulations meant to secure the health and safety of workers. They applaud the fact that Trump has not apparently paid federal taxes and they think: "Yeah, I want to be that person".
>I think they have an enormous rage. Not just against women, not only against racial minorities or against migrants – they are thrilled that that their rage is being liberated by his public and uncensored speech. We on the left, we are apparently the superego. What Trump has managed to do, rhetorically, is to identify not just the left, but liberalism – basic American liberalism and the left – as just a bunch of censors. We are the instruments of repression and he is the vehicle for emancipation. It is a nightmare.
>What Trump is emancipating is unbridled hatred and, as we see recently, forms of sexual action that don't even care about anybody's consent. Since when did we have to ask women whether they are okay with being touched, or why? He does not actually say that, but that is exactly what he is indicating. It liberates people, their rage, and their hatred. And these people may be wealthy, they may be poor, they may be in the middle; they feel themselves to have been repressed or censored by the left, by the feminists, by the movement for civil rights and equality, by Obama's presidency, which allowed a black man to represent the nation.
Not an argument. But thanks for literally proving her right with your vitriol.
Blake Gomez
Yes, "no one cares" because you aren't smart enough to understand it.
Jack Ortiz
Eat shit, you huge fucking faggot.
Elijah Anderson
(((((((((((vitriol))))))))))))
Robert Scott
Not an argument. But thanks for literally proving me right with your vitriol.
Cameron Campbell
>user posts a who
Ayden Barnes
Bitch dont have one either > i think IS NOT FACT
Connor Brooks
Is that what you think?
Aaron Ortiz
Her opinion is based on misinformation.
Discarded, sauerkraut.
Gabriel Ramirez
And another one
Carson Gray
NOT AN ARGUMENT
>if I repeat what they say that means I win the argument! >hurr durr what is context?
At least she's capable of thinking, unlike Trump supporters.
Brandon Stewart
>Her opinion is based on misinformation. Please elaborate.
Brayden Walker
Why do the enemies of Donald Trump always go to the hate argument? It literally means nothing. They just sound like kids on the playground who got blown out and all they can say is "well they hate ____!"
Why do liberals think in a dichotomy of love and hate, when I have never heard anyone on the right speak like this?
is this just
>women """""intellectuals"""""
Sebastian Lopez
Is that the dead Danish woman from South Park?
Cameron Wright
>hate argument Excellent point, see: Thanks for playing.
Cameron Gomez
fed by billions of tax money the german cultur cucks act as if they are important. no one except maybe 10 readers care about such bullshit.
Easton Torres
>a woman says this about trump supporter. Still not an argument.But thanks for literally proving me right with your vitriol.
Jonathan Perry
reminder to sage this thread OP is a german cuck who posts these threads everyday and nothing constructive come out of them
Jordan Ortiz
>I hate free speech and opposing views should be suppressed
I guess going full tampon is so much easier than just reading the interview and commenting on it constructively.
Wyatt Martinez
>woman philosopher >philosopher >a woman
Nathan Wright
Yeah we get it, you hate women.
Ethan Stewart
See
Parker Martinez
The first part of the last paragraph, specifically. Most of what she says is hearsay, though.
Adrian Phillips
Let's be fair here, you'd hate women too if they kept rejecting you and you were still a virgin by the age of 40.
Tyler Lee
>yes i hate women because I don't respect what this woman says about trump supporters. Still not an argument.But thanks for literally proving me right with your vitriol.
Ayden Rodriguez
Do you think her criticism of Trump is valid, given how she didn't present a single argument against him?
You deserve to be mocked for appreciating an opinion based on wilful ignorance.
Caleb James
I'm not a degenerate who thinks sticking a piece of flesh into another piece of flesh is the height of human experience.
If you had an argument other than "hurr durr women can't think XDDDDDD", I'd agree with you.
Michael Sullivan
>maybe if I say they're RACIST SEXIST XENOPHOBES in enough words it'll stick this time
Ayden Mitchell
I hope you are not in academia, because this "analysis" is so simplistic. She dosen't understand Trump and the phenomenons surrounding him at all. She belongs to another time and she knows it, the world is falling apart around her she wonders why, but the only thing she can come up with it's rascism/capitalism/patriarcy. Her so called scientific works ad nothing of value, all the merits were given to her to clam her down and to Signal how progressive the jury or university is. Her writings are a cerklejerk, bring something of value/insight be it left or right and i will gadly discuss it with you in great lengh.
Kayden Roberts
Being a woman isn't an argument to an end, it's an end to an argument.
Robert Gutierrez
>ad hominem
Joshua Russell
What's this guy's problem?
William Reed
>people who support Trump hate women
into the trash it goes
Ayden Nguyen
It' neither. I never claimed that being a woman was an "argument". Yet you think an argument is invalid simply because it's made by a woman. If you truly were capable of independent though, surely you would realize that that is an ad hominem and therefore invalid?
Jonathan Young
What's with the kindergarten-tier objection?
Observable facts do not need to be supported with arguments. If I say "The sun is hot", you don't get to yell "OMG YOU DIDN'T PRESENT A SINGLE ARGUMENT" without looking like a complete retard.
She distills readily available information and presents them poignantly.
Jonathan James
not an argument
Luis Phillips
>invent queer theory >expect to be taken seriously ever
Jaxson Diaz
>philosopher LMAO
Andrew Myers
>This women generalizes her hatred for media's narrative of trump onto all trump supporters. >Generalizing my disdain for this woman as hate for all women.
Still not an argument.But thanks for literally proving me right with your vitriol.
Owen Davis
>I think (insert unsubstantiated claim here)
Not very much of an argument either, faggot.
Noah Diaz
Germany has become a joke of a one-sides country, you realized that, right tan German?
Hillary, her donors and the Clinton Foundation didn't pay several years of taxes as well. She's just not that rich and the media won't report on it.
On top of that, you're so concerned about the words of Trump rather than the actions of Clinton. Her no-fly zone debacle is important for a reason. Why don't you get off of your sand nigger-loving ass and realize that Trump is a safer candidate than Clinton?
Kevin Harris
Is that what you think? If so, could you please present in argument in support of it?
Leo Sanders
...
Kevin Davis
>Butler is wrong because Hillary
Literally not an argument, back to the drawing board.
William Russell
>do nothing of note, ever What's your excuse, fag?
Daniel Hernandez
>I don't believe women are capable of thought
Not an argument.
Simply quoting your opponent and then saying "into the trash" is not an argument. It's the equivalent of saying "Oh, you believe the Earth orbits the sun? Well I find that belief utterly laughable, therefore you are wrong."
Easton Barnes
No it really wasn't but even if... So are her statements, especially about the trump supporters, so it was her, who chose the manner and quality of discussion.
Noah Morgan
> famed philosopher > Judith Butler
Literally nobody except Radfems even know she exists. Not the SJW "literally", either. The actual "literally".
Logan Taylor
>My candidate may be bad but we can't let yours get elected The major argument behind every presidential election in my lifetime
Lucas Young
>Literally nobody except Radfems even know she exists.
By your own logic, you're a "Radfem" since you know she exists.
Hello Radfem, nice to meet you. How's the Radfemming going today?
Thomas Bailey
Must be pretty nervous because you can't argue against it. Your only rebuttal is "literally not an argument". Everything Judith said is "literally not an argument", might as well. Typical tan German.
Jeremiah Jenkins
see
Asher Carter
>assuming that your candidate isn't bad either
Isaiah Foster
No, women are stupid.
>She distills readily available information and presents them poignantly.
She evidently failed to do so in this article.
>Observable facts do not need to be supported with arguments.
Except these aren't facts she's presenting. She's stating her opinion, which is grounded on falsehoods.
Example: >What Trump is emancipating is unbridled hatred and, as we see recently, forms of sexual action that don't even care about anybody's consent.
To what is she referring to? Pussygate and the convenient rape allegations which ensued thereafter?
She can't call herself an intellectual without harbouring at least a shred of doubt as to the legitimacy of those allegations -- yet she is prepared to defend them readily, as if they were fact, despite not having been proven.
Samuel Butler
Not an argument. Try again.
Caleb Flores
>cannot compute opponent's argument and reframe opponent as misogynist. Still not an argument.But thanks for literally proving me right with your vitriol.
Jack Morales
>No, women are stupid. Not an argument, unless you can provide proofs. Until then it's just an opinion, and thus not an argument.
Kayden Cook
So then you withdraw all claims that women can't think?
Gabriel Richardson
>Female "philosophers"
Luis Jenkins
The proof is in the article.
Colton Johnson
>Since when did we have to ask women whether they are okay with being touched, or why? He does not actually say that, but that is exactly what he is indicating. >He does not actually say that So it's not a problem then. Everything else she said here (in the op greentext because I'm not clicking that link) makes sense and is correct. People think the left is censoring speech and people are fed up with regulations and taxes, good to know she understand Trump supporters then.
Jason Rivera
You did nothing to refute the central point Your argument was: 1.)She doesn't understand (no mention of why) 2.)Multiple attempts at discrediting her
You're attempting to dismiss her claim without substantiation. Either the work of a stupid man or a scared one.
Hudson White
>philosopher and gender theorist Not this narrative-peddling, lesbianic demagog again.
Isaac Baker
Coming into the thread without reading it, and making the same tired unsupported meme opinion argument, does not make you "profound". Not even if you use le epic maymay image.
Point me to a specific line.
James Jenkins
>the literally who of philosophy
Noah Fisher
Not an argument. Go do something else.
Brody Thomas
>everyone who doesn't bow to a woman's shit test is a virgin found the virgin >make a point about how the "hater" argument is based on emotion and is not a valid criticism >responds with the fallacy I pointed out
wow stop posting anytime
Andrew Gutierrez
"Lesbianic" isn't a word. That's like saying "heavyriffic" or "expensaquacious".
Isaac Hernandez
Some people are famous, because they are used as example, how things shouldn't work and this is the case with judith Butler.
Chase Campbell
This was posted yesterday... just another Jew who can see the writing on the wall that the world is tired of their tricks. Sage.
Ian Thomas
Not an argument.
Luis Hernandez
>shit test www.reddit.com/r/theredpill/
William Jones
>ZEIT ONLINE: Why did you decide to write a book about public assemblies right now?
Everything below that.
Adam Cruz
>people only support trump because they don't want to pay taxes
That is not why Trump has support, and is a stupidly simplistic fallacy to support, only a complete moron would make that statement.
Austin Gutierrez
So then apparently literally doesn't mean literally?
Kevin Walker
>"Lesbianic" isn't a word.
Oh yeah? If "lesbianic" isn't a word, then how come Hillary sacrificed 90 white babies in Benghazi?
Checkmate, libtard.
Luis Turner
You do know the answer deep down, don't you?
White males especially but also males in general are workhorses for the global Elite.
With the left wing, they get to be hated and reviled workhorses that have second class rights to every other kind of person and have to use their natural advantages for the advancement of everyone but themselves.
With the Trump right wing, they get to be celebrated workhorses that are allowed to use their natural advantages for their own benefit.
All your hate whitey and hate males propaganda has come back to bite you in the ass in the form of Trump!
Don't cry too hard on Monday when Hillary can't continue campaigning.
Jaxson Long
I think Germany is fucked and no one should listen to them.
David Cooper
>famed philosopher
Andrew Clark
>Hillary sacrificed 90 white babies in Benghazi
Logan Sanchez
wow you really blew me out there
care to refute the fact that her huge appeal to emotion is just a big shit test? hoping that white knights will just fall for her damsel in distress and disavow donald trump?
Joseph Gomez
what an awesome family
Camden Nguyen
>Well,
stopped reading there
Leo Carter
Both right-wing and muslim krauts would probably like to oven this "philosopher," so good things are bound to happen to her in the near future.
Dominic Walker
This election is very simple really. GOOD vs. EVIL
She doesn't understand because she cannot see the perspective of trump supporters, she makes a baseless assumption that they are hateful. That is not the case.
Jason Hall
Leftist female who has been given special rights and privileges in her life and enjoys a high paid job in which she does nothing talks shit about working people who are about to vote in their self-interest in a democratic election.
Sounds about right for leftists.
Cameron Lee
Not an argument.
Owen Hughes
A real philosopher would actually analyze the situation with intellectual honesty, not simply regurgitate the approved political message of the day.
If this woman was a real philosopher we would all actually learn about new perspectives to look at the situation from you know. There's nothing to learn here though, except for the fact that a fake philosopher is trying to secure a political position through repeating garbage arguments about "hitler du jour".
Isaiah Powell
>shit test A term which apparently means "anything I don't like".
> hoping that white knights will just fall for her damsel in distress and disavow donald trump? And here you demonstrate a fundamental inability (and unwillingess) to understand the liberal mindset. Liberals aren't the one who thinks the world owes them sex.
Kevin Allen
Not an argument.
Lucas Miller
Not an argument.
Isaiah Ward
Are they not hateful? The supporters I know personally are mad at the gubment, welfare leeches, undocumented immigrants, liberals, the media, muslims, etc.
Not to say that the left doesn't also have hate.
Ryder Allen
Prove it.
Daniel Long
She's right, we're the ones preventing trump supporters from cub stomping half the planet.
It's kinds sad. It's like the democrats are the party of nofap.
