Haha

haha

Other urls found in this thread:

sandraandwoo.com/
youtube.com/watch?v=__mbzldzNYE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

sauce please?
also i didn`t get the joke
what the x chromosome has to do with anything?

lol?

Doesnt everyone have at least one X chromosome?

sandraandwoo.com/
Larisa (the girl on the right) is the only good reason to read it.

the x or y chromosome inherited from the father determines the sex of the child. she's saying her father should be locked up for having a daughter.

Larisa is regretting that Sabrina isn't a boy because she'd fuck her right there and then.

Have to respect the author for acknowledging that not every girl is a potential lesbian.

How the fuck could you trust someone that doesn't like action figures?

That's actually a really fucked up thing to say
"your father should be punished because i can't have lusty sex with you the way you are"

Technically nothing is stopping her

What's wrong with it?

"I wish I had a dick so I could fuck you" is the same sentiment, which I've heard a girl say to her friend.

And because you're probably one of *those* people; the sentiment was a hilarious compliment between friends, nothing more. She didn't really want a penis.

...

>She didn't really want a penis.

Are you sure about that?

Are you me?

So was that the original or a shop?

>I'm you but lewder

>With respect to readers who may look at our comic in conservative work environments, I was a bit skeptical about posting the original version of this strip in which Larisa wears a much more revealing outfit in the last panel. So I asked Powree to draw the revised version you can see above. I then asked our readers on Facebook and Twitter if I should also post the original version and everybody™ said yes.

That's neat. Most times it's facebook and twitter going bananas about anything sexual and demanding the revision.

I know it's in-character for her, but a 12 year old girl wearing a sexy revealing dress with no underwear is really pushing it for a PG webcomic with funny animals. (Though I never really understood what audience this comic is for)

Oopsie.

Wait, this larisa character is supposed to be 12?
No fucking way!

That arc was just dumb. It was attempting to satirize something about CP and the government, but I didn't even understand what exactly.

Also, imagine if there was actually a messenger that anyone could use to send pictures to everyone in America.

Yes, and she doesn't give a fuck about her public image because she's terminally ill and won't live past 20. The comic can't decide if it wants to play it for comedy or drama.

>I know it's in-character for her, but a 12 year old girl

this uber slut it`s a 12 years old?!

This comic is made by a weird German, who is obviously into lolis and shit.
The little girls are constantly being sexual, and there are bizarre narrative choices like Sandra's boyfriend being unable to control his erection.
The Raccoon also fucks his lady raccoon onscreen, although not in a strictly graphic manner.

I would not say that this comic is for children

A person below age of consent for porn in America can be charged for producing child pornography if they take a nude selfie of themselves.

is this some kind of menage a 3 meets calvin and hobbes?

Yeah, it's like some pervert disguised his/her fetish comic as a child's comic. It's really strange. Is this marketed towards kids, because it looks like it is.
I like how you'd need to be in a conservative work environment for someone to find a sexualized 12 year old objectionable

The right one is a girl?

>Also, imagine if there was actually a messenger that anyone could use to send pictures to everyone in America.

Best girl, in fact.

Or maybe, just maybe, Europe isn't as hung up on this sorta stuff?

...

The thing is, it's not for children but not really for teens or adults either. It's such an eclectic mix of funny animals, tween romantic comedy, some kind of weird sex ed, political commentary, silly gags, vidya references and dada jokes that I have a hard time imagining someone who would be genuinely into it all.

That wasn't what it was about. They charged the recipients for viewing CP, not Larisa for making it.

Meets Garfield too.

That's not the same thing this comic does. S&W is legitimately perverse. I can't understand how Normalfags would accept it

This is also a 12 year old.
It's really more of a cultural difference than "EW PERVERT".

The thing is, S&W is perfectly wholesome 98% of the time. But the remaining 2% really goes off in strange directions.

Again, a 12 year old in a bikini is not what S&W weird.
Yeah, which is why it's bizarre.

I think I recently remembered about where I was up to.
About what strip number was the gay whatshername stuff they use in the ads?

This stuff is 100% normal IRL though.

A tween girl dressing up in attire that most adult women would find very risque, in an attempt to seduce her equally tween boyfriend, because the Devil told her to, is a scene that would get the author questioned in mainstream comics, even if it's played entirely for laughs.

I don't know why but this made me crack up.

Eh. Tolls of Troy was adapted into a cartoon for children, and that on is about a cheerfuller young girl who eats people.

A little girl who eats people is A-OK in a children's cartoon if you don't show any gore. But a little girl who fucks them is not OK even if you don't show any dicks.

>That wasn't what it was about. They charged the recipients for viewing CP, not Larisa for making it.
Yeah they get charged too

If a 15 year old girl sends you nude, the response is scorched earth. Girl gets charged with creation, receivers get charged with possession

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

okay, can some Sup Forumsmrade what knows french tell. us what's going on here?

Not a Frenchanon, but I've seen it translated before. The gist is that the naked girl is late for dinner because she was taking a bath and doesn't put on clothes as a passive-aggressive response to her mom's yelling.

PPG did the same thing and no one cared because its not sexual in nature

>Tumblr losing it's shit over a 15 year old character having hormones

I don't get it. Where's the virtue signalling?

Lava nipples

Did he just rape a schoolgirl?

Does it end in lesbian sex?

Hold on, she's legitimately satanic and the BF's deranged parents were right about her?

Go for it, Landon!

Am I the only one to find Larissa more attractive in her usual outfit?

Why are her breasts bigger in the first frame?

...

No, she was paid.

>an eclectic mix of funny animals, tween romantic comedy, some kind of weird sex ed, political commentary, silly gags, vidya references and dada jokes
Sounds like it was made for Sup Forums.

My French is garbage, but here's a rough MSPaint translation.

>Lola! Stop it! Come out of the shower, were at the table now.
>Alright, here i am
>But Lola...?! What are you doing?!
>Well, i am at the table, like you told me to.
>LOLA! RETURN TO THE BATHROOM!
>You don't know what you want anymore, mom.
>Okay Lola...We had a good laugh now. Go get yourself some clothes now
>Why? Your daughter is naked all day long and mom say nothing about it.
>LOLA! Listen to your mom and aunt!
>You, you're not my father. I don't have orders to take from you.

>That wasn't what it was about. They charged the recipients for viewing CP, not Larisa for making it.
Like the police sending you kiddieporn, and when you recieve it bust in and get you convicted of owning said kiddieporn.
Rinse and repeat.
Everything to obtain the targets.

Yes.
Yes, it is.
It's quite fun and a lot better than Assigned Male.

Did you even bother inspecting the image? The picture is clearly sourced.

>a lot better than Assigned Male
What isn't?

I like how you're convinced the world is America

...

Is this what passes for tentacle porn in Germany?

The fuck? I google that shit and got nothing.

Trolls of Troy.

youtube.com/watch?v=__mbzldzNYE
Man I remember Sup Forums being all about that show until they found the original comic and were genuinely disgusted.

...

Honestly, I don't know why they even decided to adapt the comic when they changed more or less everything. Adult fans of the comic probably don't like the cartoon because of the drastically different art, lack of edgy humor, racism and gore, and God help the parents who buy the comic for their kids who liked the cheery cartoon.

I think the premise of a human girl being raised by man eating monsters is pretty cute for a show and it's not like they could just steal the idea under a different name.

But yeah, the actual comic makes Crossed look like The Teletubbies. I'm not sure if the writer hopes people will look them up after watching the show and be happy about what they find.

>I have a hard time imagining someone who would be genuinely into it all.
Not every comic must be targeted to SPECIFIC(and limited) audiences.

A webcomic needs a consistent audience, though. If you spend three months going in a direction that half of your audience doesn't care about, a lot of them will just stop returning for updates.

>I can't call my mom mom because i'm such a rebel
Dropped

The horned guy in is literally Satan. He's training her to be a Succubus when she'll go to hell.

Maybe she has legit reasons?

Seriously? I don't know if it depends on the country, but around here it's just a thing some people do. It has nothing to do with being a rebel. Some of the people I know that do it are extremely conformist

Is she her mom and not a stepmom/babysitter/older sister?

...

Wait, what is the premise of this comic? Are they aliens?

>I never really understood what audience this comic is for

Europeans

Hey, kid, wanna /ss/?

Just kids. One friends with a talking raccoon, another the son of weeaboo parents and the third being a terminally ill girl with a love of fire.

A lot of the jokes and arcs center around a "This is seen as bad but why?" or "insane world" debate. Like the time Larisa got in trouble at school for taking diabetes medication because of their anti-drugs policy.

...

To be fair the real stuff that arc was based on was retarded.

It's a joke user. There is no genuine malice on the part of the writer or the character. The narrative does not present the notion that the father deserves punishment for having a daughter as serious in any way, even as hyperbole for some deserved punishment (unlike those "people that annoy me being brutally beaten" comics, which retain an unpleasant tinge because they are, at their core, expressing genuine resent) but uses it 100% to disguise a punchline for an unrelated joke. The fictional father does not appear, nor is his hypothetical punishment described in specific or extensive detail. Again, the fictional character doesn't even really blame him for anything, she is just making a joke. I don't see how this offends you, but I am also not attempting to belittle you for being so.

Wait Larissa is terminally ill? wtf

I forget what it was specifically but I remember her saying she'll go blind by 20 and be lucky to see 30. Hence her living living life now.