We're making a cartoon with adult themes

>We're making a cartoon with adult themes
>OK don't forget to make the visual style repulsive

Other urls found in this thread:

vocaroo.com/i/s0USUVDTjrq7
youtube.com/watch?v=tijiLYiN3xI
youtube.com/watch?v=jOuSCfJgpd8
youtube.com/watch?v=mCuMfm03nFI
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Created by
>(((Nick Kroll)))
>(((Andrew Goldberg)))
>Jennifer Flackett
>and (((Mark Levin)))

vocaroo.com/i/s0USUVDTjrq7

My name is Mok, thanks a lot.

Adults don't deserve aesthetic beauty.

Apparently.

News flash, adults don't want this, they what Tex Avery & Bob Clampett.

Also this, study it like theres no tomorrow.
Yes, they do, see picture.

that sums up my feelings pretty well

inb4 someone brings up the "muh style" argument

Adults do care about looks, otherwise Voltron:LD wouldn't be as big as it is.

They wanted to make sure you wouldn't jerk off to children sexually maturing so they made them hideous.

They should've made them all attractive lolis, like the japanese. Then I'd be interested.

pretty sure they're trying to copy the simpsons, whether its because they want to or were told to.

No, it's just that it's ran by hacks as Titmouse knows better then this.

Worship of a hack like John K. is like wearing a 'Be Patient I have Autism,' hat.

Are you the guy who recorded that? The only other post I can find with it had that exact same picture. If it is your OC, I just want to say I really enjoyed it.

No, Simpsons has class; Nick Kroll, Andrew Goldberg, Jennifer Flackett, Mark Levin just did it this way because they have no talent what so ever.

I'm not saying the simpsons style is bad, I'm saying shows like this and bobs burgers end up with ugly designs by trying to copy them.

This is more of a TMS thing then a John K thing and even then you're still forgetting about Jon McClenahan/Startoons.

Why do I get the feeling it's the same guy that keep making thread about this to bitch about the designs?

It has nothing to do with copying, the crew behind shows like Big Mouth & Bob's Burgers are hacks.

It's not.

>Nick Kroll
>no talent what so ever.

He has no talent.

Now Bob McKimson, now thats a man who has talent.
youtube.com/watch?v=tijiLYiN3xI

The samefaggotry in this thread is strong.

No, there is no samefaggotry anywhere in any of these threads as they were all made by different people.

The theme has to fit the grotesque style. God forbid someone gets off to this.

No, Studio Mir has already debunked that.

Link?

youtube.com/watch?v=jOuSCfJgpd8

It is. And thank you.

The guy you're talking to is a literal autist, you know.
He's also a fucking loser.

No he is not and he is not a loser.

He is a winner.

What is the show called?

When did I say you were allowed to talk to me? Get out of my face, you pathetic sack of shit.

The word "hack" appears multiple times already. How suspicious.

Big Mouth.

Just please avoid it and go watch the Porky Pig 101 DVD instead as it will save your life one day.

You can't compare TMNT to a bunch of middle schoolers ejaculating all over the place. If it was drawn as well as the nuTMNT in your link, the show probably would have never been made.

And it's still probably going to get a lot of anatomically correct porn.

Good suggestion
I'll take that into account

If you like TMS why are you even complaining there's loads of great animation still coming out in Japan.

On to the bigger point, Startoons isn't even that unique of a studio, not only did they never get their own show, they had no style, just a weird derivative of the Tex Avery style. In the same years they were operating, you had Klapsy Cuspo, Genndy Tartakovsky, Groening's style, all of these rising to the top and all of them far more aesthetically pleasing than safe, bland, and colored neutral. Startoons is worshiped out of nostalgia and the safeness of the work. No one would ever be offended by the easy palette, curvy line work, and boring backgrounds, you literally can't be offended by it. By far the most definitive of these traits is the show they put the most work into, Histeria, notably bland, received as a Animaniacs knock off, and ugly. The show's only real accomplishment was stealing fuck loads of investor's money to deliver a lackluster product.

I will concede that Startoons was incredibly skilled at facial designs and animation, but if you think that's impressive, they designed each face of a specific grid that utterly infested their designs with the same face to make it easier to give them fluid animation. It would be impressive to me if they could animate Hank Hill's face fluidly without breaking model, but you'll end up spending 5 million dollars, go eight months over deadline, and he'll be redesigned off the character sheet because they wanted him to have 'expressive' horse teeth.

In totality, you should read Richard William's animator's survival kit instead of waxing nostalgically with your autistic chart about how the mediocrity of the 90's was actually great.

Not only that it will be made but it and Mir themselves will also be (much more) respected as well.

Its entirely repulsive

I'll take Titmouse's TMNT over this any day.
youtube.com/watch?v=mCuMfm03nFI

Im not the only one thinking he looks like a human version of pic related, right?

Nothing you said about Startoons is true, Jon McClenahan was a much bigger risk taker then Klapsy Cuspo, Genndy Tartakovsky and Matt Groening put together and everything they did was excellent animation wise.

So please shut up, you don't know what you're talking about.

Working in the same office as the animation crew for a new college humor cartoon, get ready to see another one added to the pile lads this thing is butt ugly

>bigger risk taker
>than Klaspy

Not even talking about how all three of those animators could stay in budget, name a single product they worked on that wasn't made for kids. They were bland, and they operated by saturating the market at a time that Moral Panic and religious fervor was tremendous. They never made a cartoon that wasn't created for kids, as blandly and inoffensive as possible. Sucking off Speilberg is not what I call either bold or risk taking.

Debunked years ago.

Anyway what about TMS?

>sexualizing sexual education

It's probably entirely intentional to sell the show. If the characters were fappable, then it just comes off as porn. The characters look as ugly and awkward as you feel like teenagers. It's going to be a whole ton of dick and fart jokes probably. Ideal scenario it's a cringingly relatable puberty story.

No, Studio Mir has already debunked that and Teenagers want Voltron:LD's art style not ugly.

Why Mir has to waste their talents/suffer on Lego Elves:SOED is beyond me.

Well, the world doesn't support those. That is, unless they're anime. Look at this poor, sad Frankensten. Nearly 15 years to the grindstone and it's still "niche." NICHE!

Can you explain how they debunked it?

Again youtube.com/watch?v=jOuSCfJgpd8

How exactly does this video debunk anything?

News flash, fuck you

Right there with you, user. I KNEW the kid looked familiar!

IMO, making it completely visually repulsive was the only way to defend against accusations of pedophilia. Of course, those are coming anyway, but they have a lot less credibility behind them, when you can't imagine any pedophile actually being turned on by any of this. I'm fully expecting to see more suggestive images about the female hormone monster than any of the kids in future months.

They think the Simpsons, Beavis and Butthead, and Bobs Burgers were successful because they were ugly.

You don't need to circle jerk to better animators and studios to tell me why this looks like shit. Just stop it fags

Yeah no shit underaged

No, they don't; With Simpsons & Beavis and Butthead thats the best the creators can do but with Big Mouth it's ran by hacks.

Why does he look like a fish eyed dead corpse?

That's exactly what I said you stupid fuck

why...Why are the lips in this show so fucking.....emphasized?

goddamn the lips are for me at least the biggest problem style wise.

>debunked
How do you debunk that a studio litterally created Christian cartoons? Like are you saying the studio sucking off Speilberg was debunked? Because it's not just chance that the moment he left animation Star died.

Also your obsession with TMS shows your willing ignorance of the Japanese studio process, talent isn't in a Studio, it's the people in them. Its like saying Gainex still can put out EVA today.

TMS like KyoAni is one of the exceptions.

I just spent the last half hour in paint.net trying to make the style less ugly. I'm a complete amateur so I couldn't really get the coloring and the linework 1:1.

>Show is called Big Mouth
>Why are the lips big?

The vagina lips lololol XD puberty is so funny

>Voltron
>for adults

I haven't seen the trailer for this or anything, but my impression from all the talk about this gives me a particularly difficult to describe and specific feeling/reaction that I can only equate to that time when I was ten years old I got sent to the nurse while we were watching a sex ed video because I was clearly about to faint.

Basically, disturbing.

>Nothing you said about Startoons is true, Jon McClenahan was a much bigger risk taker then Klapsy Cuspo, Genndy Tartakovsky and Matt Groening put together
Friends! Romans! Listen not to this fool! His words are naught but the delusions of a mad man!

Most of it's fan base is over 18.

The rest is over 12.

No, those words are the God's honest truth.

to be fair I think it's supposed to be ugly otherwise making it look good would make people uncomfortable

So is the horse show. But that doesn't change the intended audience.

EATING SUGAR!?

That's just it, it looks like an imitation of the flat modern family guy/simpsons/brickleberry drag and drop animation. Unfortunately that's just the most affordable way to animate at the moment

And a blasphemer, to boot! Cast him out, I say!

Blasted Horse did the same thing and looked what happened.

5 to 7 year olds don't watch Voltron:LD, they watch Looney Tunes and MGM shorts, just like adults (because their parents love them enough to teach them right from wrong).
There is no excuse, it's just that the crew behind Big Mouth are hacks and that Titmouse knows MUCH better then this.

In short put Mir to shame or fuck off.

No, you're delusional, seek help, Jon McClenahan is one of the greatest animators who ever lived.

He's not as great as Tex Avery however.

True, nor is he as great as Toshihiko Masuda, but he is a excellent drafts man.

Indeed.

>they watch Looney Tunes and MGM shorts
You can't seriously believe this.

IS THAT ANDREW HUSSIE

This show's artstyle looks like the hellspawn that would come if someone tried mixing the art styles from 'as told by ginger' and amercan dad.

It's their parents who show them those shorts because they love their kids and want them to avoid shit like The Loud House.

>different art styles are ugly because FUCK YOU

No, far from it.

NO PAPA

>THE STATE OF WESTERN ANIMATION

lmfao America is such trash

"""""""Fun""""""""" Animation

Posting in a Famicom thread

>state of western animation
>comparisons to japanese animation
>which is 90% static objects and talking mouthpieces with a 10% of quality that ranges from finally fucking passable to rarely amazing

Akira was over two decades ago, get over it. The fact that an anime with some decent amount of motion is usually guaranteed to be the star of the season and still cuts corners everywhere it can shows that most television animation as a whole is shit.

...

>Titmouse is the studio behind this
They deserve better

>an anime with some decent amount of motion
good to know you have zero clue as to what made akira ground breaking

He was talking about modern anime dumbass.
>Star of the season

Jewish people have big lips

>dude, gross shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thanks john k

ANIMATION SHOULD BE FLUID AND FLEXIBLE
FLASH AUTOMATION KILLED ANIMATION
FUCK