Rick and Morty is racist. It's just white people in it all the time...

Rick and Morty is racist. It's just white people in it all the time. There aren't any black characters in it at all except for Morty's teacher who is just a glorified background character.

Other urls found in this thread:

nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/benjamin-franklin-on-demography-whiteness/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12019240
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289685/
med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2008/10/asian-white-couples-face-distinct-pregnancy-risks-stanfordpackard-study-finds.html
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000889?via=ihub
psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-02655-001?doi=1
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Black people aren't important.

thats one good thing about it

...

>Morty's teacher who is just a glorified background character.
I mean, he isn't really glorified at all. He's JUST a background character.

Also the only black character that was sort of important was Ghost train, who got cucked and killed off in the span of 5 minutes.

The Sup Forums thread you made was funnier.

Rick, Beth, Summer, and Morty are all Latino and thus proud People of POC Color people.

he died.

oh shit son

Rick is hispanic bait-kun.

Muh tokenism.

How easily everyone forgets the black guy that cucks (in the actual sense) Jerry's dad. But then again that was just a racist stereotype as well

>Hispanic
>A race
Pick both because you can be hispanic and black. Hispanic isn't a race.

>Hispanic isn't a race.

Tell that to all the SJW's who insist that it is.
Then again these are the same SJWs who insist that race is a social construct and doesn't exist. At least until one of them needs a bone marrow transplant and the crushing weight of reality sinks in.

...

>saying race isn't a social construct
>Bone marrow decides race
>Believed that "Hispanic is a race"
You sound retarded.

Hispanics are a race until it becomes inconvenient and they suddenly become white.

...

Good argument dude. Well I wish for you luck in all bone marrow transplants in the future.
It'll be easy if you're white or Asian but if you're black that sucks because a lot of blacks don't even have the right bone marrow for you. But then again if they don't have the same bone marrow as you I guess they're a different race.

>this thread

Different user, took a cursory glance at this bone marrow bidniss. This seems more related to genetics than 'race'. Give it a couple hundred years in the melting pot, and the combined genetic interlooping shoop-woop ball of yarn bush whatever-the-fuck-you-call-it will allow interchangable bone marrow replacement.

Bone marrow actually does decide race, though.

Bone marrow is only compatible with someone of the same race.
A Negroid can only get bone marrow from another Negroid. They'll reject Caucasoid and Mongoloid bone marrow.
In fact, mixed race children often have a hard time even getting bone marrow because there so so few matches available for them within the general population.

Also, please note how my post is constructed.
I never said that "Hispanic" was a race (I'm not the other user). I'm saying that leftists say that it is, in fact, a race when it suits their needs to do so.
These same leftists also drive the narrative that race is a social construct (It's not), and that there is no such thing as race (Which is wrong. There are three.), yet are some of the first to throw around terms like "Racism".

exemplia gratia: George "If they step outta their 'hood, you smoke them good" Zimmerman

I guess you forgot about the dude who's BLACKing Morty's waifu all the time

Yes I agree
Bone marrow is only compatible with people of a similar genetic ancestry.
If you take that into account African-Americans can be considered an entirely different race than regular Africans since they have white DNA in them.
Better yet because Africans are the most genetically diverse people on Earth they aren't likely to find bone marrow transplants from other "Knee grows" so I guess there are a lot of races on Earth.

Hey, new guy here. Getting in on this Sup Forums discussion on Sup Forums. Read the likelihood of finding matching donors within the same race. I'm the same guy as here Again, genetics. Taking a look at it, based in the U.S., African Americans have the 'least' likely chance of finding a match within their own race, while Whites have the most likely, Hispanics second most likely.

I'd chalk this up to (again, focusing on the U.S.) historical racial mixing. Black population since 1600s have had interracial children consistantly, while the white population largely has not.

If I was to make this into a simpler image...

The WHITE bucket of water is still mostly WHITE with only other colors mixing in, but not so much to make a difference to the overall WHITE water's hue.

The BLACK bucket, however, is a lot more 'gray' with heavy introduction of WHITE water into their genetic pool.

But again, race as is seen by most everyone 'is' a social idea. We have people with negroid genetics and features. But like blondes will eventually be bred out, so too will all these 'diverse' races at some point with the continued rate of interracial marraige. There's been a rise of it in the past few decades too.

>they took it.

Rick SANCHEZ is vaguely hispanic/latino/spanish/spaniard or something

I'm not usually one to want to change words for the sake of being PC, but I honestly wish they'd change the term for Negroid and Mongoloid bone structure so the usual uneducated crowd who wouldn't know about them (and assume it's racist to think that different races have different bone structures) didn't automatically assume it's purely racist.

Meh, I only popped in for the bone marrow discussion. OP's post was pure obvious bait.
gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8

You don't understand user, my blond hair makes me special.

Oh boy read the thread. Since when is Spanish not white?

Fuuuuck I want to backtrack my blonde statement. Blonde hair will not disappear. But they will be on the same line as gingers in being exceedingly rare.

Now I feel like a tool. Blonde hair extinction is a hoax from bad-news.
>this is a good lesson on why to double check your shit before talking shit

Since the 1700s at least

"in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal body of white people on the face of the Earth"

nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/benjamin-franklin-on-demography-whiteness/

Don't you know? In the U.S. spaniards are all mexicans wearing sombrerros and Spain is full of deserts, canyons, and donkeys.

Italy is full of poorly-designed cities and every man has a curly black mustache. Switzerland is fat as fuck. Germans are all tall bald and fucking S&M freaks. England are polite Americans. France are assholes and all have black hair in a pixiecut. AND the middle east is only made up of dune-sands and everyone wears a hijab.

since Sup Forums

Good Ben Franklin quote. It just goes to show you how retarded Race realists are. Though Hispanic still makes no sense to qualify as a race.

If they aren't white what would they be?

European Mexicans.

>If you take that into account African-Americans can be considered an entirely different race than regular Africans since they have white DNA in them.

Doesn't this seem like a bit of a generalization?
I always see people say this, but think about this a moment.

You're basically saying that there are absolutely no pure Black people in America unless they just hoped off a boat from Somalia or someplace equally dark, and every African American is either the descendant of a black slave an an unfaithful slave owner's wife, or a black slave and a slave owner who wanted to sample his wares to determine the best breeding stock.

It seems absolutely silly to assume that everyone of African heritage in the U.S. has White DNA in them.

OP is trolling, but these kinds of statements always feel surreal to me. I'm neither black nor white, and I was raised to be wary of both for different reasons.

They're not genetically diverse they're genetically isolated. Big difference.

Framing and Spin.

Uh, not really.

While I don't doubt there have been a good amount of immigrants that did come straight off the boat and airplane, a vast, vast, vast majority (I'd hazard to guess ~90%) are those descended from original slave stock. And there was a significant amount of white breeding with black women.

Also though, it's not just white.

Escaped slaves or freemen constantly found solace in other areas. In the western frontier Mexican and African relationships were fairly common. We can also look into the niches they filled during the expansion of the frontier and railroad. Asian ancestry can be found periodically with African Americans (I.E. my Girlfriend's family) due to both being so close and joined during railroad construction. BUT the most common of all was native americans and african americans. Historically, they saw in each other an ally for all the shit they had to put up with.

Taking all that into consideration, yeah. African Americans have a shit ton of varying ancestries.

Africans are extremely genetically isolated. Many of them simply have a lack of genes that other humans due. This is due in part to the great size of Africa and how spread out Africans were in general, Ethiopia that had the most outside contact fared the best.

The Aboriginal has the most genetic isolation of any human sub species on the planet and I don't think I need to explain how or why that explains why their population is so bad.

Asia and Europe intermingled the most between groups and it shows genetically.

genetically diverse is correct
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12019240
"Larger genetic differences within africans than between Africans and Eurasians."

No. I majority of blacks in America have a very mixed genetic ancestry. A majority (a large one) has "white" dna in them.

Going to go off topic on this thread that's already offtopic from OP's bait.

I'm fucking proud we're having a civilized (for Sup Forums) discussion

Except most of those genes are for lack of a better word "stagnant" or "older" genes. If genetic diversity like what Africa had was a good thing they'd rule the world.
Instead the Jews with their 120+ IQs do and going by that definition, they're not very genetically diverse at all. It's a flawed metric.

Hmmm no. Genetically isolated implies that they all have similar genetics yet the opposite is true as they have the most diversity.
>Human "sub species"
I'm ded

Rick is Latino, you black inclusionist. It is a 100x more diverse than Stephano Galaxy as there are a multitude of humans, aliens, settings and cultures.

Race and sub species are interchangeable. The only reason we can't say it is it hurts people's feelings.
There's a large variety of human sub species, and it's readily apparent in things such as bone structure, fertility rates, muscle tone, IQ, bone marrow, and hair and skin types.

Here's a chart that shows that the vast majority of African Americans do not have 100% African ancestry.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289685/

Again you are spinning and framing. I don't understand how you got this idea that an older gene= bad but it's not true.
I'm not sure what you're saying. You admit that you were wrong just to say "yeah but still it doesn't matter" when to the context of BONE MARROW it does. And of course you don't fail to bring up IQ.

>Except most of those genes are for lack of a better word "stagnant" or "older" genes.
Damn user I can tell you're a scientist

>Sup Forums fell for the bait

IQ is the biggest determiner of success. I'm sorry if that hurts your feelings.

>a few nonpracticing jewish families such as the rothschilds are the richest motherfuckers around
>therefore jews as a whole rule the world
protip: the rothschildes don't give a single fuck about joe schnozzstein. youre as dumb as those sjws that think the patriarchy is a mobilized conspiracy to force women back into slavery

And parental socioeconomic status is the most accurate predictor of IQ :^)

Dude Jews are disproportionately rich. Far in excess of their population distribution.

This isn't some conspiracy, half of the richest men in America are Jews who have very high IQs. Politicians are disproportionately Jews. Jews are smart, smart men run the world.

Fallacy. Smart people use their smarts to get wealthy, IQ is hereditary, ergo their children will most likely be smart and inherent their parent's wealth, increasing it for their children and so on.

Again with this bone marrow point. It's been discussed why that isn't a good qualifier read the thread. Skin type is a dumb qualifier also. An American Bull-dog isn't an American bull dog if it has an odd coat color?
>Fertility rates
Educate me on this, what about fertility rate determines a race?
>Hair
I'm done...
Idgaf about IQ and it had nothing to do with the conversation we were having, you only brought it up because you were proven wrong.

>He actually believes all rich people are smart
WEW

Fallacy. Correlation does not equal causation.
It's also never been proven that IQ is directly correlated with hereditary. We don't know how much nature affects it.

Oh you don't know about the fertility rate thing? Yeah when two different races get jiggy with it there's a lower chance of the woman getting pregnant. I believe this is most pronounced between white and Asian couples, which is why there are fertility clinics to help Asian/white couples get knocked up.

That's objectively false IQ is 70% hereditary.

med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2008/10/asian-white-couples-face-distinct-pregnancy-risks-stanfordpackard-study-finds.html

Here's a thing talking about the increased risks that come with Asian/white couples compared to white/white couples.

>That's objectively false IQ is 70% hereditary
Link me and you might convert me a little.
>Fertility rates of whites and Asians
So are their children born infertile? or is it just trouble conceiving?

.t jealous brainlet

From how other anons referenced this study over the years, I always got the impression the average ir couple was effected, but apparently most don't?

That didn't say shit about decreased fertility. It just talked about Asian women having smaller hips than white women causing complications with vaginal birth.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000889?via=ihub

psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-02655-001?doi=1

The general figure for the heritability of IQ, according to an authoritative American Psychological Association report, is 0.45 for children, and rises to around 0.75 for late teens and adults

Also not that their children are infertile, but parents have more difficulty conceiving in mixed race partnerships and greater difficulties during the pregnancies. This is most pronounced with Asian/white couples but is prevalent for all mixed race couples.

>Ever trusting people from Sup Forums

That's because it wasn't a study about fertility rates it was a study about increased risks during pregnancy like I said it was.

Why did you even link me that when that wasn't the argument though? Don't waste my time like that.

The problem with IQ studies is that by the time you're able to reliably get a concept of a subject's IQ environmental factors have already had time to set in and need to be accounted for. You can say it's genetics, sure, but when the kid's been drinking and bathing in lead for a couple years already that's gonna have an effect too.

No no, that's a misrepresentation. Mixed race couples do have more issues because they are different sub species. But we're all still the same species.
The big thing about a sub species is that they're still capable of interbreeding, humans haven't been around long enough for our genetics to distance themselves to the point of being incapable of interbreeding or even majority complication results.

Because it's directly related to the argument humans are not homogenous and distinct racial differences exist.

Except studies about environmental factors have established clear negative results to bad parenting and malnutrition but only loose correlation among good environmental factors, with the biggest constant in higher or lower IQs always being the IQ of the parents themselves.

>more difficult to get pregnant
>but there are still over 60,000 white-asian mixes born in the USA each year

Think of all the sex these people must be having to overcome genetic boundaries.

Except those factors (poverty being a big one) also tend to be extremely generational so there's no real way to get a control sample. Not ethically, anyway.

The chance to actually get a girl pregnant is actually pretty low, assuming you're trying. For a same race couple there's an estimated 20-30% chance for the seed to take hold. Interracial couples have slightly lower fertility rates, the biggest difference comes later l, with mixed race couples becoming effectively infertile or seeing much higher rates of complications years sooner than same race couples do.

That's a per month %, I should note. Try long enough and unless you're actually infertile she'll get pregnant eventually, but only 30% of couples get pregnant within the first month of trying to have a baby.

Yeah whatever man not like studies explicitly take this into account and look for outliers for exactly that reason or anything.
I'm gonna go fap to dickgirl porn and go to bed have fun.

Never denied human diversity, but having trouble giving birth isn't exactly unique to only Asian and White couples. Smaller hips does not a race make.
So bad parenting and malnutrition have really bad effects on someone's IQ while good environments tend not to change IQ? Did I understand that correctly?

Not by a significant degree, no. You won't see anyone with 80IQ parents get a nice home life and suddenly have 130IQ, he might end up in the high 90s, but even if someone has 170IQ parents if they are malnourished and beaten and not allowed to create there is a very high risk of the child's growth being heavily stunted both mentally and physically. Now please, if you care there are many studies on this you can find with the click of a button. I've already linked two as well as named an organization devoted to this. Let me have my Poison in peace.

I read the Abstracts and they didn't contain much about how heritable IQ was.

*I mean the specific percentage of course the Abstracts do mention it not having much of an effect.
I'll look at the credibility of the studies though.

Everthing is wayciss in the eye of the beholder.

There is black Rick. He seems to be above average competent for a citadel Rick who was at ground zero when the citadel crashed into that prison.

>unfaithful

Your ignorance is cute, it’s called rape and the one drop rule was made for a reason.

Your body can reject bone marrow from most people of the same race too. It has more to do with genetic similarities than outright race. Your best bet would be a close non mixed family member, a brother or sister if you are mixed, or a clone if we'd get past the ethics of it.

Really though, the only reason mixed people have "such a hard time" finding BM transplants is because finding a match is hard in the first place. It just gets exacerbated by the fact that mixing creates a unique DNA mix that's a little further removed from the rest of the world's population, but it's not like they'd be better off having cancer as a pure black or white person anyway.

Its a cartoon, faggot.
You need to get a life.

Wouldn't Mexican be American Spaniards?

fpbp

0/10 bait kill yourself.