We need to spread awareness to normies as fast and as powerfully as possible.
Candid is a service that presents itself as an anonymous free speech platform.
In reality, Candid is a project started by two Google AI engineers who are attempting to create a machine learning platform that can identify "undesirable" forms for speech and automatically censor them. The founders have already publicly expressed their intention to silence opinions they disagree with (see below).
Also, the service is not actually anonymous, you have to register with Candid using either your Facebook account (where they ask for all your personal data e.g. education and employment history) or your phone number, so Candid always knows exactly who is posting each comment.
This service is an attempt to limit free speech disguised as a way to enhance free speech, and Maddox is now one of their paid shills. Maddox will never entertain the idea of discussion on this topic, not even on his """Advertisement-free""" website that totally isn't affected by his sponsorships on other platforms you guys.
A YouTuber named "Harmless Opinions" has several interesting (albeit dry) videos that expand on this:
>...revealing these sentiments. It has since been edited to this. cards.producthunt.com/cards/comments/331297?v=1 archive.is/DBdmI (archive link looks like shit, but if you check the HTML data, you can still find those words. If you can solve this, please speak up.)
>Queue Sam Hyde video of him ripping people who are trying to make "The next Twitter except you can share music files"
Why would people use Candid, at all?
It's obviously trying to market itself to people like us who value free speech, anonymity, and a general sense of freedom that comes with knowing your statements made will not ruin your life.
People who enjoy these things have some semblance of a brain, and will quickly realize this platform is redundant, not genuine, and a trap.
The free market will fix it when nobody uses this shitty product.
Normies don't care about anonymity. People who do care about anonymity won't fall for this. Why would anyone use this over an established platform like twitter/fagbook?
These types of problems solve themselves.
Samuel Powell
Googol couldn't even get people to use their normie Plus platform. They don't do anything well except serve ads.
Liam Flores
>Don't worry goyim. >This problem will take care of itself, silly goyim. That may be true, but I don't think it's unreasonable to be concerned that this is a large scale doxxing program.
They got a shit ton of "free speech" youtubers, like TheAmazingSellOut, George Rape-List Ouzounian, and someone called MundaneMatt(that's right, they payed a literal nobody edgelord with a small but loyal following)
The "Revolution" they speak of is disturbing to say the least.
Ryan Smith
>Googol couldn't even get people to use their normie Plus platform.
Exactly.
I almost listed normie+ next to twitter/fagbook then I realized nobody uses normie+, another issue that solved itself.
Anthony Davis
Oh God
OH GOD
>Candid
Have any of you fucks read the book
>Candid
>A motherfucking AI fascist censoring bot named "Candid" that learns from censorship loving sjw "candid" people
>CANDID
Robert Taylor
>Have any of you fucks read the book What book? 1984? Don't leave us hangin' Spang-bro.
Henry Miller
>That may be true, but I don't think it's unreasonable to be concerned that this is a large scale doxxing program.
If you're not going to use it, I'm not going to use it, none of my friends even use social media at all so they won't be using it.
Who exactly are we worried about using it?
The odd redditor might check it out, then leave once he realizes its an empty place, free from any ideological diversity.
Believe it or not, even liberals enjoy using a place where diverse ideas exist, otherwise it's just them fighting among each other to feel morally superior.
Liberals don't like to fight. Especially among themselves. They just like to feel smugly superior to the evil Republican racists.
They can't even.
I don't give a fuck who's on the payroll to support it. Not even a fraction of their viewers will actually use the fucking thing. It's useless to 99.999999% of the population.
Twitter is already in great decline. What makes you think an even more radical, even more useless, completely un-established platform would get off the ground?
It's like twitter but you can share music files.
Aka useless redundant bullshit nobody will use or care about.
I can see it now: Across my facebook: >Google plans to create a social media app that doesn't allow harassment of any kind!
Girls in the comments: >wow what a great idea >i've been saying this for a while now! >this is going to change everything! why can't people just be respectful? ...baka
Meanwhile on actual Candid: >crickets
Joseph Wood
One of the best things about living in Europe is that most of the right-wing rhetoric you hear in America is very much against the law here. Calling Islam "uncivilized" or saying that gay marriage isn't really marriage would get you charged with inciting hatred. Suggesting that people should buy guns for "self-defence" would be considered inciting violence, which carries serious penalties as well. We're also finally starting to seriously crack down on climate change deniers and anti-vaxxers and many European countries have laws that prohibit insulting or offending people in general. Germany has a law against disparaging the memory of deceased persons, so the crude "ding dong, the witch is dead" rhetoric coming from the US when a celebrity dies would be very much illegal. Childish name-calling and lying about people is not allowed here either, as a woman in France was recently given defamation charges for commenting "she's a liar" on a YouTube video of a politician giving a speech.
Is our freedom of expression limited? Not in the least. We are guaranteed freedom of expression through European law. Rather than restricting freedom of expression, these laws simply ensure that it's used responsibly and for the purposes of good. Unlike Americans, we understand that human rights and human dignity also need to be respected. Americans stubbornly cling to their outdated interpretation of their archaic Constitution while the rest of the world forges ahead. You Americans look very uncivilized to the rest of us when you allow bigots to speak out openly. By allowing hate speech, you are sending the message to the rest of the world that your government approves of hatred and intolerance. Is that really what you want, America?
Connor King
Perhaps my concern and posting-activism exaggerated and uncalled for. I still it's best to err on the side of caution.
I don't have irrefutable proof that you are a shill, but I find the fact that you wrote a huge wall of text to basically "Don't worry bro" oddly suspicious. In a world where WE KNOW Hillary has paid for CTR: quickleak.se/YwEvIYEv I don't think it's unreasonable to consider that you are one of these shills. Perhaps you're not. Perhaps I'm being over cautious. But I still prefer to err on the side of caution.
>One of the best things about living in Europe is that most of the right-wing rhetoric you hear in America is very much against the law here. This guy's only adding to the suspicion.
James Bennett
>I'm a shill
I asked you a legitimate question:
Who, exactly, are you worried about turning to Candid?
I'll ask another:
Why would anyone use this product?
And one last one:
Why didn't people turn to Google+, despite them trying to force it through YouTube?
Camden Morris
>Who, exactly, are you worried about turning to Candid? Normies, who will normalize thus making it weird NOT to use it. And Free Speech with politically incorrect opinions who the app may decide to doxx (as per the "Revolution" I capped here: >I'll ask another: >Why would anyone use this product? Because it was advertised by TheAmazingBanana and George Rape-List Ouzounian (both supposed free speech advocates who shown have no qualms with selling out) and Mundane Matt (a nobody with a very small but loyal following. If they care about hiring trusted nobodies on their payroll, then they seem fucking serious) >And one last one: >Why didn't people turn to Google+, despite them trying to force it through YouTube? I'm sure many people did. It didn't quite catch on, but it still aquired some people, and the worst aspect is that my Youtube comments are inextricably associated with my email address, thus chilling my more radical opinions.
Carson Jones
Even if literally 100% of the audiences of the nobodies you listed join these sites, it won't even be a top 25 social media site.
>I'm sure many people did. It didn't quite catch on, but it still aquired some people
See that's the thing. Social media requires growth and involvement.
As soon as that growth and involvement declines, you have a dead platform.
The platform itself isn't the product. YOU are the product. The platform benefits from having YOU there to provide content. Without YOU the platform is nothing.
You can't even name 1 reason people would use this other than: >An unclean obese man who stuck a banana in his anus endorses it
People don't waste their time making OC and posting original things if nobody is there to read them.
Growth and involvement are quintessential to social media. If people can still contact TheAmazingBanana on YouTube, Twitter, etc.
What reason do they have to use Candid?
At least on YouTube and Twatter they know their content will be seen. But budding (empty) social media sites do not offer that same feeling.
Growth. Involvement.
Very important aspects to social media.
This shit isn't going anywhere. Just like Google+ and my Twatter except with music files.
Ayden Johnson
>Even if literally 100% of the audiences of the nobodies you listed join these sites, it won't even be a top 25 social media site. What an oddly specific criteria. That sounds really impressive when you realize it doesn't NEED to be a top 25 or even a top 25,000 to be financially successful, and that's assuming this is made with financial gain as it's prime goal.
My concern is that it's true intention, which is learning how to censor speech, and with the "Revolution" rhetoric, even possibly a mass-doxxing of it's users.
>You literally can't even name 1 reason people would use this, other then the 1 reason you gave. How many reasons do you need? The people on Project Candid present themselves as emotional and ideological SJW's and I wouldn't be surprised if this was a giant honeypot to snag loyal viewers of TheAmazingSellOut and George Rape-List Ouzounian and other assorted nobodies with tiny loyal followings, to ruin a large number of lives.
>Google would never do such a thing. These are FORMER Google employees.
>Well, it's just not good business sense to do that sort of thing. I don't know that these SJW's have good business sense, or that their intentions are business-oriented as such.
Jaxson Thomas
Who gives a fuck if they're mass-doxxing?
it's called evolution. survival of the fittest. anyone dumb enough to post radical shit on this website had it coming.
just like anyone dumb enough to post radical shit on facebook has it coming.
it's literally the free market and evolution.
These problems solve themselves.
>act dumb get fucked
problem solved.
Not to mention you obviously don't know much about social media if you don't understand how important a pre-established user base is.
as I said: >People do not waste time posting original content on empty sites where nobody will see it.
There's a reason new social media does not catch on. Growth. Pre-existing user base. Involvement.
Are all more important than silly little twists.
"I'm gonna create Twitter except you can share music files"
The people who use this will use it for ideology rather than sharing their message.
That's already set up for failure from a growth and involvement standpoint.
Jose Edwards
>Who gives a fuck if they're mass-doxxing? HOLY FUCK! I CARE! >it's called evolution. survival of the fittest. anyone dumb enough to post radical shit on this website had it coming. HOLY FUCK! SHILL/10
Joseph Foster
>HOLY FUCK! I CARE!
Why? You're not going to be using it. Neither are your friends.
Who are you worried about?
There will always be dumb people. People will always post dumb shit that affects their careers on facebook.
You cannot save them all.
I'm simply explaining this to you from a social media success standpoint. It's not going anywhere if that makes you feel better.
Dominic Morales
>Not to mention you obviously don't know much about social media if you don't understand how important a pre-established user base is. You've pretty much eliminated any doubts that you ARE infact a shill. Since you are trying to establish "This is not a good business strategy" after I already said "I doubt this is strictly a business decision".
Zachary Reyes
So why is this different to you than dumbasses posting racist shit on their facebook?
They get doxxed too, don't you care about them?
No, you don't, because you realize it was THEIR CHOICE to do something stupid and you cannot protect them.
Nathan Collins
YOU ARE A SHILL. >So why is this different to you than dumbasses posting racist shit on their facebook? Because Facebook doesn't advertise as an anonymous free-speech platform.
Smartphones are the worst for privacy and users ever. Most kids today don't know how to do basic commands, or even understand slightly how the phone works. Everything is glossed over in nice UX and is slightly functional for consumption.
I swear old fucks who used /tech/ in the late 80s early 90s with DOS and command input know way more than more kids today. I get so angry to see people become slaves to the fucking botnet. YOU ARE A SHILL.
Josiah Turner
>So why is this different to you than dumbasses posting honest shit on their facebook?
FTFY
Mason Cooper
So let me get this straight you:
>Think this is a bad business decision, and that this social media platform will fail >You, nor anyone you know or care about will use this >But you're super worried people might fall for it as a legitimate 'anonymous twist on facebook'
Thanks for calling me a shill, but you're pretty dumb.
WHO ARE YOU WORRIED FOR?? IDIOTS??
Please enlighten me.
Ayden Jones
I think you're the shill here. A candid or Bananaguy shill trying to promote a shitty platform no one outside of 5 people will use. Get lost.
Noah Gomez
>AI
How do we redpill it?
Leo Ramirez
>WHO ARE YOU WORRIED FOR?? WHY ARE YOU WORRYING ABOUT MY WORRYING.
Why don't you worry about the things that worry you. I might be over-cautious, but you lose nothing from over-caution unless you are their employee.
If I'm so stupid, then stop dignifying me with responses. It should be obvious I'm too close minded to have my mind changed.
>I think you're the shill here. I'm a shill FOR WHAT? If you find my concern annoying, add a filter blocking all "Candid" threads, so that our concern will stop annoying you.
Oliver Garcia
Can you shut the fuck up?
Luke Long
>I might be over-cautious
me too, that doesn't mean I waste my time trying to sell my cautiousness to retards who have no intention in being cautious.
I'm just trying to figure out what you're so upset about?
I think porn is sick and addicting, but I don't go around preaching the benefits of not being a porn addict. It's up to people to make their own decisions.
Dumb people will always exist and thus, a certain amount of people will be dumb enough to use Candid.
I've explained it to you from so many points:
People who are intelligent and value anonymity will take one look at Candid and write it off immediately.
People who are retarded and think Candid is the perfect platform to call everyone a nigger, and that Google is a trustworthy company will continue to exist until the day the sun burns out.
Just trying to figure out what your goal is, that's all.
Both of us are already being over-cautious by not using Candid. We can't speak for everyone though, dumbfucks will always exist.
Brandon Ortiz
Never trust a poo who can't properly use a loo
William Diaz
theres a reason we say google now
Carter White
Fucking kill yourself-America
Henry Thompson
>me too, that doesn't mean I waste my time trying to sell my cautiousness to retards who have no intention in being cautious. You are literally making a shitload of posts that amount "DON'T WORRY ABOUT CANDID" and my posts all amount to "DON'T WORRY ABOUT MY WORRYING, YOU FILTER ME, IF YOU DON'T WANNA HEAR IT."
You are actively trying to defuse fear of Candid. You can not dispute that this what you are doing.
Matthew Ward
using google in 2016?
Tyler Nelson
The Amazing Atheist will fuck it up some how
Angel James
>You are actively trying to defuse fear of Candid. You can not dispute that this what you are doing.
No I'm explaining that Candid isn't a problem because it is not a successful media platform that intelligent, anonymity-valuing people will use.
I'm afraid of Candid. Know who isn't? Retards.
Do you know anyone who wants to use Candid, anyone that you care about?
No?
It's a self-solving problem. You're doing advertising for Candid.
I've never heard of it before now. Guess you're the shill now.
Just kidding, you're not that smart.
Joshua Flores
>It's a self-solving problem. You're doing advertising for Candid. >I've never heard of it before now. Guess you're the shill now. Great fuckin' logic. The rest of your post is literally >STOP WORRYING ABOUT CANDID and all I have to say is >STOP WORRYING ABOUT MY WORRYING.
Jason Butler
Thanks for worrying man, you've really helped out a lot of people.
Except the people who now know about Candid because they didn't before this thread. SHILL xD
Julian Bell
>Don't give the site any attention
>Posts a thread about it
Great job following your own anti-shill rules. Ya fuckin idiot.
Jordan Mitchell
>STOP WORRYING ABOUT CANDID and all I have to say is >STOP WORRYING ABOUT MY WORRYING.
Gabriel Flores
>Don't give the site any attention >Just do nothing
Couldn't even follow your own guideline. Probably just a shill, advertising for Candid.
Jaxson Foster
PAY CLOSE ATTENTION: This is the next stage of the shill attack.
They will accuse ANTI-Candid people of being PRO-Candid shills with loose logic.
The posts are getting shorter and snippier so that they appeal to uncritical eyes casually browsing the thread. They have no intention of engaging with you. They only want to say things that vaguely conversationally connect, and look like a sincere dialogue.
Connor Long
I'm just making fun of you for being a dumbass, and also being incapable of following your own rules:
>Don't give the site any attention >Just do nothing
You: DURRR GUYS LOOK AT THIS SOCIAL MEDIA SITE NOBODY GIVES A FUCK ABOUT EXCEPT ME
you could have stuck to the rules. but you have a low IQ.
Ryder Ortiz
>Is our freedom of expression limited? It is limited. Rather than teach people not to say these things you're just passing laws to make it illegal. You guys are stupid as fuck, you're introducing a big brother police state because your skin is made out of paper mache.
Benjamin Evans
>Don't give the site any attention I literally never said that. I said PAY CLOSE ATTENTION, because this website IS FUCKING DANGEROUS.
Nathan Martin
Check your image: What can YOU do?
>Don't give the site any attention You: made a thread about the site, giving it attention >Just do nothing Couldn't do it could ya?
Good job out there man. Thanks for letting me know about this new social media - Candid. I'm sure anonymity is something Sup Forums cares about so I'm glad you advertised it. I'll help you out.
Adam Ramirez
>GUIZE GUIZE I JUST FOUND OUT ABOUT CANDID GUIZE I bet you were one of the dipshits asking everyone "Why are you talking about Googles and Skypes and skittles" two weeks ago
Henry Ward
YOU ARE PLAYING COY AND PRETENDING NOT TO CARE, BUT YOU DO OR YOU WOULD STOP POSTING.
SHILLS: "STOP WORRYING ABOUT CANDID" and all I have to say is "STOP WORRYING ABOUT MY WORRYING."
SHILLS: "I DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOUR DUMB THREAD" Then stop posting in it.
SHILLS: "You are annoying me and making the board worse" Then filter me, because I'm not going anywhere.
SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
James Diaz
Your image said:
>Just do nothing >Don't give the site any attention
This is in-line with what I've been saying:
>Nothing to worry about, self-solving problem.
By your own set of anti-shill rules that YOU posted in that image, YOU'RE doing more harm than good. Starting to think you're the pro-Candid shill here.
Then there's this: >I literally never said that. I said PAY CLOSE ATTENTION, because this website IS FUCKING DANGEROUS. >pay close attention aka >do nothing >don't use the site
Wow...you can't follow your own rules and call me a shill. Let's hear from your sub-80IQ brain on how you're going to rationalize this.
Go ahead.
Logan Diaz
>Wow...you can't follow your own rules and call me a shill. Let's hear from your sub-80IQ brain on how you're going to rationalize this.
This is shill tactic number 4. Loosely rephrased:
SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
Carter Fisher
>I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
Not according to your rules: >Just do nothing >Don't give the site attention
So which is it? Should I go make an account? Should I go check it out? Should I post this on facebook?
Or should I let the problem solve itself, as this failed experiment fades into obscurity, only aided by retards like you who thinks breaking their own rules is helping.
Hudson Richardson
I'm profoundly amazed at how autistic you two idiots are
Ethan Jackson
>Amazing "Bananaman" Atheist admits to Harmful Opinions that Candid censored him.
Will Google disavow?
Nathan Martinez
Nice pasta lad
Gabriel Roberts
We can start by making it be more accepting of oppressed minorities.
What we should do is just make it okay with Sup Forums shit and not okay with liberal cuck shit.
Luis Miller
#5 SHILL: "Why are you giving Candid negative attention. You posted an image that said you shouldn't give ANY attention"
I will post all ANTI-Candid information, to antagonize shills. My anti-shilling tactics are not the same as everyone's anti-shilling tactics.
Juan Cook
>My anti-shilling tactics are not the same as everyone's anti-shilling tactics.
Oh okay, thank you for advertising Candid for us. I was a shill the entire time, but you're doing my job for me so please continue.
The more people that know about Candid the better. Would you like to join our shilling team?
Lincoln Perry
>Would you like to join our shilling team? Sure. How do I join?
Tyler Bennett
>In reality, Candid is a project started by two Google AI engineers
>anonymous social media site
>Moot now works for google
hmmmm
Camden Gutierrez
>Sure. How do I join?
Post daily threads about Candid and don't stop talking about it.
Jackson Peterson
Do you have a way of paying me? Do I have a way of contacting other shills?
Aaron Gonzalez
>Do you have a way of paying me? Do I have a way of contacting other shills?
We'll pay you in Candid-gold after you continue posting these threads for a week straight.
Blake James
>We'll pay you in Candid-gold What is that used for? Is that useful if I don't plan on using Candid?
Christian Watson
>What is that used for? Is that useful if I don't plan on using Candid?
You obviously do if you're advertising Candid for free already.
Aiden Morgan
>You obviously do if you're advertising Candid for free already.
And so this creative conversation loop ends. This is a quite interesting variation on shill tactic 4: >SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" >I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
Thomas Bell
Shill your shit on your YouTube Pigeon boy
Brayden Foster
Thanks for anti-shilling Candid for us. Or whatever you want to call advertising for us.
You're welcome to continue to do it for free if that's what you prefer.
Lucas Long
>SHILL: Thanks for anti-shilling Candid for us. Or whatever you want to call advertising for us.
>I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
Cooper Fisher
Its not a product designed to succeed, its a research platform, they will take what they learn from it and apply it to the other mainstream search engines.
Carson Cox
Thanks for "giving Candid specific negative attention" for us, if that's what you'd like to call advertising.
We were going to offer you $6.50hr but if you'd rather do it for free that's fine too.
If you change your mind contact our HR department and tell them you're the guy "providing specific negative advertising for Candid, which doesn't help us at all"
Oliver Fisher
That is if anyone uses it.
I'm sure they will though, since OP is so good at advertising.
Aaron Bailey
No they aren't, fuck off with your nonsense. They would've done this for Obama in the past two elections if it were viable, but they didn't because it isn't.
Christopher James
SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant. --- Be sure to relentlessly paste these scripts in any conversation with a shill. The more obvious their tactics, the more relentless they will be to get the last word.
Luis Moore
>The more obvious their tactics, the more relentless they will be to get the last word.
You too man.
Thanks for spreading the word about Candid, your adver-I mean "spreading specific negative attention which does not help us at all" has been very helpful.
Tyler Thompson
>SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" >I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
David Gonzalez
Keep it up, don't stop now. We need to bump this thread another 75 times to squeeze out as much advertising as we can.
Can you do it? Bump this thread for us.
Levi Morgan
SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
Michael Perry
He literally can't help himself. People with autism are interesting, I'd feel bad but I'm getting his salary + mine for this because he wants to do it for free.
Bump the thread again please. Candid needs all the exposure to your kind it can get. We need lots of autistic nerds posting radical shit all day.
Bump please.
Anthony Williams
SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
Gavin Baker
One more, for Candid.
Jack Allen
SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
Bentley Robinson
He can't help himself.
Candid exec. here. Bump one for us, you've got the autism we need on this team.
Hudson Jones
SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant.
Cameron Torres
Candid shill team here: can you give us a bump on this thread you made advertising for us (for free)?
Brody Barnes
SHILL TACTIC NUMBER 4 --- SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" RESPONSE: "I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant."
Thomas Nelson
Keep giving us specific negative attention. Aka advertising.
Austin Lewis
SHILL TACTIC NUMBER 4 --- SHILL: "You are a pro-Candid shill. Why are you giving Candid attention" RESPONSE: "I'm giving it specific negative attention which does not help them at all. You are pretending this irrelevant."
Robert Smith
Shill tactic #1:
>Say you're not advertising when you really are
But it's okay, give us a bump here boy. We love you here at Candid HQ
James Torres
Totally spot on. This is a product no one asked for, from a company who can't succeed in social apps if it's life depended on it.
Henry Gutierrez
SHILL TACTIC NUMBER 1
SHILLS: "STOP WORRYING ABOUT CANDID" and all I have to say is "STOP WORRYING ABOUT MY WORRYING."
Joseph White
Stop advertising for Candid and it'll go away. How about that?
Literally on your list of rules. >Just do nothing >Don't give the site attention
Doesn't specify negative or positive attention. All attention is bad.
But thanks for advertising for us anyway.
-Candid Team
Nathan Edwards
SHILL TACTIC NUMBER 5 --- SHILL: "Why are you giving Candid negative attention. You posted an image that said you shouldn't give ANY attention"
I will post all ANTI-Candid information, to antagonize shills. My anti-shilling tactics are not the same as everyone's anti-shilling tactics.
Leo Cook
>My anti-shilling tactics are not the same as everyone's anti-shilling tactics.
Probably cause yours don't work.
Jonathan Long
Read the contract goyim.
Jack Morgan
>One of the best things about living in Europe is that most of the right-wing rhetoric you hear in America is very much against the law here.
Translated from Viking: "Boy do I love having no freedom"
Benjamin Sanchez
Neuro-ID might be the AI that candid uses. It tracks your mouse and touchscreen use to determine your mood and honesty.