It amazes me how much he has changed

What happened? Was it cancer? Was it mom? Was it browsing Sup Forums? When will he deliver the Final Argument?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=VwHXixxdZB8
vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/10/26/13418304/alex-jones-jewish-mafia
youtu.be/KuSJUJkri78
youtube.com/watch?v=1-jb1UTfqLo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

His wife left him

He turned even deeper into introspection and realized hitler was right all along.

>His wife left him

Is this true?

>His wife left him
That explains alot
youtube.com/watch?v=VwHXixxdZB8

tha argumen uhhhhHhh to end uhhhhall argumends

I love the affection Sup Forums has for Molyneux. It is pretty hilarious. It is kind of tsundere.

in a few of his videos i remember him mentioning his wife saying she wanted a divorce.
They might still be together, they could have worked their shit out.

I dont religiously follow his videos so i couldnt tell you for sure.

He's like a father figure who never really approves of you but dammit if you don't still look up to him.

Wait, what? Proofs?

What happened? He followed the money.

I think you have it backwards, user.

We treat him like he's an imbecil.... but he's our imbecil.

>implying
I've religiously been following his videos for the last 2 years (lots of idle time at work) no trace of him or his wife talking about divorce, quit spreading rumors about argument man.
Lel
>implying you can't reach the same conclusions by using the old bald noggin'

(((stefan molyjew)))

>tips fedora

Stefan go to bed.

He started taking his medication
Calms the mind clears the thoughts

I think he just said fuck this shit and went with trump. I mean the best libertarian candidate ever was ron paul and he didnt even win a state. And then you have that dickhead gary johnson making libertarians look like twats.

>mfw we turn everyone we touch into a mirror image
>fist Benny "empty a clip on every spic" Garrison
>then Alex Jones
>now Molyjew

i think alot of us have changed alot in our views in the last few years, truly historic times!

Final argument will be revealed after he becomes Trumps secretary of education

...

...

He determined he made more money appealing to alt right retards than libertarians and ancaps.

He pretty clearly followed the inevitable conclusions you have to arrive at when you consider IQ is largely genetically determined.

Where were you when Alex Jones named the Jew?
vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/10/26/13418304/alex-jones-jewish-mafia

this

>youtu.be/KuSJUJkri78
Skip to 9:11
>wink right when he says jewish
Wew

what changed?

I only casually watch. when is the time of pre and post change?

>Moly Cult will be the Trumpstaffel

But whufsat mean vhough?

Jews did 911

We'll luckily get the Final Argument in this lifetime

this is amusing since this guy was /lit/'s punching bag and crown idiot years ago before Sup Forums discovered him. he is very lowly regarded in the philosophy community for being a psychotic who wins arguments by obfuscating his words so that no one can decipher what the fuck he's on about

but that was years ago, maybe he really has changed. i refuse to give him a view

He has in no way changed his tactics/methods, he just panders to a new audience.

>I refuse to listen to a point of view that might be different from my own
You appear to be lost.

That he's Jewish mafia & they aren't gonna be beaten.

The final argument is he is doing this for money, just like Milo, Sargon and all your heroes. After all people now a days wear ideologies like a pair of glasses. Remember when libertarianism was the solution to all the problems in the world?

>i refuse to give him a view
this is smart

i said nothing about his views. some i might even agree with

the worst thing about him is his cult-like following i.e. limp cum-slurpers like you

I give it another 3-4 months before Sup Forums hates him like they do with sargon

>this is amusing since this guy was /lit/'s punching bag
Because /lit/ is known for holding several world-acclaimed philosophers. I pleb like me would be so lost in there.

>he is very lowly regarded in the philosophy community
>philosophy community
Let me guess: the big boys there are all Clinton-voting leftists?

/lit/ isn't all that good tho desu

anyone who shits on the culture is a bad person in my book, and theres a lot of nuthuggers on /lit/ who hate the series

Gee maybe he wants youtube cash.

>cult-like followers
Every retard who was defeated in an argument eventually begins to throw this one around.

That's how we know you're stupid.

>i said nothing about his views. some i might even agree with
You did. You said that you're not willing to even hear them.

>the worst thing about him is his cult-like following i.e. limp cum-slurpers like you
In what way am I cult-like for calling you out of your closed-mindedness? I'm ALL EARS.

I wouldn't mess with him if I were you, lest he'll call his buddies from /lit/ and then we're screwed!

>being a psychotic who wins arguments by obfuscating his words so that no one can decipher what the fuck he's on about
Can you give us a couple examples when this happened?

What do you guys think about based Bill Whittle?
Is he redpilled?

No, he probably can't because he's parroting some drivel he's read before.

>tfw too intelligent for arguments

He became our pet. Not a good place to be.

the Money leboswski, the money
he whined long time for 1$ donations, didn't make enough money, started doing populist videos for youtube

He took a while to jump on the Trump train.

He used to be a big Cruz guy, and even after Trump's nomination he was reluctant to openly support him, but he eventually faced reality and realized that you can't call yourself conservative and vote for a Clinton at the same time.

This was around the same time Trump "became more presidential", shortly after he won the nomination. Trump realized the couldn't use the same tactics against Clinton that he used against the other Republicans during the primaries. Based Bill liked that, and gave Trump a chance.

This kike is basically Gavin Mcinnes but he does better research. He is a fellow traveler and wants to make money off of Trumps rise just like Milo and his buddy Mike Cernovich. I watch his videos from time to time but I have come to realize that he provides absolutely nothing new to the table. He is no Kevin Mac Donald. He makes hour long videos to maximize profits. His channel is basically r the Donald PowerPoint slides. If you think he's ever going to make the truth about the Holocaust or Hitler you're kidding yourself. He's a Jewish ancap to the core. And yes this is an argument.

>can't call yourself conservative and vote for a Clinton
Trump is a Clinton.

In his lifetime, how many people do you think have called him "Molluxnux"?

/lit/ exemplifies what I hate about philosophy hobbyists. I've learned more from a few books by Nassim Talen than I've learned in the ponderous nonsense I've seen from 'philosophers'. Why don't you go and choke on Hegel's cock and leave Sup Forums?

4:08 that little grunt lmao hes suppressing his madness

His best videos are when he has other people on - that is the one where he shuts up and lets them talk, instead of interrupting or rambling for 30 minutes off topic.

Suggestion on a good book to start with by him?

*Taleb

I will add that Molyneux's weakest link is his claim to being a philosopher. I wish he'd drop it. He's too honest for that dog shit. I never see people criticizing Noam Chomsky for reducing Trump support to 'nativism'. I haven't seen philosophy defend the west and its universities from insane mind melting leftism. I'll take their criticisms of small fry eccentric youtubers who while they are odd do seem to care about the truth, when they target actual problems.

Read his Incerto which are his 4 main books. Fooled by Randomness, Black Swan, Bed of Procrustes, and Antifragile. In that order too.

>If you think he's ever going to make my truth about the Holocaust or Hitler you're kidding yourself.
fixed

Yeah yeah, it wasn't 6 millions, it was like 1 or 2 millions, including all the other European ethnicities Hitler went after. Some of them were plain shot, some of them died from disease, some of them from starvation, some of them from plain negligence, but all of those can be put on the Nazi's tab, no excuses.

All the people you cited are doing stuff related to current events. Face it: the Holocaust doesn't matter anymore. Both sides throw it around like it meant nothing. Not even Jews give a fuck, they just use it to guilt people into giving them free stuff.

If you want some truths to share with your friends when the Holocaust is a relevant topic, there's several videos right there on YouTube already, like that guy who did hour-long videos showing how the design of Auschwitz was retarded or how the supposed "death" camps couldn't even serve as simple concentration camps.

You've probably already seen this one:
youtube.com/watch?v=1-jb1UTfqLo

>baaww people aren't worshiping Hitler on an altar like I do
Hitler was a dirty socialist like every other. Don't expect an AnCap to go easy on him.

...

would you look at that...
NOT
AN
ARGUEMENT

Oh, and check out Taleb's twitter page. It is pretty great.

The point I was making was that Stefan is essentially Gavin Mcinnes. You didn't disagree with that so do you agree?

HAPPENING HAPPENING HAPPENING

GO TO 5:01

youtube.com/watch?v=VwHXixxdZB8

STEFAN SAYS UNIVERSITIES ARE RUN BY "LEFTIST PROPAGANDA MERCHANTS"

Not an argument.

When you say they were shot are you referring to the camps or the war. I have seen that the international Red Cross cited only 200,000 died in the camps.

Be fair. The same was true for Sup Forums too. Honestly, as much as I do thoroughly enjoy seeing Molymeme lean more and more right, it is only the newfags that are praising him as "our hero" or whatever. Sup Forums used to shut on him 24/7 ONE just the same.

Gotta give it to the man though, he shilled like hell and found himself a nice niche audience and at leat he isn't as cringey as Milo.

Ben Garrison on the other hand acutely changed and realised we were right about his imagery being anti-Jew all along. We just helped him realise what it all meant.

Alex Jones is a retarded answer. Man has always been against (((globalists))), just too smart to reveal his power level until now when the climate is right.

You're right, it wasn't. It was a statement.

I've listened to him for 7 years

Here's what has changed

-early on he focused more on psychology. That has shifted more to politics and current events

-he didn't think it was possible to achieve change through voting. He thinks Trump may be an exeption to this.

-he used to be a strong atheist who viewed Christianity pretty negatively. His opinion softened over years and at this point he's essentially pro-Christianity, though he's still an atheist himself.

-he used to believe more in racial equality, but as time has gone on this has changed. It's not actually as new as Sup Forums thinks. It's been a long process as he's reviewed the evidence and had different experts on his show

-recently he's become skeptical of "free market" economics the world we've got. He ultimately wants a free market, but he seems to no longer believe we should pursue free market policies at all costs, as there's no such thing as a free market in the current climate. He's warming up to certain protectionist policies.

-similarly, he has come to support strong immigration control. Ultimately he is for freer ability to move, but he doesn't think it can be allowed when we have all of the public services that just bait undesirables in.

There's probably other stuff I can't think of. If you've listened fo him for a while you can see that these changes have all had long arcs. He's not just rapidly swinging from redpills or following the money. And they're all in the service of the same goals he's always had. I personally think they've been good moves. I can see why some of it has upset his dogmatic libertarian listeners. But they should loosen their bow ties

Lads, stepping stones. Next big video will be about the Holohoax.

I don't know. I know Gavin Mcinnes is homosexual, that's about it. I don't really subscribe to his channel or follow him on social media.

All I know is that's he's not exactly a conservative libertarian. I do remember hearing him say that he's against anonymity and that it should be banned. This essentially means he's against free speech.

>be involved in libertarian group in aus
>few years ago the guys would suck his dick and praise him
>now they all hate him, think hes a racist sell out who has betrayed his own beliefs and just trying to mirror the thoughts of the "evil alt right" to increase views, mostly because he now supports boarders

I find it funny

>This kike is basically Gavin Mcinnes but he does better research.
The two are not comparable at all. Gavin McInnis vs. Stefan Molyneux is like comparing Jon Stewart to Anderson Cooper. Both are liberal shills, but one has talent and the other is a Jew.

>He is a fellow traveler
You don't know what fellow traveler means.

>but I have come to realize that he provides absolutely nothing new to the table.
Are you aware that he has written something like a dozen books? Because it seems like you think he's only some sort of small time youtuber.

>Kevin Mac Donald
Literally who.

>Kevin B. MacDonald is a retired American professor of psychology at California State University, Long Beach, best known for his use of evolutionary theory to analyze Judaism as a "group evolutionary strategy"
Lol, what the fuck.

I was wondering about Alex, but even if he is hiding his power level or shills about ultra male vitality, it doesn't matter, because he has done more to prevent Glabalism by exposing the elite and the Clintons than I have. I'm glad he's being taken more serious than mainstream journalism at this point.

I would hazard that he went with Trump because the alternative long term effect is that the world is set back a few thousand years and we have to start again from scratch.

At least the potential is there.

I'm the opposite. The way lefties feel about Trump is the way I feel about Stefan. It really worries me that he has unironic fans.

Wow this is me. I love Stefan. Need to watch more.

not everyone uses "merchant" exclusively as a codeword for Jew you fucking moron

>Kevin MacDonald
>literally who
Reddit please leave

why do white people like controlled opposition so much? is it because he is spouting some Sup Forums memes?

Not an argument.

>everyone who disagrees with me must be retarded

we're talking about someone who browses Sup Forums regularly and he's describing an activity that jews are famous for.

you colossal retard

Lost all credibility when you don't know who Kevin Mac Donald is. And yeah Gavin and Stefan are very similar. Not in how they go about things but their relationship to the alt right. They are close but still at arms length. And just what is in those books he's written, I'm assuming it's like his videos ergo nothing new. And I think you should look up what a fellow traveler is. Because he is one just like Milo, he'll drop any connections to the alt right once Trump wins unless there is money to be made.

That's what I'm trying to tell you.

>He thinks Trump may be an exeption to this.
Because of the recent boom in immigration. If we lose this one, it's all gone. It's our last chance at reverting the process. We won't survive 4 years of Clinton.

>His opinion softened over years and at this point he's essentially pro-Christianity, though he's still an atheist himself.
Same thing happened with atheist's God Mr. Richard Dawkins, who recognized that having plenty of Christians around is a good thing.

From his own words:
>There are no Christians, as far as I know, blowing up buildings, I am not aware of any Christian suicide bombers. I am not aware of any major Christian denomination that believes the penalty for apostasy is death
And:
>I have mixed feelings about the decline of Christianity, in so far as Christianity might be a bulwark against something worse

Perhaps something similar happened to Stefan?

>He ultimately wants a free market, but he seems to no longer believe we should pursue free market policies at all costs
>similarly, he has come to support strong immigration control. Ultimately he is for freer ability to move, but he doesn't think it can be allowed when we have all of the public services that just bait undesirables in.
Great, he opened a Hans-Hermann Hoppe book.

Captcha; stop stefauto

>He's not just rapidly swinging from redpills or following the money.
that's exactly what he is doing, this movement is the same as the """""""anonymous""""""""" protestfag movement and he's capitalizing on children spouting cucks and such, you'll cringe about it in a few years

If someone wasn't controlled opposition, how would you know? Is it a feeling you get?

Can you teach us sheeple? I certainly wouldn't want to risk forming a coherent movement.

It's good to know that people who share my ideas are controlled opposition or feds.

Otherwise I might have to take this stuff seriously. Phew boy, that is not for me. This is just for my internet alter ego

He finally grew out of anarchism.

>There are no Christians, as far as I know, blowing up buildings, I am not aware of any Christian suicide bombers. I am not aware of any major Christian denomination that believes the penalty for apostasy is death

that's correct unless you look at African Christians fucking shit up and the IRA not so long ago, but right now Christians are leading armies of Christians into bombing women and children, why would they need to suicide bomb?

>Lost all credibility when you don't know who Kevin Mac Donald is.
Kevin MacDonald is not relevant to the modern political discourse.
>And just what is in those books he's written, I'm assuming it's like his videos ergo nothing new.
Aren't you one to talk then? Lol.
>I think you should look up what a fellow traveler is.
I know what a fellow traveler is. It has very little meaning or relevance outside of talking about Communism.

You're not alone here buddy. Same deal. He mixes lies with patent bullshit. I did my Masters thesis on determinism and can say with 100% certainty that there is not one philosophy department worldwide who would not immediately see that he has no idea what he is talking about on that subject. He fundamentally misunderstands the actual argument in a hilarious way. It's like he didn't even bother checking Stanford Encyclopedia to make sure he was roughly on the right track. He is great at roughly meandering through subject matters, but it's very telling when he discusses something that you have knowledge of.

nice coping mechanism, i guess you need it
*back to circlejerking furiously in an echochamber*

yes, clearly I'm the retard for not projecting my internet nazi roleplaying onto everyone else in the world

>Bush and Obama are Christians

I will not reply to you ever again.

not an argument.

>He ultimately wants a free market, but he seems to no longer believe we should pursue free market policies at all costs
I can almost guarantee you that Stefan didn't believe in that. He's not dogmatic and has never been, at least from my perspective. "At all costs" is something way beyond what he has advocated for.

Unless this is something from his very early days.