What philosophers do Sup Forums support?

What philosophers do Sup Forums support?

Stefan Molyneux

Samuel Heidenberg

Karl Marx

alex jones

Malthus

Moonman

Heidegger

>was ist sein, was ist sein, was ist die frage nach dem sinn vom sein
DA HAT DER HEIDEGGER WIEDERMA RECHT

(((Philosophy)))

Socrates is my fucking man

Diogenes.

Mac Stirner
Errico Malatesta
Valarie Solanas

none

Marx

Betrand Russell is mah man. and also Dante Alighieri, his divine comedy is pretty good

Voltaire.

Neechuh.

Adding Laozi as well.

Zizek ahahahaha

where is adolf?

Epictetus and Aurelius

Anything other than Plato is trash

Diogenes The Madman

>No Asian philosophers
That's kinda racist...

>using my oc
I haven't felt this good since I stopped posting on [s4s]

le arguing man

machiavelli is patrician tier

>no Jung
Nigga why

Ily

>Marx
>Sweden
No surprise here

Went to Australia.
The Sartre-Beauvoir couple is severely overrated in the English speaking world.
Also: Deleuze and Derrida's ramblings are widely distributed.

This is so typical of philosophers whose followers act more like a cult than a bunch of students. Their followers translated everything and flooded foreign markets with such crap

...

Thomas Hobbes
Edmund Burke
Roger Scruton

I consider myself a John Locke Liberal, so him

*Anything other than Aristotle

Aristotle, Augustine and Aquinas.

BRING IT ON

"philosopher" is codeword for "retard".

Christopher Hitchens

There is only Bacon. Everything else is but a matrix within a matrix.

Anyone and anything to do with objective epistemology, hard as diamonds science, and rejection of everything else.

who else /overwhelmedbythelackofmeaningofaworldwithoutgod/ ?

Retard detected. You must have a philosophy to be able to conceive of basic concepts (as concepts and categories need to be defined first), be it an unconscious one or one that is actually thought trough.

Also Immanuel Kant and Schopenhauer to some degree

Every user on Sup Forums is a philosopher.

Based (((Ayn Rand)))

Voltaire has a cool name.

Karl Marx, Nietzche, Bertrand Russell, Darwin and Locke. Also, why isn't Thomas Paine up there?

Anyone who picks Descartes is a retard

replace lenin with trotsky wearing a lenin mask

Diogenes is the original shitposter.

why is Jesus a nigger on that pic?

You can't stay on a cross outside that long and not tan a bit m8
especially since sunscreen hadn't been invented yet (unless I'm not up to date with kangist technology)

Locke and Rousseau

/Thread

best modern philosopher

wtf is this racist shit, where's the african brothas at??

This thread is filled with lefties. Don't you know Rothschild is funding the Fabian Society to push its leftist agenda? When there will be a dictatorship of the masses like Marx proposes, nothing will stop those who control the media.

This. Did you millennials never play outside as children? I was nigger tier as a child and now I am a pale ghost. The sun will do that.

Nice try, Alisa (((Rosenbaum)))

Giordano Bruno

JULIUUUUUUUUUUS EVOLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Did you mean /thedonald2.0/?

Cicero, Tesla, Locke, Thomas Hobbes.

Ayyyy lmao

...

Ye.

...

>tfw Nietzschian Jungian Anarcho Capitalist with fascist leanings

Its hard to explain my beliefs

descartes is the only good one there

if you don't give the D, how will you breed?

Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name. Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.

...

Baudrillard, Bakunin, Marx, Rousseau, Freud and Zizek all have brillant insights. I don't see myself as a leftist though.
I "support" Hegel, Kierkegaard (even though he mocked Hegel), Heraclitus, Augustine and Kant. I'm a muslim, though.

LOL, that's like, mr edgy adolescent

2spokky4me.

Machiavelli is great. You don't always have to agree with what he asserts one should do but he does teach a good amount about human nature.

Bonus points because he doesn't write like he's paid by the word.

off of that image, Thomas Aquinas, Petrarch, Aristotle, Adam Smith, JS. Mill, Kant, Berkeley, and Descartes

i encourage everyone to read Petrarch. beautiful stuff

>said the Julius Evola fan

Also not an argument. In a time of decay and degeneration all noble things are "edgy".

You're a reactionary, Im a revolutionary.

> Adam Smith has an invisible hand
Kek'd
Also > no Edmund Burke

>Stirner
>supporting Sup Forums ideology

None
Theologians are and always were more important and insightful.

YOU HAVE BEEN SPOOKED BY STIRNER

ALL SPOOKS WILL LEAVE YOU, BUT ONLY IF YOU REPLY WITH "STAY UNSPOOKED, BASED STIRNER"

I haven't read much philosophy, need to get around to some more.

My favorites are Machiavelli and John Stuart Mill, the latter forming most of my morals and political ideology.

>St. Augustine
>Aquinas
>Jesus
>not theologians

Ayyyyyyy

Socrates
Plato
Aristotle
The Word (Jesus)
Augustine
Aquinas
Kant


Only right answer

>"Sup Forums ideology"
>Sup Forums is one person or ideology

>John Stuart Mill
Literally a liberal cuck

>christcuckery

should i read the prince? is it redpilled

He would but not for the reasons Sup Forums does. Just out of self-interest.

Plato
Machiavelli
(((Spinoza)))
Nietzche
Evola
Gentile
Molymeme

Its kinda entry level stuff desu, you will learn some basics of power, influence, human nature.

>and forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors

>Proddies in charge of aesthetics

It should be trespasses not debtors.

You're a denier of spirituality.

Say what you want but he was redpilled like no ther

He was all about personal satisfaction unchained to any idea.
Sup Forums is similar, since we make fun of every meme/spook people believe in.

He is an avatar of all *chan things, not just Sup Forums.

>christcuckery
Enjoy your mental masturbation

It's a very good read, yes (even if everybody will tell you it's basic and entry-level, when it comes to philosophy the entry-level is still very useful to know).
Even better if you dig into the historical context.

dionysius the areopagite
alan watts

Schopenhauer
Otto Weininger
Elliot Rodger

Can't get more red-pulled than this.

A swiss flag praising Marx; we will have seen everything now; chickens have teeth.


pol should study latin poems.

This thread is far from being patrician.

I do not see Voltaire on the list; the most influential philosopher of the 18th century.

I am in a good mood so i will educate you:

Scire Futura

Cursus fatorum nescit mens ulla virorum;

Solius est proprium scire futura Dei.


You're welcome; the meaning? No man can know the course of fate; it is God alone who knows what the future holds.

weird how Aurelius is not on there