Why have cartoons become more prudish over the years? You could get away with alot more raunchy jokes in the 90s...

Why have cartoons become more prudish over the years? You could get away with alot more raunchy jokes in the 90s. Why havent we lessened on our strictness as the years gone by and instead go backwards?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/pe7driNrW9k
youtube.com/watch?v=QisgVKBkNe0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

The first enemy were soccer moms and US protestants, though we could also use the term normies to describe them. The second enemy is liberalism and its general sterility.

Simply put creative people are perpetually pushed aside and censored either by the merely stupid ones or those indoctrinated into some bullshit ideology that they mistake for reality and/or a metric of quality. Notice that Japan doesn't have this problem because there's no "problematic" themes as a concept nor misguided religiosity. The two seeming polar opposites are in the West (or specifically in the US) expressions of the same sort of extremism that seeks to not only substitute reality but deny it altogether (example: teenage girls or adult women without boobs). France has no such problems.

In short, cartoons coming from the US have always paid way too much attention to the consumer instead of educating him or simply not paying attention to him. This is largely caused by financial interests. Until we kill the notion of "industry" in regards to all cultural output and disregard mere profit, and until creative freedom and an acceptance of nature, of the divine and the demonic reemerges we will have retarded sitcoms and cartoons with vague non-humanoid shapes bumping into each other and talking about sharing and accepting the unacceptable.

I don't know what cartoons you're watching but plenty still have some risque jokes.

Amazing World of Gumball had a blowjob joke once.

That really sucks. It also fucked up how tumblr faggots and SJW are just as prudish as the 90s soccor moms and bitch and whine at porn artists and writers whenever they do something lewd in thier shows. I thought liberalism was about sexual freedom, not sexual repression.

>muh sjw boogeyman
>I'm so weak and helpless to stop him
>why don't more children's cartoons appeal to grown men in their 30s
Your life must be pretty good if your biggest concern is a fabricated boogeyman

>fabricated
>have ruined both marvel and modern animation
Shut up

There's truth to this - Star Vs, TLH and probably a few newer cartoons such as Gumball aren't shying away from sexual innuendo and such. I also give kudos to Star Vs and TLH for not being vulgar with their stuff, and in the case of Star Vs the fanservice is subtle and almost classy.

Liberalism is primarily about letting the goverment dictate what you do, how you do it and what you can or must not think. You are merely deceived by the word "liberty" in the name of this totalitarian system of control.

Liberalism only advocates sexual freedom if it is unnatural or deviant. It HATES simple, happy sexuality of normal people. Liberal sexual "freedom" is always tied in with politics and political goals. To them sex is a weapon, a tool for destruction.

As for protestantism of yesteryear it grew not from inherent purity of an individual, but a deep unwillingness and cowardice to accept oneself and ones urges, because most of them are dark, heinous shit - we're human after all. This is why protestants back then produced hardcore loli fapfiction about "satanic kindergartens" and so on. They cannot deal with their own urges, so they project them outside and suddenly everyone and everything is suspect, evil, dirty and out to get them.

A healthy individual faces his perversion (whichever that may be) and embraces it. By acknowledging it it loses its power, and can be harnessed for creative output or controlled. Liberalism on the other hand seeks to unleash all these primal appetites and use them to hollow out an individual by destroying him and everything around him. It's very effective. That kind of person inevitably becomes a vessel for whatever memes or programming those in power wish him to adhere to.

But how would they unleash these impulses if men arent allowed to have them? Ever since i heard the term rape culture, it seemed to me that the far left hated male sexuality of any kind, and the sexualization of females. How would they turn it into a weapon when your standard feminist cuck isnt even allowed to indulge into his sexuality?

>Teen cheerleaders practicing their "booty-shaking moves" explicitly to distract the football team
>Episode where Marco grows a tentacle arm, which attracts all kinds of attention from girls, two explicitly saying "I want it to be my boyfriend!"
>Starhas an extended fantasy about her crush, ending with a splash of blood-red paint and revealing her with a lewd expression chewing on her wand and legs crossed
>Entire episode centered around Star hitting puberty, getting so horny she can barely walk straight, and peeping on guys working out in speedos, until she transforms into a "mature" form, hunts down and ties up every boy in school
>Marco's friend finds a figurine of an extremely curvy pixie woman, puts it in his pocket, and says "I'm saving YOU for later"
>Marco warns Star to "Never go with a predator to a second location"
>A motto at the princess etiquette school is "Tis better to be fussy than be called a hussy"
>The entire "Banagic Wand" episode is such an obvious extended dick/dildo joke that it was banned in the UK
That's just the first season. The second season goes on to make jokes about Marco and Star being """smooch""" buddies, Marco being recorded and sexually harassed on-screen while only wearing a towel, and the school having a "kissing hole" where the students "practice kissing."
Star Vs is lewd as fuck and OP isn't watching the right cartoons.

If they dont have star in a bikini then its not worth it, pic related i love the show, but things in that show arent as lewd as much as shit from a decade ago

>backwards
degeneracy doesnt go in directions, its just either there or it isnt

Think it through user. You answered your own questions. You don't need my thoughts, you just need to dare to face the full horror and implications of your own questions.

Dunno why you included me in that. I said Star Vs isn't shying away.

Plus they make fun of people for the sjw Boogeyman shit but their Boogeyman are just men in general, stupid shit

>wears the severed living head of her boyfriend as a fashionable item.
>he tells her several times that he would rather die than live like that.
If someone is getting objectified there, is him.

>listening to Kaziklu, the unironic pedophile Nazi

>things in that show arent as lewd as much as shit from a decade ago
well there was a scene where marco watches her undress and she sticks out her leg to slip a boot over it in a classically seductive fashion

Okay, good point. Honestly, im just upset we havent seen her stomach yet.
Hes literally the best name fag on here

There's really nothing on air right now even comparable to stuff you saw in 90s shows like Ren and Stimpy, Rocko's Modern Life and Cow n Chicken those may be considered the more extreme cases of what you could get away with but even your average cartoon up until the early 2000s could generally show alot more gross and suggestive humor than now. I don't know if this is even because of the industry itself has changed or the newer artists behind shows these days are simply more conservative.

Fcc doing it's job.

>a scene where marco watches her undress
Rewatch the scene. His hat blocked his line of sight,

>the best name fag on here
>not ForeverVirgin

The fcc should be fucking dismantled

Because when you let cartoon creators do whatever they want without any other input you get Family Guy-tier humor, where the gag is seeing your favorite character get rubbed against a giant cheese grater while screaming for five minutes. It's what every cartoon without boundaries is reduced to because they creators soon get bored and see the show as a job to do rather than the passion project it may have once been.

It's good to temper creative writing with other, sensible input. If you don't believe me then go watch Family Guy, or new Simpsons, or a Star Wars prequel.

This makes me hope the next decade will bring back a rebellious attitude to counter all the prudes left and right trying to stamp out creativity these days

What's wrong with pedo nazis?

Most series should last three seasons at most, it's these stupid notions of trying to franchise every marginally successful piece of media that leads to stuff like modern Family Guy or Simpsons

Agreed, but they could atleast sexualize the characters at some point. With family guy the art styles ugly so it doesnt really work, same with simpsons. But goddamn i would pay money for a proper panty slip with star, or marco walking in on her changing and you actually see it like pic related

They've done nothing wrong though

Or you could take your degenerate ass to the nearest morgue and ask for cabinet space to lie in

Theyve butcherd art and censoreed the shit out of american televison. Them and the MPAA should be fucking gutted and everyone in it unemployed

>to stamp out creativity these days
>sexually suggestive themes
>creative
user, you get all your fart jokes and child nudity off shows like south park. Leave children shows for children

>wanting to see cartoon boobs
>degenerate
So im bad for expressinng my sexual interests?

Yes, these are shows for children

>kid show about talking ponies
>art

youtu.be/pe7driNrW9k
This is considerd a children show, if they can handle this then they can appreciate a decent side titty

It got removed in my country

maybe its just murricans.
this is some cartoon they had for kids in europe
youtube.com/watch?v=QisgVKBkNe0

Thats fucking horrifying

WAS considered a children's show. Now the same creator can barely get by making commercial segments

Animals of Farthing wood is also European, I heard no one complain about animals getting brutally murdered throughout the series when I was a kid

>television and movies arrive
>it's pretty much an endless cavalcade of brainless smut and violence
>Hays Code appears
>all that smut and violence is now forbidden on screen
>so is additional bullshit, like glorifying crime or fascism/communism
>all the people in the industry looking for easy money leave
>only people left are those actually creative enough to keep your attention without boobs or blood
>experience what is widely considered a golden age of cinema
>Hays Code is banished, no rules again
>everything becomes absolute dog shit again

If anything we should make censorship even more prominent in what we consume. If creators won't abide by the philosophy of good taste willingly, maybe crushing their fucking throat with a boot will make them. At the very least it would get Steven Universe off the air.

>Children don't see boobs in their life constantly
??

Yes, john ks misery is funny, but its still considerd a childrens show, as it gets reruns on nick outside of america

If you ask me steven universe doesnt go far enough in some aeras.

Kids love SU en masse

There are always adult jokes in kids media and whenever it happens idiots on youtube act shocked like they can't believe a cartoon got away with that. That hasn't changed.

>if it has blood or nudity it can't be creative

You're a fucking child user.

how the fuck is the star vs. art style any more erotic than the family guy art style? It's a lateral move at best.

Considered user. Times changed for the better and Ren n stimpy, beavis n butthead, other shows i can't think of, don't meet the new standard for Quaility children programming. So they get delegated to comedy control. Drawn together, south park, that stupid Tosh show, moonbeam city, some other shows i forget, ugly Americans.

>relying on violence or nudity to get attention

The characters actually look cute and sexy. Maybe its because there eyes are bigger

>times have changed for the worse
Ftfy
Because user i find characters in the calarts style attractive

Or maybe you need to take a seat

>finding a cartoon character hot makes me a pedo
Nice bait

>names only characters portraying children in his initial statement

Yup. Tighten censorship. That'll do the trick.

It's not like you can get a shit product from being too restrictive. Or that acceptability is subjective to an individual's values and tastes. It's not like the phrase "crushing their fucking throat with a boot" alone would be censored in a show today, despite how good that made you feel to get off your chest. I get where you're coming from, wanting a bit of restraint, but forcing it on everyone won't do the trick.

Marcos moms hot as shit and is a criminally underrated milf

They haven't, take off your rose-colored glasses.

>Amazing World of Gumball had a blowjob joke once
It also referenced its own fan made porn series by using actual characters from it.
That's probably the most extreme any show has gotten in terms of vulgar material even if it was only for a split second.

>It also referenced its own fan made porn series by using actual characters from it.
Im gonna need a sauce on that

Season 2 of Star vs literally opens with a scene of Star casually hanging out in the bathroom with Marco while he takes a shower

It also includes an episode where Marco chases a sexy demon lady for 16 years and grow into a sexy 30 year old, and when 14 year old Star sees him she can't stop drooling over his abs

Was Banagic wand really banned in the UK though

that golden age of cinema largely sucked ass, you know

>complains about nudity and violence
>uses a goblin slayer meme

but different euro media is able to produce stuff with nudity, sexual content, raunchy jokes AND tell a good story. You can use these elements to compliment the story rather than detract from it.

Why are they so different?

yeah it is but its fappable at least

>Why have cartoons become more prudish over the years?
F is for family had a sex scene that showed a man's balls.

We've seen Peters Peter and balls

>cartoons have become more prudish
>lesbians express sexual attraction and kiss on screen a year or two ago
?????

Theyve gotten more prudish onnother things, like the human body, and sex jokes

F is for family is a recent cartoon, that's the point.

Yeah but no titty

>last week we saw a sexual shower scene
>we saw teenage cheerleader booty shakes
>naked Steven
>Shakira and her slut tigers in Zootopia

Symbiotic titans

...

Damn look at those sausage fingers. Definitely a porker.

Have you watched the second season yet?

Check out the show in this thread and say that again.

kids' shows don't need to have lewd on air, that's what the internet is for

Its art styles ugly so it doesnt count

Seriously, where did this obsession with 'puritans' and 'soccor moms' on Sup Forums come from? Do these people live under a rock? And why are they so obsessed with France?

Marvel and animation went to shit before SJWs got any real power.

Don't you mean "conservatism"?

Don't tell me you've never heard "in this Christian household we DO NOT watch Rocko's Modern Life".

Tell me how that's part of the "Liberal Agenda" there.

SJWs are the new christian soccer moms. They're censorship happy nutcases who will glady restrict free speech if it means blocking out things they don't like or agree with.

Politics is a pendulum, it swings left to right and back again whenever one side gets too crazy for the moderates to deal with.

The far left is just as bad as extremist conservacucks. There both shit and the main reason why this country and politics as a medium are guttertrash

>It also referenced its own fan made porn series by using actual characters from it.
>own fan made porn series
what episode

I feel like no one cares about being less prudish and only care about being more sexual.

Side note- saying that you're against extremism of whatever form is likely to bring out that guy that trolls people into "you're just a centrist cuck then"

Holy shit, are you really this pathetic? Demanding children's cartoons to pander to fat neets on the Internet and their sexual fantasies? At least focus it on shows made for your demographic, autist.

Both liberalism and (modern) conservatism are about sexual freedom for women, and sexual repression for men. That's why they've teamed up on issues like banning prostitution for men only (already came to Canada from the Nordic countries, the US can't really be far behind).

Cartoonists ignored the religious fundies, but they're afraid of SJWs. Censorship is much more powerful when the censor is inside your house.

Shut up faggot, euro cartoons do it and cartoons used to do it, so shut the fuck up and eat a chode

I thought prostitution itself WAS illegal?

One thing is a creator wanting to do it, other thing is being a neet demanding masturbatory fuel, while acting like you are on a fight for freedom of speech.

You are no better than the fujos demanding their shifty ships to be canon.

He's referring to the "Nordic model" of combating prostitution. Instead of doing the liberal thing and legalizing and regulating sex work, several Nordic countries have decided to only punish the client, and not the prostitute.

They've somehow passed off this deeply regressive policy as liberal, and it works just about as well as the War on Drugs worked when it cracked down on addicts instead of drug dealers.

Why do all these countries want to ban prostitution anyways? What do they gain from it?

It's "wrong".

Also unsafe but that can be fixed with regulations but namely because it's "wrong".

...

Thats from the porno dude. I should know because ive fapped to it multiple times. They didnt even use there voices in it, so i dont think its offical.

You're such a retard that you unironically believed this fan project to be official, Jesus Christ

Protitution takes away the best way women have to control men, and with it to control family and society. There's a reason why extremists on both end want to keep it illegal, even though that leads to increased sex trafficking and coercion.

>a womens only worth is how she uses sex to get an advantage over men
Ive known this for years, and even though i ask questions like "why would a man voluntarily cuck himself for feminism", i know deep down thats its a sad attempt to get noticed by women and get poong tang. I still ask questions about why people like dobson exsist, because i want there to be a less scary reason. Like maybe they enjoy subjugation and have all their sexulity and dignity taken away.