Lola Bunny: Old or new?

Lola Bunny: Old or new?

For me it's hard to decide. I love both. While I love the old one mostly as sexy, athletic femme fatale (my big weakness), I have to admit that her personality is forgettable, generic and kinda annoying. As from design aspect she was so out of place for Looney Tunes universe. New Lola from the other hand while they made her much less sexualized ("Cuz it's the current year!"), she is still charming, her voice is hot and her personality is actually interesting, funny and more memorable. And from design aspect she fits better to the Looney Tunes universe.

New
No doubt
I don't need my comedy characters to be hot or sexualized I just need them to make me laugh
If I want a fap I'll watch porn damnit

I'm sure a lot of people here are going to say new, since they have shit taste.

> yandere so thirsty for Bugs that she undertakes Daffy's training to the point of falling for his duck dick just like my chinese comics
> HAY, NICE BUTT
yeah I'll go with new.

>you can't dethrone a movie I watched as a kid to forget how my uncle raped me
whatever

New one is bland.

The new one, the only thing the old Lola had for was being fapbait, hell you the new Lola has a personality and you can fap to her.

I can't fap to the new Lola Bunny. I can only fap to her voice acting.

New, old one was made to get little girls to watch the movie and buy merchandise.

Well that's your problem, I can do both.

Old one solely exists as furryfodder.
New one is a chartcer and is actually funny.

baaaaw, they introduced a character that girls would like in MY movie! how I will ever recover!?

How about this? We take old Lola's design and give her New Lola's voice and personality?
Everyone's happy.

Not that user but clearly that's not the point.

I don't think that a sluttish furbait would attract little girls. Besides Looney Tunes was always gender neutral show.

why not both? :^)

Not gonna happen. Sexy female characters are problematic now to american media.

Both versions are good but if I had a gun pointed at my head i'd go for the current new version for all the ssme reasons you've mentioned. Does she always wear shorts? She'd look good as a cop.

The old design! THE OLD DESIGN!!

Good fucking God, this.

I'd be fine with that but it's very important she not be too attractive like her old design. It would ruin everyone's enjoyment of Looney Tunes. There's nothing funny about sex or being attractive.

The new one is funnier. Old one was boring.

Fpbp

Yiff in hell you furry piece of shit

Why did they cancel the reboot when it was finally finding its footing?

New no question, i just would like her to have some personality and thats what new lola has. New lola can still be sexy just keep her current personality

Its kinda like amy rose in a sense

Because Family guy reboot. See Scooby doo for another example.

Βut Amy Rose's personality is annoying.

What happened to Scooby Doo? Also The Looney Tunes show is funnier than Family Guy.

I think they cancelled The Looney Tunes reboot in favor of that awful Seth McFarlane Family Guy reboot, which quickly got itself cancelled as well.

It became cool, user. It became cool.

On the plus side, the new Velma design is rather hot.

Nobody is talking about The Looney Tunes Show, everyone's talking about Wabbit.

>It became cool, user. It became cool.
That was sarcasm I assume?

Then someone's not trying hard enough.

New ones much better than what they tried doing with her in the comics. Which basically turned her into a watered down Bugs.

>someone hasn't heard of the new Scooby Doo show, "Be Cool Scooby Doo!"

>Seriously, it's literally called "Be Cool Scooby Doo!" with exclamation point and everything.

>Help, I've forgotten how to not green text!

You must be curious about furries considering the fact you clicked on this thread.

Old best for porn.

New best for actual character.

Continuity alert! Those aren't Lola's parents. Sure hope someone was fired for THAT blunder.

>had to readjust it

>that mom
good thing nofapber is a month off

>A character is only good if it's fapping material
Jesus, if you just want sexualizaton then just watch porn.

We are talking about a LOONEY Tunes character, are you actually going to tell me that old Lola would actually fit in a Looney Tunes Sketch on a major role (not involving just being "Bugs' GF") with the slapstick comedy that the show is known for?

She'd fit if they actually tried to give her a personality and made her a watered down hybrid of Pepe of Minerva Mink.
She'd be terrible but she'd fit.

New Lola is an actual Looney Tune.

Thus she's the better character. Is this really even a debate?

>post bland
>call new one bland

it's a watered down bugs permanently stuck in crossdressing mode but without daring to kiss and fondle his targets

>New Lola is literally "Every Kristen Wiig Character: The Cartoon"
so she's not even "original" in that regard

New one, obviously. She was actually pretty funny. Old one was utterly forgettable.

Honestly, a knock off is better than nothing at all. Or a copy of something blander like what old Lola probably was, but i don't remember enough TV and movies from back then to tell.

Looney Toons used to be straight copies off routines and actors from classic cinema themselves, they just outlasted the things they ripped off.

>buff Shag
>lanky Fred
>Scooby is just a guy in a costume
>Daphne's a dude

dare I ask who Velma's impersonator was

New

TLS > Loonatics > Classic

Can't I just say I like both and settle for a threesome?

Old for the body, new for the character (mostly the season 2 of TLTS where she is not more a creepy stalker)

New, no contest

I agree in general but in what universe is nulola less annoying than classic lola.

New one bland