To all the haters of western foreign policy in the middle east: the middle east was bound to implode...

To all the haters of western foreign policy in the middle east: the middle east was bound to implode, and the west is just giving it a guiding hand rather than let it go undirected off a cliff.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_presidential_election,_2014
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Does the other said say "Up with ISIS"?

Instead of letting crazy dictators kill their own mudslimes now we have terrorists blowing shit up around the globe.

Man, sure glad we saved those people in Lybia though.

the West is finished

>"the west is just giving it a guiding hand so that they don't attack the true parasites that are Israel and Saudi Arabia."

Fixed that for ya rabbi

>a guiding hand

notably missing from this image is israel.

That's right!

How can you people be so ignorant?

USA is supporting the Yemeni regime and bombing the rebels, the Yemeni regime is a vocal minority of sunni muslims supported by Saudi Arabia and the rebels are all shia muslims.

>the middle east was bound to implode,
Gaddafi would have created an Arab-African union more powerful than the EU or Russia dumbass

Libya was done either way, but instead of what it is now it would be a monstrosity of dictatorship and Islamist controlled areas. At least now there is a power vacuum which can and will be filled, whereas the other option would never result in an eventual democracy.

What the fuck did Gaddafi do? Why do lib cucks hate him so much?

>democracy
>in the Middle East
stale meme is stale

Those dictatorships would eventually fall regardless of western intervention. I guarantee that the situation would be 10x worse in all these countries if they were left to themselves, because you cam be sure that their people would eventually rebel. Youre just crying because what happened is obviously bad and youre too blind to see that non intervention is much worse. Iraqs inability to govern itself resulted in Isis

Are you a disinfo shill or just simply a brainwashed moron?

Either way you dont belong in this board.

>Syria
>Iran
>Yemen


>Dictatorships


Do you even know the meaning of the word? Their leaders were all democratically elected.

Why am I wrong?

Yea taking down Gaddafi was a super smart move. Now North Africa is a chesspit of terrorism and Europe is getting flooded with sandniggers.
Mission accomplished, West

Iran I know was elected, but Syria as well?

Libya was better with Gaddafi
Iraq was better with Saddam
Iran is not a dictatorship
Syria is not a dictatorship
Yemen is not a dictatorship and the USA supports the current regime, not the rebels

Yes, and with a shit ton of international seers to prevent voter fraud.

Thanks for giving me another reason to be sad that my country is backing the wrong side in the Syrian civil war.

>No gulf monarchs
>Iran twice
hmm

The fact that all the "Syrian rebel" camps were flying the Al-Qaeda flag back in 2012 when ISIS didnt exist should´ve been a major giveaway.

Iraq will be free of Isis within a year, with a democratic and stable government. So, wrong.

Libya would still be in civil war. The people rose up against Gaddafi, the west simply provided support. you seem to forget that.

Syria elected? Lol

Iran is a dictatorship and theocracy

Yemen is Saudi Arabias backyard and we are their ally

Yeah. It's perfectly okay to flood our countries with refugees. Fuck off.

>Syria is not a dictatorship
Lets not really kid ourselves, I'm sure Syria needs Assad, but he wasn't opposed when running.

>the middle east was bound to implode

Syria was stable, peaceful and prosperous for 30 years

Sunnis are just fucking semitic niggers who can't stand to see anyone do well for themselves.

Every state is eventually bound to fall.
It doesn't mean you should fuck shit up every chance you get.
It's like saying murder isn't wrong because everyone eventually dies.

How is assad a dictator? Wasn't he the democratically elected leader?

the civil wars would happen regardless

It more like saying you should take a terminally ill patient off life support when the blood is pouring out of their ears

>The people rose up against Gaddafi
You mean all those AQAP, Qatari and Sudanese mercenaries that posed as Libyans?

The day gaddafi died all the public buildings in Libya the rebels rose the Al-Qaeda flag to demonstrate they now controlled the country.

Why dont you ask a real Libyan what they thought about Gaddafi, and their opinion on the rebels?

Iraq has been a shithole since you people invaded their country 12 years ago, and will keep being a shithole because only a strong handed dicatorship can keep in control the mesh of cultures and religions Iraq has.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_presidential_election,_2014
>Presidential elections were held in Syria on 3 June 2014. It was the first multi-candidate election in decades

Iran is as much of a Dictatorship and Theocracy as Israel is.
Their system is virtually identical but with different religions.

Why do you support the Yemeni regime and no the rebels then? Double standards?

The middle east has been relatively stable in this state for generations.
All those interventions achieved is replacing the old "regimes" with new ones while causing massive damage to everyone involved. It's delusional to think that military intervention will achieve democracy in the middle east.

Most of the fighters were civilians of Libya who were legit rebels. Just because al queda had presence doesn't mean they were even close to the majority of fighters. The situation has deteriorated but the Islamists are still the minority and in time they will be removed.

we'll get trump up there soon enough.

Moving from the jewpetrodollar to gold

no, they werent

Source

He opposed OPEC, Central Banking and wanted to create a unified pan-african coin backed in gold instead of debt.

The country was the most successful African coutnry and he didnt play according international banking rules so he was a bad example and had to be taken care of.

>Most of the fighters were civilians of Libya who were legit rebels.

Yeah, I'm sure the Libyans were just boiling over with rage at having to live in a stable, secular state with the highest standard of living in Africa.

The Libyan "revolution" was the product of a handful of bribed elites, paid revolutionaries and opportunistic Islamists that Gaddafi had previously repressed for decades.

Now the West has their cheap dollar-denominated Libyan oil, and the country is a fucking hellhole.

Was very amused during the Dem primary debates when Hillary claimed that the Libyan revolution was the spontaneous product of freedom-loving patriots. Maybe D voters really are that stupid.

Do your own reseach moron.

This was heavily discussed back when it happened in /new/ and then Sup Forums,

Its clear you dont belong here, so gtfo and do your own reseach instead of coming here wanting to be spoonfed.


You should leave or lurk more if you are a newfag.

There's nothing wrong with central banking as long as it's govt. controlled.

Why so Syrias