PODESTA WAS CONFIRMED A PEDOPHILE TODAY, DONALD TRUMP'S "CHARGES" ARE A FALSE DISTRACTION TACTIC

So two things happened today. One, it was confirmed Podesta and friends flew on the Lolita express hundreds of times. (oh boy).
i.sli.mg/8XLWle.png


2). The Hillary campaign paid off the "Jane Doe" in the Donald trump child rape case to come forward, which for anyone who knows anything about legal suits, means her case is going to be thrown out as no jury will be able to judge it fairly. Its a purely political move.

The entire transcript of the legal accusation here.

scribd.com/document/326057027/Amended-Complaint-Filed-9-30-2016#from_embed?platform=hootsuite

It's pretty funny, because it implies the girl was Epstien's sex slave for months, and then Donald just showed up one day, raped her, and cucked Epstien out of her virginity, after supposedly personally killing two other of Epstien's child slaves in some murderous violent rage.

It's also not a charge against him for breaking the law with any evidence, it's just a girl suing him for emotional distress over an event she said happened, and then additional emotional distress for him saying on TV that she was lying. It's a complete fabrication that the bloom legal team is playing to try to get some cash out of him.

The entire last half of the lawsuit is now "BOO HOO HE HURT MY FEELINGS ON LIVE TV", it's pretty pathetic.


So there you go, you can now derail any anti-trump rape thread or accusations with zero effort.

Other urls found in this thread:

i.sli.mg/8XLWle.png
nytimes.com/1993/11/02/us/supreme-court-roundup-child-smut-conviction-vacated-after-us-shift.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

On todays #NextFakeTrumpVictim

The Jezebel article (yes fucking Jezebel of all places) at the archive link is worth reading in full, this one was a year long #NeverTrump op in the making. Probably the one Rick Wilson and Frank Luntz have been alluding to.

bump

Podesta's not running for president

> then Donald just showed up one day, raped her, and cucked Epstien out of her virginity

That's not what the complaint says

bump for interest

them bringing up this stuff about Epstein and trying to link it to Trump makes me more convinced than anything that the rumors about Bill and Epstein are true.

Bill isn't running for President

You're kidding yourself if you can't see how it would be damaging to Hillary. Bill is part of her brand.

>i.sli.mg/8XLWle.png
durrr, yes, the President being married to a child rapist, and covering for him, should have no bearing on whether we elect her.

I know yer just funnin', but seriously, all of my rage when actual Hillshills say this.

Bump. Hillary and her cronies constantly use the Saul Alinsky tactic of blaming your enemy of what you're guilty of.

is trump innocent until proven guilty?

...

Obviously. I don't like Trump for his policies.

> 40% import tarif
> Expand military spending
> Increase immigration enforcement
> No tax increases on people making over at least 1 million
> Advocating Japan/S. Korea get nukes

if you don't like trump, why don't you go back to plebbit?

you prefer crooked shillary who took 25 million dolars from countries that she acknowledged fund and support isis, then sent them weapons?

you stupid corrupt evil retarded fuck

even the left are turning on her

Why so mad?

I don't like Clinton either, but I live in the real world, where it's a two party system and she at least advocates for the correct things

Enjoy the rapeugees mate. Really I should be supporting you, every 1 the US takes means 1 less in Europe.

> Expand military spending
not really he just says other countries should pair their fair share for the protection we provide.
> No tax increases on people making over at least 1 million
the 1% already accounts for 33% of tax revenue

>she at least advocates for the correct things
mishandling emails
trading in illicit arms
being paid off to support islamic terrorism

please supply better bait

Like trying to aggravate a nuclear power and start WW3? Or get us even more involved with the Middle East than we should be? Fuck off.

> mishandling emails
straw man. No one actually cares about this

> trading in illicit arms
Standard US operating procedure for the last 30 years. If you actually cared, you would be rallying again the CIA.

> being paid off to support islamic terrorism
Lobbying isn't supporting

How does it feel to be a satellite state of Saudi Arabia?

> Like trying to aggravate a nuclear power and start WW3?

lolwhat? how?

> get us even more involved with the Middle East than we should be?
It's hard to imagine Trump's "expanded military" wouldn't get bored and push for involvement in the Middle East again. The Middle East is the only region it's acceptable to war hawks to play war anymore

No need to hyperbolate. The US dictates policy in every global interaction.

>No one actually cares about this
surely not the agents whose brother agents didn't make it out after their covers were exposed

surely not every security cleared person who knows the law would apply to them even if she has become above the law

>Standard US operating procedure for the last 30 years
once an ilegal act happens for more than 29 years it becomes legal, got ya

>Lobbying isn't supporting
taking foreign donations isn't lobbying you pathetic fag, it's bribery and treason

WOO LAST WEEK!

wonder what else the leakers have for us, oh, she so screwed, and I say that as a proud independent black woman, LAWFY LAWDY SHO NUFF

nytimes.com/1993/11/02/us/supreme-court-roundup-child-smut-conviction-vacated-after-us-shift.html

>WASHINGTON, Nov. 1— The Supreme Court today vacated a child pornography conviction and told a lower court to reconsider the case in light of the Clinton Administration's new position that as long as minors are wearing clothes, depictions of them cannot ordinarily be considered child pornography under a 1984 Federal law.

What did she mean by this?

>So two things happened today. One, it was confirmed Podesta and friends flew on the Lolita express hundreds of times. (oh boy).
>i.sli.mg/8XLWle.png
Sorry, but where does this confirm who the passengers were?

Have you not been paying attention to the war drum beatings against Russia, like her insistence that it is behind EVERYTHING this election?

And how she is dead set on a unilateral no-fly zone in Syria, which Russia has stated has no intention of following?

Even if it's not nuclear war (at first), there will definitely be a conflict if she gets in.

Tarrifs against outsources products, not against nations

We are russia now friend.