wsj.com
FUCKING HAPPENING
fake
sorry drumpfkins
not even a real link, doesn't show full article. (it's a fake article)
(((wsj)))
is there a credible source talking about this? no? didn't think so
drumpf btfo
>To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Sign In
thanks for the heads up
>wsj.com
Its real just behind a paywall
more speculation. as figured, nothing substantial has come out of this email thing at all
Fox is covering it live right now
glad to see we got some smart hill missiles in here
does op think we're stupid? he's just posting a non-credible source about a story that has already been debunked
GET THE FUCK IN HERE NOW
>>Sup Forums95784651
>>Sup Forums95784651
>>Sup Forums95784651
CTR pls go
hahaha op didn't even read the article. the headline was just eye candy, the actual text shows that clinton did nothing wrong. not this time trump fans!
im so ready for madame president
oh man, I thought this was going to be terrible... but then I opened the link
it's another non-story dead on arrival
...
What is it? The first paragraph makes it look juicy
do people really care about her emails this late in the race? how about we talk policy for once.
/rant
>tfw literally just unsubscribed from WSJ
Can you screenshot the full article and post it here?
nice to see the wsj is still doing honest reporting. they seem to have a level head. with this news it seems clear to me that hillary was not involved in any of the scandals that have recently broke.
I'll be sure to tell my republican friends all about this! thanks, friend!
haha are there still some people here who consider wsj to be a credible source? it's a pro-trump mag(a) through and through.
>wsj.com
It's actually legit and breaking all over!
sorry OP. I'm going to wait until I see a credible source reporting on this. I don't want to muddy my brain with dishonest reporting.
...
By DEVLIN BARRETT and CHRISTOPHER M. MATTHEWS
Updated Nov. 2, 2016 10:04 p.m. ET
130 COMMENTS
Secret recordings of a suspect talking about the Clinton Foundation fueled an internal battle between FBI agents who wanted to pursue the case and corruption prosecutors who viewed the statements as worthless hearsay, people familiar with the matter said.
Agents, using informants and recordings from unrelated corruption investigations, thought they had found enough material to merit aggressively pursuing the investigation into the foundation that started in summer 2015 based on claims made in a book by a conservative author called “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” these people said.
The account of the case and resulting dispute comes from interviews with officials at multiple agencies.
Starting in February and continuing today, investigators from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and public-corruption prosecutors became increasingly frustrated with each other, as often happens within and between departments. At the center of the tension stood the U.S. attorney for Brooklyn, Robert Capers, who some at the FBI came to view as exacerbating the problems by telling each side what it wanted to hear, these people said. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Capers declined to comment.
The roots of the dispute lie in a disagreement over the strength of the case, these people said, which broadly centered on whether Clinton Foundation contributors received favorable treatment from the State Department under Hillary Clinton.
Senior officials in the Justice Department and the FBI didn’t think much of the evidence, while investigators believed they had promising leads their bosses wouldn’t let them pursue, they said.
kek
Do you know what an ID is?
These details on the probe are emerging amid the continuing furor surrounding FBI Director James Comey’s disclosure to Congress that new emails had emerged that could be relevant to a separate, previously closed FBI investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s email arrangement while she was secretary of state.
On Wednesday, President Barack Obama took the unusual step of criticizing the FBI when asked about Mr. Comey’s disclosure of the emails.
Amid the internal finger-pointing on the Clinton Foundation matter, some have blamed the FBI’s No. 2 official, deputy director Andrew McCabe, claiming he sought to stop agents from pursuing the case this summer. His defenders deny that, and say it was the Justice Department that kept pushing back on the investigation.
At times, people on both sides of the dispute thought Mr. Capers agreed with them. Defenders of Mr. Capers said he was straightforward and always told people he thought the case wasn’t strong.
Much of the skepticism toward the case came from how it started—with the publication of a book suggesting possible financial misconduct and self-dealing surrounding the Clinton charity. The author of that book, Peter Schweizer—a former speechwriting consultant for President George W. Bush—was interviewed multiple times by FBI agents, people familiar with the matter said.
isn't this that conspiracy website hilldog was talking about earlier? geez, and I thought I was out of the loop.
OP, you need to follow the news more. you're obviously uneducated about the current political climate.
The Clinton campaign has long derided the book as a poorly researched collection of false claims and unsubstantiated assertions. The Clinton Foundation has denied any wrongdoing, saying it does immense good throughout the world.
Mr. Schweizer said in an interview that the book was never meant to be a legal document, but set out to describe “patterns of financial transactions that circled around decisions Hillary Clinton was making as secretary of state.”
As 2015 came to a close, the FBI and Justice Department had a general understanding that neither side would take major action on Clinton Foundation matters without meeting and discussing it first. In February, a meeting was held in Washington among FBI officials, public-integrity prosecutors and Leslie Caldwell, the head of the Justice Department’s criminal division. Prosecutors from the Eastern District of New York—Mr. Capers’ office—didn’t attend, these people said.
The public-integrity prosecutors weren’t impressed with the FBI presentation, people familiar with the discussion said. “The message was, ‘We’re done here,’ ” a person familiar with the matter said.
Justice Department officials became increasingly frustrated that the agents seemed to be disregarding or disobeying their instructions.
Following the February meeting, officials at Justice Department headquarters sent a message to all the offices involved to “stand down,’’ a person familiar with the matter said.
Megyn Kelly just presented this on her show. It's the happening of the century you dumbfucks.
sad to see trump shills are still posting debunked right wing websites and passing them off as truth.
*sigh*
Within the FBI, some felt they had moved well beyond the allegations made in the anti-Clinton book. At least two confidential informants from other public-corruption investigations had provided details about the Clinton Foundation to the FBI, these people said.
The FBI had secretly recorded conversations of a suspect in a public-corruption case talking about alleged deals the Clintons made, these people said. The agents listening to the recordings couldn’t tell from the conversations if what the suspect was describing was accurate, but it was, they thought, worth checking out.
Prosecutors thought the talk was hearsay and a weak basis to warrant aggressive tactics, like presenting evidence to a grand jury, because the person who was secretly recorded wasn’t inside the Clinton Foundation.
FBI investigators grew increasingly frustrated with resistance from the corruption prosecutors, and some executives at the bureau itself, to keep pursuing the case.
As prosecutors rebuffed their requests to proceed more overtly, those Justice Department officials became more annoyed that the investigators didn’t seem to understand or care about the instructions issued by their own bosses and prosecutors to act discreetly.
In subsequent conversations with the Justice Department, Mr. Capers told officials in Washington that the FBI agents on the case “won’t let it go,” these people said.
As a result of those complaints, these people said, a senior Justice Department official called the FBI deputy director, Mr. McCabe, on Aug. 12 to say the agents in New York seemed to be disregarding or disobeying their instructions, these people said. The conversation was a tense one, they said, and at one point Mr. McCabe asked, “Are you telling me that I need to shut down a validly predicated investigation?’’ The senior Justice Department official replied: ”Of course not.”
so... anyone going to post a credible source? or is this just another hoax? seems like a hoax to me.
>wall street journal
kys
Are you fucking huffing gas?
14 posts by this ID
right wingers have been trying to tear down hillary for the past 3 decades. one little hoax story like this isn't going to accomplish anything. they'll need facts to do that. and, gladly, the facts are not on their side.
ty lad
>conspiracy website
The Wall Street Journal? Really?
oh man, I knew the media was desperate to get trump elected but I didn't know it was this bad. A hit piece of this size 1 week before the election? how desperate can they be?
>95796410
>▶
>>>
>1478135518
CAN WE PLEASE GET SCREENCAPS TO MAKE UP FOR THIS FAGGOT
here ya go CTR
thank you based richfag
Link please
Thanks bruv
don't worry guys, most people aren't going to fall for this obvious bait. everyone isn't an uneducated trump voter that can fall for something as dumb as this.
how does it feel to be out of a job in a week?
this happens every election cycle. the media teams up and comes up with some fake story to make up some controversy. this time is no different. they're going all out to get trump in the white house
> 4/4 first replies all from CTR shill
you know that your final paycheck will probably never show up, right?
>1478135518
Bump
I want the names of these "corruption prosecutors"
>then we find out they've been taking clinton foundation money themselves
what a total embarrassment. I thought the wall street journal was a respectable source. I guess not.
after publishing this fake slander I will be cancelling my subscription
anyone willing to match me?
CTR BOT MALFUNCTION
>CTR BOT MALFUNCTION
CTR BOT MALFUNCTION
ree go away
you guys do realize this is why the FBI exists
i hope comey brings it back. thats the real reason all those resignations came in, it was statist bootlickers and moles.
fbi was created to battle shit like NSA and CIA and shadow government sneaky jew hillary shit
>Link please
ok, you lazy fuck:
someone post the CTR names list please
the FBI confirmed that the wsj is in the tank for trump's campaign. it's no surprise that they'd publish this kind of "journalism"
secret-recordings-fueled-fbi-feud-in-clinton-probe-1478135518
Paste into google
First result.
This works for every wsj article
Oh shit, this is a legit HAPPENING!
>2 dragon dildos were deposited into your anus, thank you for correcting the rectum
it's clear to anyone with at least 3 brain cells that this story has no substance. it's all speculation and spin.
can anyone post a single credible source? or is this literally just this one (((news))) site reporting on this?
WE LITERALLY SHITPOSTED TRUMP TO VICTORY AND THE FBI WILL DEAL THE COUP DE GRACE
GONNA STOP MASTURBATING, NEXT WEEK I GO ALL OUT.
Mods why is this person allowed to post. Kys shill etc
I came, I saw, I corrected
Wherever I go I must also correct
Absolutely corrected
I wonder why this isn't posted anywhere else? I guess it's just a fake story, maybe OP photoshopped it.
Oh fuck it's HAPPENING!!!!!
not.
sorry drumpfkins