Sup Forums hates the poor

And loves (((the elite))) and their (((entertainment)))

...prove me wrong Sup Forums.

>P.S According to the (((elite))) YOU ARE THE POOR.

Other urls found in this thread:

money.cnn.com/2016/11/02/investing/venezuela-debt-running-out-of-cash/index.html
youtube.com/watch?v=Zyr9OqNFi-o
youtube.com/watch?v=LCRNI04tnN8
youtube.com/watch?v=L8zhNb8ANe8
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

I've noticed over the past 2 years Sup Forums has developed a disdain for the working class bordering on being equivalent to liberals' disdain for the working class

>inb4 the "Sup Forums isn't one person" meeme

The fuck are you talking about?

We're the only people that give half a shit about the rust belt.

>if everyone had more money they'd be instantly happy and the rich should give up what they worked for
This has been tried.

(((moneybags)))

>Sup Forums has a disdain for the working class
Literally what?

>developed a disdain for the working class

And how exactly do you figure that? I have never once got that vibe.

>if you don't use the poor as political pawns and try to bribe them with other people's money, you hate the poor
Kill yourself.

liberals seem to think their vote is supposed to be used to give them money and when others don't use their vote that way they're shocked to find out other people vote for greater values beyond mere materialism

Marxism requires a dictatorship of the proletariat - which is a direct democracy of the masses.

Leninism (first one you've pictured) decided you don't need a dictatorship of the proletariat (= not Marxism).

Stalinism (second one you've pictured) that all you need is control over the government (which is really more like Fascism).

So I guess I agree with your picture; Democratic Socialism hasn't been tried... and "Communism" has merely been a way for authoritarians to trick the masses into putting them in power.

As usual the world is a complicated place.

>democratic socialism hasn't been tried
Uhhhhhhh

...

>bernout
>not a full blown communist

Hello CTR, if only you knew what we desired for our people.

money.cnn.com/2016/11/02/investing/venezuela-debt-running-out-of-cash/index.html

I think this was the fourth treehouse of horror. They replayed reruns all weekend

Venezuela - to my knowledge - has never had direct democracy (as opposed to corrupt 'representative' democracy like the west has).

>I've noticed over the past 2 years Sup Forums has developed a disdain for the working class
Those are the stem faggots in like one thread or shills

Yeah. We hate the poor. That's why we're voting for the guy who wants to make it so the poor pay no income tax. Right.

In fact seldom as direct democracy been tried anywhere. But all this is besides the point.

>le marxism has never been tried before maymay
According to Marx himself, before full-blown communism can happen, there needs to be a transition into a planned socialist economy. How exactly do you expect to have a planned economy without the planning being centralized? Your Marxist delusions are only applicable in a Marxist borg collective where everyone just magically arrives at the same plan. The fact that every attempt at communism has failed to reach the unattainable ideas of communism doesn't mean that communism hasn't been tried.

N o
R e f u n d s

>also learn economics faggot
youtube.com/watch?v=Zyr9OqNFi-o

I think you're referring to hatred of welfare queens, not the working class.

This is generally true, however Trump is an exception from the norm at least in some key aspects. All the cuckservatives in the party tried to work against him, but he won the nomination despite their efforts.

Keynesianism and The Paradox of Thrift; silly.

youtube.com/watch?v=LCRNI04tnN8

More money supply in the economy = better long term outcomes and smoother transitions between economic cycles.

As usual, the Marxist will ignore any arguments that he doesn't have a pre-canned response to. Acknowledging such arguments is dangerous to the Marxist, as they may shake his faith in the Marxist cult by puncturing its narrative. What a pitiful creature.

>N o
>R e f u n d s

>also learn economics faggot


You have presented no arguments.

I have presented an argument. Your mind is just incapable of acknowledging its existence, because the Marxist cult scripture doesn't address it. Here it is:

youtube.com/watch?v=L8zhNb8ANe8

australia is a nice country thats why he has such a simple view of things , no crime, no poverty , everyone polite, have your kid die in a Venezuelan socialist hospital see if youre so open to the idea then

I can't tell if you are retarded or a shill, oh wait. . .

Most governments are centralized. Also; I'm not a Marxist - I'm a Social Democrat.

Already covered that here:

The fact that you guys would argue against Direct Democracy says something about you.

you're ignorant, they are filled with "worker's consul" and all that bullshit

In fact do you rabid delusional anti-communist types even remember what my original post was about?

No you don't because you're suckers to HOLLYWOOD.

>muh freemarket will solve everything
>muh capitalism is flawless

Yeah, right.

your middle finger single handily counter argued that communism works

wtf i hate the freemarket now

> democrats push for globalism
> somehow this is good for the average american

Once again liberals are projecting.

your original post was a diversion from the fact that you're a delusional anarcho-syndicalist type of retard, trying to borrow the bit of credibility from keynes.

You're completely ignoring the argument and moving the goalpost. You said Marxism has never been tried. Do you concede that the only practical means to implement a planned economy as Marx requires is by central planning, or do you think you can have a planned economy with a myriad of different and possibly clashing plans at the local level?

>remember what my original post was about?
Your original post was literally about nothing. In fact, I have addressed that as well, but your tiny mind just couldn't handle my response:

>Sup Forums wants lower taxes for everyone
>Sup Forums wants closed borders which benefits the lower class
>Sup Forums wants stronger state rights which provide competition and better quality among states
>"y-you guys hate the 99%"

B-B-b-butthurt!

>I'm a Social Democrat.
So you're fundamentally a capitalist who agrees that the means of production should be privately owned. Good to hear.

>worker's consul

= not a direct democracy.

>fails to address the argument again

This (the image). Horkheimer, Adorno, et al. would have hated the current left in America almost as much as they hated the Soviets and despised the American and Parisian Marxists in their own day. Their criticisms of popular culture and aesthetics would BTFO today's hipsters, if hipsters were capable of reading dense prose.

Yeah; but obviously the flaws to capitalism have to be addressed by a government that gets live and unavoidable feedback from the people.

I'm practically a western secular democrat but because I say ONE THING about Marxism - all these ancaps are freaking the fuck out.

Because they need a safe space. Fucking retards - and can't handle

IDEAS
>IDEAS
IDEAS
>IDEAS
IDEAS
>IDEAS
IDEAS
>IDEAS

On the contrary. I used to despise the Brits because my school experience here had me anxious every single day that I would be fighting to defend myself physically from these apelike snowniggers we have as our underclass in England.

I forgave them. Even those degenerates, reprobates and untermensch are my brothers and I defend their right to their ethnic and national identity.

Would still incinerate them once we got rid of the niggers, pakis, gooks and jews though.

>anons providing a counter argument to your claim
>"c-conservatives need a safe space, they can't handle ideas!!!!"

WHOA THIS GUY KNOWS ABOUT MARXISM - HE MUST BE A TOTAL COMMUNIST!!!

COMMIE!
>COMMIE!
COMMIE!
>COMMIE!
COMMIE!
>COMMIE!
COMMIE!
>COMMIE!

Fuckin freemarket retards.

>fails to address any of the arguments
It's okay. I knew full well you won't even try. All I'm really trying to demonstrate here is that no discussion can be had with a leftist, and therefore violence is the only way to deal with you.

>It's okay. I knew full well you won't even try. All I'm really trying to demonstrate here is that no discussion can be had with a leftist, and therefore violence is the only way to deal with you.

See this bitch here is still going "COMMIE! COMMIE! COMMIE"

Because he's retarded.

Back to the gas chamber for you Hershall.

Sorry you're so easy to (((/TRIGGER/)))

being called a commie is an insult,
we see you the same as a Scientologist whos strongly defending scientolgy

All I'm saying is over the past two years I've seen a lot of posts along the lines of "dude if you're working a hourly wage job just kill yourself lmao", "dude he isnt STEM master race like me lmao", "dude you arent salaried at your job fucking subhuman lmao", "dude i hate waiters and busboys and dishwashers lmao", "dude why doesn't everyone just go into (((finance))) or (((accounting))) like me lmao"

I mean you can say I'm wrong if you want but you're gonna notice it sooner or later if you've been here as long as I have

If you're stuck in a lifeboat with a bunch of lunatics that keep rocking it because they think it's their democratic right to do so, and there's no way to reason with them to make them stop, you just throw them in the water. People this delusional forfeit all of their rights, not just the right to vote and influence the direction of society.

Jews hate poor people; I get it; I get it - you're agreeing with my original post.

>if you don't use the poor as political pawns and try to bribe them with other people's money, you hate the poor
Don't worry, leftist shill. The violence you deserve is coming. Your cult is losing all over the place.

Aren't most of the bigger money makers Dem though?

I still can't believe how triggered you all were because I said something about Marxism - whilst NOT EVEN ARGUING FOR MARXISM....

....talk about an American taboo.... McCarthyism really fucked up free speech for you yanks. Can't fucking even discuss an idea; or even just the flaws in capitalism without Americans freaking the fuck out.

>muh freemarket
>muh YOU'RE A COMMIE!

>muh freemarket
>muh YOU'RE A COMMIE!

Hillary is a republican pretending to care about minorities and other women. We're voting for the least crazy out of two republicans.

Criticizing Capitalism isn't automatically COMMUNIST!!!

>guy on left is supposed to be the moron
>guy on right can't even put money in a bag properly, shits spilling out the top, Bag clearly has more room

>if someone challenges a retarded statement i make about marxism, they are triggered
You just keep proving my point: there's only one rational way to deal with a leftist. And trust me, people are starting to see it.

I can understand that as an argument.

Sup Forums is mocking upper middle class gender studies majors that are stuck working shit jobs

really m8? you're that cynical? you make a huge post about how lenin and stalin weren't true socialists and yet gets deeply offended when we call you what you are, a dirty communist?

Jewbee is still triggered over here - and it's HILARIOUS!!! :D :D :D

...

Fuck man; I didn't realize that praising DIRECT DEMOCRACY was COMMUNIST - fuck man; thanks for telling me.

You just keep sperging out like a rabid animal and this is getting boring. I've addressed both your OP and your meme-tier claims about Marxism. See you when you come up with actual counter-arguments (i.e. never).

do you know what "soviet" means you idiot?

Anyone whose afraid of direct democracy is just afraid their PREFERRED POLITICS will FAIL THE DEMOCRATIC TEST.

Keep sucking elitist cock guys. Bye bye JEWBEE!!!

You don't know anything about marxism you dumb fucking liberal classcuck bastard.

See you around. Always sperg out, never address the argument. Make sure the true nature of the left is clear to any onlooker.

No one is afraid of direct democracy. The fact is that the only people who have time to dedicate themselves to "decision-making" councils are parasites and communist party members who don't truly work or study, and are just activists pushing an agenda. They also have no idea how to run a business but think just because the decision is collectively decided then it's the right decision. That's how the land reforms in Venezuela went down, now people are starving and running to Colombia to buy food.

>Anyone whose afraid of direct democracy is just afraid their PREFERRED POLITICS will FAIL THE DEMOCRATIC TEST.

I've noticed it's mockery of ANYONE who's working "shit jobs", especially if they're between 19-26

GO back to your ancap paradise Brazil. Enjoy your fucking anti-government DIRT FUCKING ROADS - bitch.

That picture is literally the opposite of Republican voting.

insert
>I vote Democrat because it's the current year 2030450 and transnegroasiandogs can't vote.
>I vote Democrat so I can tax the fuck out of this dumbass and take his money.

>gibs nao
No fuck you.

Oh yeah; and enjoy your massive crime problem and drug cartelz...

....no fucking wonder you love

>muh freemarket
>muh government is a parasite

Fucking addicted criminal Brazil.

Yeah is that why they're against NAFTA?

It's why they peg everyone who doesn't have an undergrad and making a certain amount of money as "wageslave leech scum"

kind of like the liberals do concerning anyone who doesn't have an undergrad

I'm conservative you moron. The biggest obstacle to crime is obviously the country being overrun by socialists like bernie sanders who work against imprisonment of criminals and defend dindus to death.

*to safety

Brazil has been ruled for the last 10 years by a pro-protectionism, big state, leftist party

try 100 years

oil (production and distribution) is state-controlled
natural gas is state-controlled
50% of the banking system is state-controlled
even the telephone system was 100% state-controlled until 1998

>Anyone whose afraid of direct democracy is just afraid their PREFERRED POLITICS will FAIL THE DEMOCRATIC TEST.

You have no arguments!

But all the famous rich motherfuckers vote for Democrats.
>everyone, and literally everyone in Hollywood
>all those big tech CEO's, especially from Silicon Valley
>media people in general

what "direct democracy" are you talking about? political system or a buzzword to defend the soviet economic system (i.e. "democracy in the workplace")?
I welcome more political power to the people, we voted against civil disarmament but leftist bernie cucks like you just ignored the referendum.

reminder that Lenin held elections in 1917, lost, and betrayed all of Russia instituting a single-party dictatorship.

Complains about poor people through out the thread then says:

>I welcome more political power to the people

Sure sure Brazil. Get back to your ancap conservative safe space.

>"BRAZIL HAS MURDER AND DIRT ROADS BECAUSE YOU SUPPORT ANCAP AND NEOLIBERALISM"
>they don't, they support the left
>"AAAAH, BUT IT DOESN'T COUNT SINCE THE LEFT THEY SUPPORT IS REPRESENTATIVE!"
>"YOU SEE WHY MY UTHOPY IS PERFECT?"

Alright man

Here we go; another brave anti-communist from the McCarthy era:

>Anyone whose afraid of direct democracy is just afraid their PREFERRED POLITICS will FAIL THE DEMOCRATIC TEST.

fuck, thank god someone finally made this.

I'm sorry - did Brazil get DIRECT DEMOCRACY whilst I wasn't looking?

No you fucking retard.

>The fact that you guys would argue against Direct Democracy says something about you

I don't know if you have noticed this, but most people are selfish and stupid, and most people don't have the time or inclination to read lengthy legislative proposals before voting on it.

I'm poor and I voted for Trump. I care more about my country than how much money I have.