Refugees

What are advantages and disadvantages of refugees?
Why shouldn't the US take them in?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=upTBiQEow94
youtube.com/watch?v=CNUFpvW2fv4
youtube.com/watch?v=5XRc0mOz5t8
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I have no problem with European (White) refugees from shitholes in Eastern Europe, Christians in the middle east, North Koreans, or Yazidis.

But unfortunately that's not who most refugees are

there are major disadvantages for the bottom 10% of earners. for the rest of spciety, immigration is generally a net benefit.

Despite this, we are dealing with a not-so-typical migration which entails the movement of near entire population centers. With this comes the obvious baggage of culture clash.

some suggest our views are an over reaction, but other like me suggest we dont the ability to integrate 1 million plus people at the moment. simple really.

advantages: rich get richer

disadvantages: more shitskins

>wanting to go less than 60%
You are better off ded

given most of them are muslim shitskins, they'll just do nigger things with the added benefit of randomly detonating

Cowards who flee from conflict instead of fighting aren't welcome. We turned boatloads of kikes away pre-ww2 because of this tradition.

Give them to Europe, they enjoy the diversity.

there is no advantages

Obviously if the West takes in Muslim refugees then the Muslims can't claim we're anti-Muslim. The downside is- we have to let in Muslims... and we can't be overtly anti-Islam.

There are no advantages, unless you're a refugee; you can rape and live off the government as much as you want.

because the rich arab countries right next door didnt open their doors...

Its an invasion. Better stock up on food.. because going for groceries is going to be hell.

youtube.com/watch?v=upTBiQEow94

here.

It's not a choice.

Refugees have to go somewhere so they are mainly channeled to the wealthiest countries where they can find some work.

In a way it's the free market at work. Resource allocation.

Work is in Germany, so the worker moves to Germany. What on Earth would they do in a failed state like Syria?

When they passed from Syria to Turkey, there was at one point 3 million refugees.

Turkey was overwhelmed and shipped them through small boats to Greece. If anyone tried to stop Turkey at that point, there would certainly be war.

Which would leas to more destabilised regions and more refugees.

So the answer to you is that on a global scale it promotes stability, even if on a local level it's a nuisance.

youtube.com/watch?v=CNUFpvW2fv4

more of our based polish bro.

Note: Germany wants to make travel between countries even more transparent?

The US has over 300 million people; we don't need more of 'em sucking the govt. teat.

they blow things up and shoot people
disease
suck money from welfare
that enuf?

>Disadvantages
Society falls apart
Degeneracy follows
Economy ruined
White race extinct
Society stops advancing
etc.

>Advantages
Some lonely childless women have a chance to get some sand nigger dick

>Refugees have to go somewhere
yeah, they have to go back.

There is never an advantage to refugees. Even in the best of circumstances the only incentive to take them in is feels.

In the case of Syria where ISIS will he embedded with refugees, and many of the rank and file refugees view the US as partially responsible for their current circumstances, taking them in is unjustifiably retarded

There are literally zero advantages. They will cause a drain on our economy, create a threat to our national security, all so the democrats can secure them as liberal voters. It's all about votes and nothing else.

advantages:
>
disadvantages:
>they have no qualifications, so they won't find work, which leads to more people living off the government
>most of them are violent, so that increases crime
>most of them are not-so-moderate muslim, so they won't respect other peoples religion, increasing tension between them and maybe even leading to more crime
>taking refugees won't solve the country's problem, so that will lead into taking more and more refugees
>taking even more refugees will change the average person's appearance in the country, and maybe even destroy it's culture

i tried to be as impartial as possible, but well, thats how it is lad

50 years ago, world population was less than half of what it is today. Think.

>advantages
having lots of new rocket scientists and doctors
literally solve all of your problems
>disadvantages
none

so you see goy, you should totally bring more muslims into your country, there are only benefits attached to it

lol scientists
ooga booga
poo

Send them back. The vast majority become life-time welfare recipients.

It's not fair to select a small group to be given better lives while the majority are stuck in crap conditions. Address the root causes which are making them refugees such as globalist controlled politicians starting and fueling conflicts.

>let in refugees
>they inevitably cause so much chaos that the only solution is a massive police state

Governments only want refugees because in the long run it will result in more power for the government.

More consumers in the market. More bucks for corporations

What are refugees?
>Women and children running from war
Who is in this picture?
>Men that should be in Syria fighting ISIS
They left their women behind to fight the war while they ran to Europe to commit crimes. Yay social justice!

>advantages
none

>disadvantages
more welfare spending
more crime
more Islam
more future left-wing voters

youtube.com/watch?v=5XRc0mOz5t8