Air carriers

You can only post in this thread if your country is rich and developed enough to own air-carriers.

Rampfags need to NOT apply.

Nice carrier Homo, would be a shame if something happened to it...

>Brazil
> rich
> developed

Lmao

>Brazil
>Ranked 52 for prosperity
>tfw even Romania is more prosperous than Brazil
>This thread

wew lad

www.prosperity.com/rankings

Look germans were able to target a us carrier in peace time! Cool.

Didn't the French do the same to you guys during some War Games?

its French

inb4 some britfag non-ironaically argues ramps are better than CATOBAR

Everyone always does. AIP subs can get by US passive sonar in the early 2ks.

If there was a real war, there would be active sonar in play, and a carrier group wouldn't get close enough to shore to be a target for a AIP sub.

>aircraft
>carrier

This is all we got.

EMALS just got certified. Ford class is almost ready to go.

What's going on in this thread?

What does it matter if the ship does what it's meant to do, send and land aircraft.

catapults only work 80% and are easly disabled when attacked by missles

ramps dont have this issue

It's ducktape based

...

>catapults only work 80% and are easly disabled when attacked by missles

Bro, you dumb. Ramps = no awacs, inflight refueling, limited fuel on take off, limited payload.

Catapults at 80 percent is better than a ramp, and a missile disables ramp or catapult. Any hit means the carrier withdraws.

>You can only post in this thread if your economy is so big, white triggered niggers are in such luxury as to meme the election from their basement.

>socialist_landscape.jpg

>80%
proofs pls
>easily disabled by missile
Good thing the carrier has destroyers, cruisers, fighters and AWACS.

Why do ramplets even try? I know without even scrolling down that this thread is full of irrelevant ramptard salt

>No carriers
GET OUT REEEEEEE

And where the fuck is France?

This is now a prosperity thread you can only post here if you are in the top 10