SMOKING GUN ON PAY TO PLAY!!!!!
CRITERIA AND LIST OF ALL DONORS!!!!
Link for CF, State dept and foreign donor criteria for accepting money
PAY TO PLAY BABY!!!!!
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
SMOKING GUN ON PAY TO PLAY!!!!!
CRITERIA AND LIST OF ALL DONORS!!!!
Link for CF, State dept and foreign donor criteria for accepting money
PAY TO PLAY BABY!!!!!
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
GET THE FUCK IN HERE AND GET THIS OUT TO EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!
SEND THIS TO ALEX!! SEND TO BREITBART!!!! SEND THIS TO DRUDGE!!!!!!
PAY TO PLAY EXPOSED AND CF LINK TO STATE DEPARTMENT!!!!
GET IN HERE DAMMIT!!!!!!
Someone explain plz? I'm lost
Yeah, op should have highlighted something, its a bretty long email
but:
> We really need make a policy decision on this soon - whether we are
> allowing those lobbying on behalf of foreign governments to raise $ for the
> campaign. Or case by case.
> Want to add that these folks can also be divided into two categories -
> those who lobbied while HRC was at State and those who are currently
> registered.
> Karuna, can you recirculate the list of foreign agents that we know of so
> far? It's not a huge # in terms of the # of people - but it does include
> people we are close with like Tony Podesta, DLA Piper, etc.
Then a big list of donors.
And this is highly illegal?
Yes, it is an FEC violation and a felony
funk dat butt behbeh yeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaah
funk dat butt
I'm not 100% on the laws, but its not good. It looks like some of the donors are registered through FARA
en.wikipedia.org
but theres more :
In judging
> whether to take the money, we would consider the relationship between that
> country and the United States, its relationship to the State Department
> during Hillary's time as Secretary, and its relationship, if any, to the
> Foundation. In judging the individual, we would look at their history of
> support for political candidates generally and Hillary's past campaigns
> specifically.
> Put simply, we would use the same criteria we use for lobbyists, except
> with a somewhat more stringent screen.
It sounds like an admission that lobbyists gave money to the foundation tho.
How did Hillary sell it as a senator?
> This is really a straight up political call. One middle option is to take
> case by case. If, for example, they are FARA registered for Canada, we may
> not case. If for N. Korea we would.
You sound like a first year college student playing politics
> I do want to push back a bit (it’s my job!): I feel like we are leaving a
> good amount of money on the table (both for primary and general, and then
> DNC and state parties)… and how do we explain to people that we’ll take
> money from a corporate lobbyist but not them; that the Foundation takes $
> from foreign govts but we now won’t.
>we’ll take money from a corporate lobbyist but not them; that the Foundation takes $ from foreign govts but we now won’t.
Hillary was head of the state department from 2009 to 2013.
Email is dated April 18, 2015
It means that the state department is still running funds for the Clinton Foundation even after she has left office.
This seems HIGHLY illegal.
>In judging whether to take the money, we would consider the relationship between that country and the United States, its relationship to the State Department during Hillary's time as Secretary, and its relationship, if any, to the Foundation.
> Republic of Iraq (2/28/13 - Current); Embassy of the Republic of
> Azerbaijan (1/31/13 Current); Republic of Cyprus (11/13/12 - Current);
> Republic of Kosovo (3/13/12 - Current); Republic of Albania (4/15/11 -
> Current); Republic of India (10/8/10 - Current); National Security Council
> of Georgia (2/3/10 - Current); Hong Kong Trade Dvelopment Council (4/20/09
> - Current); The Government of the Arab republic of egypt (4/1/09 - Current,
> previously 5/18/07- 6/30/07) PLM Group, LLC (9/27/07- 3/1/09); Podesta
> Associates, Inc (2/17/94- 2/10/95)
>
> Ben
>
>
> The Following Up and Recovering of the Libyan Looted and Disguised Funds
> of the Transitional Government of Libya, through Washington African
> Consulting Group, Inc (12/3/14 - Current); and Sharp & Barnes LLP for The
> Republic of Colombia Federacion Nacional de Departamentos (8/31/10 -
> Current); and Alcalde & Fay (10/21/94- 2/12/96)
what the fuck does "The Following Up and Recovering of the Libyan Looted and Disguised Funds of the Transitional Government of Libya," mean. Did Ghadaffi's inheritance fund Clinton?
> The Kurdistan regional Government (5/18/14 - Current), Government of the
> Republic of Cyprus (8/4/09 -10/31/11), Embassy of India, Embassy of the
> Republic of Peru, Government of the Republic of Cyprus (10/20/08-
> 10/31/11), (9/25/07- 10/31/11),
> (2/27/07- 10/31/11); and Breaux Lott Leadership Group for Government of
> Taiwan, Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (5/21/09-
> 5/11/10)
Oh look there's more, the Kurds are funding them too?
you sound like a betacuck fuckboi
It's literally nothing, they are talking about how to accept money from foreign agents within the law
Fuck off this is becoming a meme now
Foreign nationals cannot contribute to a presidential campaign. Hillary's campaign finance director was getting money from foreign donors
fec.gov
excerpt:
"Can non-US citizens contribute?
Foreign nationals are prohibited from making any contributions or expenditures in connection with any election in the U.S. Please note, however, that "green card" holders (i.e., individuals lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the U.S.) are not considered foreign nationals and, as a result, may contribute. For additional information, consult our "Foreign Nationals" brochure."
If one of those donors is not allowed to, she is screwed!
what the fuck did you just say about me??
FFUUUUUCK
Bumps
BUMP
No slide pls
> If we do it case by case, then it will be subjective. We would look at who
> the donor is and what foreign entity they are registered for. In judging
> whether to take the money, we would consider the relationship between that
> country and the United States, its relationship to the State Department
> during Hillary's time as Secretary, and its relationship, if any, to the
> Foundation. In judging the individual, we would look at their history of
> support for political candidates generally and Hillary's past campaigns
> specifically.
This links the Clinton Foundation to the State department to foreign powers and the Clinton presidency campaign.
This is the ESSENCE of PAY OT PLAY.
Otherwise, what does the Clinton Foundation have to do with Foreign donors? To a State department Hitlery has left for 2 years ago?
PAY TO PLAY
bump!!!