Republicans are shitty for the economy

Have a scientific analysis that proves it:
cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2015/10/AER_revision.pdf

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_GDP_per_capita
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3520939/#!po=58.4211
youtube.com/watch?v=y-Yszp3SmxE
youtube.com/watch?v=qw3S35wGgT8
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Trump isn't a Republican though, he's the first memocrat

He is the republican nominee, and his policies are similar to republican policies but even worse.

Btw let me add this:
Red states, in average, have worse GDP than blue states
Darker shade of blue = higher GDP
Lighter shade of blue = Lower GDP

source:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_GDP_per_capita

Note 1: This is GDP per capita so it has nothing to do with the size of the state
Note 2: Notice that out of the 11 states who have a GDP per capita worse than 35,000, 10 of them are red states.

>memocrat
Kek

Including jfk and previous Democrats in the same category as modern ones is a bit silly. They have undergone some significant changes.

>he doesn't even know what GDP is
Tell me, how is GDP calculated? :^)

A FUCKING STAR

Gross domestic product (GDP) is a monetary measure of the market value of all final goods and services produced in a period (quarterly or yearly)

Because the economy grows/shrinks the very second a president enacts a policy.

OY VEY

Are you implying bush jr. did something good for our economy?

What a cuck.

WHIP WELL JESUS

So tell me how it is calculated. :^)

What I'm saying is it takes years for a policy to have an effect , by which time the next president is already in.

Am I saying Bush did something good so Obama reaped the benefits ? Who knows ? What is TARP?

Democrats also do better in:

- Unemployment
- Stock Market values
- Less likely to have a recession

AND YES, democrats also do better GDP wise

>he doesn't even know how these things are calculated or what they represent
wew

Republicans fix things.
It takes time for things to improve.
Democrats elected.
Democrat inherits improvements
Democrats ruin things.
Bad policy takes time to show.
Republicans elected
Republicans inherit Democrat mess.
Repeat.

presidents control the economy

>throwing gibs at everyone
>improving the gdp

Cute graph that doesn't mirror reality.

>his policies

you don't even know what his policies are and how they'll be implemented until he gets into office

don't try and pretend there is any difference between Democratic party and Republican party at this point

we elect the candidate not the party

>States full of niggers have a worse economy

Wow, I'm super surprised by that. Africa is such a beacon of civilization after all

>undergone some significant changes.

democratic party is still the party of the KKK and race baiting, killing black people

Republican party is still the party of abolition

Newbie here:
Is Government expenses included in GDP?
What about debt/GDP ?

>Academic who's income comes from the government says the party who promises to reduce government spending is bad
Really activates my almonds, thanks Chaim.

And Democrats are demonizing fucks, whose heads really are stuck up their own ass.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3520939/#!po=58.4211
>tldr: Leftists exaggerate the Rights moral differences, while those on the Right can more accurately step in the shoes as Leftists

ITT:

Republicans refuse the acknowledge the truth because they are brainwashed by partisan politics.

Be objective for a second. its clear democrats are better for the economy

Even Keynseyian economists admit that cutting taxes + boosting spending is a quick fix that jumpstarts GDP

Unfortunately it also tears a hole in the deficit. Short term gain, long term pain.
It's usually the Republican's task to reign it in, which of course makes them look bad because the GDP shrinks off it's artificial high

For example, Jimmie Carter was a totally incompetent person, easily the worst president in living memory. To argue he was some kind of genius who was spectacular for the economy is a joke.

In general, wealth matches IQ levels. A socialist white country will be happier, wealthier, and have a higher standard of living than a capitalist black country (assuming they could even manage something as complex as capitalism).

It's just the way things are. There's a reason every single white country is wealthy, every single Hispanic country is a shithole, and every single black country is hell-on-Earth.

Being from Israel, this guy should understand this. His government only gives citizenship to people who can prove they have Jewish DNA, and injects blacks with sterilants in their vaccines (happened recently, a huge scandal). Jewish publications openly brag about the vast Jewish overrepresentation at the top levels of society. It's clear they are aware of how IQ levels correlate to economic/societal success.

This, right here.

Case in point: lower gas prices. Barack Obama sure as fuck didn't do anything to lower the price of oil. George Bush did. It was the Bush administration that approved all the new oil exploration. That takes many years to come online. Barry comes into office, the Bush approved oil starts flowing, prices drop and... Barry gets credit. Yet he did jack shit.

Predictable that a Keynesian retard spouts lies, tortures statistics, and appeals to authority instead of making reasoned arguments.

I'm starting to think this poster is part of some weird troll to make us really really hate Israel.

Some posters mentioned that our levels of Jew hate have gone down as our Trump support has gone up - maybe this is related to that.

Whatever the case you're making Jews look bad.

Maybe you're a fucking Arab.

The economy and the nation are two different things

(((the economy)))
oy vey

That is a good summarization, I know a thing or two about that myself considering Trudeau's economic plan is Keynesianism to the letter.

ITT:

Republicans refuse the acknowledge the truth because they are brainwashed by partisan politics.

How about you shut the fuck up and reply to my post you sniveling little rat faced homunculus:

Your post is just excuses and denial motivated by partisan politics.

It couldn't be clearer that democrats are better for the economy. the data shows a very obvious picture.

The sooner you realize you are in denial, the better

>Hurr Durr read my data

You don't understand what that data represents.

Philistine.

Want to know my politics? It's not partisan at all:

youtube.com/watch?v=y-Yszp3SmxE

The data shows Democrats are better for both the GDP and Unemployment rates.

So please, stop the excuses.

No, it shows a CORRELATION

That CORRELATION is created by PUBLIC POLICIES that have FURTHER IMPLICATIONS about the ECONOMY they're in control of at the time.

It's the mark of a linear/low IQ thinker to only comprehend correlation.

It is not enough to recognize patterns, you must also discover what produces them.

It's a correlation that happens literally every single time.

At this point, you should start to realize its causation.

>you should start to realize its causation.

People ITT have explained what is causing the phenomena you're seeing - and why it's not the wonderful and good thing that you think it is.

You choose to ignore it because, being ignorant, you do not understand explanations are like a child require an authority figure to condescend to you in order to feel secure in your judgement.

anyone notice where the OP shil is posting from?

explanations, are like*

TIL presidents micromanage the economy.

Idk, this is like the shit we were fed in 11th grade. Basic boilerplate liberal propaganda.

OP doesn't seem to have any sort of intellectual fortitude, I don't think he even understands how GDP is measured

Hey friend, tell me something.
How does this mesh with your steadfast belief in egalitarianism:

youtube.com/watch?v=qw3S35wGgT8

Since you are accusing others of intellectual dishonesty, let's see if you have any

>Republicans
>Sup Forums

Now tell us how terrible Bush was. That'll blow us the fuck out!

Did no one look at OP's (((flag)))?
Never trust a fucking Jew. God damn you people. Sage the fucking thread and put the Jew in the oven. We've got more important things to do than argue with some one born a natural con-man.

>Government spends money it doesn't have to create positions in part-time sewer painting
>See!!! Dems are better at job creation!!!
>Government activity such as spending money to build roads no where and houses no one lives in raises GDP
>See!!!! Dems are better at raising GDP!!! GDP's the only thing that matters
>I'm a kike with nigger-tier intelligence!!! Please rape my face!!!

>kike spreading disinfo

Correlation is not causation. Most GDP "growth" is just money printing.

watch the debt, maybe that explains something

GDP is an inaccurate measure of growth. Democrats have always been more wasteful with resources, requiring multiple layers of bureaucracy that contributes towards annual GDP but creates massive deficits and eventually debt as the result. Besides, he's barely a ''republican'' in a sense that he doesn't intend to waste trillions on overseas wars but only use a fiscal platform from the republicans (not even that, because he opposes open market to an extent)

Both parties are garbage, we just need an anarchic period for awhile in this country

nice flag. Inflation is made up concept made by and for you. Scientific studies are hugely biased. 0.05% of research articles are true, most can be p hacked. like this one

GDP goes up when you tax public sector employees then give them the same money back as wages. Then tax it again, rinse, repeat.

/thread.

GDP is commonly used to measure the well being of the economy. nice try but no

PRINTING MONEY AND DEBITS, RAISE PRISES, IT THE DEMOCRATS WAY

but one of them is a white nigger begging for money on the side of the road.

>protip: there's information to back up assertions about the equality of shitty

>Republican administrations enact policies that set the economy up for a boom down the line
>Democrats preside over that boom and fuck everything up in the meantime

or did you think the moment you signed a law or act it sent shockwaves throughout the macroeconomy

>Republicans are shitty for the economy

Well then it's a good thing that Trump is a conservative Democrat nationalist instead of a Republican.

GDP per capita is a better indicator of economic health than overall GDP. The US could import a billion immigrants and the GDP would rise.

GDP has gone up in the US but all other factors like income inequality have gotten worse.

yeah, you're right.

Republicans come in, burn everything down like a california fire, then want to take credit for the booming forest that's found fertile ground

protip: try not celibrate the fertile soil that comes from the bloody mutilation of people.

>Obama
>Comparable to Bush

sounds about right. Except this "analysis" doesn't reach any earlier than 1960. This eliminates absolutely AMAZING presidents like Theodore Roosevelt, who was republican.

TL;DR the data is skewed by limiting the data to about 16 presidents out of 43 total presidents of the United States.

Don't you love when academia decides to be biased?

Conservatives: "I don't care about facts, my party promised they are good for the economy, they can't be llyying am i right :'D"

Even kek is laughing at how naive you are

Most of them are basically battered wives. Democrats try to give them shelters to go, but they convince themselves that they deserve it.

bump