I think this might be why threads are 404ing.
Do not let this shit slide.
I think this might be why threads are 404ing.
Do not let this shit slide.
Other urls found in this thread:
washingtonpost.com
girlsportraiture.wordpress.com
periscope.tv
washingtonpost.com
archive.is
twitter.com
...
...
these are from a previous thread
That statue is of Dahmer victims. headless and contorted back like that.
a link to crap from one of the "artists"
girlsportraiture.wordpress.com
> "At political events, there's an inevitable awkwardness," former Clinton administration official Sally Katzen said at a Women's Campaign Fund dinner at the Podestas' home this summer. "The art is an ice-breaker. It puts people at ease."
>Not always. Folks attending a house tour in the Lake Barcroft neighborhood in Falls Church earlier this year got an eyeful when they walked into a bedroom at the Podesta residence hung with multiple color pictures by Katy Grannan, a photographer known for documentary-style pictures of naked teenagers in their parents' suburban homes.
IT'S
HAPPENING
I'm bumping this shit until the end of time
I mean for the most part I thought/think the "child sex ring" stuff is a bit of a stretch but here is actual evidence that P. has a taste for that sort of thing.
On the other hand, the story is about him being an important art collector, so it could just be a function of that.
Avish Khebrehzadeh made her art in the Podesta's house
What the fuck am I even reading anymore?
I think they are being deleted for turning too much into /x/ territory.
A video about the article:
periscope.tv
What is /x/ about owning child pornography and displaying it for everyone to see in your house? Mods need to get their shit together and read the article.
NO SLIDE YOU
checked the WaPo archive, you can buy the article for 3.99 or so, but it's not there to read anymore
Naked teenagers? Could the nutjobs be right?
Also, as damning as the language in the article sounds, technically "teenagers" could mean 18-19 year olds, so there is some wiggle room (until we know which images exactly were displayed).
this is the one you want to read:
washingtonpost.com
Post the naked teenagers and I'll be the judge of if it's "art".
holy fuck lewd confirmed pedo
same shit just scroll down
>inb404
Just checked the links out. The article pops up for a second then goes to page not found. They know we know! We need an archived link.
...
Thank you! It's on its way to 404 now. Just checked the original link
>washingtonpost.com
Woah, it shows up for a split second and then disappears.
So this dudes older brother collects fucked up art and shit, tries to purposely make people feel uncomfortable, associates and sets up private dinners with satanic rituals? What the fuck is going on?
After hearing about South Korea, are we learning about our own government cult conspiracy? This isn't even /x/, this is a fucking 12 year old article that just canonizes everything in the emails.
>washingtonpost.com
HOLY SHIT I JUST WENT TO THIS LINK AND IT'S 404ING NOW. IT POPPED UP FOR HALF A SECOND THEN 404'D.
check
archive.is
was there a bit ago
I read it, I'm just amazed it's completely legit.
It being deleted is even more suspicious and disturbing.
Seriously everybody, just use this fucking link:
I thought we didn't trust archive.is anymore.
Avish Khebrehzadeh - another Podesta favorite
yeah,as /x/ as i find this shit 99% of the time i think that is kind of weird
that article doesn't cover what we are talking about here. Nice try, though
Dude scroll the fuck down, Jesus Christ. It's there.
>Not always. Folks attending a house tour in the Lake Barcroft neighborhood in Falls Church earlier this year got an eyeful when they walked into a bedroom at the Podesta residence hung with multiple color pictures by Katy Grannan, a photographer known for documentary-style pictures of naked teenagers in their parents' suburban homes.
Bump. This can't be led to slid.
Bump for later