Tfw you literally can't work this out without common core

>tfw you literally can't work this out without common core

Trump is too stupid to understand CC, something they teach 1st graders, that is the only reason he wants to get rid of it.

65?

Oh and the answer is NOT 65.

what does common core have to do with this?


that's like saying "you literally can't figure this out without homeschool or catholic private"

it's a maths problem, the type of education has nothing to do with it.


source: common core graduate
i don't know the answer

How? Please kill me

63+(19-17)=65, whats the common core way?

x-19
>17 people get on, becomes
x-2
x-2=63
x=65

How is it not 65?

Intoxicated but I think there were 61 passengers before hopefully they're not niggers because they'd count for less

How isn't it 65?

X= 63 - 17 + 19

You didn't quantify "some" using CC.

>How many people were on the train to begin with?

1, the driver

>Whats the common core way?
Pull out a calculator

How is it not 65? 65-17+19=63.

wife is an elementary school teacher. Literally every teacher despises common core. Kids are best taught on an individual case by case basis predicated by their current level and every educator worth their salt knows this. Trying to teach algebra to someone who can't add is retarded.

82. What does CC have to do with reading comprehension?

51

Do the question backwards

65

Apparently you fucking retards can't read. Read it carefully mongs

Nigger what? how are you supposed to know that

ABOLISH THE WAGE SYSTEM

Scribble over the question and write a paragraph about your love of socialism, fags, trannys, feminists, and that you hate America.

no maintenance?
rly good question

Niggers in mississippi aren't just going to instictively know how to do mental math.
Have some symphathy

19

Fuck you emu, you're full of shit.

jk its 65 i was just pretending to be retarded

This is why we need to get rid of common core

Duh

Okay that is stupid

>Train to begin with

So we ignore the 17 people get on the train

and just add 63+19= 82

What's the point of the 17 tidbit if we're gonna ignore it? otherwise it would be 65 if we were to subtract

CC is a mistake

Clearly, there were zero people on the train 'to begin with'. Trains are not built and put into service with passengers already on board.

0, because the train started out with no passengers when it was made

Everyone replying seriously needs to go back to r/the_donald

63
+17
-19

thats not common core fuckhead

You're on the right track there hermanito

underrated post

T0 = some
T1= some - 19 + 17
63 = some - 19 + 17
63 +19 -17 = some
65 = some

x
x-19
(x-19)+17 = 63 + 17
x-2 = 80
x = 82

>all this nerd shit

Damn it, you stole my answer

underrated

>right track

heh

x(t=final) = x(t-initial) + delta(x)
xf = xi + (17-19) = 63

solve for xi:
xi = 65

if common core gives you a different answer, then you're wrong. And common core should be removed for teaching children invalid methods of mathematics.
source: my fucking minor is in math; get rekt you communist faggot

As a non-burger, what is common core?

82 is correct.

or our Sup Forums is just full of retards

0 because trains aren't made with people already on them you fucking retards checkmate commie core

Whats it like being a loser nerd virgin AND wrong?

see

It says theres 63 people after the 17 get on, so it is relevant.

>Tyrone smokes two blunts and a bowl before going to collect da gibs
>How many dollas be on dat EBT card, playa?
Show all work and reasoning.

>(x-19)+17 = 63 + 17

how did (x-19) get equal to 63?

show your work

Oh, so this problem takes place in Detroit?

Alright I guess the answer must be

0 = correct answer if "to begin with" means when the train was first commissioned
1 = correct answer if "to begin with" means at the start of the day when the only person inside is the conductor
82 = correct answer if "to begin with " means before 19 people got off

Found a picture of OP

also sage

what in the mother of fuck? where does the question state that the first stop is also the original amount of people in the train? the question can also be interpreted in that there was a given number of people on the train, before the 1st stop. in which case the answer would be 65.

x-19+17=63
x=65

Why would you EVER need to know this?

What about the operator?

0

x is some

x - 19 + 17 = 63

it is 65

82 to begin with.
19 get off; 63 on the train.
17 get on. Now there are 80??

How the fuck is 82 the right answer.. if you work ahead it doesn't make sense.

Let me fix your grammar for you.


Trump is too stupid to understand Common Core. This is something they teach first graders. Because Trump cannot understand Common Core, he wants to get rid of it.
If you can't articulate a thought well enough to properly insult one then don't say anything at all.

Good one Durel
Pic related, Durel don't do math, math is nerd shit

It's 82, mate. Did you argue with the teachers at school?

he is counted in the 63 unless he got off after the first stop.

try going backwards you dingus. or just pretend 1 person got off, and no people got on.

surely it's not the arithmetic people are failing at, it's the algebra.

Common core is trash tier, everyone who propagates this shit is a cunt.

3/5ths

Per CC, they are 15% of pop.

The answer is undefined faggots

Preps us for having to convert imperial units to metric.

We literally speak two languages familam, get on our level.

Why do Americans have to learn doublethink mathematics? I'm awaiting the CC question that claims 2+2 has always equaled 5.

dunno, how's it feel to be championing an incorrect answer?

he set x-19 = 63, but that's incorrect. The question states that there are NOW (as in AFTER the change) 63 people, not that there were 63 people AND THEN 17 got on.

>I think I know math
>I'm going to make fun of muh muricans
>championing an incorrect answer
>calling americans stupid for pointing it out

explains why New Zealand never went to space, you fucking retard

English is not even my second language, burgerclaps, so thank you for CORRECTING THE RECORD.

>tfw tagalog then cantonese then english

63+17-19
80-19=61

65

x number of people on the train
- 19 got off the train
+ 17 got on ( net of -2 from X)

there are now 63 people on the train...
x -2 = 63
x (-2 +2) = 63 +2 (got to balance both sides!)

X=65

X = some amount of people on train "to begin with"
19 leave
17 join
63 = amount of people on the train "now"

X - 19 + 17 = 63

I realize we are living in a bizarro world, but how the fuck do you come up with 82 as the answer

Wrong.

They there are 63 people on the train after both the 19 people get off and the 17 board it.

Hence the correct equation reads

x - 19 + 17 = 63

The question is ambiguous as your answer takes for granted that the question could be completely reasonably thought of in a totally separate way. you assume that once 19 leave and 17 get on that there are now 63 people. that can mean x - 19 + 17 = 63. What in the fuck are you on?

Did you not? Teachers aren't worth shit lol

oh fuck, you're not new zealand, you're australian

fuck, I'm sorry, you genuinely are mentally handicapped...

isn't it 61 or am i dumb? 19-17=2 63-2=61

65

Every answer is undefined until you calculate it.

Do you never question authority? If a teacher was saying something that I was sceptical of then I'd question that.

Operators are not in the shell of the train as it is being built in the train yard.

Operators are out in the bush killing terrorists.

fucking ez work backwards

63 - 17 + 19 = 65

32?

Wow, do you also question your boss at work? great subordination guys, aces

Fuck you.

>2+2 has always equaled 5.
That'll be the day. I'm thinking 2049 (100 yrs after 1984)

You probably won't believe me, but I have actually had a teacher tell me that > means less than.

0?

>Having a boss

lol cuck

Have I had too many beers to recognize troll threads?

I'm on a train with 63 faggots. We make a stop and 19 get off so now there's 44. We stop again and
17 assholes get on the train making 61 faggots.

haha, very submissive and servile of you, wagecuck!

Don't ever question your authority!

Im not sure yet. Maybe if you the exact same thing just one more time youll get an answer

I also think that is the answer but I'm so confused with everyone saying 65?

Only correct answer

/thread

The answer is 65 passengers to begin with, you plebs