Les Sisters

I'm still not sure if this show will ever come to the United States, but more episodes are airing in France and Italy. Disney picked it up in Europe, but it's without a home stateside. This episode is about hypnosis.

youtube.com/watch?v=e0hI5ZltIpo

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=F4MlLVZVtPg
youtube.com/watch?v=PQp1Q7aekbE
youtube.com/watch?v=rRWEHXcAW_c
archive.whatisthisimnotgoodwithcomputers.com/int/thread/70849261/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Of course, it's in French and not English.

Few other new episodes as well.

youtube.com/watch?v=F4MlLVZVtPg

youtube.com/watch?v=PQp1Q7aekbE

...

This cartoon is certainly very French.

youtube.com/watch?v=rRWEHXcAW_c

The closest it will ever get to coming to the States is if it starts airing in Quebec.

If they aired it on CN or Nick, they'd just censor all the good parts anyway.

I've seen girls exactly like them on public transport once, except, there were two of the younger ones, twins. I wondered if they read the comic, as it is published in my country.

Eh, artstyle lacks that certain something that made me fall in love with the comic. It just looks flat, for lack of a better word. Especially Marine and dinosaur dentist girl looks off.

>artstyle lacks that certain something that made me fall in love with the comic
They didn't show them topless like in the comics. I get it.

Jesus Christ, I'm gonna have to file rape charges against myself if I ever decide to marathon this.

>round nails

Why is there ALWAYS something to mess it up?

pity(You)/10, work on your baitskills.

In the extremely unlikely event that you aren't just shitposting, compare the art in pic related with the webms. The webms just look flat.

...On a serious note...

This is very nearly sexualizing little girls. Should we? Even here? There's this whole thing going on right now and I think this is sort of how it starts...

Neogaf refugee spotted. Fuck off, we don't want your kind here.

>Neogaf

I don't know what that is.

And who is 'we'? People who want to freely sexualize children?

Actually they're based on the creator's daughters and even though the older one is supposed to be 13, he still intentionally made her flat as a 5 year old.

this whole post pisses me off

Welcome to Sup Forums. Enjoy your stay.

I didn't mean the comic, I meant our reaction to it. Some people are so, let's say 'normal' that they can depict children in bathing suits without it occurring to them.

Which aspect, user?

I know, I know. "Remember where you are". But is that really a good idea? Creating a safe space for stuff like that?

Only sluts have flat nails.

I meant as seen from the top. They look like stickers. Bah.

>And who is 'we'?
People who think your pearl-clutching alarmism is embarrassing.

>Creating a safe space for stuff like that?
God, take it to Tumblr, you bag of shit.

I think those people mistakenly believe everybody's freedom of action is as ironclad as theirs.
As for pearls: pearls start out as tiny irritants, but grow into huge Crystal Gems which habitually endanger the lives of children...

I don't get that 'Tumblr' thing. Tumblr is full of porn, sexism and racism so obscene even this site wouldn't host it.

"we" as in, people who can tell the difference between real life and drawings.

>There's this whole thing going on right now
What thing? Spacey and that producer guy? You think they got into that by watching cartoons with kids in swimsuits?

This show seems like something Chris Savino would produce.

It's only you frustrated Americans that think of this as sexual.

Are you trying to say that the French, who are notorious for their sexual content in cartoons did not add this clearly fetish hypnosis scene on purpose...?

meant for

>Tumblr is full of porn, sexism and racism so obscene even this site wouldn't host it.

How fucking new are you? Take a stroll around the boards newfag.

Where can I read this comic?

Not really, it's your own fetish radar. Hypnosis has been used for comedy for decades.

As opposed to mildly French, or some other nationality?

>hypnosis
Is there any ballbusting.

>French cartoons
love 'em

The amount of detail on her butt and general crotch area seems unnecessary.

It this kind of faggotry that keeps me from coming to Sup Forums more often, I don't find it in other media-related boards.

So is there any /ll/?

Why they are always barefoot? Is this made by french Tarantino?

Perversion aside, I like that level of detail. It's rare to see in American cartoons. You know, like how they draw girls without belly buttons so they wouldn't be "too sexual" or something.

So ... is this show about lesbian incest?

Picked up

I hate the French.
This is pure degeneracy.
I wish the French would collectively just crawl so deep up their own asses that they suffocate in there.
Absolutely disgusting.

@96536081
(Toi)

I assumed this was degenerate, but I looked it up and it's just you guys who are degenerate...

Well, not here, sexual Les Sisters should go on /ls/. You support /ls/, right?

Why do you guys gotta turn the one halfway decent thing the French have ever made into degeneracy? Isn't there enough of that from France already?

I'd believe you user if there were studies that proved sexualizing fictional characters correlates to sexualizing actual children. As of now, it holds the same amount of validity as saying violent video games make people actually violent.

Remember that they censored their nipples in the translated Les Sisters comic collections.

>the dude's stare at the end

Just to make clear, not that user, I'm the guy who overreacted just a few minutes ago (), I have 0 problem with sexualization of children on Sup Forums, I just thought that these edits were real (which in itself is pretty telling about the French, desu). I'm not at all shaming you, I'm a total lolicon, too, but perhaps people like just don't want this kind of stuff to go out to the public and are afraid for the moral fiber of society (quite rightfully so).
On Sup Forums tho, fuck, go hog wild. I encourage that. :)

>I'm a total lolicon, too, but perhaps people like just don't want this kind of stuff to go out to the public and are afraid for the moral fiber of society (quite rightfully so)

That's exactly what happened to Chris Savino. Nickelodeon knew that this man was too dangerous and had to be stopped from normalizing lolicon at all costs, so they invented a fake sexual harassment claim on him. :^)

The show's artists obviously don't cut corners. That should be a good thing.

I don't know about that. Seems more like a Nick Robinson sorta thing, where leftists are so cucked that they wanna go back to the Victorian era of men needing permission to talk to women.

>this thread
PEDO ALERT

How was he normalizing lolicon? The only girl he ever showed naked was the damned baby.

I'm sorry I overreacted. I know it's tough to deal with shit like that. Sup Forums should be the last place where I cry out retarded anti-pedophilia zealotry.

Why everybody is upset it is cartoon characters not real girls

Inching closer every episode.

god damnit, every time I make up my mind that this shit adaptation isnt worth watching, they do something like this to pull me back in

>This is very nearly sexualizing little girls
t. mahmoud abdullah bin laden

Because the normalization argument is very important.
Normalization is very much a thing.
Look at the western world now vs 20 years ago. There was a normalization of gays first, then trans people, now we have shit on tv where 10 year old boys walk around wearing ball gags.
You're not a puritan to recognize shit like this and how it can be harmful, so I'm personally very much against degeneracy on public display.
Sup Forums is for degenerates in the first place, tho, so it's fine by me to sexualize kids here.

>pearl-clutching moral crusader Sup Forums faggots shit up yet another thread

Why don't mods do their job?

There really wasn't much to see anyways.

censor improved it

Bonjour, monsieur Américain.

>Remember that they censored their nipples in the translated Les Sisters comic collections.

...

Is this how burkas happened?

archive.whatisthisimnotgoodwithcomputers.com/int/thread/70849261/

Ah, this troll. We meet again...

That's a weird haiku

>she dyed her hair
Actually she looks better than way.

Don't burkas only start being required at like 13?

I remember an argument here once that amounted to
>acknowledging the "Slippery Slope" is stupid because it doesn't exist
or something but there's clear proof of it in normalizing degeneracy looking at the past century.
Hell, you could even point to racemixing or children following love instead of parental forced marriages depending on where you want to start and "what measure is degenerate".
Those last two examples are ridiculous by our standards but it doesn't change the fact that it's happening and people are caring less and less about it.
It probably has something to do with religion and tradition or something.

Lets stop having a real conversation and go back to posting french girls feet

Is that all you care about?

No idea. But maybe we could do the opposite! To protect little girls from the roaming pervert hordes, burkas will be mandatory until 13. Or 15, just to be safe.

...

any incest?

all this talk about not existing child getting baited
about morals and ethics

fucking normies

I'm not kidding, user.

I can, but I can still utter my worries about it...

No, but I think people might be a little more sensitive about sexual mores right now.

I can accept that.

Seriously? It was just about the show? Tsk. See That's how it starts.

...
>Muslims
>Having trouble with sexualizing little girls

...

>Extra details are unnecessary
This is why Cartoons are dying.

>Sup Forums
Really now.
Kneejerk accusations aside, it's a stupidly obvious (You)farmer. Honestly, I'd be surprised if a good 3rd of the convo isn't him samefagging, hoping others are dumb enough to join in.

Monsieus Pays-Bas, actually.

...Gggghhhh. The other end of the spectrum.

That because the comics are actual drawings by an artist and not just computerized paper dolls being puppeted around

dutchfag?

also normalizing girls is what we should do instead of holding them in such a high regard that its taboo

Agreed, but depicting underage girls in provocative poses... where is the line?

I like this, btw. I do. But that doesn't mean it's OK. I like lots of things which are not OK at all.

>where is the line
It's fictional. Why should there be a line?
Disliking something is not a valid reason for censorship.

The blonde guy is cute.

>Les Sisters
>They don't les each other out

What's the point?

1: its fictional
2: last i checked girls will be girls so doesnt matter what they wear / act, depending on the person looking at them they will sexualize them, not the way other way around
3: have you ever gone outside? girls at the beach / pool will always be a a mine field because there's barely anything covering their meat slabs, unless you live in the desert with the rest of the actual child fuckers

>no blonde french loli to hypnotize and dominate me
life is pain

>this entire post
I don't think it could be more obvious that you come directly from tumblr.
You have to go back.

>This is very nearly sexualizing little girls
oh no, heaven forbid anyone thinks about fictional characters in a naughty way!

please leave, Neofag

so are you saying that isn't Sup Forums?

You're far more Tumblr here. They're really assblasted by things like pedophilia and incest but thinks trannies are great.