If most of the Western world converted (as in actually attended church...

If most of the Western world converted (as in actually attended church, not just larping) to a single denomination of Christianity, which one would be the best? Has to actually have churches

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CKKvdQPsMz8
youtube.com/watch?v=Z7nizgcVjUk
fatimamovement.com/images/eBooks/PlotAgainstTheChurchPinay.pdf
archive.org/details/AnOpenLetterToConfusedCatholics
twitter.com/HoneyBeeAlaina
instagram.com/polarbong/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Calvinist for the West

Orthodox for the East

>left

PCUSA is pro gay marriage tho

needs to get BLACCED

left is cute as fuck. 7/10
Would have passionate sex with and snuggle afterwards with.

what dis girls name again

Orthodox
>tfw my priest spent an hour talking to me about how shitty Judean are today

She looks better without makeup.

None. Christianity is literally the religion of cuckoldry. Your refugee-loving Jesus caused all this.

Procreate/10

meant for

She looks cute without the makeup and shit

Alaina Fox, pornstar

ill take left

middle is the best

Looks better on left imo

Catholic

Orthodoxy is the superior form of Christianity and is the only form of Christianity that will exist in 100 years unless things start to change.

youtube.com/watch?v=CKKvdQPsMz8

for sure, yeah

i love how everyone here is a women hater at the same time you post nothing but hot girls here. even people from other races its always a hot white chick

Traditional Roman Catholicism

Just give this a listen. Nothing else comes close.

youtube.com/watch?v=Z7nizgcVjUk

Catholic

My bros

>left

Girls without makeup are the best.

None. Christianity is a cancer

You or the bull stud she brings home?

Is Traditional Roman Catholicism not the same religion as Roman Catholicism?

Quakers.

why does this white man have a black cock?

Is this Japanese porn?

girls that look good**

If you watch too much IR porn your cock turns black. This is a warning to all you closet BBC loving self-loathing "racists".

the one on the left is cuter though. Fuck makeup, more women need to go natural

pre Vatican II

latin mass > *

True. However, I always like girls without makeup even if they are 5/10.

V-II is an Ecumenical Council though

>Calvinist for the West
you don't even understand what you're talking about. Calvinists are evil personification.

I know, lets judge if you're one of gods chosen by how rich you are! that's right, only when good things happen to someone would you have gods favor. while bad things mean you're sinning. Furthermore per the Calvinists, everything is predestined, meaning you're never responsible for your actions.

the worst possible christian denomination ever.

turkzilla

It's older. For me personally I'd only go along if it was Catholicism post-wars of religion but pre-french rev.

the episcopal church, think catholic church but with women priests and gay bishops

i dont get why you qq over makeup
as a guy i dye my hair, wear foundation etc ( bb cream from south korea ) , wear expensive cologne, have been working out over ten years

every1 is fake

Isn't Orthodoxy just really old fashioned Catholicism?

Did you even read this thread?

How is that a good thing?

Yes, but that's like... really fucking old though. Orthodoxy-Catholic schism happened even before the middle ages.

Left is cutest desu

Im gay, but i still see beauty in women and id take the left 10 times out of 10

Listen to the link I created.

They are "in communion," meaning they tolerate one another as part of the same Holy, catholic, and Apostolic Church.

However Traditional Catholics basically reject Vatican II and celebrate in the Traditional Latin Mass (not the novus ordo mass). It is the mass that the Church celebrated originally, that developed naturally over the centuries. It emphasizes the Sacrifice as the primary purpose of the mass (as opposed to a homily or music or other ancillary things). It is celebrated in Latin, so that every mass, everywhere, is identical in form.

There are actually many differences. You should read "An Open Letter to Confused Catholics" by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. It will help you to better understand Christianity itself as well as why Catholics do what they do (Traditional Catholics).

Also, twelve cardinals revolted against Vatican II and attempted to prevent it, and in doing so wrote a book title "The Plot Against the Church" under the pseudonym "Maurice Pinay." Unfortunately they failed to circulate it in time to prevent Vatican II. It is a very, very based, well researched book: fatimamovement.com/images/eBooks/PlotAgainstTheChurchPinay.pdf

Left: Adorable innocent new born baby :3
Right: Degenerate whore

picture is more interesting than thread topic
op broke the rule

none cause there all full of shit and are just there to take your money and fill your head with propaganda

And none of that makes you anymore attractive, unless maybe to some redlight fag queens on a saturday night

Kek. True.

>she

Forgot link to Archbishop Lefebvre's open letter:

archive.org/details/AnOpenLetterToConfusedCatholics

11th Century. Middle Ages are generally marked as beginning at a few hundred years before that.

They're not very traditional if they reject an Ecumenical Council that the Pope and more than 90% of bishops supported.

left wins, bro.

I think this is her:
twitter.com/HoneyBeeAlaina
instagram.com/polarbong/

She looks innocent and moddest in OP's photo but like all internet camwhore's, she's a degenerate slut.

Traditionalist Catholicism

Fuck off, mormon.

I'm not a Mormon

Traditional Anglicanism in the Anglo-sphere, then everyone else should either be Catholic, Orthodox, or have their own Protestant national church. The separation of church and state was a mistake.

Germanics should be Protestant

Latins should be Catholic

Slavs should be Orthodox

baka desu senpai

CoE is still state managed

What a faggot you are.

no

the religion practiced by followers of the Second Vatican Council is significantly different from pre-1965 Catholicism

Ah shit. I swear I thought it happened in the 900s. Whatever I'm not keeping track lol.

Wrong, friend.

Vatican II was non-dogmatic in nature. It defined no new dogma. Pope Paul VI said as much himself. The pastoral changes that it ministered are expressly optional with respect to those items that Traditional Catholics deem retrogressive.

Hence why the two remain in communion. If it weren't this way, Traditional Catholics would be excommunicated. They are not.

But V-II was supported by the Pope and almost all the bishops, and declared an Ecumenical Council. How can you be a traditional Catholic if you reject what they say?

>the Pope

Angelo Roncalli was never the pope.

Doesn't have to be dogmatic, it can just be canonical. Refusing the accept canons supported by the Pope is grounds for excommunication in Catholic. For instance, when the Pope forbade the laity from partaking of the wine in the Middle Ages, it said priests and bishops who refused to comply were to be excommunicated. That's probably not dogmatic, but it still is backed by the Pope's authority.

Sedememers are just Larpers.
Novus Ordo is just fine.

You could say that about any Pope you disagreed with.

Islam

t. КГБ

No, you can't. Angelo Roncalli wasn't the pope because his beliefs are different from Catholic dogma and he's therefore a heretic. Anyone who's a heretic can't be Catholic, and obviously can't be the head of a Church they don't belong to.

I'm agnostic but this is plainly obvious shit.

Roman Catholicism started doing whatever it pleases millenia ago, just go with it. If you disagree with RCC innovations, check out the One Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church - the Orthodox Church - since they are the first Church, pre-denominational.

>Angelo Roncalli wasn't the pope because his beliefs are different from Catholic dogma and he's therefore a heretic
So Honorius I wasn't the Pope?

so naive lal

this

>it said priests and bishops...were to be excommunicated

Notice how Traditional Catholicism is not excommunicated? They are in communion, expressly. This has been affirmed, so there is no use debating it.

Traditional Catholics are free to reject the pastoral changes in Vatican II. Period. Vatican II consisted of no new dogma. It did consist of very corrosive pastoral changes to the vast majority of the Church body. But all such changes, being free of new dogma, are reversible.

post pics and redpill me

Mormon.

>calvinist

Does this meme even exist anymore? Or even taken seriously if it still is?

My point is that rejecting the decrees of the Pope and the majority of bishops, even is such decrees are not dogmatic, goes completely against Catholic tradition.

Pentecostal

Not Christian

Non denominational christianity is the best.

Presbyterians.

>St. Antoninus (1459): "In the case in which the pope would become a heretic, he would find himself, by that fact alone
and without any other sentence, separated
from the Church. A head separated from a body cannot, as long as it remains separated, be head of the same body from which it was cut off. A pope who would be separated from the Church by heresy, therefore, would by that very fact itself cease to be head of the Church. He could not be a heretic and remain pope, because, since he is outside of the Church, he cannot possess the keys of the Church."

five seconds on google

I've been to non-denom churches, they tend to think there is nothing wrong with fornication

The Pope decreed that Traditional Catholics are free to practice what essentially amounts to pre-Vatican II Catholicism.

This was his decree. Numerous bishops agree with the decision.

But he didn't declare that ex cathedra. Furthermore, if you use this to mean "any decree I don't like," you can invalidate any Pope.

"Immaculate Conception? There's heresy, so that's an invalid declaration by the Pope."

And this very permissibly reflects the changes of Vatican II.

>Giving a shit about any of the inane rules in the old testament
You realize Jesus dying on the cross invalidated those right? Christianity is about being good to your neighbor, turning the other cheek, and living through him. Old testemant is liter𝘢lly jew tier.

Fornication is prohibited in the NT

You tell me
Prominent members of the SSPX, including Lefebvre(Pope like figure) himself, have, at various times, expressed approval or support for a restoration of an absolutist French monarchy; the Vichy government (1940–1944); and the party of Jean-Marie le Pen.

On the basis of statements made by Bishop Williamson, (((the Anti-Defamation League))) has accused the Society of being "mired in anti-Semitism".

It was in an SSPX priory, where he had been granted asylum as "an act of charity to a homeless man", that French Nazi collaborator and war criminal Paul Touvier was arrested. On his death, in 1996, a priest of the society publicly offered Requiem Mass for him.
On 16 October 2013, the Society offered to perform a funeral for Nazi war-criminal Erich Priebke, but the ceremony did not take place due to protests by some 500 people outside the Society's Italian district house in Albano, near Rome. The local authorities of the ((("""Catholic Church"""))) had refused him a public funeral, citing a rule of canon law that, unless they gave some signs of repentance before death, a public funeral must be refused to manifest sinners to whom it cannot be granted without public scandal of the faithful. The society issued a statement on its website saying, "A Christian who was baptized and received the sacraments of confession and the Eucharist, no matter what his faults and sins were, to the extent that he dies reconciled with God and the church, has a right to the celebration of the holy Mass and a funeral.

Cool bro, lets go to church so we can watch people preach in a language we can't understand, not like we were going to understand the message anyway.

catholicism because it's worldwide

>Furthermore, if you use this to mean "any decree I don't like," you can invalidate any Pope.

I'm not doing that. I'm just telling you the rules of your own fucking church which clearly state that Angelo Roncalli couldn't possibly have been the pope.

>But he didn't declare that ex cathedra.

It was declared ex cathedra by Leo XIII and many others.

>Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9), June 29, 1896: “The practice of the Church has always b
een the same, as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the Fathers, who were wont to hold as outside Catholic communion,and alien to the Church, whoever would recede in the least degree from any point of doctrine proposed by her authoritative Magisterium.”