Basically the entire country is painted red

>basically the entire country is painted red
>Trump still loses
what the fuck kind of rigged system is this? how is this allowed?

Other urls found in this thread:

law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/electoralworks.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=uTCkGvTGssU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>what is population density

>(((Israel)))
looking for unbiased answers, thanks

Probably since half of them are flyover states.

>What is beaner and liberal population massing

>what is population density

It is more about the population. Good old times when each state only got one electoral vote.

Nuke California desu

>Australia
looking for unbiased answers, thanks

looking for nonshitpost answers, thanks

just trying to help

>16 states can win the election
>instead of a popular vote

Fucking jews

Only the major cities. Rural Cali is just like the rest of the US.

>what is population density

you can help my finding the nearest oven and kindly entering it, thanks

LMAO DRUMFPF BLOWN THE FUCK OUT

>>what is population density

we accept non-shitpost answers only, thanks

>what is population density

I DONT UNDERSTAND THIS FUCKING RETARDED SYSTEM ? WHATS WRONG WITH : EACH VOTE COUNTS AS ONE?

but that doesn't make sense. somehow people in the middle states count for less just because "fuck you"
when did the dems set this racket up?

Thank you merchant you are our greatest ally. The only democracy left in the middle east.

those middle states are just an artificial abstraction they dont actually exist in physical reality. The second you set foot out of Illinois you are in California

looking for answers not loyal to the crown, thanks

so much for goy gratitude
we even arranged a surgical "islamic" shooting of gay hispanics in the middle of a critical toss up state
it's your own fucking fault you people are too cucked to actually do anything with it

>What is population density

You did good Goldstein.

I hope putin nukes california first

fucking liberal shithole and illegal immigrant capital of the world

choke on a dick, all of you.

>you painted almost all states, but cause population density you lose

What a shit system.

Because then smaller states would be cucked by the bigger ones. Electoral votes is the only thing that gives them any relevancy.

It's a shit system, but that's the logic.

almost 40 million living in CA

honestly, with such a lopsided population density it would make more sense to split the country into smaller parts. otherwise you always end up with two or three states dictating what the rest has to do

looking for answers not drowned in rice, thanks

>again, population density

American education hard at work in this thread

some states have more people in them than others, genius

>What is population density
Seriously, this is it. If VT and CA switched populations (which would be hilarious) VT would have 55 votes and CA would have 3. Hell, the city of Houston has more people in it than a few of these states combined.

>not loyal to the crown
Go to hell, traitor colony.

The Electoral College remains in place over two centuries after the framers of the Constitution empowered it to select presidents. Though occasionally maligned, this system of electing a chief executive has been incredibly successful for the American people.

Many modern voters might be surprised to learn that when they step into a ballot box to select their candidate for president, they actually are casting a vote for fellow Americans called electors. These electors, appointed by the states, are pledged to support the presidential candidate the voters have supported.

You can help by giving us your wall designs for free

California has a population of 30 million while Montana just has 900.000. It is somewhat in relation to the population in each state.

so (((conveniently))) the places that count for more also always happen to go democratic. hmm, really makes you think

>it would make more sense to split the country into smaller parts

that's what states are retard

california has a fuckload of illegals

still think your idea is good?

Ohio and Texas are the only states red there that have any meaningful population.

Every damn election Sup Forums goes through the same retards come out decrying the college but its right. It gives states a number of votes based on population. It does it on purpose so that smaller states have a bigger say. You should be happy, without the college it would be a Hillary blowout even moreso. For instance, in 2008, McCain lost by nearly 10 Million People. Romney lost by 6 Million, afaik, and this year it will be similar.

tl;dr the college works fine you are just mad because your candidate doesn't do well in states where people can actually talk with other people

Sorry, OP, but the kike called it correctly.

Courtesy of the electoral college, which is one of the few areas of sovereignty left to the states,
the people don't directly elect the president. The states elect the president through the electoral college.
Each state is given a predetermined number of votes roughly based on population.

law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/electoralworks.htm

terrible system, instant runoff is so much better

What are the best state maps to compare live and polling?

don't make me come over there and dump all your tea into the ocean again to prove a point

>an aussie giving an informative post
what time line is this?

Think he meant to separate the state of CA into more states. Hell, NOCAL and SOCAL, just like NC and SC. Cali on its own is very deciding and owns just under 1/5 of the votes needed

Lol this. You're protesting against the system set up by those founding fathers whose dicks you dumb cunts all revere and seem to want to suck off 50 at a time.

Stupid fucking Americans

yep.

Worth noting that this system cuts both ways. Because most states choose winner take all, and electoral votes are distributed based on total population, this means that states with significant liberal cities drag rural voters into their total EV count, e.g. California. But it also means that states with liberal cities that don't outnumber the conservative rural voters have THAT population dragged into the EV count, e.g. Texas.

It's a shit program that only kinda works if you imagine the US as a federation of friendly nations instead of a single American nation. Since it isn't, it basically just means that fewer people's votes actually matter, and a ton of people have no say whatsoever in the government.

>what is Mexican density

well you fucking arent. kike.

New Hampshire is Red now, friendo. ME's district is trump but the state is HRC.

Don't make me get your brother to burn down your white house again.

FLORIDA
WILL
GO
RED

Break it down to the county map and it's even more upsetting. All the blue comes from tiny, densely populated, islands(cities), within an ocean of rural red. It's the uppity rich elite who pay for overly expensive high rise apartments dictating the lives of the rural working Joe who's entire livelihood is tide to the local factory, saw mill, small business, or farm.

If something like that map happened, and was shown live on TV, I think you'd have mass riots and civil war.

What stops the entire red section from leaving the US as separate countries again?

inb4 THIS HAPPENS and TRUMP WINS POPULAR VOTE

Why is California allowed to have more votes than the total of half the country combined

>if you take up more space you should get more votes
Is this why America is so fat?

a good jew is a ovenjew

What the fuck
Why california has so many votes? Does the 1/3 of USA population live there or something?

shut up you antiquated sheep insemination pipette

does it makes it possible to lose even with more than 50 % of the votes ?

Thank you greatest ally

the fact that they have fuck all for population

thats the point

>What the fuck kind of rigged system is this?

It's this thing called "majority rules". It's a part of democracy.

You see, the more people in a state, the higher the electoral college votes that state has. Most people in the USA are concentrated into a handful of regions, many of which happen to swing Blue. The two main exceptions to this rule are Texas and Florida, which are typically Red.

Therefore, the more electoral college votes a candidate accrues, the more people support them. If they get 270, they officially hit the minimum majority necessary to guarantee a victory. So if Trump loses, it's because not enough people support him.

No, retard. Everyone counts as one vote. High-pop areas like California, Texas and New York just have more people, therefore more votes. You can twist it around all you like, but it all comes down to this: the election is a popularity contest and Trump just isn't as popular as Hillary. The end.

>so (((conveniently))) the places that count for more also always happen to go democratic. hmm, really makes you think

Texas and Florida defy this conspiracy bullshit you posit. Also, it's amazing to me how you can't just face the idea that maybe, just maybe, GOP isn't as popular as Dems. Nope, instead you're doing Olympic-tier mental gymnastics to concoct all these conspiracy theories to salvage your precious ego.

Yeah, it's the most populous state in the USA, by a metric shit ton.

Jewish Press is pro-Trump. Jews outside media aimed at other jews are anti-Trump. Not hard to figure out, goyim.

This is why we need to abolish the EC and also FPTP. The EC is demographically fucking conservatives while the GOP and DNC team up to prevent anything besides batshit crazy and middling politicians from getting mainstream. All it would take is a single election with a Dole, Nader, Bernie or maybe even Trump character in the third party slot and a preferential ballot to really displace the set in parties.

The constitution, US military, and the massive majority of people there that will never want to secede.

>implying that was Canada
All involved were British Soldiers
FACT

>using (((.))) to separate zeros
Sausage, just why?

alright but most of those are minorities and illegals the dems baited in with free welfare, housing, food, phones, internet, etc.
so how is this fair at all? what happened to checks and balances

About 1/10th, so they receive about 1/10th the electoral votes

texas should be 55 like CA

Can almost promise you that if they redistributed votes, CA would have more given than the 55 they have now. It's a lot of land with a lot of people in it, that's the only reason why they get ~1/5 the nation's entire vote. The state should honestly get cut in half.

Texas is very much the same except most of the west is practically uninhabited

If it were based purely on population, California would actually have ~65 electoral votes.

...

>11.5 million illegal immigrants

Jesus fucking christ

Why? Texas has 26 million people while California has 39 million people. The electoral college votes each state is entitled to is proportionate to that state's population.

California was really fortunate with it's boarders.

They really should let Jefferson become a state.

>pic related
When will you realize that you guys were just the terrorists of the 19th century? Like seriously, that war was like our Desert Storm.

Fighting primitives over shit that we didn't really want anyway.

about 15% of total US population
they don't even get 11% of the electors though

yes

Al Gore won more votes in 2000, but Bush won the electoral college

Hello from Russia, yankees

our economy is larger

Yup, we're big down here and could be much more dense population-wise if we were to develop more into west Texas but there really is no point in doing that when all the commerce is on the Gulf.

Yes, although it's unlikely. It is technically possible to win, in a two-candidate race, with about %20 of the total national popular vote, if you win %50+1 in all of the states where votes have the highest Vote:EV ratio, and screw the rest. You can go even lower with third party candidates fucking things up and making sure you get a plurality in those states, even if you don't actually win them.

You can win a majority, even a wide majority, and lose the EC in theory (although it is highly unlikely of course). You can win a plurality and lose the EC (which has happened multiple times in only around 50 elections, a ridiculously high error rate). It's not a good system for representing the will of the people, which wasn't its intention, and not actually a good system for representing the will of the states either.

>THE DEMOCRATS DID IT
kek, typical trump voter everyone

most states are winner take all, so if you win barely enough states with 50.1% of the vote, and the other guy wins all the rest with 100% of those votes, you could become president with way way less than 50% of the total vote.

Official thread theme:
youtube.com/watch?v=uTCkGvTGssU

It's just a fucking wall. Literally just build a wall.

Left map makes the nigger infested shitholes in the south visible

>dat blue along the Mississippi

Are illegals allowed to vote?

You guys started it with the sanctions and Naval naval impressment.

ah so that was the deal back then
nice democracy they have

it was made illegal after the civil war, state sovereignty and the federal government has been centralizing power since.
considering how even it points are, if the red area seceded they'd have equal man power to the blue area but considering that most of the military comes from red states the red area would probably have more military power or at least a more militaristic culture

To keep things clear and I have a problem counting a number following itself multiple times like 14888888888

(((Economy)))

Electoral college votes aren't based on economy, they're based on population.

I meant to put one more naval in there, damn only two made it in.

If they have to follow the same rules in terms of registration before a set date, then technically no if they aren't registered, which they shouldn't be able to without proof of citizenship.

Both NorCal and SoCal would be democrat, what you're looking for is west cal vs east cal