This will get Trump into the White House. I guarantee it.
Easton Flores
Over 75% of all the people at the stations were Hillary supporters.
What the FUCK!?!? How can that be true. I thought we had this one in the bag!?
I'm fucking dying here!!
You guys going to vote Jill just so that we can possibly fight the system in 4 years time?
I reckon we all just do it - she only needs 5% guys. That way we can take down Clinton in the future.
Gabriel Rogers
WHATS GOING ON?
Aaron Allen
The Farage Theorem
This is a formula that I designed in order to calculate the amount of tears the losing side of any major election/referendum will shed for the enjoyment of the winning side. It has been named for the great EU detractor Nigel Farage. In order to calculate this, we first need to calculate an average amount of tears per person.
Our tear ducts hold about 1.1ml of tears at a time on average. During times of extreme sadness, the average amount of times people will cry per day is about 4-6. So we will assume they will cry an average of 5 times a day, producing 5.5ml of tears per person. It will help to convert it to liters (0.0055) for later.
Next, we need to look at the popular vote percentages, and add together the losers to find the percentage of the population that will be suffering from butthurt after the vote. The popular vote would be a good sample size for the rest of the nation (think of it like a big poll), so we will take this percentage and multiply it by the total population to figure an average number of buthurt citizens.
Now, as time moves on, we will start to get over it, but some take longer than others. We will assume a half-life of a day for tears of butthurt, meaning that on the first day, we will have the full amount of tears, next day a half, next day a quarter, ect. This will wind up being 1.99 ad infinitum, so we will round up to two.
Finally, we'll assume that 20 percent are good sports, so we'll multiply our number by 0.8 to in order to remove them.
Here is what we plug in.
T= Total amount of tears collected. V= Total percent of popular vote for losing candidates/side of referendum (converted to decimal). P= Total Population of the Nation in question.
Here's the formula.
T=0.8[2(0.0055VP)]
Sebastian Lee
dont go on r/donald unless you wanna be depress by seeing all these cuties knowing you have no chance with them irl. sads bad man.
Kayden Phillips
It's pretty simple. Let's plug in some hypothetical numbers to see how well it works. In this hypothetical, we have a Trump victory, with Clinton winning 49.5 percent of the popular vote, Johnson winning 6 percent, and Stein winning 2.5 percent. Also, the population of the United States is estimated to be about 325 million at this time.
1,658,800 liters of tears. Let's convert this for Freedomland.
That's 438,208.6 gallons. 10,432 barrels. 105 of our larger tanker trucks would be required to move it all.
One can play with the numbers for the half-life of butthurt, as well as the assumed good sport/butthurt ratio of the losing population. This was just a hypothetical, and it can work for most situations.
Ayden Perry
Remember the exit polls that said Trump was winning the Iowa primary?
this election has taught me that our enemies are Finland, Germany and South Africa
the most unrelenting shills and shitposters who have been doing this for months
Eli Garcia
UPDATE ME GUYS
PLEASE
Ian Butler
It's based on party affiliation, means jackshit
Alexander Sanchez
Aboo
Leo Howard
fuck off
Connor Gray
Favourability/Unfavourability exit poll
Luis Turner
>shit that never happened
Leo Powell
Why are exit polls supposed to be any more accurate than the typical shitty polls we're used to?
I know it sounds like delusion to start downplaying exit polls but from what I understand they're even less accurate than fucking RCP averages and aren't a real measure for how shit is going.
Eli Bailey
HILLARY LANDSLIDE CONFIRMED!
Luke White
Fox News
>long lines this morning in Detroit which has never happened before
