Fox did a good job with Logan. I'm worried we won't get more films like that if they get bought out by Disney
Will the MCU ever decontruct a hero like Logan or Man of Steel?
hopefully not
>comparing DCCU Sups to Logan
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Oh wait, you're serious.
I don't think the MCU takes its heroes seriously enough for a deconstruction to be effective.
>Hahaha...
Stop.
yeah just as soon as they're done wanting to make billion dollar movies
>ill the MCU ever decontruct a hero like Logan or Batman Begins?
Fixed yw
we can't laugh anymore? My bad, I forgot we can only speak in buzzwords now. I should've called him a cuck or something.
Batman begins isn't really a deconstruction though.
Typing out HAHA multiple times is cringey and autistic.
You would need somone as skilled and brilliant as Snyder
Logan worked because Jackman got to play the part for 15 years prior, so people were accustomed to his Wolverine. That is when you deconstruct a character. MOS Superman can't be deconstructed because he was never a character. Just relying on people knowing who Superman is to excuse not writing a character is shitty story telling.
Technically they already have with how they did Iron Man.
Now, by another technicality the comics beat the movies to the punch, but in regards to film the degree of barely functioning hero that Stark was portrayed as was not common at the time. They could have done a more conventional version of him looking at how Howard was done in Captain America, but clearly decided to unravel him further with each installment.
To the extent it's become common now what with your Stranges, Quills and so on affecting a Stark like "stumble to virtue while leaning on vice" approach to their heroics, so people gloss over it, but still.
No, literally never. Disney would never take a risk with a movie like that, I doubt they would even make something like Deadpool or even just that fucking New Mutants horror movie. The MCU as whole was a fairly big risk at it's time but ever since that's taken off the most daring thing they've done is retool Thor into a GOTG movie. I'm pretty sure Marvel was trying to get that shit started before Disney bought them anyway.
that makes no sense, i mean take DKR for example you didn't really get to know Batman in that beforehand it was taken just as it is. Superman is equally as iconic in the public and and thus it can work.
>Implying Man of Steel is anywhere near the same league as Logan
Thanks for the laugh.
I don't think you need a series of prior movies in order to do a superhero deconstruction, least of all one for the most popular and well known hero ever. The problem is Snyder is didn't know what he was doing and the movie was very poorly written.
Man looking at that Magazine makes me wonder what Superman movie by David Lynch would be like.
>TFW you prefer MoS and thought Logan was just good
huh, guess i'm a minority here.
> it's a snyderfag tries to slander the MCU by trying to bandwagon onto Logan episode
your movies were shit
your universe is shit
your execs are getting shuffled out
logan was great, don't sully it with your presence pajeet
Logan was the flawless final chapter of the story of an icon.
Man of Still was a clunky bootleg of the successful Nolan trilogy made as damage control after Green Lantern bombed.
I... didn't do it multiple times, though?
This is what that would look like;
Hahahahahah
Hhahahahaha
Hhahahahahahahaha
Do you not know what laughing looks like in text? Or would you prefer LOL? Like, what? Are you retarded, bud?
Also I'd just like to point out how hilarious it is you respond to my post which contains criticism of overuse of buzzwords, with a post containing two overused buzzwords. So I guess my question is already answered.
>you're just using buzzwords
OH NO NO PLEASE DON'T NO NO HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Hey, it's a deconstruction. It's not a GOOD one, but it is one.
Define "deconstructing".
>inb4 some idiot copies tvtropes retardation
Iron Man 3
Man of Steel didn't deconstruct shit.
>Man of Steel
can't deconstruct what you constructed in the first place, famalan.
Batman Begins isn't really a deconstruction
mildly more realistic, but still a pretty unironic take on the concept
Batman Begins isn't a deconstruction. It's a REconstruction
>what you never constructed
fixed
You don't know what deconstruct means.
By this argument, does that mean Watchmen isn't a deconstruction since Moore's OC do not steals weren't a thing prior to the comic existing?
Watchmen isn't an origin story. Man of Steel was trying to deconstruct Superman in an origin story.
Ooh. Uh. 2013 didn't have the most sturdy superhero movie lineup, did it?
>Trying to associate Logan, a movie people actually liked, with the DCEU
Stop
Why would an industry that had like a dozen movies like Blankman and Mystery Men before it had serious takes on the X-Men and Wonder Woman NEED deconstruction?
Watchmen deconstructs the genre using thinly veiled stand ins.
You can deconstruct a character, a franchise, or a genre. Doing one doesn't mean you're doing the others.
Is DKR really a decon though?
Dark Knight Returns isn't a deconstruction, it's a reconstruction. Also, it worked within the idea that it was a possible future for the then comics Batman.
Man of Steel is the most half-assed deconstruction I've seen yet. Its the same exact campy superman plot except with a few "Whoa! look how dark this movie is!" moments.
The worst part is the fight, narratively speaking. Spending 15 minutes on supermen punching each other around isn't a deconstruction, its almost a glorification.
>deconstruct
there's that word again
How the fuck was Logan a deconstruction?
prettymuch and it was shit
>I'm worried we won't get more films like that if they get bought out by Disney
It'd be for the best. We don't need more emotionally hamfisted movies like Logan.