If this don't make you laugh ur soulless

if this don't make you laugh ur soulless

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/MqMie92LuZY
youtu.be/rlQYqQs0R3w
dailymotion.com/video/x20z3qb_ep-32-bugs-bunny-nips-the-nips_shortfilms
youtube.com/watch?v=Cu3SEd1M-uU
m.youtube.com/watch?v=kgSS1pDkMgQ
twitter.com/Gingerhazing/status/743635835392655360
telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews/11132618/Hidden-racism-in-childrens-television.html
huffingtonpost.com/Amelia/when-your-favorite-childhood-films-are-a-little-more-homophobic-than-you-remembered_b_2277954.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

make me raugh rong time - a good joke among fliends

We have come for the golden ass.

its only funny because its innocently insensitive
if edgy youtube animators did the same today for edgy appeal it'd feel forced and fucking awful

GIVE US THE ASS

Mmmm you bet

LOL!

those two creeps have got something to eat.

...

youtu.be/MqMie92LuZY

youtu.be/rlQYqQs0R3w

I like the Disney classics.

>ur
Neck yourself.

HAHAHA RACISM IS SO FUNNEH XD

Any weebs here can translate what he's saying during 2:23-2:39 and 3:36-4:26?
dailymotion.com/video/x20z3qb_ep-32-bugs-bunny-nips-the-nips_shortfilms

But, it is.

People like you are why shit can't be funny anymore

Racist humor stops being funny when you stop being a teenager, if you're not a fucking idiot. Take it from someone who used to think the word "nigger" alone was basically a punchline.

>Racist humor stops being funny when you stop being a teenager,
T.triggerd tumblrite

Why don't you all swooce on outta here.

Now swooce is funny

What's the joke?

You.

That he's frozen in there and we're out here
That he's the sheriff
That we're frozen in here and
That what I wanna know is, where's the caveman?

it actually didn't make me laugh as a kid, I just thought it was a disguise

...

>Take it from someone who used to think the word "nigger" alone was basically a punchline.
There's your problem.

Even when I was a teenager I didn't think the word nigger alone was a punchline.
Maybe you're just a retard.

for everyone wondering youtube.com/watch?v=Cu3SEd1M-uU

The problem with racist humor is how repetitive and dull it generally is.
Wow, you called a black person one dumb chicken eater, how completely unpredictable, Mr Hitler.

Add up the fact that mostly legit racists take themselves way too seriously, and you have one endless chan of one-side jokes. It`s always that one target, and all you have to do is repeat the thing you already said thousand of times. So, in short, they think of themselves so big and compromised to the cause that they kill the humor in the process. In fact it was never their intention to make people laugh, only to spread bullshit agenda in comical ways.

It does not mean, of course, that stereotypes jokes are doomed from start, or that people will ban every single stereotype, like some Sup Forumstards fear mongers seems to believe

The key word is intention

Still not offensive as this

People who cry about diversity on SW movies seems to forget about the prequels, and how now they are compensating in all the blatant stereotypes it had

...

>The key word is intention

If only SJWs focused on intent they'd be a lot less censorious.

I was so disappointed that the spoiler wasn't "nigger." How could you waste a set up like that?

it's as funny as calling OP a fag.

Because you're a very boring individual.

As he illustrated.

If I said I'm black would that give the illusion of depth of character?

>SJW is that one screencap from Tumblr right guys?

Does not work that way. Middle class brats can cry all day about LE EVIL MEN in Tumblr and yet it will not say a thing about feminism.

Try reading up a book on the subjects, instead of buying false flags from Sup Forums

Nice strawman, but no

Wat? I'm not sure what you're getting at.

Basically: "Why do you assume stupid ass kids on the internet are representative of societal movements that've existed since the 1920's?"

Because they act the same way as the ones I meet IRL, both at cons and increasingly in local politics.
What did I say that was wrong? I constantly hear them ranting that intent doesn't matter, only how they perceive it or how they assume a victimized group perceives it.

>I`m not assuming one random individual on the internet to be the representative of a complex web of ideologies...I do it in the real as well!

Such smartie.

>no answer

Damn, I was hoping you were more than just a ruseman.

>it's not just one person, it's hundreds, it's all of them
>that's still not representative enough!

Answer what? You are just admitting you are cherry-picking, taking that as the absolute truth. No matter what I say, there will be always one cherry to pick that says exactly the opposite of I`m trying to.
A waste of time, really.

Go back to tumblr you worthless stupid cunt.

>it's all of them
>[source needed]

But again, why visiting libraries, looking up for the hundreds of researches, studies, people, parties, ideologies and such when a bunch of TOTALLY LEGIT screencaps from Tumblr sums it up, rite?

Satan, I'm asking you to give your perspective, to understand why you disagree with me. Yet all you do is hurl insults, which is the mark of someone who wants to troll, not someone who has an actual political point of view that contradicts my lived experiences.

Disappointing, really.

You can't give a source on lived experiences, you should know that.

>visiting libraries, looking up for the hundreds of researches, studies

Recommend something I should read. The library is one block over from where I live, I'll go take the book out if it's a serious recommendation.

My perspective is that cherry-picking is not a valid argument. Is that easy

“I got robbed by a black man before, therefore, all of black people are bad. I swear, I read it on a chart!“

That`s basically what are you saying, but putting the EVIL notion of anything “social“ on the way

Unless you want to change your argument from something other than “i saw it, so it`s true“ there`s no place to go, really.

I don't understand why you're so desperately trying to avoid saying your perspective, instead of endlessly criticizing mine.

It implies you don't have a perspective, you just want to criticize others.

>A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Mary Wollstonecraft
>Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen
>Woman in the Nineteenth Century, Margaret Fuller
>The Subjection of Women, John Stuart Mill
>The Woman's Bible, Elizabeth Cady Stanton
>Jus Suffragii, (1906 -1924)
>The Feminine Mystique, Betty Friedan
>National Organization for Women (N.O.W.) Bill of Rights
>Heresies: A Feminist Publication on Art and Politics (1977-1992)
>Feminist Studies (1972–present)
>The Feminist Art Journal (1972-1977)

That for a start. Considering you are talking seriously, of course.

I've actually read A Feminine Mystique (I've also read "It Changed My Life") and liked it, and I will go try to get at least one of those books on there.

But they're not SJW. Or do you conflate SJWism with first and second wave feminism? Because while they're related, they're not the same. Even third wave feminism doesn't completely map to SJWism.

>My perspective is that cherry-picking is not a valid argument
>I don't understand why you're so desperately trying to avoid saying your perspective

I have a feeling you have no idea of cherry-picking means

It`s a well used informal fallacy that, in front of lots of data, the person only chooses the one more convenient to the situation
A good example is a typical Sup Forums thread, that ignores everything on the news that does not agree with their terms and visions, calling that a super-truth (redpill)

See my point now or you are gonna ask for my perspective 3 times in a row? C`mon now, it`s get boring.

To quote George Lopez, if it's funny, it's a racial joke; if it is not funny, it's a racist joke

SJW is a buzzword.
It used to be one nickname for everything rad-socialist. You know, CUT OFF MEN`S PENIS, COMMUNISM OR DEATH and all kinds of crazy chants. Nowadays, however, it only means that someone has one social conscience

“So do you think that women being less sexualized in Hollywood is a good thing, along with more independent and strong roles?

YOU FUCKING SJW!!!!!!“

Just proving my point. You don't have a contrary perspective, you just want to bash my perspective.

Your perspective is that you made up facts, you moron
My perspective is that mindset is not a valid argument. Any schizo can say he`s Napoleon for real, and yet it does not mean a thing

What is so hard about it? Are you really THAT dense, not understanding basic principles of language?

The Jew is in character.
But glorious nippons never become such pushovers like those.

On the contrary, SJW is referring to a particular type of extreme far-left thought that's become distressingly common in mainstream political circles. (At least where I live.)

"SJW" doesn't refer to people who want more positive representation of women and minorities in popular culture. It refers to those people who declare you a sexist and a Nazi deserving of punching because you also appreciate sexualized women.

Fuck, my original post specified that SJWs are the censorious types. I didn't say "liberals" or "feminists", just SJWs.

Gibberish.

You're the one not getting it.
"SJWs" are a specific sort of radical. If they don't have certain beliefs, they're not SJWs by definition.
I'm not using the word as a blanket slur of all feminists, I'm using it to refer to a specific, censorious political mindset.
It's like if I said "delusional schizophrenic", I'm referring specifically to the people who think they're Napoleon or hearing voices, I'm not talking about basic neurotics.

>On the contrary, SJW is referring to a particular type of extreme far-left thought that's become distressingly common in mainstream political circles. (At least where I live.)

I`m aware, I only used the recent meaning of it.

If you search for SJW on the internet you are gonna find all kinds of vanilla social standards. This is SJW nowadays. From speaking against Trump to defending diversity, you are now a SJW.

In short, anything that tries a little to change the status quo is a SJW for mostly people.
So i`m not even using that word anymore. It became meaningless to me.
Just like cuck means anything but the real thing those days.

And yet you failed to show any censoring, besides “I saw it once“

Fair enough, but I'm using the real definition of SJWs, not the slur the alt-right for liberals in general. Read my posts, not once have I called them liberals or feminists or attributed mainstream opinions to them.
Fuck, I'm a strong liberal myself, active in local politics, trying to make some real change in my community, and the fucking SJWs are giving all of us a bad name.
And they're real, and they're out there, and they're pushing terrible right-wing ideas, like censorship and getting offended at everything that disagrees with them.

At least where I live. In my personal experience.

Remember notPikachu from Drawn Together?

There is literally nothing wrong with being racist towards asain people and you can't prove me wrong
m.youtube.com/watch?v=kgSS1pDkMgQ

I live in Russia, blatant Asian stereotypes are super irrelevant to us, I can guarantee 99% of Russian people watching the prequels never understood those were even supposed to be stereotypes, which is why SJW shilling in the new trilogy becomes so much more prominent.

As as said some posts ago, they are all middle class brats.
It`s hip to act all socially conscious , so they are surely gonna jump on it. And that`s the thing, ACTING like one liberator is what matters for those idiots, and not actually changing things. Same way for mostly people showing off LE FUNNY protest signs is way more important than actually making one efficient protest. Granted to happening when militants join in, now even recruiting members for political parties and other dick moves.

That`s the ultimate image of one SJW for me. One idiot that jumps into a bandwagon without having any idea of what the hell he is talking about, ending up as one parrot from a major party.

>come into thread expecting racist stereotypes
>get politics

You wanted examples? Why didn't you say so in the first place?
Most of what I'd show you, you'll dismiss as tumblr or twitter crazies, even though there are lots of them and they're active, and some of them leave the basement and take that activism into the real world. And I sure as fuck aint putting links to people's personal Facebooks on here. But if you haunt leftbook, you'll see tons of them.

Fuck, just look at the "standard leftbook rules" used by so many FB communities. If you say something that they deem offensive to a protected minority group, then intent doesn't matter; you're gang mobbed, out on your ass, and defriended online and IRL by everyone in leftbook circles.

A quick google search turns up this from a SJW comic book creator: twitter.com/Gingerhazing/status/743635835392655360
And this from mainstream news outlets:
telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews/11132618/Hidden-racism-in-childrens-television.html
huffingtonpost.com/Amelia/when-your-favorite-childhood-films-are-a-little-more-homophobic-than-you-remembered_b_2277954.html

> Take Scooby-Doo, for instance. Who didn’t grow up watching the capers of Scooby and his Mystery Machine pals? We couldn’t wait to introduce it to the kids. We set the DVR and a few days later gathered the kids for a viewing. They loved it, but as the episodes aired, my husband and I started exchanging poignant looks increasingly often. The show is horribly racist. After one particularly offensive episode, we had a talk with our kids about the Asian people we know in our lives, and how they talk and act nothing like the people we just saw on Scooby-Doo.

>We deleted the episodes and the timer, which sucks, because I remember loving that show... we are sticking with Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated. It’s a remake that started in 2010. To be honest, it is not nearly as entertaining as the original, but it lacks negative racial stereotyping, and the kids seem to like it.

Huh, looks like we strongly agree after all. You use the same definition that I do. These types have no clue how to win elections, but boy do they love to virtue signal.

Only quibble I have is that (again in my experience) they're not middle class kids, but upper class kids, usually with trust funds and no worry about money, and zero knowledge or concern for the pressing class issues that are getting worse and worse by the day.
They couldn't care less about Trump's terrible tax plan, for instance, but freak out at the idea of having a controlled border and cutting back on illegal immigration. They couldn't care less that many illegal immigrants (who are mostly hard working, decent people) undercut the wages of the lower class and blue collar laborers, making the widening class divide even worse.

Fuck, forgot my image. Perfect example of what I'm talking about, filthy rich upper class privileged white boy who WORKS FOR THE FUCKING MAYOR, getting paid near 6 figures out of my tax dollars, and his upper upper class family, who've never known a worry about money in their lives.
I agree with the cause they're fighting for, but the way they fight for it, the stupid, counterproductive, outright racist signs that they hold up in the middle of their lily white, filthy rich neighborhood, make those of us who are working on the streets look bad.

Holy shit those are bad.

I also like how their mind work. To prevent censoring they need to censor more. How enlightening.

That all said, I do not recommend Telegraph or Huntington Post columns that much.Their tendency to over-exaggerate and point fingers is astonishing

Also, let`s aim at the good things done by social changes instead of lame blabbering done by media douches. That`s what they all want after all.

>To prevent censoring they need to censor more.

Yep. Sort of hypocricy and doublethink that you expect from the far-right, and that should have no place on the left.

>That all said, I do not recommend Telegraph or Huntington Post columns that much.Their tendency to over-exaggerate and point fingers is astonishing

Absolutely. But they're mainstream websites that are taken seriously by people, and held up by both the far-right and the far-left as examples of mainstream liberal thought.

>let`s aim at the good things done by social changes instead of lame blabbering done by media douches.

If only! For some reason the extremes never look at the positives, while lazerfocusing on the negatives.

this particular clip is cringe though

as a korean who spent his youth in japan, it's ad-lib gibberish

make me :^)

EPIC

Didn't they have french accents? Or was this only in my dub?

Are these even racist?

That's not true. A bad racial joke is still unfunny. Actual racist stuff can be funny if there's a meta joke in it.

if this don't make you raugh ul sourress

>>Tumblr

How did the Telegraph go full SJW? They used to be the Torygraph. Now they're shilling just as badly for the other side.