Shipping/sexualizing x fictional character under x context is wrong

>shipping/sexualizing x fictional character under x context is wrong
why does this keep happening? what is so up people's asses that they cannot tell the difference between real and fictional?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bOzbWvidp_o
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because they just want something to complain about.

Because, simply put, I am right and you are always wrong

when you reject morality all you have left is legalism. legalism comes from the government. government generally sticks to bare facts and actions. But deep down people still know morality is what they should care about, and that's more about your heart than your actions. so they get the two confused and try to police thoughts
also, they've been raised that anything you want to do is okay and you should just do it, except the few things that aren't okay, meaning you shouldn't even want those
even though everyone wants bad things all the time, because that is how wanting works. which is why it's NOT okay to just do whatever you want

how does morality applies to making two characters want to kiss each other?

well fuck me, I didn't expect a thought out and honest answer, but you certainly raise valid points user

peer pressure from society is a hell of a drug

not that user but
it really depends on the context and whether it can be taken as wrong by certain groups

it could be a about gays, minors, races, etc, take your poison, as long as there is a possibility of someone being triggered, that will be the case

Oh boy this thread again

sexualizing is okay
shipping is gay and you should die for it

Nobody got rid of morality, what is moral and what isn't just shifted, like it has countless times in history.

Who the fuck let this tumblr level shit in here?

just a PSA

All shipping is immoral and all shippers should be gassed.

i feel sorry for all post office workers.

When half the threads on this fucking board are nothing but shipping faggotry, it gets pretty annoying.

Even worse, most of them are just for masturbating to, but for some reason they would rather shit up Sup Forums even more instead of taking it to /aco/.

...

I’ll go to /aco/ when they get rid of the “no loli/shota” rule.

They don't allow that anywhere, you dumb pedo.

I didn’t claim otherwise...

fuck you too Sup Forums

desu i never understood why stuff like loli and furry was banned on /aco/

that makes up a pretty big chunk of what Sup Forums jerks off to

>Allowing furry
Loli I can understand, but furries are one of the most obnoxious faggots there are.

yeah, i’d say they’re tied with futafags

I'm okay for whatever in fiction, but most of these people, at least the ones that aren't mentally ill, can actually tell the difference between reality and fiction. They're just concerned on the effect it CAN have on reality, like a little girl being groomed with loli porn, for example.
Such as something being presented as normal in a context could make people think that it IS normal. Like when faggots watch that horse show and say that it helped them learn to be more caring or some shit. There aren't really any studies on this sort of thing though, so this is essentially just a theory which I don't subscribe to.

Futa has had a home on Sup Forums for a long time.

Furry never has except that one time as a joke to get them banned.

>when you reject morality

Like when your state only narrowly refuses to elect a pedophile?

People haven't rejected morality. Common sense perhaps, but that always comes back to kick people in the teeth until they listen.

>what is so up people's asses that they cannot tell the difference between real and fictional?

The Internet.

After a long day's work earning money for Mr. Richfuck, you could always rub yourself for a few minutes to get into that relaxing dreamworld that took you away from the torrent of shit that you spent your time struggling through. That was before your mind could be molded and monitored by the psychopaths who see you as mere cattle.

Welcome to the future.

>if you're not tumblr you're Sup Forums
hello tumblr.

It's totally reasonable for you to get bent out of shape over them, of course.

>Futa has had a home on Sup Forums for a long time.
Aren't we lucky.

/d/ is older than Sup Forums. /d/ was and has always been for dickgirls.

Furry is garbage and doesn't belong even on Sup Forums. This coming from the place that used to have a loli and guro board.
So yes. Furry is way worse than anything else that has been here or is still here.

I was just referencing the comic you posted genius

Sorry sonic I'm still gonna fap to blaze.
*shrugs*

>Furry is way worse than anything else that has been here or is still here.
I don’t know about that. Most of the hatred for fur shit just seems like a handful of people trying to uphold some remnants of old goon culture.

being tired of≠bent out of shape

Sonic, you've been a non-contributing mooch when making a PSA about sharing food. Don't act like you have a high ground on these things.
youtube.com/watch?v=bOzbWvidp_o

>hot pocket mods not giving out perma global ip range bans for meta posting
Shameful tbqh familia.

Your fucking love interest is a 12 year old who can't stop flashing her panties and already has a rack. Fuck off.

>tbqh familia
If there's anything that deserves a permaban...

If you haven't noticed, a bunch of Sup Forums characters would fit the furry tag.

The problem isn't furries per se. Its underage and autistic faggots from Deviantart and Tumblr. People here just want to fap, not hear retards overly attached to their OCs or online personas.

>why does this keep happening? what is so up people's asses that they cannot tell the difference between real and fictional?
Because for a lot of people, sexualing let's say underage characters, they're doing it BECAUSE the characters are implied to be underaged in their head. So the real person is attracted to a fictional child because they have a real desire for children. See: most Loud House fags.

There are others who are attracted to characters who happen to be kids but the person is attracted to them for their design, voice, and personality and don't give a shit about their age (Especially since most kid characters in cartoons act like adults anyway). Those are just waifu-fags. See: Raven from Teen Titans. Most people who like her are because of her goth design, not because she's 16. She could be 16,000 and the same people would still like her.

The problem comes from how do you determine which is which if someone is lusting after one of the Loud sisters? You typically can't so you just lump them in as worse case scenario since pedos are probably top of the list of "worst shit you can do".

Nice tumblr reaction image, faggot

Man I loved bionicles. Whenever I finally give up on having a GF I'll probably get em all.

You kissed a human. Fuck off.

>I don’t know about that. Most of the hatred for fur shit just seems like a handful of people trying to uphold some remnants of old goon culture.


furry culture is still the same though. Its filled with immature obnoxious community that have a loose grip on reality. They run rampant when you give them an inch, then complain that your treating them unfairly when they've gone to far. Given the events of rainfurrest 2015, shows that the furry community has not fucking changed since the early days of Sup Forums and the internet as a whole.

>you kissed a human
She kissed him. And he was dead, so he couldn't really say no.

Well after that web search, I can tell you that definitely isn't the furry community I remember Sup Forums shitting on.Though they should really rethink their "sex positivity! Everyone is included" stance. I know I'd rather beat the ass of someone wearing diapers throughout the hotel lobby shitting on people's cars rather than let them hang with my group when they say "I just wear diapers and like the sound of diapers".

>he made this thread again
why, did someone hurt your feelings mocking your OTP, OP?
Tell us who hurt you, you spammy faggot.

>And he was dead, so he couldn't really say no.
So she was a furry and a necrophile.

>morality
>when talking about shipping people who don't exist
I can see it now, a whole new movement for the rights of fictional characters

the actual source is worse though
facebook
its the first time I make this thread, scout's honor
though I have seen similar ones before so I don't blame you, I really find interesting to hear out others' point of view, specially if they argument instead of spouting buzzwords

If they could separate fiction from reality and separate the artist from their art they wouldn't be SJWs.