Why don't we have more "heroine ends up naked" jokes like Sup Forums media? It's all in good fun...

Why don't we have more "heroine ends up naked" jokes like Sup Forums media? It's all in good fun, don't really see why it's so offensive

A naked man is considered humorous. A naked woman is considered erotic.

Because nudity isn't funny. Sorry, but I'm above the age of five, I know what genitals look like. Whoop dee shit.

Because Sup Forums is superior, you should know this by now

Because it's typically extremely transparent pandering toward an audience that thinks with their dicks.

Nothing wrong with that inherently; lots of shows have fanservice. But it doesn't make for compelling writing if half the episode is just attempting to get dudes to watch by having sexy naked chicks.

Addendum: Tripping the Rift was a perfect example of a show with very little substance, but it had a robo-prostitute chick who got naked in a lot of episodes because they knew it'd draw in more viewers.

Because cartoons aren't that desperate that they need to pander to horny 40 years old neckbeard virgins

>pandering toward an audience that thinks with their dicks
So, the average Sup Forums user?

...

>Because Sup Forums is superior
normies never fap to anime girls but they do to some cartoon girls

and normies do get laid, so I rather be a normie that sometimes reads comics, works on my own comics and is not a sad loser that obsesses over a 2D girl

I think just about everyone with sex drive can admit they've watch a meh-tier show or movie at some point just cause they thought a character was hot. Hardly exclusive to Sup Forums, or even men.

On the one hand, I don't like sexual pandering if it's too obvious and detracts from the show. I think that's kind of boring. I usually end up liking the nonsexualized female character, not only because they're more interesting as a character but because it feels like you're being patrician for not taking the obvious choice. Probably not the only one. Many people love VELMA over DAPHNE. And sexual shit has never been a road to success. No one like Tripping the Rift even though they had that naked chick, not even people who like naked chicks. It was still a shitty, shitty show.

On the other fucking hand, the criticism has gone full fucking retard and now having a boner ever or seeing a boob ever is evil and I'm fucking sick of it.

You can thank christian censors from the 80's and 90's

I've gotten very frustrated because a lot of the louder and always online girls about this don't admit they do this too. What do they think shipping is. Why do all the most rabid ships that attack other ships as problematic seem to include the two most traditionally attractive characters (Zutara, PB/Marceline, Keith and Lance on Voltron, Lance and Allura on Voltron...), or when they like the boring show with the nonthreatening prettyboy lead. It's just annoying.

xena warrior princess

But there's so many of them.
Think of the ratings!

>that jiggle

Source?

>or even men
Woman in the west are more likely to watch a show for attractive characters than males are.

Tripping the Rift.

Read the fucking filename moron.

both Sup Forums and Sup Forums are full of recycled tropes of their respective mediums

the only reason comics dont recycle this trope is because it never caught on

Same reason why females get away with pretty much anything and males can go to jail for mere suspicion of rape - double standards.

To be honest, OP's image pulled me here, and I don't even know what other MRA bullshit you people are posting about, but I rather have a TtR thread.
Did anyone caught that surprisingly good Motoko Kusanagi thread on /aco/? Because I've been in a sex-bot mood, since then.

Eh, the show was just too shitty to care. I wanted to love something with Stephen Root but the show was a complete nothing

It's not a joke if you want it because it turns you on user

>too shitty to care
It's got a character, or characters, that people want to fuck. Sup Forums cares.

>Motoko Kusanagi & Six
Why have I not thought about this before

That thread was bizarre in a way that it shouldn't even existed on /aco/. But it went extremely smooth, even to the end.

Can't do it without sjw going insane

I liked the violent utopian world episode.

Fat women would bitch that it creates an unfair image, and lazy mothers would have to explain to their kids what sex is.

Can't have that.

I'm glad its not prevalent in Sup Forums shit because those jokes are rarely ever funny

>we should have ENF scenes with thicc wmen instead
I see no real problem with that

Tastes differ, but you also sound autistic. The comedy doesn't come just from her being naked, it comes from her being embarrassed at a public speaking event.

>only 40yo virgins enjoy jokes with nudity
What makes you such an expert? Are you sure you're not projecting? You sound like the type of idiot who thinks people become doctors just so they can see other people naked.

You underageb&s are just spoiled. Back then you'd have to jump trough a hundred hoops to see some lewd Sup Forums, and that show was also CG which was still new and cool at the time. This, the juvenile humor and violence made it pretty awesome for a pre-easily accessible internet porn era teen.

This. Or, more succinctly, American media is so stuffed full of Puritan values that a woman is automatically "sexual," always, at all times, even if she is fully clothed. You can either be edgy and taboo with sexuality and use it excessively to be "adult," or you avoid it completely, but it will always be within the context that showing a woman's skin is sexual, always, no exception.

Nips don't have feminists crying about everything

Sup Forums blow the fuck out

Now I personally don't care for loli, but it's bloody ridiculous and down right hypicritical how the only character in The Loud House to drop trou, or show arse, is the little boy. If I recall the girls don't even wear two piece swimsuits. It's not even a 'boys will be boys thing'. Those many girls in one place are much more likely to be vulgar than boys. especially shocking since its Chris 'finger in the stinko' Savino's show

>get naked in front of a crowd
>get embarrassed
really subverting my expectations over here, the humor eludes me

There's obviously a set-up that we're missing. The humor is in the reaction of the victim, the audience and the context.

There's only two pay offs to the female public nudity
>1. young boys oogle her with wide eyes while possibly taking pictures or getting aroused
>2. the girl covers her body and runs shrieking/or becomes promiscuous (without sex)

That only happens when its played for cheap shock humour. Only other Female nudity is promiscuity but it's only for porn.

>since
>Itt:pedo