This idiot wouldn't have actually WON, would he? I have never been more scared of a candidate than Sanders. Sadly...

This idiot wouldn't have actually WON, would he? I have never been more scared of a candidate than Sanders. Sadly, I think his kind is the future of the Democratic party, and the polls about what would happen if only young people vote have me gravely concerned that these fringe-leftist loonies will multiply over the coming years.

I hate being a millennial. My generation are a bunch spoiled brats who want everything handed to them through a little slot on their "safe space" door. I was formerly a Democrat, but Bernie's very existent redpilled me.

Other urls found in this thread:

big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/Gravis_Sanders_Election_Poll.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

should've been hillary's Vp.

Bernie would have beaten Trump. He had all of Hillary's voters to begin with, without being corrupt to the bone or a murderer. DNC fucked themselves.

Her turnout was on the first vagina president.

No. Sanders is beta Trump is alpha

He absolutely would have defeated Trump.

>all of Hillary's voters
I know quite a few HRC voters that ditched her when she adopted parts of Bernie's platforms.

He's white and he doesn't have a vagina. He's a fucking commie. He only joined the Democratic party to run for president, he never would have won the hearts and minds of the Dem establishment even if he got the nomination.

He would have been crushed.

Why? Idiot millennials?

The man is ideologically and politically unhinged.

They would've won, together. I doubt he would've won alone.

nah sanders would have lost just as hard especially in the great lakes area who don't want fucking socialism

I'm pretty sure his statements praising breadlines would've lost him some voters had he made it to the general election.

He would have instantly shored up the entire Republican base and leaners. Then he would have scared off rural blue voters once GOP started airing attack ads on his communism.

They think because he had college students he would win. Problem is all Trump had to do was bring up economics and he'd lose everything because nobody wants to pay for his shit system/

Exactly, he was never attacked in debates. He would've been beat so bad.

Would have lost florida. Florida was won by Cubans, unlike in Romney/Obama, in whic the cuban vote was 50/50, with Trump it was 60/40 since they did not approve of Obama lifting the embargo with Communist Cuba. Bernie has defended and praise castro in the past and in one of the debates.

Not sure if america can vote for an openly socialist president.

...

They aren't having kids. Lol

Top of the ticket? Less than zero chance, when Americans saw his proposed tax policies, he'd have lost every independent, any Democrat with a job, and all conservatives. A self-described socialist atheistic Jew is tailor made to do well in California and Washington, and get fucking BURIED in every moderately purple state. He'd have had Clinton's map, while losing Nevada, New Mexico, all of Maine, New Hampshire, and Virginia. Minorities also probably would have shied away from him due to not being a man of faith. He couldn't even get blacks in the primaries against Hillary.

Bottom of the ticket? He'd have won Hillary the election, easily. Thank God she was beholden to Kaine due to a promise years ago when he was the head of the DNC. Would have injected a lot of life into the Clinton campaign, and gotten millennials to show up and vote.

I find it extremely comical when people think that anybody other than millennials would have voted for this assclown in the general election. Old people, religious minorities, and Democrats with any money would have fucking killed this man.

I noticed an enormous amount of people that were completely torn between Hillary and Trump. They seriously didn't want to vote for Trump, and would have voted for anyone BUT Hillary, so they ended up going Trump because they didn't have any other choice. That's just what I think though; I'm not some sort of political genius. I can only say what I saw around me.

He got even less of the crucial Black vote than Shillary. Which is weird considering how this guy fought for their rights in the 60s.
People on here told me they didn't like him because they didn't want to share their gibsmedat with working-class Whitey.

He probably has a vagina. A 70 year old woman had more testosterone than him lol. One if the things I liked about Hillary was that she appeared strong and confident about her ideas. Bernie appeared like a cuck especially if you see those photos and videos of BLM invading his rallies.

Yes, he would have. Lots of work to do these next 4 years.

The good/bad news is you will grow up like everyone else eventually. The idiots won't but fuck 'em

You might hate Sanders because he supports poor blacks but based on his voting record he is more about economic stratification before racial stratification.

He gets poor whites better than any single person in his entire party, the same demographic that just drove Trump to victory. He and Michael Moore are the only people of significance in that party who give a shit about poor whites at all.

Sanders was a truthsayer - and wasn't afraid to bring up the dark sides. But some people don't like that and made sure he was shut out.

>He had all of Hillary's voters to begin with
no he didn't. Loads of people, even my dad, hated him cause he's a socialist.

Had Bernie run against Trump. Might have even been worse, honestly. A lot of those blue states wouldn't even be safe.

Would have been absolutely beautiful, and the biggest landslide since 1984.

Most liberals don't know what socialism is; nor do they want to know.

He wouldve won, no question. Too bad the corrupt dnc fucked him over.

Too bad? More like thank Christ.

He most likely would have won. Which is all the more reason why leftists everywhere should hate Hillary Clinton.

She never has and never will deserve to be president.

Go ahead, explain in your own words what socialism is without using the words commie or comunism.

You dont know shit, mouthbreather.

That's in large part because Hillary and Trump's domestic policy weren't that different apart from a few key issues like Obamacare.

Bernie would get railed because he's an honest to god socialist, they could take his actual policy positions and use them to prove to the American people that he's an economic lunatic. Most people never saw that in the primaries, all they saw was a nice old guy who wanted to give everyone free shit.

He calls himself a socialist
This is political suicide

Gibs me dat.

Also where did you get a picture of my beard?

Enjoy John Bolton as secretary of state and the worst of the establishment neocons, you contrarian edgelord. Hope the first nuke hits far from you, so you can live and look like those mummies in fallout.

If you find that surprising, I should show you the one of your moms pussy.

Holy shit that's a god tier beard.

>has Jew in his ID
>utterly terrible arguments

Bernie, stop hitting the bottle and go to bed.

He's five Jews drinking Hi-C. It's plain as day.

There seem to be three types of millenials: actual spoiled brat snowflake millenials, normal young people, and--worst of all--the Wahhh I hate my generation and their safe space participation trophiessssss spastic queerlords. You are the third one m8 which is worse because you are more prevalent, internalize a stereotype and allow single experiences or interactions with normal young people to affirm that stereotype.

No. Every single democratic candidate will be nonwhite from here on out. Bernie will be in a primary and be accused of mansplaining and using his privilege and all sorts of shit. It will be like those women that grabbed the mic and the crowd will be hooting and hollering. Talking about economic issues will just confuse them and they will say you're "distracting from the real issues"

most people, especially people in college, lean heavy to the left when they're younger and get more conservative the older they get. the whole argument of this country's youth leaning more to the left is ridiculous. 18-24 year olds have been protesting everything for the past 50 years.

do schools not teach history anymore?

No. I have a bachelor's in a STEM field and I never took any sort of history class. I imagine at even more liberal colleges they make it even easier to avoid subjects that don't interest you.

I think he meant well, but the problem is that he is a radical left wing socialist. Socialism is always dangerous. You should be scared of him.

Millenials embraced him because of the plethora of free things he promised them. They have no understanding of economics and that in order for someone to be given something, someone else has to pay for that thing. They just say "the 1% will pay for it" but they don't realize that the 1% will leave the country because no one works hard to be taxed 90% of your earnings. The whole concept is retarded and that tap runs out.

>This idiot wouldn't have actually WON, would he?

probably not. Bloomberg would have run 3rd party and thrown the election to Trump.

>Meanwhile, Trump offering massive tax cuts across all classes while INCREASING government spending on military and infrastructure
Everyone offers free shit during election season.

They would have hated any Democratic nominee as much as Hillary.

Left wing votes never stay left for long. They grow up and turn right.

Gen Z are the opposite of millennials. By the time another Democrat gets elected they'll all be old enough to vote. Many of those millennials will get more conservative as they age too.

Those tax cuts will allow businesses to grow and new business to open, this tax cut increases jobs, pay, and the ability to stimulate the economy. When you have more people working, they are earning paychecks, which then create government revenue through taxation and go to goods and services which stimulates the economy. This is a win win situation.

I'm sorry that you don't understand economics 101, but I do. I just gave you your first lesson.

The stimulation of the government revenue through federal income tax figuring in the additional booming industry that employs more people, along with other taxes, balances out rebuilding the military and infrastructure. A lot of that infrastructure will be on state taxes, not federal anyway.

What else do you need help with?

What? Where are you getting this from lol, how exactly would Gen Z be conservative?

Hillary chose Tim Kaine because he agreed to step down to let Debbie Weisserman Shultz rig the primaries for her.

Hillary's destiny should look like mexico

Bernie's Destiny should look like Hillary's

I'm okay with Teds destiny

Trump's destiny should look more like the 50s or something.

Lol Crazy Bernie will had been rediculously stumped. The only reason trump went so easy on Clinton was because she was a woman.

But or would had been entertaining watching California go R...

New poll says he'd have won.

big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/Gravis_Sanders_Election_Poll.pdf

Bernie would have won, he had the same idea that trump had on economic policies but clearly defined.

Both respectable conservative and liberal economist's analyzations of his plan place it at creating 9 trillion dollars minimum in debt while creating mild short-term job growth. I could go into a thousand reasons why it wouldn't be worth the price, but I think the experts have covered it well enough for you to slowly trod through yourself

Both Republican and Democrats would be against it if he ever pushed it. Which he never would because it's a joke of a tax plan.

You didn't really believe Bush's "Tax cuts always pay for themselves" bullshit did you? Sorry you never got past the basics of economics 101.

True financial conservative here, not eating the half-baked public school dogma you're swallowing. You can't teach me anything.

We're still posting polls? Did we learn nothing?

If Bernie actually had gotten elected, he would still have had to deal with a Republican House and would have achieved less than Obama, disappointing and disillusioning his fans forever.

I'd play Ted's game.

Bernie absolutely would have won.

>b-but he would've been redbaited into irrelevance!!

Ask Clinton how well redbaiting Trump worked out.

Not saying his plan wasn't a joke either, just calling out a double standard.

They are only factoring in temporary government jobs, not private enterprise jobs. Those wouldn't be temporary unless a democrat socialist gets elected next and regulates and taxes said businesses to death.

You can only grow an economy by lowering taxes and allowing entrepreneurs and businesses to expand. Capitalism is the best system in the world, and I don't mean the crony capitalism that we have now.

You cannot tax a country into a booming economy. It's impossible. You cannot make the poor rich by making the rich poor.

Well, I graduated with highest honors, so I don't give a shit what you identify as. You're wrong here.

Because the Huffington Post got the polls right the first time right?

We have to forget about them, they are lost. Focus on preserving the future, everyone born after 2000.

>He had all of Hillary's voters to begin with

obviously not

I have 15 phds and a masters in lying on the internet.

If you were any respectable level of economist you'd know his taxplan is unrealistic and unsustainable. I told you I'm a financial conservative, I believe in growth via tax cuts. But there's a limit to how low those cuts can go, and Trump's crosses the line by a mile. You cannot pull a booming economy out of a debt spiral. These are Greece levels of tax cuts if they were to ever be approved. No one is talking about spooky socialist boogeymen right now. And yes, they do factor in private sector growth, in fact, that's the only thing they factor in because there's no way to interpolate using temporary government jobs as a base.

...

Someone tell me why minorities wan't Hillary when Bernie would offer much more gibs?

no, weak sell out cucks don't win

No he wouldn't have. Clinton didn't rig the primary, there is no evidence she did. The DNC wasn't impartial like they should have been, but she didn't rig it. If he couldn't beat her, then why do his supporters think he could beat Trump when Clinton couldn't?

No, no he couldn't for the reasons I outlined above. His supporters don't vote and he doesn't have the popular support he claims to have.

How would he get the black vote? Obama got so many votes compared to Clinton because all the niggers wanted their nigga in the white house.

He literally said he didn't know how to break up the banks you fucking idiot. He was promising pipe dreams. Granted so was Trump and he won.

Zero chance. And even if he did pic related would have played out

nah bro. Bernie is the guy the rich elites feared most. cause he was the only one concerned with helping the common man out.

we got the wrong populist as president.

And yes, he def could have beaten Trump. The only reason Trump won was because he was for change. Bernie was for change, AND had a long political career. It would have been no contest.

The DNC being partial, and evidence leaked in her emails prove she rigged the primary, not that it would have mattered.

Never in the foreseeable future would americans elect a socialist as president.

Even Trump admitted on Twitter that he would not have stood a chance against Bernie.

Because no matter what, they will never trust a white man.

No. He's a socialist. We're capitalists. It's really just that simple.

...

Every thing he advocates has been massively successful in other first world nations

You overestimate the intellectual capacity of the left.

This is true.
>but murica is different

>Every thing he advocates has been massively successful in other first world nations
WITH A HOMOGENEOUS POPULATION

You're a bold faced liar is all you are, there are plenty of sources that can enlighten you to how tax cuts are beneficial to the economy. Barack Obama destroyed our economy with his overspending on failed policies such as Obamacare. This is why we are in this situation.

I never said you could magically make a good economy out of one that is dying. What you can do is deregulate and offer tax cuts in order to create new businesses and jobs which stimulate the economy through taxation and spending on goods and services. You aren't grasping that. You truly think raising taxes are the only way to fix things, and that monetary tap runs out.

In this situation you are dead wrong. You're putting words into my mouth that I never said. You can go be retarded if you want to, but I will enlighten you on something. I'm wealthy, do you want to know how much of my money the government takes? I get to keep roughly 45% of it. How much more do I need to pay out in taxes to make you happy? I'll move my business elsewhere if they increase much more, which is why the other businesses are already doing the same thing.

This creates a situation where it's easier to be profitable if you just fire everyone and outsource. This is what you are in favor of, instead of actually gaining some knowledge of how the economy works.

Not only should the government give tax cuts, they should eliminate the corporate tax completely because corporations don't pay taxes the workers pay taxes and the customer pays for the tax, not us.

...

>universal health care doesn't work because there some non white people

Kek. Kys

It has?

No it hasn't. The nations he is thinking about are Sweden and Denmark. Denmark is not socialist, it's a market economy, there is a huge misconception. Sweden has taxes so high that people are struggling without government assistance, AND Sweden was made profitable through capitalism. Sweden now has a 180% car tax, that's why no one drives and they rely on public transportation.

Like Sweden?

Literally proven with UK and Sweden.

Trump has to turn america around or we are screwed next election

lol he wasn't wanting to tax cars.

He did march with MLK.

No

He wants to tax rich people, who are known to be proficient in avoiding taxes.

The UK is not socialist. I literally just proved you wrong on Sweden.
I never said he did derp, the car tax is a consequence of free college and free healthcare. That money has to be paid for somehow, and Sweden, now a failing country, has taxes through the roof.

>tfw you have just captured another little boy for your rape dungeon.

No he had the same problem as Hillary. He ignored the blue collar workers.