What makes a cartoon animal "dangerously cheesy"?

What makes a cartoon animal "dangerously cheesy"?

There is a point where you can just tell even in pictures where it isn't supposed to be obvious. What gives it away?

Pic related is from "Housepets!" by Rick Griffin, a comic which is a very good example of this.

Other urls found in this thread:

deviantart.com/art/Housepets-in-my-regular-style-717905631
deviantart.com/art/Housepets-in-my-regular-style-II-717915334
youtu.be/oDnNF5cHCdo
e621.net/post/show/1417401/animal_genitalia-anthro-bailey_-housepets-blush-br
e621.net/post/show/1417404/animal_genitalia-anthro-breasts-canine-cat-dog-duc
youtube.com/watch?v=UbQgXeY_zi4
ricksketchbook.tumblr.com/archive
youtu.be/22bO-ayI7Hw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Here's the full strip.

...

Why do they wear scarves but no other clothing for the winter?

Low effort drawing that relies on me fitting it to a human form I already know. There's very little 3D form, the proportions seem overly focused on forearms and chest.

The fur is being implied by an outline instead of a texture, and it's super over-the-top. Most advertising mascots, for example, will keep that outline of fur very small, unless it's meant to be something like a hairstyle, like what is showing.

Overall, you get the feeling the artist cared more about showing off how "unique" and "animalistic" the character is, rather than any sort of action or emotion.

There's something in the eyes too.

I think the number one thing is that all furry artists learn drawing from each other. There's some unmeasureable quality that gets transferred this way, and I'd be sad (but not surprised) if someone told me you can never shake that effect for the rest of your career.

If seeing them makes you worry that the next page could have gay sex, it is dangerously cheesy.

I believe the famous quote is, "I will not define hardcore always gay furry porn, but I know it when I see it."

Everyone having the body of an athlete

Is it wrong that I find the characters of this webcomic so... attractive? Something about their design and anatomical structure just makes me feel funny.

Is this the turning point? Am I infected? Should I end it or embrace it? I'm scared, aroused, and confused.

Fashion, I guess.

You'll live. But if the infection spreads, you will be exiled. Your name will be burned from the records.

Why are furries 95% gay males?

For the longest time it was the only release for a boy in a very religious family. Maybe you are sexually repressed?

Animal-people, except they're cartoons first, characters second, and animals third.

Tails, fur, teeth and weird eyes are just sort of... there. They're not distracting, and the characters are unique despite having similar body types and color because of facial details, not because they're totally separate species.

Drawing cartoon animals is easy, but if you take advantage of that you look like a furry artist no matter what. Always put effort in, and people will notice.

Grape, the purple cat, is a female.
Yeah, the way Rick gives most of his characters the same bodytype confuses me as well.

No, not sexually repressed at all. I just think that the characters are, well... cute and pretty and all, y'know.

When characters seems as if they're going to fuck every other second through various innuendos and "hints"

That's supposed to be a girl?

Nah, this nigga gay.

>Grape, the purple cat, is a female.

I believe you yet feel very skeptical at the same time looking at that design.

Bisexual (and atheist) but yeah, mostly gay. This is why you shouldn't force religion on your children. As Jesus said, "let them come".

It's her thing. Even the dog used to believe she was a tomcat.

The fuck are these ugly designs? It looks like this place is stuck in a 1989 time loop. That zebra looks straight out of a new wave or glam metal video.

You lost your way, you're tainted now for life.

>being naked
>big eyes
>unnatural colors
>detailed physique
>weird tufts of hair

Not sure if genius or stupid.

>brown fur is an unnatural fur color in this instance?

A few of those girls scream 2005, but the rest are 1980s and 1990s.

Oops. Excuse the green text

Have you seen these?

deviantart.com/art/Housepets-in-my-regular-style-717905631
deviantart.com/art/Housepets-in-my-regular-style-II-717915334

Wuffle is there to exemplify the oddly detailed physique

>has the perfect artstyle
>his entire gallery is full of lewds
Nononono NO, I mustn't. You're forcing this conversion on me when I know it's wrong.

You watch this Duran Duran video and tell me that zebra wouldn't fit in just fine.
youtu.be/oDnNF5cHCdo

lewd

At first glance you should be able to tell what a characters purpose is, Id say if an animal character is sexualised for any other use than comedic value it is walking into the "dangerously cheesy" territory

>, Id say if an animal character is sexualised for any other use than comedic value it is walking into the "dangerously cheesy" territory

So were does Minerva and Wilford fall? Dangerously comedic?

No

e621.net/post/show/1417401/animal_genitalia-anthro-bailey_-housepets-blush-br
e621.net/post/show/1417404/animal_genitalia-anthro-breasts-canine-cat-dog-duc

How cheesy is this?

youtube.com/watch?v=UbQgXeY_zi4

But wait, there's more!

ricksketchbook.tumblr.com/archive

>Am I infected?

You were infected from the moment you watched your first cartoon.

this... isn't... relatable...
...

To prove my point, here's one from 1989. At one point, he's even wearing the same outfit, except with a cap and jacket.
youtu.be/22bO-ayI7Hw

I never understood in this music video why the snake goes for the waitress...

Or is it?

>Getting rid of spooks

...

As long as it add other values than its added sexiness it serves a purpose and if your mind can recognize that it is not danger cheese.
For example Blacksad has detailed women but it adds to the realistic tone of the comic.
Meanwhile OPs example is just sexy because it is, it serves no other purpose to satisfy the furfags fetishes.

Well, when you're in middle school, you do want to have sex and masturbate every hour.

It's rotoscoped so they're all actually humans. Not a sin.

Down the rabbit hole I go.
Thank you for ruining my life.

If you say so. All I see are cats.

Welcome to a world of new experiences. Try to remain pure though.

I take it you haven't seen what's in that gallery. Admittedly, it's pretty tame compared to other shit.

>worry

We both know it doesn't take much to eventually devolve into the weirder furry stuff.

because you got dubs I'll tell you something
>be me, preppy mormon preteen
>never jacked off once
>watching some completely innocent cartoons when suddenly I feel something in my pants.
>repressed.tif
>looked the character up on my dsi browser
and that was how I discovered porn
>it was lucario

What exactly does "cheesy" mean in this context? I always thought it meant sentimental and corny.

>lucario

I'm not at all surprised by this.

Context clues implies furry/extremely furry

Is that a Pokémon?

and I'm not ashamed by it.
I got into many others after.

Yep. Zoroark

How new are you?

Zoroark from Generation 5, which was over 7 years ago. See the above question

put a luxray in there and you have the best taste

Sorry. English isn't my first language and I wasn't aware of the meme

No harm done. My context post wasn't mean to be taken in a rude way.

It was gfur.

>lucario with a muzzle

That's a fantasy of his...

Do you even Lopunny?

>What makes a cartoon animal "dangerously cheesy"?
If porn of it exists. I wouldn't worry about it too much, honestly.

>Pic related is from "Housepets!" by Rick Griffin,
Personally, I kinda partial to the androgynous look, but I haven't touched housepets in years.

perhaps, mega form is even more perhaps
lets throw in blaziken and call it a day

The image was porn and the normieyoutuber supposedly didnt know

this is why we cant have threads dedicated to anthropomorphic animals, you savages cant control your lust, you also have horrible taste in pokemons

>lopunny

That doesn't seem possible. That artstyle alone should show something is amiss.
Taste is subjective my good user

What the fuck is his outfit even supposed to be? Torn jeans and a tank top exposing the midriff, but what the fuck is it?

Shit taste in art too.

Take pride in your first masturbation. That's what I was taught.

Don't forget the low head-to-body ratio. Most funny animals have pretty huge heads.

This is among the lowest you can go.

>shading style that attempts a 3d look but still feels as dry and synthetic as a fitness centre ad
>blatant and shameless use of anime eyes, doesn’t even try to play around with the style
>facial expression always has to be this arrogant shit eating grin as if to say “yeah, you hate furries but I’m a muscular pred and you’re a hairless primate omnivore, you’re on the wrong side of history fucko LMAO. Never talk to me or my pack of homosexuals again or I’ll rip your neck open.” It feels too implicative that the artist irl is a physically weak outcast who spends too much time fantasizing superpowers that they would use to get back at people who bully them.
Worse, is when an artist tries to portray an impractical utopian society that clusterfucks furries with these qualities together, making a forced, awkward mess that’s a poor attempt at an escapists vision. Granted, I took pic related from an old source that probably originated long ago but this goes to the artists who haven’t improved from this.
And then there’s the baras with german shaped heads slapped with a muzzle.

forgot to add that the fur looks like literal spikes

What? No mention of constant bedroom eyes, angel/bat wings, weird hybrids, glowing fur/body parts and other stuff?

You need a Lucario version of this.

>Check the webcomic
>Latest stuff doesn't show much gayness, mostly sitcom and some weird fantasy thing with a demon?
>Early stuff looks pretty close to early VGCats
This is just like when Wuffle looked like every panel could lead into porn, but the creator literally never made anything sexual with it. It's quite fascinating.

These were the first things that came to mind. Those too, e s p e c i a l l y the glowing fur

I'm not a furry, I'm an anthropomorph enthusiast

I will make that edit though

Lola Bunny is very dangerously cheesy.

...

oh my

...

That can't be real.

how cheesy is too cheesy, Sup Forums?

How long until that one anti furry janitor who has a hate boner for endtown axes this thread?

I love his new haircut

it makes him look very cute

>for endtown

must be nice to think your threads are so important but no, it's generally all threads about anthro things getting axed for no reason

>no reason
It mostly has to do with some people spamming porn and ruining it for everybody

no, it's been a long, long time since porn was spammed, last thread that got killed for no reason was a prequel one iirc, killed 2 minutes after some guy posted "bump" because it was in page 7

I mean, I could have of listed every other "anthro" comic that immediately gets the axe anytime it gets discussed like poppy, but I figured endtown would suffice as an example.

It's a relatively safe place to explore your sexuality. Also the bright colors and simple facial expressions attract autism.

Sauce? I know it's a manga but I forgot the name.

Beastars