ITT: webcomics that make you think

ITT: webcomics that make you think

...

this one is sure to scramble your macadamias

I managed to swallow this one by explaining it as the, probably heterosexual, man thinking that the idea where for every male there are thousands of females as a form of paradise.

I know that's not what he meant, but at least that way I can sleep at night

>claims to choose race of characters at random
>the butt of every comic is white
Really percolates my pecans.

He had already made this joke with a "what if" predicting machine.

i know what you mean bros i got triggered too

They're fucking turtles m8
Did you ever watch that episode of Futurama where Fry falls in love with the Lucy Liu robot and the after school special says that that lifestyle would eliminate crime and war since guys will just stay home to fuck their gf bots?

that one was a little funnier though

You may be noticing a pattern where there is none. It's not like you actually checked actual distribution against random distribution to infer odds of the system being rigged. You may tend to recall instances of these cases more often because they stand out to you.

not him but i did a little test where i checked the likelyhood of a comic including a gay couple over time. MASSIVE spike as the comic progresses

Is that when he started using the randomizer? Because if genders are randomized then it's 50/50 that any couple will be gay.

homestuck really made me think about how not to do a webcomic

not sure, when did he start using the randomizer?

...

someone explain this to me
he just say "look, females can build a utopia "
or there is a joke i can understand?

Nope. Just bare-faced sexism.

No idea. Just observing that if genders are randomized in a script gay couplings become as likely as straight ones.

well, damn.
thanks user

Powerful.

Saving this to draw porn of later.

Doesn't surprise me.
It's very easy to tell when someone who writes comedy has his head up his ass even if he avoids showing direct signs.
I always had that kind of feeling with that artist.

Which is a gross misrepresentation of the proportion of homosexuals in a population.

And? Was his point to generate statistically valid sets of characters?

Its called a persecution complex, many people around here have it.

ah yes those mid-atlantic sea dwelling penguins

No. There's absolutely intent here in racial choices. The artist admits it as such.

In addition, whenever there's a "controversial" topic, he uses a character designed after himself. A white male with reddish brown hair.

>doesn't disprove the affirmation
>just assumes he's wrong

So that... is the brainpower... of SJWs... woah

Alt text:
If you're more irritated about the geographical location of the penguins than the fact that the penguins can talk, then I have nothing to say to you.

Considering he's got enough of a background in science to channel Gary Larson, and actually built a randomizer in the first place, I would assume he understands at least the simplest ideas about porportionality. Which is more than I can say for user here.

thats ok, millions of democrats deny reality every waking moment

Why couldn't it be translated penguin talk?

...

God please do

>trickle down economics

You might have noticed that the butt of the joke is also disproportionately a ginger, just like the artist.

better than financing drug addicts

there better be an actual homeless person with this somewhere

>The artist admits
can i get a link or something?

Wait, what's the joke for this one? Was she going to use the coconut oil as lube or something? Do people use coconut oil as lube?

>Do people use [insert liquid substance] as lube

yes, yes they do

...

>Similar composition and formatting
>Both done quickly with scribbleness as part of the aesthetic
>Left looks enormously better than the right

Makes me think about what the fuck people are going on about when they say the right looked crappy because it was done on a crunch deadline.

>people defend SMBC
>this shit comic is still on that Sup Forums approved webcomics chart

That really makes me think

Is this the right place to mention natty comics?

just lurk more until you feel the tempo.

I thought the punchline was going to be some kind of turtle orgy/harem.

are proven to work

I mean, they're not wrong. I appreciate the cartoon violence. There should be more of that instead of people settling their differences with words and cool heads.

So that's Uncle Sam who is losing his liberties and virtues but gets distracted by Satan through the Military Industrial Complex (i.e. the Cold War) and the pornography industry (i.e. moral bankruptcy)

Is this bait obvious ENOUGH? Can we go further?

It's not wrong

>you have to accept my views at face value without any proofs or you're SJW
Really makes one think.

All that proves is that women can get away with anything and not get arrested.

I mean let's face it you guys. You need an IQ of at least 140 to understand the free market

Nice bait

There's a difference between facebook democrats and actual democrats. The former is what you're thinking of; though that's still favorable compared to the state of denial republicans live in.

First user is right though. You're assuming that he's randomizing sexualities of characters. When he seems to just be randomizing genders in the script.

So we have married partner one, and pick their gender randomly, and we have married partner 2 and pick their gender randomly then they have a 50% chance of both being the same gender.

You're confused over what feature is being randomized.

>I would assume he understands at least the simplest ideas about porportionality.
Understanding proportionality doesn't mean you have to impose quotas in your piece of fiction.

Proportion of Gay in real life never dictate the proportion of gay in fiction. you are not making any points there.

but one has to wonder why you would have so many faggots in your comic.

>Sinfest used to be a cute comic about a little devil girl falling in love with a shy bookworm.
>Now it's the biggest, shallowest, most patronizing political social justice feminist commentary bullshit imaginable
Liberals ruin everything they touch.

Wait, does Sup Forums really think this is Feminist?

Do you people not realize this is making fun of feminism?

Now let's see what percentage of those statistics are from non whites.

I hadn't considered exactly what's being randomized and how, as I don't remember seeing a complete description.

>Proportion of Gay in real life never dictate the proportion of gay in fiction. you are not making any points there.
...unless you write your fiction using a randomizer that dictates how much gay is in your fiction.

His randomizer, if it works as described by user makes for a much gayer universe.

Or he's making a joke about the assumption that the requirement necessary to build a utopia is being female.

I figured the setup was expecting ecological disaster. then going with utopia. A reverse planet of the apes.

A giant turtle orgy was also in the cards.

Or the simpler feminist punchline about how we would have a utopia with no men around.

If so, I didn't get the joke.

The comic on the right looks like it's from a 90s geocities page

...

So he's good about staying on-model. Unlike everyone who works on Steven Universe or the whole CalArts movement.
There's no pleasing you people.

because then you'd only be irritated at the geographic location
duh

>doesn't denounce her father's pedophilla

Really gets the old noggin' a joggin'

The joke is that feminists always say that without men there'd be a utopia. The joke is that this is stupid, and if that were the case we wouldn't be worried about turtles only having female babies.

I mean we have a LITERAL incarnation of "the Patriarchy" in the comic and Weiner's done off-color anti-feminist comics in the past.

I think you should reread that, user
The author's stupefied that it happened, drawing attention to something like pedophilia is only a positive on Sup Forums

Stop posting this cancerous comic, you stupid faggot. Whichever mod nuked it yesterday, I wish he'd do the same today.

>There's a difference between facebook democrats and actual democrats
none whatsoever, just check out twitter

"Mind blowing" is not denouncing or even condemning it

I was expecting some female ninja turtles. I am disappointed.

Small differences in averages become large differences at the extremes. But it goes both ways.

Consider also that men are the ones who actually built civilization. Most important contribution women have had is motivating men because men do that shit just so they can fuck women. A society of women couldn't even maintain a status quo, let alone make progress.

No, he's good at drawing the exact same expression over and over again. Go home, Sup Forumsmblr.

Natty has to be a poe.
IT HAS TO BE!

It's condemning it when you portray the person arranging the marriage "tricking" a child by using candy, a situation that everyone understands because of the various works depicting a harmful stranger pedophile offering children candy
But I'm not an autist, so I understood it at "mind blowing"

as much as I don't like the direction the comic went in, I'm impressed he's never missed a day (that I know of). He's also making bank on Patreon now, and in spite of how I thought I'd feel I am happy that people still care about the comic despite the shift in tone, and that it seems to be lucrative for him to make it.

theres no way to be sure, authors twitter seems real though

Simpler, sure, and I imagine if you're looking for feminist comics that's what you'll find (though it'll look pretty silly because its literally comparing women to sea turtles).

The real beauty of this is that it should piss both sides off if they're not paying attention.

If I ever see a homeless person with a sign like that, I'm giving them money.

>look at how dumb this nigger is
"Hahahahaha I'm not racist I just love dark humor"
>Joke at the expense of white man
"This is so cringey and sexist. SJWs ruined everything."

I fucking hate all of the snowflakes on this website.

Actual democrat: votes
Facebook democrat: doesn't

That's the difference.

I like how you only highlighted one type snowflake. gg Sup Forumsmblr

this is technically a webcomic though its in the paper as well

>I fucking hate all of the snowflakes on this website.
Then what are you doing here? Go seek out likeminded folk on Reddit.

get those axon terminals warmed up, youre gonna need em

Hey does anyone remember that comic of the "furry" that jacked off to gay porn and the whole thing was a wonky adventure about him realizing he was gay because I kind of need it right now

This comic have so many layers I can't even tell what it is about

Asscastle?

Oh my fuck, thank you user

You have no idea how much gay furry porn I've found trying to look that goddamn thing up

>Using the dictionary to prove your superiority
>Not understanding that words often have multiple meanings/usages

When I use this word in a negative sense it has negative synonyms.

When I use this word in a positive sense it has positive synonyms.

Well, I'm happy I could help. I guess.

>You have no idea how much gay furry porn I've found trying to look that goddamn thing up

I bet you hated every moment...

Natty is a fucking enigma.

...wut...?

...