>"Ah need mah Ar-15 so ah can overthrow the gubbmint!"
Do you gun nuts even hear yourselves? What kind of civilized country allows half its citizens to carry WEAPONS OF WAR on city streets?
I for one don't want our democratically elected government overthrown, and nobody else in this country apart from you nutjobs does either. Stop compensating for your tiny dicks and agree to some common sense regulation. There are people dying because of you.
>>>/www.reddit.com
Weak b8, faggit. Enjoy that BBC
Make Sage Great Again
A FUCKING LEAF
I would think as a Canadian you'd have first had experience with how real countries are run.
By the way, are you aware you can't save with an image?
*sage
This doesn't concern you, go back to your hellhole
Terrible b8, seriously try harder next time
>the guns make people insane
liberal idiocy, exhibit A.
sage
>misinterpreting this hard
I knew right wingers were stupid, but god damn. Guns don't make you stupid, it's just only stupid people that own guns.
Gun control is illogical and counter-productive in every objective study.
Have you not turned on the news lately?
making the connection between insanity and guns, not insanity and gun owners. I think you're the one who needs to touch up on reading coprehension.
sage
>watch this pasta get over 100 replies.
Shit gets posted every single day.
>get attacked with fists
You live
>get attacked with gun
You die
What's so hard to understand about this
i am fearing for my life
What a crybully
sage
If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns, because guns will be needed to disarm the people. So it's not that you're anti gun - you're very pro gun. It's just that you believe that only the government (which is so honest, reliable, and virtuous, etc.) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun control - there is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small political elite and their minions. - Molyneux
>>get attacked with fists
>die because other person is stronger than you
>get attacked with fists
>shoot man
>you're not dead or harmed
????
>Get attacked with fist
You die as blunt trauma with fists can be very lethal, especially if gone untreated.
>Get attacked with gun.
Very hard for inexperienced shooters under stress to hit moving targets, plus most handgun wounds are survivable; most people shot by handguns, if they receive medical treatment and stop bleeding soon, are very much survivable. In addition, even in the US where over a third of the population owns firearms, unless you are involved in gang violence, it's very unlikely you will be targeted. Plus having your own firearm acts as a deterrent.
>There are people dying because of you.
The weak deserve their fate.
Every time you throw another insulting stereotype into your effort to persuade, you increase the chances of Trump getting 8 years and being followed by another somebody you won't like. Don't you get it, yet? We're tired of being condescended to.
This retard is actually trying to say fists are more lethal than guns
I guess that's why we use only fists in the military?
Please please kill yourself. Should be really easy for a gun nut like yourself
>We're tired of being condescended to.
Funny, that doesn't make you correct.
And that gives you power over us?
I am just waiting for the Trump is gonna ban our guns shit to start cause gun and ammo sells will go down and they will need something to boost sells again.
You lost hillshills. Guns won't go anywhere.
Kys.
Nobody forces you to stay there cuck.
>"Ah need mah Ar-15 so ah can overthrow the gubbmint!"
Mocking something doesn't make it less true.
>this thread again
saged and hidden my shill friend
Thats just it Faggot, we aren't ruled BECAUSE we have guns. go back to cuckistan
Just admit you don't have a moral leg to stand on.
>half its citizens
All of them are allowed to faggot
...
Morality is for lesser beings.
morality is subjective
When the government overthrown, atleast you would have something to protect you from armed soldiers. Maybe not tanks, but its better than being without any protection. Is it so hart to understand?
...
...
...
There are people dying because of niggers. You don't need niggers to defend yourself, or overthrow the labour force through affirmative action. Why don't you stop virtue signalling and agree to common sense regulation, people die because of you.
Ban niggers.
...
>We need to take away guns to keep people safe
>import savage shitskins by the millions, and enabling them to breakdown social cohesion.
Do you liberals live in reality?
...
...
...
>muh holocaust
Stopped reading after the first line. The only thing you need to ask yourself is how much deaths from these guns happened in this century? To answer it: almost none. Such laws only punish law obeying citizens.
Why do you keep posting this thread?
...
To feed his wife's son
>What kind of civilized country allows half its citizens to carry WEAPONS OF WAR on city streets?
The best kind, because they don't insist on putting people into class. You are treated the same under the law, regardless of your age, gender, sexual affiliation, race, religious belief, etc.
Our qualification requirement for the Chief Executive of the United States is:
>Over 40
>A natural-born citizen
That's all it takes to be qualified to become president. Nothing more.
Our government does not pretend to be made up of a different class/species of human, and the fact that this upsets you is incredibly telling.
>fatshaming
>shaming him for supposed mental disease
Shameful.
How dare you. How dare you sir. People like you are why common sense gun laws never get passed.
fuk u commmy
now get back to sukin kok
>98 lb woman has 300 lb man attempt to rape her in a dark alley at night
>Fists only = rape
>Gun = no rape
>Gay man gets accosted by 3 hillbillies.
>Fists only = chained and dragged behind a car for miles
>Guns = a real fighting chance
You seem to like the idea of "might makes right," rather than offer people an equalizer. Why?
Kazarian mafia shills
I am more statistically likely to die in a fist fight than being shot due to not being a Black, Asian or Hispanic gang member. The overwhelming majority of people do not abuse firearms when they have access to them and those that do typically acquire them illegally, even in the United States.
Gun control doesn't protect me. In fact, by destroying manufacture and removing substantial commercial sectors from the economy (In the UK today, the private shooting industry is worth roughly a billion pounds), you'd actually encourage crime by removing jobs, especially in the firearms trade which excels at providing distributed local work for high skilled machinists and engineers, not even considering the huge retail sector.
How dare I what? Digress? You pathetic cuckold.
Such laws never work because criminals get guns illegally, and only punish gun collectors and people who want it fir self protection. Your lust for black cock did enough cancer to society. Do all of the world a favor and jump off a bridge, cuck.
*woosh*
Interestingly enough, if the liberals who want most guns banned actually had taken advantage of their right to bear arms, they could also be a credible threat that stood a chance in the revolt they keep going on about.
As it is, I look forward to the Safety Scissors Charge of the Left Brigade with glee.
Nice argument. Better than anything you said so far.
>russian for murderer of negroes
I wan't guns. If you Anti Gun your more likely to have your wife cheat on you. proven fact
chill, ally.
its a joke
I was pro gun control for the longest time because I bought into the moden millitaries will evisercate any civilian militia argument, plus my college town was shot up by the supreme gentleman my freshman year. Then the Turkish Coup against Erdogan happened and I saw citizens rise up and stop it.
Guns are an important tool in the hands of the populace to stop Tyranny.
lol might makes right bro it's called the "is-ought gap"
enjoy the next 4 years of total republican control
(inb4 muh 2018 midterm won't be a democrat blowout)
Who gives the government the power to use those weapons of war?
...
Just like their "job"
>I for one don't want our democratically elected government overthrown
Heh, Sup Forums will have no choice but to agree to this now. Well played.
OP's logic
Holy shit people, OP so fucking absolutely right!
We gotta embrace that truth there, y'all getting the picture?
We gotta rise up, take action, just like all those in Portland, NY, LA and Chicago!
We gotta stop a Stalin/Hitler/Pol Pot!
Say it with me, we're gonna have our own protests and tell them what needs to be done ... LEGALISE M-16s!
(and bullpup equivalents, and whatever else)
You don't really get a say in the matter. I milled the receiver for my own AK last week, I'm going to finish the rest of it on Wednesday.
I might make a habit of doing it weekly so that I can just hand them out to whoever wants one on the day of the rope.
...
>common sense
by who's opinion?
How do you rednecks actually think these bullshit arguments are convincing anyone?
Most paranoid people I've ever met I swear. Ruining this country
Your lameassed AK is a gimped semiauto variant, your contribution is invalid!
That's a revolver, it's completely slow,(small too) it's got nothing to do with salt rifles!
To get us to fix the law?
Where are you getting this take away guns from? It gotten clear, we need NEW guns!
You do realize you're destabilizing our democracy, right?
Firstly, we aren't a democracy, we're a democratic republic.
And no, he's not. The government did that when they decided to ignore "Shall not be infringed," part of the 2A.
Nothing he is doing is illegal. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean he is destabilizing our democratic republic.
Automatics are only useful for wasting ammunition.
Top kek, as if an armed populace isn't inherently destabilizing
How do you think this country was even formed
Why do anti-fun fags always make everything about dicks?
I like guns
An armed populace resisting an unjust government. Presuming you agree with that, what is your point?
>Britain
>unjust
Pick one
>not knowing the Brady meme
I always argued on /k/ that, while hilarious, people actually ended up believing all that horseshit
You watch what you say! Who do you think you're talking to?
I think up a MEGA COOL PROTEST, and you can't say nothing about why the protest ain't an awesome idea, so you bring up something out of nowhere about ammo waste!
They were giving government dictations to the colonies, while giving them no representation in Britain. They selectively increased taxes on the colonies, but not in Britain, simply to amass more wealth.
Please feel free to tell me how that was just.
What if you live in a 20%+ black population neighbourhood? What do then?
I can only be "gun-free" in 90% white hoods.
SHALL
NOT
BE
INFRINGED
>simply to amass more wealth
The fuck? They had just fought a war to defend the colonies. They were only making us pay back some of the cost.
Say what you want about representation, but you can't say we weren't being treated fairly.
Except we totally were. If Cuba tried to invade Hawaii, do you think it would be just if the federal government increased federal taxation on JUST Hawaii?
Americans should use their guns for protection, instead it's more used in crime than protection.
New York could need a real vigilante to clean up the crime. Gangbangers aren't at all afraid and that isn't a good thing.
Yes.
Then you are wrong. All people are treated equally under the law, regardless of location or any other factors.
Hitler did ban guns though.
Hitler was a socialist lefty, SJW's have more in-common with fascism than they'd ever care to admit.
Cool strawman ahmed. Wanna bring it to the white house?
>canada
>real country
wanna know how i know youre trolling?