What is the White Supremacist explanation for the Middle Ages in Europe?

What is the White Supremacist explanation for the Middle Ages in Europe?

After the fall of Rome Europe fell into a low level agricultural society for 900 years, some of the highlights:

>little if anything was invented
>no scientific discovery
>white people didn't go an explore anything
>Europe suffered military losses to the Turks
>people were burned for witchcraft
>people shit in the streets (just like India)

Where was all the inherent superiority of the white race during this time?

There were barely any Jews around so don't tell me it's da jewwwwws

Other urls found in this thread:

strangenotions.com/gods-philosophers/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

We were the niggers of the time.

>Christianity

>White Supremacist

S A G E
A
G
E
/thread

Only Atheists blue pilled by secular Jews can say those things about the middle ages.

Black death
Barbarian invasions. Germanics, huns and magyars.
>no scientific discovery
Renaiscensse
>people were burned for witchcraft
More commom in modern age

>Muh ebin "Dark Ages" meme.
>Muh ebin religion of science.
>Muh super great Enlightenment.
Fucking casuals.

Immunity to the black plague was coincidentally correlated with high intelligence so it left behind a race of supermen.

This, middle ages were great, I wish I had lived during those great times

>little if anything was invented
>no scientific discovery
>white people didn't go an explore anything
>Europe suffered military losses to the Turks
>people were burned for witchcraft
>people shit in the streets (just like India)
Still kicked ass in the crusades though

Islamic invasion caused the dark ages.

Quite literally speaking they established a Caliphate which existed for nearly 1,000 years.

The Crusades was the tipping point, when everything turned around.

Crusades were a failure.

It was the reason the turks conquered the Byzantine Empire.

>Islamic, Hunic, Scandinavian, Germanic and other invasions
>Black Death
>the fall of rome leaving a political and economic trouble
>Feudalism
>No scientists because of the manorial system
>the Church having too much power

Witch hunts weren't a medieval phenomenon, ya dingus

Christianity happened.
It set us back centuries.

What was your grade in history class OP?

>People in the ancient era always shat in the streets, Rome was clean because it was a centralized capital of a massive empire with good sanitation
>The issues with Europe during the dark ages only extended for a few hundred years. from the 5th century to around the 10th century. This was a western European problem, the Greek/Byzantine civilization was at it's apex at the time.
>Scientists, learning, poetry, and art all continued to advance during this time albeit more slowly. It is a myth that the dark ages were anti-science.
>Europe still, in this decentralized state, managed to hold back massive invasions from Moors and Ottomans and eventually prevailed against their greatest threat.

>barfing up the dark ages meme
it feels so good to know that our enemies know butt fucking nothing about anything.

>no scientific discovery

strangenotions.com/gods-philosophers/

"The story of that breakthrough, and the remarkable Oxford scholars who achieved it and thus laid the foundations of true science - the "Merton Calculators" - probably deserves a book in itself. But Hannam's account certainly does them justice and forms a fascinating section of his work. The names of these pioneers of the scientific method - Thomas Bradwardine, Thomas Bradwardine, William Heytesbury, John Dumbleton and the delightfully named Richard Swineshead - deserve to be better known. Unfortunately, the obscuring shadow of "the Myth" means that they continue to be ignored or dismissed even in quite recent popular histories of science. Bradwardine's summary of the key insight these men uncovered is one of the great quotes of early science and deserves to be recognized as such:

These men were not only the first to truly apply mathematics to physics but also developed logarithmic functions 300 years before John Napier, and the Mean Speed Theorem 200 years before Galileo. The fact that Napier and Galileo are credited with discovering things that Medieval scholars had already developed is yet another indication of how "the Myth" has warped our perceptions of the history of science."

If you mean venice stabbing rome in the back while pretending to go on crusade sure

>People in the ancient era always shat in the streets
The Indus valley people figured out a drainage system, Rome had toilets

it all fell apart when the Roman political system died, white people weren't smarter then anyone else they had the systems in place that allowed people to come up with these solutions