Britfags- Defend the Monarchy in 2016

how do you still justify it?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=lUN2F7xZim4
bmsf.org.uk/about-the-monarchy/the-queen/duties-rights-and-powers-of-h-m-the-queen/
youtube.com/watch?v=YZFNUJeDldw
youtube.com/watch?v=Xz1XORmNP2M
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger_culling_in_the_United_Kingdom
twitter.com/AnonBabble

not really a fan but compared to corrupt politicians and paedos in the parliament id go with a royal family.

i personally think monarchy wouldnt be that bad, if we had 1 person running a country for an indefinite amount of time it would be easier to throw a coup these days to make things change for the better. nowadays the pm and politicians change every couple years before we get enough dirt on them to do anything. btw kate middleton is a 5 at best that bitch ugly

There is nothing to justify, we're a parliamentary democracy, not an absolute monarchy. That we didn't revolt and put an end to hundreds of years of our history like other European nations is a bonus.

it's a vestigial insititution that nowadays mostly works as diplomacy and protocol, and keep themselves in 'parallel' with democracy by not influencing the vote

as long as a monarchy pays for its own expenses don't think there's much problem with it

How can I fuck the Queen

>americans still think we are ruled by a queen
fucking hell, its called keeping our culture and tradition, an alien concept to yanks who don't have any

>Anericans defend Drumpf when he lost the popular vote

Why do they still justify this system

Much better than turning over control of your wallet to 10M genetic defectives like you do in your beloved "democracies".

Moreover, there is no legal basis that covers the theory of democracy - whereas a monarchy is straight property rights.

Constitutional monarchy is good.
It lets cultivate nationalism(or "patriotism", call it however you want) without associating cartain political faces with the state.

So you can shout both "God save the queen" and "Theresa May\David Cameron can suck a dick" at the same time without being accused in being "un-patriotic".

Fucking this

Because she saves me £3.50 a year and she costs me, at most, £1 a year.

I'd rather have the £500m+ a year from tourists visiting her, than not.

Also, she is the ace in the hole when shit goes wrong. She is ACTUALLY incredibly powerful. Beyond most peoples knowledge. But she can effectively fuck up the world.

Best reason? She can remove utter shite from the government.

how do you justify a nigga fucking your wife progressive?

she makes bank

I'd much rather have someone that's been groomed for life for the position of head of state. And it's nice to have someone who devotes their entire life for the good of the country.

The queen cannot lose an election. So she has doesn't have to satisfy special interest groups to keep her in power.

A bloody revolution is unlikely, since the armed forces are sworn to the queen.

Although E2 hasn't really used any of her parliamentary powers, the monarch can. Victoria used her powers to further animal rights for example.

The queen is also steadfast. No matter how bloody and divided our politics gets, we can always rally as a nation behind her. (hence why our monarchy has lasted so long, but republics come and go on a regular basis)

She is also good for our economy. The crown estates generate hundreds of millions of pounds which goes straight to the government.

Absolute monarchies are bad. Constitutional/parliamentary monarchies are great.

youtube.com/watch?v=lUN2F7xZim4

they have way more pull then you are letting on. the government is in her name after all.

shes a figurehead. she holds no actual power.

Powers of the Queen:

The power to appoint and dismiss the Prime Minister
The power to appoint and dismiss other ministers.
The power to summon, prorogue and dissolve Parliament
The power to make war and peace
The power to command the armed forces of the United Kingdom
The power to regulate the Civil Service
The power to ratify treaties
The power to issue passports
The power to appoint bishops and archbishops of the Church of England
The power to create peers (both life peers and hereditary peers).

>bmsf.org.uk/about-the-monarchy/the-queen/duties-rights-and-powers-of-h-m-the-queen/

Fellow Amerifats don't know this but the Brits pretty much invented nationalism, using the Monarchy as a kind of symbol of Anglo values and authority.
>If this tradition did not exist there would be no American Revolution.

Imagine if I said "Americans still defend the constitution in 2016"

That's what you have just done

very much. its the only reason the executive branch exists.

In the UK the people are sovereign. The Queens holds our sovereignty in trust. Thus, she is a figurehead of our collective will. Her parliament carries out the duties of government on behalf of the will of the people. There is no need for a power grab because the line of succession is fixed and so you don't get the detritus of the earth like Killary setting up a democratically subvertive mafia selling off the machinery of state to nigger-tier arabs.

>Bloodlines descended from ancient nobility
>Ordained by God just as the heroes and warchiefs of old were said to be descended from the gods themselves.
>Have intergenerational responsibility for their realm
>Are expected to be a living example of what is honorable and decent to their subjects.

A form of governance based on blood, honor and birthright. Kryptonite to the jew.

I don't like the monarchy but to say they were ineffective would be foolish. Regardless of what I think it brings more positives than negatives to the table

The monarchy is what keeps us one cut above other countries.
They are the embodiment of what it means to be British, the government runs the country on her behalf so if the shit every hit the fan we can remove government.
In terms burgers can understand
>The Queen and her royal line is our second amendment
The rest is all gravy, but her first duty is to the country and to carry out the will of the people.

This is the only problem with the monarchy, the will of the people means that with immigration changing the people we will soon have a crisis on our hand.
The Queen is annointed by God during her coronation, and when she dies sometime in the next 10-15 years, 20 tops, and her son Charles becomes king there is going to be a real argument on whether or not they are really relevant anymore.

The SJW and Muslims will argue that since she is anointed by the God of the Church of England they are not represented and with all the traitors and morons calling them tax dodgers (they're not, the Queen has worked every day of her life since her ascension) there will most likely come a day when a party will try and remove them.

This cannot be allowed to happen, the UK can lose her empire and overseas territories, we can lose our status in the world but when the Monarchy fails and is removed the very essence of what it is to be British goes with it.

In the UK we have this thing called 'cultural preservation'. It might be hard for americans to understand, because to understand it you need a culture to preserve in the first place.

>tourist money from burgers gives us a profit
>George 3 gave us all the crown lands in return for a small salary which makes a profit
>tradition of being British, a staple point of our conservative nation
>creates a stable government unlike France which is on their 195.5th Republic or Italy who have had more presidents than the US
>patrician as fuck
>can put royal on the front of everything (royal marines > us marines)
>makes military classy as fuck with parades that blow 3Rd world commie shitholes the fuck out (I'm looking at you DPRK)
>did I mention burgers pay a Fuck ton of money to look at her house and guards?
>culture, you wouldn't understand my 300 year old friend

They bring in a lot of money from tourism and unify the nation culturally.

Having a hereditary head of state and an elected head of government is not a bad idea. USA should probably split up its executive office into a council or a prime minister/president dichotomy.

Even Rome at periods split up its Consulships. I think the founders felt that Congress was enough of a check but in recent times this is proving not so, as the executive continues to grow its power of legislation and "police actions".

Tradition and History lad. Some of us don't want to throw away our culture.

youtube.com/watch?v=YZFNUJeDldw

Well there's a dignity royalty. A majesty that precludes the likelihood of assassination. If you were to point a pistol at a king or a queen your hands would shakes as though palsied.

if you did. I can assure you, if you did, that the sight of royalty would cause you to dismiss all thoughts of bloodshed and you would stand... how shall I put it? In awe. Now, a president... well I mean...
heh, kid
why not shoot a president.

WHERE THE FUCK IS MY PORTRAIT OF THE QUEEN, GOVERNMENT?

I WANT MY GOD DAMN PORTRAIT BEFORE SHE DIES, REE

>This cannot be allowed to happen, the UK can lose her empire and overseas territories, we can lose our status in the world but when the Monarchy fails and is removed the very essence of what it is to be British goes with it.

>Implying this country isn't already beyond saving

The reasons for the existence for the monarchy is twofold.

1. Tourism - although I say this is BS because who the fuck visits Britain SOLELY for the royal family. Even if it's for Buckingham Palace that would stay because it's a monument

so really there's only one reason

2. Incomes from the royal family's land ownership goes straight to the government and enriches the country itself. No more monarchy means that privately owned land has its incomes redirected to the monarchy's pockets rather than the state.

There's your one reason.

I don't like the monarchy or the fact we have an unelected upper house but I can certainly see the reason for keeping both.

1.) Having a sovereign going back thousands of years is the absolute pinnacle of the customs on this island that make it great

Also

2.) It stops upstarts from ever dreaming Imperial dreams as 'President' or 'Head of state', because no matter the politician, there is always a bigger fish

inb4 a wild serbian appears

youtube.com/watch?v=Xz1XORmNP2M

Wow Cromwell sure has mellowed out after a few hundred years

>eurocucks are selling out their traditional values and abandoning their culture and heritage
>britcucks should scrap their anachronistic monarchy

Make up your minds, amerifats.

Not a britfag but we use our king as a spokes person and most people don't care if like 0,0000001% of our tax money goes to some fat guy because jews are taking far more.

It brings a lot of money through tourism to the economy since chinks love em

Gr8 post m8

Brits like to know there's someone above them in some fashion, even symbolic dominance is good for them
that's how you get a nanny state and a distaste for freedom

you know that prince chuck was best buds with saville and prince andy is best buds with epstein
the pedo network originates with the royal inbred reptilian demons . Chuck is proud to be descendant of dracula, the blood drinker

...

>implying anybody gives a shit about the House of Glucksburg

monarch is the last thing standing between our democracy and 1984

Said the vassal state to the free nation

We don't have the right to bear arms like you Americans do so the Queen is our only defense from a tyrannical government.
Our armed forces are loyal to her and not politicians.

...

Because she likes Corgis and she's based.

this

i thought farmers can have like shotguns and shit

in what way shape or form are we a vassal state you mongoloid, you're not even in the EU any more and most of our trade is done with member states and the US
your empire is dead billy

nothing is as important as the house of glucksburg

This man will be our king

For the purpose of hunting foxes or badgers.
Your constitution gives you the right to bear arms for the purpose of raising a militia to defend your citizens from your government.

They're pretty much a non-issue.

Even hardcore Republicans don't really give that much of a shit about removing the Queen/monarchy, because it doesn't really matter that much.

She has no political power and is more of a symbol than anything.

...

>A form of governance based on blood, honor and birthright. Kryptonite to the jew.

toppest of keks considering that's what Jews are most notable for, their nepotism.

To the EU. Your tax code has recently been completely written to benefit your masters in Brussels, soon you'll be dragged into a EU army.

what do you tommies think about "the crown"?

Contributes to our identity, which most countries have lost in this fucked up globalised world we live in. Without things like this we'd just be a bigger belgium, basically a bland boring shithole with no interesting characteristics or culture. Im proud of the monarchy, its the only present day thing weve got to symbolise our history and success. Weve had a monarchy this long why stop now?

>Said the country that only owns 4/5ths of it's Island.

Gay. She looks nothing like Lizzie.

Overacts the fuck out of everything and has a socialist slant (thinking about that Civil servant having a fucking monologue to Atlee)

Looks fucking great though

then what did you mean by free nation

keep in mind also that the UK is not a Nation

it'll be united in my lifetime by all accounts so I'm not too bothered
looking forward to the civil war once orangeutans try to oppose another democratic vote

FUCKIN' ROASTED

true
you should stockpile for the fox/badger apocalypse then

It's already happening.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger_culling_in_the_United_Kingdom

It'll only get united because you Cucktholics are outbreeding the Protestants because you don't use condoms.

>free nation
Sovereignty.

>united Ireland

Oh man your one of 'those' paddy's

Enjoy your eternal disappointment

...

american tourists flock to see the blessed queen

they snap their photographs and say "gawd darn it, isn't it a pretty scene"

...

It looks like he has a fucking ballbag attached to his chin.

saw her crown and whatnot at the london bridge one time

>Chesterton's fence is the principle that reforms should not be made until the reasoning behind the existing state of affairs is understood. The quotation is from Chesterton’s 1929 book The Thing: Why I am a Catholic, in the chapter entitled "The Drift from Domesticity": "In the matter of reforming things, as distinct from deforming them, there is one plain and simple principle; a principle which will probably be called a paradox. There exists in such a case a certain institution or law; let us say, for the sake of simplicity, a fence or gate erected across a road. The more modern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, “I don’t see the use of this; let us clear it away." To which the more intelligent type of reformer will do well to answer: "If you don’t see the use of it, I certainly won’t let you clear it away. Go away and think. Then, when you can come back and tell me that you do see the use of it, I may allow you to destroy it."[79]

this alongside the fact that Catholics outperform Protestants in schools across the 6 counties
so much for Protestant work ethic kek
what'll really bring it about are the middle class not being as radical Unionist as they were in Carson's time, they'll vote for whatever benefits them economically which atm is you lads pumping bennies into their hole of a statelet

>vassal state to the free nation
>Sovereignty.
?
quite sure you meant to imply we were somehow your vassal state, a dream of a notion

>Oh man your one of 'those' paddy's
the majority yes, that is of the ones who give a shite rather than the average prole

Culture and tradition. That's it. They have no real power and never will have power ever again. The only real productive uses they have are tourism and diplomacy (with royal visits and such).

>implying you filthy human have anything to say against fallen angels

I don't really care if they join you desu, they all seem to be retards anyway. But for the moment, we are still cucking you so I will enjoy it while it lasts if you don't mind.

The royal family produce top-notch reaction faces, without them our shitposting industry would suffer significantly, Farage alone cannot keep it afloat.

does the queen ever engage in politics or does she always remain neutral?

The monarchy and westminster are both useless. They are like antique relics rolled out for a quick laugh.

you're subsidizing our people (tons of knackers in NI of the Nationalist as well as Loyalist persuasion) with your dole money as well as your monkies up there
they're just a burden on you for taxes, I don't feel very cucked tb h, though I would like to see a united Ireland because it looks better on a map and I'd essentially be shitting on the graves of dead patriots if I didn't

correct he is our national ballbag

So? Both Scotland and Wales are drains on our economy as well.

kek

I don't. I don't care either way, if some are happy with a bunch of big eared royals waving at them so be it.

She looks nice on our money and let's shit skns know that they'll never be a true westerner.

so it's not cucking in any sense, you're footing the bill for their sponging off you and annual chimp outs and you don't control whether they stay or go, that's up to the people in the 6 counties

It's not a monarchy. Saudi Arabia is a monarchy.

What we have, is a bunch of people playing pretend. It's called a ceremonial monarchy.

It only exists right now because it's extra cash from tourists.

The '''monarch''' here literally have no power, have no say on politics, welfare, and who we should go to war with.

In fact, if they decided to interfere with our democracy, then the royals would be overthrown within hours.

British businesses make a lot more money off tourism brought in by us having a historic, world-famous monarchy, than we pay the monarchy to exist.

Why else would someone on holiday visit a shithole like the British Isles?

...

but user I want England to be a Republic again.

Imperative english five year plan

1. repeal the monarchy
2. distribute royal lands and put the money into the nhs
3.install a egalitarian republic under corbyn

I though Soros was the goblin king

You mean that time when the Jews were let back in?

Why the fuck would we get rid of them? What the fuck would we do with them? They own huge parts of the UK, are irreversibly tied to these lands and are a huge beacon to the world about the UK.
The Royal wedding (which americans got butthurt about because we didn't invite Obongo to) was the MOST watched thing ever put on television.
The chinks are obsessed.

By not being a faggot.

HANG ALL REPUBLICANS

>mfw the queen outlives him

It doesn't.

Trillionaire gets free shit from the public and tax exemptions.

Worst Jew in the history of the Jews.