Is it true ?

Is it true ?

How can I be part of it?
Stock investment? Falling into the nanotech meme?

don't care, progress doesn't make you happier.

>unsourced, no key

No, we're already rich. Even in the middle of a recession, we have more security, more food, technology is at the point of being disposable.

The better question to ask is if you're prepared for the consequences of an increasingly fragile economy.

no idea, i wonder about this as well, even went as far as to fall for a meme engineering major (intelligent embedded systems)

wtf is the y axis measuring?

kinda. there has to be some new development. but we won't ALL be rich, it'll be the ones who risk something for this takeoff

What's the Y axis on that graph?

I agree, this graph reeks of bullshit.

scientist found a way to revive dead people
Praise KEK

porn

we wont all get rich but there will be more jobs available, which means more disposable income, which generally means more income for all trades, however money just stagnant in the hands of the rich, who dont spend their money but rather save it. Higher taxation on the rich fixes that, however, it also discourages people from keepign their money inside a country and makes them more likely to exploit tax loopholes and keep their money offshore.

Theres a fine balance to maintain to make sure people benefit from an economic boom.

New, unregulated technology. Boom.
Government starts regulating. Bust.

We won't get rich again because the left has given up trying to fix shit countries and has decided to import them here instead

WHAT IS THE Y AXIS?????????????

Trumps going to put money into NASA and ESA want to build a moonbase. Private enterprises in both Yurup and the USA are looking at orbital resource extraction.

Asteroid mining = shit tons of rare resources, resources the developing would won't be able to access due to being unable to into space.

Thus we return to the 18th century economic model where you could buy and entire defeated African tribe and all their possessions from some Ivory Coast warlord for nothing but a few handfuls of glass beads and some mass produced ironmongery.

% of monies

But Australia, isn't a hyper regulated Nat-Soc country the answer? Is Sup Forums wrong?

>putting faith in something in something hypothetical and 'somewhere down the line'

Relying on significant new scientific discoveries for a long-term system can't go wrong.

Number of shekels earned by our good goy Rabbi Goldstein every passover

Labour participation rates are dropping ever since they peaked somewhere in the 1960's so answer that question yourself.

Just because a bubble after bubble is created doesn't mean people get richer.

It is very true but the main problem nowadays is that the workforce, a key variable in the capitalistic system, is/will be subject to radical change.
With the arrival of robots close to sentience, nanotechnologies and the failure of modern healthcare, the wealth created by this new boom is not sure to be redistributed evenly among low class workers.
The issue being that if they don't have wealth, they don't buy, therefore no one sells anything to them and they won't be able to use new technologies and distribute them throughout society. The global benefits from new technologies get lost and we're fucked with a revolution.

>built
retarded image by someone who doesn't understand capitalism

>There isnt even a legend for the axis

...