Anybody have some examples of shitty election reporting by the New York Times?
Something like pic related, but for NYT.
Anybody have some examples of shitty election reporting by the New York Times?
Something like pic related, but for NYT.
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
wikileaks.org
mediaite.com
nypost.com
twitter.com
Pls guy's.
Like pic related, but from NYT.
Like pic, but from NYT.
...
yours is better cause its the same author lol
Thx 4 bumps.
Would love some of this but from NYT.
Bumping with some more hypocrisy.
I wish there were a lefty Sup Forums, (aside from the one that isn't a dead shithole), so I could post this to see them rationalize it.
Lefty Sup Forums voted Trump. He won the working class vote, after all.
What's this "lefty Sup Forums" you're talking about?
Oh. Well I meant an actual lefty Sup Forums, or perhaps bizarro Sup Forums
This is where I actually crossed over. This and his really well thought out statement of the "Dude WEED" issue.
If you ask me, there couldn't be a lefty Sup Forums right now.
These days, the left/globalists are utterly on the wrong side of history, with violent repression and everything.
They control the media, the banks, the (multinational) businesses, most of politics.
Public discourse is utterly manipulated in favor of the left/globalism, and therefore that public discourse is increasingly untruthful.
When you allow for free and chaotic discourse to occur in this setting (i.e. Sup Forums), that freedom and chaos will inevitably slant towards the side that holds the most objective truth, which these days is the right/nationalism.
Just look up any article they wrote about Trump, Bernie or Hillary. Literally every single one. "Trump is bad" "Hillary is good" "don't bother voting for Bernie"
>being new
cripplechan lad
I know, but someone has to have some kind of easy-to-digest image ready.
Many, perhaps even most lefties outside the regressive sphere were for Trump. Know actual commies for Trump even.
Main anti outside of regressives were those willing to swallow mainstream media bs without thinking and those living in a bubble
Bump with more hypocrisy.
...
nytimes.com
Bannon-as-white-supremacist stories count?
Kek says yes, praise him.
But honestly, I'm looking for the shit they put out pre-election.
Two reasons:
1) to find evidence of their shitty reporting that led to the public "apology" they put out
2) NYT provided free access to everyone for the election, allowing them to indoctrinate more people
That's not shitty reporting.
Pat smith was genuinely NON-genuine. She was not really inspiring and 90% of her speech was "lock hillary up". Trump might have won, but don't revise history in the process.
The sad thing is that Pat Smith's story could have been amazing if she focused on her son more.
You won't find anything in the primaries bruddah trump reporting was %100 ratings driven
The big thing they did was have each editor explain why Clinton was the best choice, highly unusual even for a paper widely seen to be a Dem shill gimme a minute I can find it
Also
nytimes.com
The shit might actually consider "misogyny, racism and greed" worse than war
I'm back
wikileaks.org
Also this was the damn front page on the fay after the election
Sauces
mediaite.com
nypost.com