So today I was given the topic "Should Europe allow or deny Syrian Refugees?" for a 3 page paper for my uni class...

So today I was given the topic "Should Europe allow or deny Syrian Refugees?" for a 3 page paper for my uni class. Any of you guys have good sources for the anti-immigration part?

Other urls found in this thread:

breitbart.com/london/2016/08/01/900-syrians-arrested-uk-one-year-including-rape-assault/
refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Just tell those cucks what they want to hear, user. Only fight battles that matter.

DELET THIS

>Europe = A handful of wealthy Western-European
Refugees fleeing war or persecution are not given the right to choose their host countries

Our guy Viktor Orban has a lot of speeches which make good points you can cite.

damn, a whole continent of black people and its the worst part of the planet
really makes you stink

Yes we should but under special circumstances.

1. They must have some form of identification to prove that they are Syrian refugees.
2. It must be through the 'Adopt a Refugee' program where sponsors can chose whether to host refugees in their homes and no one else is forced to.

Off the record, just had an argument today on this topic with someone that claimed that they "don't mind a little terrorism considering all the lives that we'll save".

>"don't mind a little terrorism considering all the lives that we'll save"
Top kek, haven't heard that brilliant argument in a long time.

Keep it professional and keep it Civil.

Do not talk about race or other politically incorrect ideas.

Do focus on

- definition of refugee
-UN rules on treatment, protection and resettling of refugees ie) closest safe country
-focus on the difference between who is actually a refugee and who is an economic migrant
-conclude with the hard legal responsibilities that western nations are meant to uphold according to current international law.
- talk about the negative impacts that mass migration from refugees are having on western countries who should not have to suffer this when it is not the host countries fault that things are shit.

Remember when you do conclude to mention that although it is your opinion based on data that Europe should deny access this does not mean a black or white stance. We can still provide aid and funding to legitimate refugees that have followed the law and gone to the nearest safe area. This way no one can outright use slanderous name calling when they can't logically argue against you. That way when they start accusing you of bigotry they will look like a child to everyone who has paid attention

>Argentina
>Italy
>Black

Write about how denying the Syrian refugees is extremely racist, but unfortunately the problem of radicalised Islam has appeared in Europe and it does not seem to be going away, and this in turn is triggering far-right nazi marches and genocidal movements.

So to prevent a resurgence of nazism and genocide we must unfortunately shut them out until Islam has become secularized.

That infographic with the blue circles about Muslim attitudes and beliefs. Talk about replacement rate. Talk about the increase in sexual assault and rape. Talk about native Europeans being outbred in their own countries. Talk about the increased radicalization in second generation Muslims. Talk about how they can't fucking pay for these skillless people who don't even speak the language. Talk about terror threats from now until infinity.

Dashcam footage of trucks going through Calais on a daily basis

but be absolutely subversive about it, i.e.

>no. refugees have become a wedge issue emboldening the far right eu-seccessionist parties in europe.

They aren't refugees.

If they were refugees, it wouldn't just be middle aged men bailing on their families.

>Write about how denying the Syrian refugees is extremely racist

Never ever give a "I agree but" argument. You give your opponent the way to discredit you by announcing that you have already conceded the moral platform

just read the refugee treaty, it stipulates that a reufgee needs to register in the first "safe country" , and they pass like 7 of these safe countries before reaching the gibs

>"Should Europe allow or deny Syrian Refugees?"

Why should Europe only accept Syrian Refugees?

Imagine you're a syrian, and you see the war come closer to your home. So you pack up and leave and go to Turkey or whatever.

Now, you're just a poor person in a refugee camp. You're safe in Turkey.

Why should Europe help YOU? Why shouldn't they let in all the OTHER poor people in the world? Surely some of them are more deserving, and less likely to commit radical bombings.

Also, there's the whole fact that it's cheaper, some estimates say TWELVE TIMES CHEAPER, to resettle the syrian refugees in the Middle East, instead of putting them in Europe.

That means you can help 12 times as many people by simply resettling the syrians in the middle east.

Why don't you want to help the poor syrian refugees, europoors? Why must you be so greedy and take the best doctors and lawyers OUT of places where they can help their countrymen?

Isn't that just colonialism 2.0?

>Isn't that just colonialism 2.0?

That's exactly what it is.

It's German-sponsored Islamic colonialism of EU.

3 page? you only need one word.

>NO

All anyone should need to look at are the crime statistics before and after refugees.

They actually apply here, and then leave to re-apply in Germany. It's legal.

also this

Kijkte gij ens hiero

You should allow Syrian refugees, but not anybody else. Build the paper on the ability to recognize who is Syrian refugee.

breitbart.com/london/2016/08/01/900-syrians-arrested-uk-one-year-including-rape-assault/

Anything from here

refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/

Ann Corcoran
@RefugeeWatcher

Created blog Refugee Resettlement Watch in 2007, but it's more than that now. Immigration (legal and illegal), if not stopped in 2017, will destroy America.

just get real sources of muslims saying islam is crazy and get real parts of islam instead of your cucked quarn, i mean this may get some shocked eyes and a few cry babies, nd you getting arrested but you will guarantee a few people shocked and red pilled

>Off the record, just had an argument today on this topic with someone that claimed that they "don't mind a little terrorism considering all the lives that we'll save".

No fucking way

give it up lads, OP made a thread and didn't reply to any of our advice and so wasted our time

economic migrants are not refugees

most refugees in the crowds not even syrian

Some other points

-We don't bring these people here from syria (or whereever else they come from), they come on their own. They pay somewhat in the ballpark of 10k€ for the trip, which is a lot of money. The upper middle class makes it to europe, the poorest people are left to their own means in the countries the refugees come from
-for the money germany pays to house its ~1.5 million refugees every single displaces person from syria (in excess of 4 million) could be housed and supplied with basic needs
in refugee camps in syria or turkey
-integrating so many people without basic education and entirely different culture is impossible. It will end like it did in france and sweden

nope, they need to directly enter from conflict territory,when they leave greece they technically could all be rejected under art.31? of the convention on refugees of 1951
t.law student

Also don't forget to highlight that they willing choose to by pass thousands of miles to come to the west because they know they will get the biggest handouts. Because they know if they do manage to get here they will be protected by a biased media and liberal crowd defending them from criticism

All the while knowing their are many obstacles and may not even get in and sent back. These are not desperate people wanting an honest life. These are people trying to take advantage.

>greenland
>mexico
>brazil
>black