Why is there no male version of Disney's princess line for boys?

Why is there no male version of Disney's princess line for boys?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/BONhk-hbiXk
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Like they make them futas or something?

it exists, its called Transformers

Disney just doesn't own it yet

There was in the mid 2000s, it was called Disney Heroes. Didn't do very well.
Disney has always struggled with appealing to boys, which is why they bought marvel and Lucasfilm.

Why couldn't they just make another movie like Lion King?

>Aladdin
>Hercules
>Beast
>Li Shang
>Eric

All the counterparts to the Princesses weren't even characters for the most part, at least not majorly developed ones. Maybe Prince Phillip since he got to kill a freakin' dragon.

Boys don't give a shit about the Prince from Sleeping Beauty or John Smith.

Why Kida from Atlantis never gets included to the Princesses list, lol

They tried that before, and it did terribly.

There is, it's called Disney's Marvel's the Avengers®

Disney is trying really hard to pretend the early 2000s never happened. hell you could extend that to the entire 2000s, they only have two films from that decade they still seem to aknowledge
Not exactly their best period.

I want to say because less than half of them matter. and half of those is actually royalty or became royalty. And beyond that the movies are mainly about the princesses and who has ever made a line or promotional campaign for side characters.

I mean it's really just Aladdin and Beast out of this image.

Princes don't sell well.

Because literally none of the princes are interesting.

Because boys get the good movies.

Sup Forums in a nutshell ladies and gentlemen

Because the Princess line was conceived when Disney execs noticed that little girls showed up in generic princess dresses to Disneyland, Disney on ICE events and so forth and that clearly there was an untapped market there.

Little boys don't show up in Disney parks or events dressed as Disney Princes or Disney heroes. If they dress up as anything, they dress up as superheroes.

>Disney has always struggled with appealing to boys, which is why they bought marvel
>Appeal to boys, struggle financially
>Appeal to girls, acquire enough money to buy company appealing to boys
Hmm. Sumin fucky going on here.

Disney probably has trouble appealing to boys because of they are a strongly liberal company.

Little boys want to see violence and they want it to be lots of fun. They think moral lessons are boring and silly. That's something that goes against liberal style thinking

how come kiara is never included in these?

fpbp and double-dubs checked.

>buy star wars to get the boys
>turn it into 'gurl power'

>John Smith
>Not loving when Pocahontas saves Mel Gibson from her ignorant savage family before assimilating.

I remember those. Never seemed to sell.

Dolls arent selling well enough, so they grabbed onto Star Wars, Marvel does well enough to get the boys.

...

Disney supposedly doesn't technically officially own Hasbro on paper according to law... But Disney totally owns Hasbro.

Parents don't want their boys to play with toys. That would make their sons gay and effeminate and shit.
Girls on the other hand are allowed to play with toys and puppets and dolls. It makes them feminine and girly, which is what society wants girls to be.
On the other hand, parents are more than willing to buy their sons video game consoles like the Switch or a PS whatever.
Disney should focus on buying up video game companies instead if they wanna profit from boys.
Or just produce their own video game consoles.
The X-Disneytendostation.

Disney never even put any effort into appealing to boys properly, and the things that did appeal to boys they refuse to properly acknowledge.
Like some of their cartoons, or movies like Hercules.

>Parents don't want their boys to play with toys. That would make their sons gay and effeminate and shit.
Give me a credible source on that one there, because I'm sure pulling things out of your ass isn't going to suddenly make them true. If it were, things like Transformers wouldn't sell at all.

Boys are allowed to play with toys, but they have to be cars or action figures or legos or something sports related

Transformers and GI Joes are not toys?

No. That's now gay stuff.

They're collectivable action figures

Disney doesn't want to attract that fanbase anymore than they have to

...

which one would have the biggest futacock?

Your son is gay dude, just let him have his childhood. Don't turn him into a depressed piece of shit Sup Forums dweller

Disney should tap into the sensitive boys market. Not just the fags

youtu.be/BONhk-hbiXk

You mean the children of single mothers market?