AnCaps

What the fuck is their problem?

>fair share

AnCap here, debate me if you dare.

Would a vaccine add to or multiply your autism?

The theory that vaccine causes autism is tinfoil hat tier conspiracy theory.

>*autistic screeching*

Why do you subscribe to a failed ideology?

How fast can you count the words in this sentence?

>Fair share

Not an ancap fag but pic related.

I don't get this picture.

Ancaps are fine with others doing this.

The problem is that you do it to us.

Anyone who can't reason that it is within your best interest to sometimes give the illusion of submission is not smart enough to be self reliant. I'm an anarchist capitalist patriot who pays my taxes. Ama

autism the post

>taxes pay police to protect you
>response time is too slow to protect you
>spend most of their time writing traffic tickets
>revenue generated from citations goes to everything BUT roads

Seems like there should be a police subscription pro option. Kinda like Reddit gold. Basically it's a get out of trouble free card for any non felony offense.

>fair share
>fair

(You)
4 seconds?

>implying it has been tested in a ~70% white country.

BTW #notanargument

Not an argument the post

>ur pic
But even though the unrealistic strawman memes are obviously unrealistic strawmen, the common point of all the memes is that ancap societies eventually devolve into a cold, ruthless capitalism that is removed from humanity and empathy. The memes taken as a whole are indeed an adequate, logical rebuttal, you need to refute this argument in kind.

>my ideology is perfect if men were angels

so is ancap

to be fair, any sort of societies and/or ideology tend to fail or perform extremely inadequately if not run by white people

And what is wrong with Capitalism, exactly?

They ascribe to an untested political philosophy that requires a truly naive understanding of the human condition to function without issue. One that when totally successful, would be virtually indistinguishable from our own society in every way but in principle, with taxes being replaced by fees. Then when they debate they just accuse you of not having an argument.

Can no one in this place use jewgel?

Nothing.

"Maintain society" has come to mean buying smartphones for Taekwaneesha and her 9 kids instead of shooting/imprisoning/exporting them

Autism basically

>Paying the state taxes for it to uphold law and order is completely unthinkable
>Paying a corporation to do the same thing is a-ok

Why are ancap defenders so retarded?

...

Is it this time of the day again?

What is the difference?

...

...

Exactly

>Anyone who can't reason that it is within your best interest to sometimes give the illusion of submission is not smart enough to be self reliant.
pseud

...

kys

I'd have no problem with paying for the services I want.

That is in no way similar to having my money stolen for whatever the government chooses.

defend this

What exactly?

Corporation implies that the it cannot check itself or be checked by the people.

If you formed a corporation that did do that, then what's to say it's any different from the classical definition of government.

Welp.

STAHP pls

my mum already died eight times this week

reply to this or your mother will have a large painful shit

what does this have to do with anarcho capitalism?

Delete this

The thing that gives anarchism its appeal at least for me is that it seeks to destroy the gap that usually exists between the personal and the political and give people responsibility for and control over their life and work. That's what is meant by anti-political.

The problem with ancaps is that they don't take this from the anarchist tradition but instead come up with this weird abstract deontology that doesn't actually have anything to do with the real experience of the individual. Their supposed anti-statism really just amounts to being against taxation because a lot of their arguments are actually based around how the free market would carry out the functions of the state more efficiently.

How does corporate = unchecked power?

In my opinion not only can you not get the power of the state checked, but it has much more power over you.

If a company is harming people, people will gather against it. If you gather against the state you are silenced and mocked if you are lucky to not be harmed or killed.

Yes a company can harm you, but it is much easier fighting back agaist a company than a nation.

how ancaps deal with the idea of different corporations with different deals upholding the law within the same area? what if someone protected by a different corporation violates my property rights?

The US government is the private company that owns the territory we call 'the United States', your taxes are rent, deeds only confer limited quasi-ownership of land but not actual, proper ownership, which is always retained by the US company. They homesteaded (through their citizen employees) and purchased the land over the last several centuries in proper Lockean fashion.

Your move.

well the argument is that without government in the way people would naturally arrange themselves to allow the free market since that usually provides the best outcomes.

Read Nozick's writings on it in "Anarchy, State, and Utopia". He argues a minimal state will always naturally emerge from an anarcho-capitalist system.

faggot

How to build road?

Yeah... and something about a corporate parallel entity being set up in each of our names, thus rendering income tax illegitimate.

Plus the flags with fringe being part of some illegitimate entity.

Also... am I being detained!??!

But that arrangement would still be doing things that are the same as what a government would do in every way (and possibly more effectively) except it doesn't collect taxes?

well I would say in a free society people who want similar things in a society would congregate together so the corporations likely would uphold similar standards. If there was a dispute about what actually happened though I would say that different companies would agree upon a third party to determine the outcome.

the picture implies a voluntary transaction.
>This retarded

Bark well, dogger

Ree

delete this

>implying people couldnt adapt

kek

what do you wear?

What do you think of national socialism?

idk...i was vaccinated and i have autism

Anarchists are people who don't understand the concept of a social contract.

Lol

>future wife
nice try giving me hope

Well yeah if you can do something to the same degree of quality, if not better, why not do it without force(taxation)? The same as why woul you kill a hostage holder when you can negotiate him out of it?

like i'll ever get married

They don't understand that taxes are paying for services/goods, they just live in a self-absorbed bubble.

Did someone say ancap thread?

...

...

hurrr

...

I'm against taxation, but I'm also against the way society at large is structured. Just getting rid of taxation doesn't get rid of the dependence on authority that has made itself a part of everyone's life.

...

...

is this what jesus did

...

...

Economic fundamentalists are autistic trash

Nobody is forcing you to live in a country with taxes. If you don't want to pay them, move somewhere else where you won't have to worry about paying taxes.

...

oh shit

In a free society people would be completely free to go and live without large structures if they so pleased. I personally feel companies would be small and community based to meet their customers needs. The point is it's completely voluntary so people can do whatever suits them.

...

jews invented global warming with fake jewish thermometers to trick us into buying jewish air conditionaers

fuck

They are autists who think society's problems, issues and organization are reducible to logic.

...

...

...

thank you

Taxes are just company jargon for rent, they're charging you for using their land, market places, resources, etc. You wouldn't expect a private business to offer land and goods and services free of charge would you?

Someone else please post more. OP I know you've got some, my supply is limited.

...

Ignoring history in favour of theory.
Same problem as political economists.

/thread