Brit/pol/ - Orwell Was Right Edition

>Snoopers Charter Passed
zdnet.com/article/snoopers-charter-expansive-new-spying-powers-becomes-law/

>Are Nige for Peerage
news.sky.com/story/is-ukips-nigel-farage-in-line-for-a-peerage-10659541
>throwback to Nigel not DARING TO DREAM
news.sky.com/story/farage-dismisses-peerage-claims-saying-it-will-never-happen-10638240

>Tories threaten to take power away from House of Lords if it stalls Brexit
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-house-of-lords-delay-theresa-may-article-50-vote-parliament-a7422731.html

>British woman 'arrested in Dubai after reporting rape
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38013351

>Sinking Sturgeon faces growing calls to RESIGN over shambolic Brexit threats
express.co.uk/news/uk/733523/Nicola-Sturgeon-called-on-to-resign-over-SNP-sleaze-and-Brexit-threats

>Sir David Attenborough receiving death threats over Donald Trump comment
standard.co.uk/showbiz/celebrity-news/sir-david-attenborough-receiving-death-threats-over-donald-trump-comment-a3398321.html

>UK charity warns tourists in Dubai not to report rape after woman who was 'gang raped' arrested
independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/rape-victim-dubai-united-arab-emirates-uae-extra-marital-sex-report-detained-in-dubai-police-charity-a7422326.html

>Sturgeon sunk by Ruth Davidson during fiery FMQs
express.co.uk/news/uk/733376/Ruth-Davidson-Nicola-Sturgeon-FMQs-Scotland

>Tornadoes hit Wales and Midlands
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38016701

>Petition to increase defence spending as Donald Trump calls for NATO allies to do more.
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/172383

Other urls found in this thread:

metro.co.uk/2016/11/17/non-offending-paedophile-says-not-all-paedophiles-are-child-molesters-6263925/
youtube.com/watch?v=KdFzMLZAXEM
youtube.com/watch?v=TpP-n9Oqj-Y
youtube.com/watch?v=MWHPJ8hO-ZM
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

ITS OFFICIAL

THE MEDIA HAVE NOW CROSSED THE LINE IN TO TRYING TO NORMALIZE PAEDOPHILIA
metro.co.uk/2016/11/17/non-offending-paedophile-says-not-all-paedophiles-are-child-molesters-6263925/

anime is for nonces

first for haggisposting

1st for gas the tories

>she will never be your wife with whom you raise a healthy and productive family fully of outstanding subjects of the British empire

What's her name, lads?

>inb4 the 13 year old looking characters that get regularly tentacle raped are actually hundereds of years old

>required watching - newfags fucking click
youtube.com/watch?v=KdFzMLZAXEM
youtube.com/watch?v=TpP-n9Oqj-Y
youtube.com/watch?v=MWHPJ8hO-ZM

>Laura Southern

Sigourney Weaver

Tunnocks teacakes desu

Who dares step into the den of the BEADY ANGLO?

literally a man

>kot
POLES OUT

Muh waifu

Eccles Cakes you disgusting chocolate loving PEON.

>i hate trip fags but im so obvious im basically a tripfag
fuck off

...

>What's her name, lads?

there's been a few

Chloe, Charlotte, Ellen, Molly I've held crushes on or admired from afar

never kissed a girl though

that Pepe is me tonight

How does brit/pol/ eat their tunnocks teacakes?
I eat the bottom first desu wa.

>Chloe, Charlotte, Ellen, Molly
Slag tier names

>preserving anglo culture
fuck off, I eat shawarma and coffee

Never had one in my life tbqh, I've had the lidl's rip off but that's about it.

hold them in my mouth and crash a car into a wall

>Charlotte
>slag tier
Stop hitting my nerve you bastard bitch.

Is Ellen really a slag name?

How about the name Trish?

If you had a time machine would you go back in time to bring hundreds of thousands of Britons/Celts/Anglos etc to the present day instead of the current form of immigration?
Or do you think they'd be just as alien and unable to integrate as sandniggers, regular niggers and Poles?

Charlotte is literally the most slag tier name on that list, followed by molly.

Charlotte sounds like the type of bird that lead you on so you'd hang out with her and get her gifts only for you to later catch her shagging some chav.

Well Ellen and Chole aren't that bad but Trish is absolutely slag tier.

>

>It could quite well send productivity through the roof as each sector battles for public opinion to claim more money.

Anything to help public sector production. It would have its snags as your 'Representative' crony would argue you choose him/her to make that tax allocation case for you while wining and dining with establishment. But if the Tories were ever serious about a One Nation state ruled from the bottom up then it would make some sense. A more aristotelian society.

Though we see with Brexit the bottom only gets heeded when it does what the top wants, though i can't see this system of government lasting if it stays as it is.

>lidl ripoff
I hope you're not confusing teacakes with the lidl lebkuchen.

would be an insult to the lebkuchen

No, I mean the actual tunnocks teacakes rip off, I forgot what they are called, it was something german or polish.

>tfw live in Charlotte, NC

how does it feel to live in a slag city?

what the fuck is a lebkuchen you dog-beating slavsquatter

i cant tell if thats bad or not

>'Representative' crony would argue you choose him/her to make that tax allocation
There would still be a need to someone to allocate tax, as there would have to be tax allocated to fill the minimums threshold. His job would still be there, still getting paid a bazillion quid to drink posh wine and berate plebs.

Plus surely there should be enough support from the public to essentially shut up any whining crony.

>adblock stopped working for some reason
What the fuck are these ads lads?

What adblock?

Is it paedophilia when a 16 year old has sex with a 15 year old?

UD slag then tell me.

They are classes as a minor, so maybe. I do know it's statutory rape though.

Reminder that the new "snoopers charter" legally can't come into effect until we are out of the EU.

no, they're both under 18

god I love our fucked up laws

sex at 16, paedophilia at 18
>in 2 years the answer to your question will be yes
>1 year later it will be no again

Don't remember, some adblock from google store. It just disappeared from my extensions, so did most of my other extensions. Fuck knows why desu.

wtf I love the EU now

>the MPs are voting in by threatening us with this shit

hmmm, sounds kikey

You on a phone? If you're on a laptop or desktop use uBlock Origin, I use it and it's great. Don't use Adblock Plus, they actually serve ads now. A fucking ad blocker serves ads.

>tfw you will never have a threesome with susan boyle and nicola sturgeon

So if I witness two 17 year olds having sex, is that illegal?

Exactly, it's a double play. We're damned if we do and damned if we don't.

May however has revealed her hand to the public too early. It is now more clear than ever that the reason she, a remain supporter is so adamant to "fulfil the will of the people" is because it is the only way she is going to force through the only thing she was relevant for prior to becoming PM.

No I'm on a desktop but it's absolutely fucked now, shuts down every 20 odd minutes and my files and shit keeps disappearing so I'm not installing anything until a get a new one.

>tfw half of my memes are gone

Already ordered a new PC but I'll have to wait 1 or 2 weeks for it to get here.

What are you beady eyed Anglos plotting in here?
Answer me.

Fuck the Snoopers Charter.

You're going to need some heavyweight stirring equipment lad.

for you

>if you're related etc and had reason to be involved, it's very unlikely you'd be found guilty of anything. Parents marching in on their kids fucking around underaged is not gonna send the parents to jail. We have common sense judges.

The downfall of smelly yanks, but looks like you already have that covered.

>there should be enough support from the public

Parliament could argue that the 1% that pay 25% of all tax receipts wouldn't allocate it to the NHS as they don't use it etc.. then knowing how things are the NHS would be exempt to some extent along with others 'vitual' allocations and it would get watered down. Though it could lead to thing like foreign aid getting next to nothing.

It's been a long time coming.

I knew it.
You Anglos always were with them.
Screen capped for evidence against you kind.
USA will never surrender

Just make it 18 years old for everything for goodness sake.

>swiney american ages
16.

Kids are fucking developed at 14

Okay, so how about a similar system except instead of allowing individuals to choose where their tax goes all the tax is put in to a big pot and counted up, then the public as a whole get to vote on how much goes where.

Each person who chooses to vote, every X years say, gets to choose how much percentage of the tax budget (not including the minimum tax) gets spent on each area. Then all votes are added up and averaged, with the remaining percentages being an average of the national opinion.

Sorry if I didn't articulate well there, a bit tired, but I think you can understand. Do you think that could work or is there too much potential for the percentages to average out so similarly each time that nobody would hardly see a difference?

>t. nonce

none of them were slags, they were all quiet plain types

>falling for the female jew

Yeah when they were with you.

Are you saying you'd allow porn with 16 year olds in it?

Thunder and lightning and rain by me tonight lads

who /comfy/ here

>kids are fucking developed at 14

Maybe. Like I said it's irrelevant now, haven't had a proper conversation with a girl since about 2012

Nope, that's just how teenage pregnancy happens.

If an adult were to exclusively have sex with mid-to-late teens the (15-19 age range), it's called ephebophilia. Basically, anything that is a philia with humans, it denotes it's an adult engaging in intimate relations with someone who is not an adult.

For once a yank that isn't a complete spacker.

>Trish is absolutely slag tier.

Fug, I think she may have gone by "Patricia" before uni so I'm hoping she isn't a full slag

i thought they already knew what we do online

did they not? i've been paranoid all this time for no reason

How nonce like

Don't take it to heart mate, I'm just shitposting.

>abbreviates her name before uni just to sound like a bigger slag
You know exactly what she wants.

oh they can find out easily, for sure, been that way for years and years. i strongly believe that anything they officially ask for, they've already been doing for a long time beforehand. but now they have permission to do anything they want with that information.
before, they had to pretend like they weren't listening in, now they don't have to pretend.

are you a paki?

The government does what it wants, legal or not.
When the public find out what it does, the government passes laws to legalise what it's doing.
Snooper's charter also requires ISPs to store your internet history for a year, so if you become of interest to authorities they can go back and find something dirty to hang you for.

Will this negatively affect you or me? Probably not. But it is one of many powers the government should not have. When storage capacity develops further and they update the ruling so its a lifetime history they keep, the current ruling class will have dirt on anybody, including future politicians, business owners or whoever, allowing the powerful to perpetuate their own favourable systems by controlling who ascends to power and blackmailing potential threats. Coupled with the five eyes stuff (which was already retroactively legalised by the dirty scum after they were caught). Pitchforks have been raised for less, but there's such a massive volume of information we all take in day to day, 99.9% junk, that no large group can focus around an issue. The future is terrifying if you pay attention lads.

I see what you mean, to begin with it would need to start low, say, 90% minimum tax except from allocation, with 10% allocated to a general voter choice.

I'm kind of enjoying it tbqh

The did, illegally, but now it's legal for them essentially, and now they can have all your data stored for up to a year, so if you ever do anything, they can go and look through everything you've ever written online to royally fuck you over

It's fucking disgusting, especially since the only reason it passed is because MP's made an amendment saying they are exempt from this, We should try and bring this bill and the amendment to the light for all Brits to see

interesting, thanks for the insight lads

This genuinely isn't going to work, it lacks a clear understanding of how the internet actually works.

In addition to costing a fucking fortune for the government and for ISPs it is going to end up one of those deals where they are legally obligated to take every single person in the country to court. Downloaded an MP3? That's jail. Said you were going to do anything illegal to vent? Jail for you.

There is no fucking way this can possibly work, Jimmy Wales has been saying from the start that there is no fucking way it can possibly work. This is an old man law. It is no different to them passing a law to "ban the mp3 record players".

abviously you would need to break down those larger sectors down also into their parts, or maybe not, which ever would be the easiest way for granny to understand and work.

you'll be first go then Goebbels.

>*autistic screeching*
Sorry, what's that?

Maybe it'd be wise to implement a rule where people cannot vote to allocate taxes to a sector they work in/are biased toward. So a doctor can't allocate funds to the NHS, an MP can't allocate funds to MP expenses, a BBC exec can't allocate funds to the BBC, and so on. This could hopefully prevent fat cats from slamming loads of tax in to one place that'll only benefit them, meaning they could only get extra funds if the public believe they deserve it and not simply because they want it.

Well, each sector could have someone to distribute the funds. So we can have the public voting on sectors as macro things, then when those funds get pushed through to said sectors the money gets distributed within it on a micro scale according to which bit of the sector needs what funding. The more complex you make it the less the public are likely to WANT to do it.

How does it feel to like getting assraped by the gov't, who will only prove to hand your money off to sand niggers and other lib fags who will do nothing but squander it for more useless shit?

>implement a rule where people cannot vote to allocate taxes to a sector they are biased toward
So fat people and smokers couldn't allocate taxes to the NHS because they are more likely to need it?
So poor people can't allocate their taxes towards housing and transport since it's them that use it the most?
So historians and the like can't allocate their taxes to culture because they're biased towards?
How would this autistic screech ever work?

I did say "work in/are biased toward", meaning they work in a sector so are likely to be biased toward it. An overweight chainsmoking cashier doesn't work in the NHS, so what would that matter?

You took my words, cut out an important part, then complained that I was autistic. Fuck off, unless you want a proper discussion just fuck off.

How does it feel knowing you're entire political ideology is based on autistic screeching?

Morning lads

You said work in/are biased towards, and the people I mentioned are clearly biased. Take some time to reread your post before you screech, spacker.

Morning lad.

Kek not an argument

How does it feel to know that the only reason half of your country's white kids are born is because they're mudshit rape babies?

You're misunderstanding the "/", I see now. It wasn't supposed to be an exclusive "or", it was supposed to connect the bias to their employment.