Does National Socialism inevitably always lead to war?

does National Socialism inevitably always lead to war?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=1tDOZOW0IFg&index=1&list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe
youtube.com/watch?v=MqgfjXaJxV8
youtube.com/watch?v=yZNtYmdZ-4c
twitter.com/AnonBabble

it seems nationalism is generally a reaction to communists who don't know when to quit pushing people's buttons

the people finally snap and close themselves off

the communists don't like this since their entire ideology is based on control

internationalists and globalists go to war against this sovereignty

etc etc

But National Socialism itself is based on the darwinist ideas about struggle ect. Nazi Germany declared war on Europe instead of Europe declaring war on them.

Only one way to find out!

yes. your currency will lose value and you'll be forced to force others to accept it.

why does living always lead to dying?

well if Germany just reclaimed their country from the Communists after the civil war why did they have to declare war on everyone else? why couldn't they just be contempt with having a National Socialist state to themselves?

If it doesn't then it's going to crash

remind me for what reason wars are fought for again?

danzig. look it up.

hitler had to decide, let my people be tortued and killed or give into the provocation but fight for what it's right. also, poland (and allies) wanted war very badly and have been prapared to go attack germany anyway.

We don't actually know because there's only been one instance of it.

The idea that Trump is going to do this is purely idiotic. I've already been telling my friends that we should wait and see what he's going to do as president before we pass judgement.

I told my dad that he probably won't last the term and that Pence will probably be president in less than Trump's term. Now calm the fuck down.

The Greatest Story NEVER Told:
youtube.com/watch?v=1tDOZOW0IFg&index=1&list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe

fair enough the Poles did commit atrocities but lets remember that Poland got BTFO. I understand that Hitler wanted to have peace with England but why did he have to go to war against Norway and the Netherlands? Why did he have to invade the Balkans and Greece just to prop up Italy?

I don't know, did he? I'd like to say because of ((them)) but honestly if you're already the center of europe it actually would make sense to include the rest. for economical reasons and bigger is better.

what I do know, the fatal turn of events was USA joining the war. I can not say for sure but I think the chances wouldn't have been to bad for germany to actually take over all of europe otherwise.

why is national socialism good

daring to oppose the Jews leads to war

when did the Jews declare war on Hitlers Germany?

A preservation of culture and ethnic identity
A culture of hard work and community
A sense of belonging and unity
A healthy natural environment I.e. Volkish
A nation based around it's citizens rather than outsides looking to move there and ruin the housing market
>See Australia

The banks were too Goyish

In reality the British declared war on Germany despite Hitler's effort to unify with Germany as an ally.

British foreign policy hasn't changed much since Napoleon; don't let a single power control Europe.

1933?

I'm a Jew.

We're a very pragmatic people. Though sephardic people would tell you otherwise.

We're all semites. The way we see it, it all went fucked as soon as he opposed the jews. We were content to help the economy, the medicine, everything else.

1933, when Hitler said "fuck off ye cunts, we've had enough of your shit"

I don't know whenever this is truth or fiction but I certainly like to think it's real:
youtube.com/watch?v=MqgfjXaJxV8

Hitler opposed the Jews because they opposed him and his people, the Jews have always deserved whatever suffering came their way

it is inevitable that a system based on fascism will descend into rapid warfare, consider the following
in a world where those in power fight strongly to keep themselves in power at the cost of every plebeian beneath them, you understand how the very idea of the plebeians screaming loudly to elect someone to stand up for them is disgusting to them. of course democractic election is not always the case, but to explain it more simply i will use our current system of governance.
the plebeians are incredibly scattered, they will never agree on much and they will never have any say in anything, thus the ultimate danger to the people in power is if someone harnesses the chaotic power of the plebeians into challenging the current rule. it is no question whether or not the plebeians can immediately overrule anyone they dislike enough when focused into a force, and so any man utilizing the power of the people to do his bidding against the malevolent rulers will be met with extreme and swift opposition.
this ties into fascism because fascism is always the result of a man harnessing the power of the plebeians. it is never due to background politics or corruption, because fascism is the idea that the country is stronger than the banks funding the country, and that the country has to make their own way free of the debtors chains. it is also the idea that every man of the nation is equal, and that ever benefiting off of a loyal person of your own nation is the ultimate evil. you can see how these ideals do not fit in with politicians and nobles who wish to pull strings and profit.

fascism can only get strongarmed into power. the charismatic man of the people will convince the plebeians to fight for his cause, electing him peacefully or otherwise into office against the unjustices currenly residing there, and then it is inevitable that the heavy push for pride in ones heritage and country will lead to competition with those surrounding the nation after you conquer it.

1/3

however another thing has to be said before i get into that, because in a world where globalism exists, countries do not relinquish themselves of debtor's bonds in isolated cases. it is very evident what happened in world war 2, it was fascism versus the entire rest of the world, and so it will be again if fascism ever takes ahold of another cluster of nations. the struggle of fascism is the struggle against globalism, you see how it may be difficult for a lone nation to fight off the entire world, but such is the power of fascism and nationalism. it grants its people almost inhuman and magical strength, yet it can be explained very rationally. every person in the nation not only has a cause they truly believe in, an enemy they truly despise, and a leader they truly adore, but they're also caught by love and cameraderie for every man in their nation, both past, present, and future. this means they will do their very best to secure a future for their children and their kinsmen, and they will do their very best to preserve the past and make a glorious history that future men of the nation may be proud of. not to mention that they believe the enemy wish not only to kill them personally, but also to destroy their way of life, their culture, and their future. based on the past few sentences you see why they care enough to work particularly hard.
meanwhile on the other end, the globalist peons don't care at all. it is simply corruption, degeneracy, and self benefitting through and through. every action is done for selfish reasons, perhaps there are a few honourable people fighting out of love of their country, more likely than not they are no more than mere mercenaries, being funded by far more despicable people.

2/3

(continuation of last paragraph) none of them have any faith in anything, they don't care what happens after they die (thus no divine punishment), it's simply to make ends meet and to make money to make pleasure. in some cases they intentionally work poorer to strain themselves less, but ignoring that, they won't overstrain themselves just to earn a keep.

so now that it is stated how difficult it is for fascism to get into power, what if every nation was to be nationalistic and fascistic, would it inevitably lead to war?
the answer is indeed yes, because every nation would be so proud of their own and so despised by other countries, due to propaganda or sheer will of kinsmen long dead by the time they are born. but this is healthy competition, nothing more. there will be war, there will be death, there will be struggle for terrain and resources, but it will benefit humanity as a whole. no man will remain decadent, no man will grow degenerate, and no man will think to benefit himself personally over the greater needs of his nation state as a whole. this is why fascism is superior to all. it is superior to religion because instead of being held on a personal level of "do as i say or go to hell" such as in christianity, or yet worse, "do as i say and you go to heaven" such as in islam, the order of thought is "i must benefit my nation and all those who reside within it, lest my heritage, my next of kin, and my future family will cease to exist as i would wish them to"
it is a glorious and worthwhile way of life, worth all the death and misery in the world. for there cannot be misery where there is true faith.

3/3

Maybe there, but not elsewhere.

For example, I absolutely despise Hollywood Jews. They're spilling nonsense that makes us look REALLY bad.

I can't even go to the synagogue anymore because I don't believe in their bullshit. I'm exiled from it because I went "you know you did that right?" when they put it in the paper that they had nazi literature on their doorstep last week.

...

there are Jews who are monsters, and if they all have to go to stop the rotten ones, then so be it

Lots of nazi threads these last few days. I count fifteen in the last two days alone. Something is happening

They literally put that there to get pity. I was like"what the fuck is this?!?!?!?"

I'm thrown out,I don't care.

The Trump shills left.

you must understand, the jews and zionists do not believe in your faith. you may be a jew and truly believe in judaism, however there is nothing inherently wrong with that. they are simply using people like you as a defense mechanism. they say "look at me goy, now look at all these other jews, they never harmed anyone and they don't conspire globally you silly crazy nazi goy, now give me shekels for offending me", but truly they regard you barely any higher than any common goy, they simply refuse to disrespect you due to the invaluableness of your protection.
the """jews""" who use you as meatshields are nothing but satanists, who benefit themself at your cost. they are the ones who deserve everything that is coming for them, for they are the ones that have caused thousands of years of misery for regular jews who had nothing to do with any of their conspiracies. the age of the conspiracy offers significant protection, they pose as a religion but they don't believe

>Leader was a violent meglo-maniac with a God-complex and extreme intolerance of dissent

Why are you even asking this?

Okay, maybe Strasserism could've worked out since what they wanted was basically what is now the European Union and unlike the NSDAP, they were willing to compromise. But Strasserism is so different from the NSDAP's platform it might as well a different ideology.

Russian shills are leaving now.

Capitalism does

Germans couldn't even beat the slavs lol

Yeah, no.

Europe declared war on Germany, they drew first blood in Poland against the German minority.

You were saying?

Still disappointed we kept germany around post ww2

We kept the Japanese did we not? They'll be great again, just like Germany.

Even if we have to make them great again.

Germany is already great, a nice little beta country

My ancestors disagree, sorry I want to MAGA as well as MEGA.

If you haven't realised by now that literally every human society leads to war in the end because it's interests collide with those of another society, then you really should pick up some history books m8.

nah, we're overrun with rapefugees and imigrants. it's pretty much over since we have no weapons and even our Bundeswehr sucks. After basic military training was discontinued, the younger germans wouldn't be able to use a firearm even if they could get some.

it all started when japan invaded manchouria in 1931 and when italy invaded ethiopia in 1935
you're not redpill you're dumb as fuck

You were saying Ahmed?

don't even call me ahmed fucking americunt
and if you don't know that ww2 started in asia between 35-37 then japan should have destroy you

>France
>Got rekt by Germany in just a month

It's sad that Germany had to be castrated after ww2

what's the lint between my country getting lead by old tard alt-right and the fact that an americunt don't even know hiw own history

I will call you Ahmed, Ahmed. Deal with it, you chose this existence. Your country used to be great, I visited it once when it still was.

Fucking embarrassment you all are, AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE!

Japan? Destroy us? No, they learned their lesson and I look forward to their continued success in a Trump administration.

Seeing French and German flags on here is like seeing a man with liver cancer. They're dead, but still walking around acting normal.

It's really sad.

you're just dumb as fuck ((we)) will destroy you , trump will just annihilate any form of jew's hate in your country that's why he hate muslim & mexican , that's why he supported netanyahu in 2013

Now now, Muhammad, you're doing a pretty lame "historian" wannabe. What do you really want when all you can do is to wave a white flag everytime you see a German tank or infantry?

No more than nationalisim by itself or socialisim by itself.

There's nothing inherrently darwinistic about nationalisim, or about socialisim. Capitalisim if anything is more darwinistic than socialisim.

Hey, don't be such a downer. It's not ALWAYS another society's conflicting ineterests. Sometimes population causes a competeition for resources, or there's an internal schisim in society that causes a breakup.

The thing is, Germany after ww2 was otherwise a really great design. The Allied Forces and Germany created the most ideal modern democratic republic. The problem was, the german people didn't have the will or the power to stop destructive "elite" from corrupting the basic law. it was written the first twenty (i think) paragraphs are unchagable and eternal... then they went and changed them. the "supreme court" gave it's okay, the end.

>((We))
youtube.com/watch?v=yZNtYmdZ-4c

Heard it all already. Stay mad matzo.

wtf are you saying farid ? there is more muslim in manila than in france you 're worst than indonesia . Not a country just a battlefield for japan and usa

This. But as euro we're into this together with burgers. Forex people understand.

Krauts should do a better job this time.

How's Deutsche Bank holding?

Ahmed don't be sad that you can't get an american visa now that trump is president

nice puppet, you aren't as illetrate as ahmedian

Best post I've seen on Sup Forums

I'd say it's 50/50, either it leads to war or it doesn't

>France
>Lesser muslims than Manila
>100000 is greater than 4700000
Nice math there

confounding ahmed and schlomo
that's why you aren't a country anymore

Stay mad, cuck.

Opposing the (((establishment))) now will lead to the unleashing of the beast so to war again.

He had a rough day taking care of his wife's son

Mussolini was an idiot and he cost Hitler a year on the Russian invasion by attacking Greece.

The Jews will not give up their stolen power willfully.

>Nazi Germany declared war on Europe instead of Europe declaring war on them.
You're a fucking moron. Do you remember that war that ended about 15 years before Hitler took office called World War I? When Europe declared war on Germany and at the end the British and French banking systems, dominated by Jews, attempted to exterminate the entire population of Germany?

does neo-liberalism (the form of capitalizsm that we have right now) always lead to war?

because economic sanctions =/= real war

No but Judaism does.

March 24 1933.

That sounds like heaven, honestly.

I truly don't understand why we don't all adopt it.

>all I'm sayin is, give war a chance

Because it makes you think you're the better human being, and start thinking "why is my shitty unworthy neighbor breathing my air and alive next to me?"

>memes. the DNA of the soul

>but why did he have to go to war against Norway and the Netherlands?
Because of the sanctions they were unable to trade; thus they had to take what they needed by military force.

it is inevitable for any other form of governance to quickly devolve into war or subjugation, why not have the war benefit mankind as a whole instead? they will make unprecedented technological leaps in search of weaponry, they will do anything to exploit something before the other nations discover the necessary technology (such as colonizing other planets or asteroid mining)
anything that is not fascism is degenerate and selfish, so their desires for wealth and power quickly make people go at odds with each other, why not instead have a life where the common folk are at peace with their destiny and have a purpose, where the higher ups are placed there on merit because they wish to benefit their nation state?
i cannot see the negatives, there will be war but the positives are much greater. keep also in mind that mutually assured destruction would not be on the table for someone who does everything to salvage their own nation, at worst they'd nuke the earth but have a safe and secure plan of escape
military tradition through mandatory conscription breeds honour and respectable common people, everyone looks at their fellow man with a different view than thought possible in todays cutthroat world

You realize that England did the same to iceland like we did to norway?

yes because other countries got jelly.

don't forget that the brits placed mines in norwegian waters and "borrowed" our merchant fleet

Not necessarily. but if You follow Hitler's economical Plan then yes it inevitably lead to war

In the case of Hitler and the nazi's they wanted to save Europe from what they saw as the 2 biggest threats to the European people and their culture: the zionists in the west (UK&USA) and the bolsjeviks in the east (Sovjet Union). So yeah they had to conquer those areas if they wanted to save the people living there.

b-but natsocs are actually socialists
commies are their cousins

It does when it's funded by the rothschilds.

superpowers should never fight otherwise you get fallout4 wasteland

Most of you aren't even jews you indoctrinated retard.

so Imperial Japan was funded by the jews?

Its not fascism when they do it, have you forgotten, goy?