Morrisons' All Star Superman is actually just the first page and its the essence of the origin.
A Year One, if I'm understanding it correctly, is his first year in operation as a superhero, a totally different thing than what Morrison did.
But, I'd agree with you, it's what Birthright did (although THAT part of Birthright, Waids nonsense - and that entire set of years worth of DC stories where they would claim hard light or similar - about invading Kryptonian armies is THE worse part of that series, so I don't object to it being redone).
Cereal Lord was all over the place, it was a retelling from Krypton's destruction past Year One and there are objectionable things about it, but I don't see Miller's thing redoing it or replacing it, per se.
JMS Earth One is a different continuity, but yes, again it is a Year One story in the first (and probably second volume, given the brief time gap).
Anything that ignores and redoes Byrne is OK by me, plus which that crap is 40 years ago. However, isn't what Bendis is doing essentially the same thing? If so, it's confusing.
For that matter, what Landis did with with his Manapul issue is also essentially Superman Year One, albeit not in canon.
I don't object. Based on what others are saying, I'm not excited. And actually uninterested due to the fact that Romita Jr's art doesn't appeal to me generally, and Frank doesn't appeal period, and based on people's complaint about him, that's would be my main issue. But if XYZ highly talented writer and say Ryan Sook or Manapul or Doc Shaner or Chris Samne wanted to do something, I'd be all for it.
Attached: Origin.png.jpg (1988x3056, 657K)