>the areas that voted for Hillary are the areas with the most educated people and the most technological innovation
Seriously, how do you defend this? Everyone in the red states benefits from the technologies and successes of people in the blue states.
Other urls found in this thread:
strawpoll.me
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>most technological innovation
nice graph
umm texas has like the fifth largest gdp as compared to other NATIONS, also those red states produce the food that feeds the blue states. if shit hits the fan food > tech
>implying that most of the votes dont come from Commiefornia
>implying they can even survive without red states giving them water
>implying it isn't full of spics
Cute
> RI
RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Food > Tech
BTFO
the areas that voted for Hillary are also the areas where people are most assured of their superiority over others
your point?
Educated? No. Average Trump supporter had $72,000 income. Average for Hillary was $61,000. Indicating that Hillary supporters included stupid people with useless degrees. A plumber or electrician is infinitely more valuable than a million women's studies or sociology grads. Stupid people who think they are smart because they have worthless degrees voted overwhelmingly for Hillary. But, we knew that.
This.
I would really like to see how the "educated voter" distribution would look like if we excluded all garbage like sociology, african studies, gender studies, languages and other crap.
Everybody in the blue states wouldn't have food if it wasn't for the red states
>one of the largest rail yards in the country in in NE
>headquarters of the largest rail company in the country is in NE
listen here you coastie shit if you want anything to get from point A to point B you'll keep your goddamn commie dickwarmer shut for the next 8 years
>most educated people and the most technological innovation
>Nevada
Gee
How do truckers benefit from losing their jobs to robot vehicles?
How do US born IT workers benefit from the market being flooded with curry coolies?
Smart phones are neat but it isn't better than a decent job.
>Everyone in the red states benefits from the technologies and successes of people in the blue states.
That ain't true at all. All the blue states depend on the productivity and resources of the red states. Without the red states, the blue would die from hunger in a week.
>umm texas has like the fifth largest gdp as compared to other NATIONS
>uneducated
>tons of oil
Texas is like the Saudi Arabia of the states. Also it doesn't have the fifth largest gdp, California is the world's 8th largest economy.
>if shit hits the fan food > tech
We can import food, we can't import innovation.
Lots of poor people with liberal arts degrees does not denote intelligence
Our largest agricultural producer is... CALIFORNIA, you sure about that?
>most educated
Then why did she only win the lower than 50k income bracket?
>Delaware
>most technological innovated
Nice joke. Ha!
I am from Delaware and even I don't believe in your horseshit.
>muh almonds!
>muh fruit!
Guess where the grain is grown
Muh taxes.
Here's how the map actually looked cuck.......
>the blue would die from hunger in a week.
Except most of the blue states have significant agricultural EXPORTS.
They are also the areas that take everything they hear from the media for face value, even though Wikileaks proved that Huffington Post and CNN were mouthpieces for the shill campaign. It is possible to have a college education and also be a fucking idiot.
And everyone in the blue states gets to eat because of the red.
Racism. And climate change.
>import food
Now how will you do that with half the USN blockading your ports and your highways shelled to shit by artillery?
Hello Sup Forums it is clear we have a problem with Canadian shills on this board. They are more than likely funded by the effeminate cuck Justin Trudeau and are here only to disrupt our community.
According to Hirohito all boards are allowed to enact changes if they can get a consensus. So i ask every user on Sup Forums should we enact a final solution and range ban every leaf from the board.
I will be running this poll over the week until we have a final solution to the Canadian question. If we decide to exterminate every leaf i will then present that decision to the honorable Hirohito.
>look at all my empty land :^)
Kek. This map still aligns with OP's statement.
Maybe this is off topic, but I am nearing the end of my computer science degree. I see absolute pathetic nerds and minorities flocking to this field to become code slaves and to enjoy and be thankful for it. It's become a real redpill for me. Even retarded rednecks are more of real men than fucking students..
Also I'm pretty sure the reds aren't too keen on robots taking their jobs.
>import
From where? We are the greatest producer of food on the planet. Any imports would be much more expensive than those coming from the states.
You mean for luxury food like oranges? That's not going to feed a populace.
Someone Red Pill me on the voter fraud shit, all I've seen is some stupid tweet that haphazardly says 3 million illegals but 0 actual proof of it.
Welfare payments aren't real GDP paco.
Horse shit, the US is the breadbasket of the world, without the flyover states a loaf of bread would cost you $30 and a steak would be about $250. Try thinking clearly on an empty stomach, hard to innovate when rioters are literally breaking down your doors to eat you. Your population density would turn on you so fast if you couldn't feed them it would be some good times. Everyone makes fun of country people but I bet you couldn't support yourself in the wild for a weekend.
Wow, what an egotistical faggot.
good luck raising your own food, mining your own coal, and producing all of the paper goods you will ever need.
not to mention your fucked up flawed process in thinking that everything was invented in your little concentrated urban shit states.
The bud states are a bunch of faggots who got their shit pushed in
They probably liked it.
>states
>some 30-odd counties
>COUNTY
The shit winds are-a-brewin' faggot.
>California among other states is full of illegals who can vote thanks to lax voter ID laws
Really makes you think
underrated
Depends on what type of grain. Either Illinois followed by California... or Kansas.. Followed by California.
Minnesota turned democrat? What? I'm confident more than half ot 'em were pro-Trump.
I remember reading about this one blue collar guy who managed to replicate the WW2 nuke design in his workshop for fun. One of the Project Manhattan scientists even commented on how accurate it was.
Leftists being so dismissive of "flyover" states when they are so dependent on them shows just how ignorant they are.
Based spic is based
>the most educated people and the most technological innovation
>New Mexico
Wew
thats what you get for focusing on coastal cities and neglecting the middle of america
You have to have a valid ID to register to vote.
If you want to register to vote same day, you have to show a valid ID at the polling place.
That's exactly how it works at the place I worked at. And people come to check in all that things are running smoothly. Also, if you register same day, you are put on a database to check if your ID is valid.
I think the number is extremely inflated or outright incorrect.
>bread would cost you $30 and a steak would be about $250.
Most "blue" states actually do have a fairly large agricultural component to their economies. $30 for a loaf of bread might be a stretch, but it will go up slightly. Farmland will also become more efficient if cutoff from the "red" states because the focus will shift from specialty produce towards produce that provides more efficient nutrition. The "red" states will lose a significant portion of their economies because a larger portion of their GDP is based off of crop export.
>Most "educated" people
Honey I'm sorry, but thousands of liberal arts degrees are worth less than any single blue collar worker.
>this one blue collar guy who managed to replicate the WW2 nuke design in his workshop for fun.
And the EU thinks they have a chance to maintain Globalist control if they try to holocaust the US.
Strictly speaking there's no reason California can't give the vote for President to illegals. The constitution says nothing about how each state decides to apportion their electors. Originally the intention was that state legislatures would decide who to vote for and leave it at that.
no, no, no. Blue states are completely subverted by statist ideaology, they don't even have a clue as to their rights or what is lawful vs what is not. They will always vote for
Expansion of state
Redistribution of wealth
Raw democracy
anti property
anti individual autonomy (except where it doesn't matter)
People in blue regions are compacted, marginalized, concentrated into urban areas and entirely dependant on gov subsidies, anti-free market gov favoritism etc. etc.
They are total brainwashed urbanite marxist yuppies and are the antithesis of American values like free market, property and rights.
It's a mistake to attribute technology to these regions, the only reason that large companies even exist in these areas is due to logistics, networking and because of the industries prior to what exists now, ie. LA was where sailors worked during off duty time while ships were docked, so they were competent idle labor available, so a film industry grew around that labor force, then computer technology developed from the technology used in cameras and the materials used and all of the supporting infrastructure used in that technology. The chicken did not come before the egg.
I guess our founding fathers didn't think that democrats would become turn-coat hypocrites that would try to turn the US into a socialist shithole.
>Most "blue" states actually do have a fairly large agricultural component to their economies.
Is it large enough to feed their populace? Give me a source.
>are total brainwashed urbanite marxist yuppies and are the antithesis of American values like free market, property and rights.
How do you think I feel everytime I go to work, and have to deal with these people up in MN?
Wow. Someone managed to replicate a well-published concept with readily available blueprints and how-to guides?
I don't care. Trump won, eat shit libcuck.
I feel for you. keep up the fire.
I don't even mind when you guys post this bait because it just gives me more excuses to post about my state.
>This
I live in Illinois and 95% of the state outside of the Chicago Metro area entirely agricultural (and red with the exception of counties with large universities)
>cities voted dem
>wow such smart
>literally all city niggers voted dem
Hell, even in MA, if you go west of 495 it rapidly becomes nothing but backwoods and farms. Every county still ends up as blue as always though.
Pretty sure the government never published the blueprints or a how-to-guide senpai.
>Give me a source.
I doubt that one exists and I don't feel like running an analysis. You haven't provided a single source to support your statements, so why should I?
What my point is that most "blue" states have the ability to expand their agriculture programs while most "red" states won't have the ability to expand their r&d expenditure.
Econocuntamist here.
>the areas that voted for Hillary are the areas with the most educated people
Cities have the highest amount of educational variance. Cities often contain people with less than high school education (niggers, spics, etc.) to the Jews and chinks with graduate degrees. Rural and suburban areas are much more homogeneous. Therefore, so what if "educated" (or, rather, people with degrees) congregate in cities? Secondly, that postulate rests on the assumption that people with bachelor degrees are smarter than people without them. And, really, there isn't a lot of evidence to suggest that unless the degree is in STEM. On average people with bachelors degrees are only 7 IQ points smarter than the average American (and in case that doesn't mean anything to you, that's less than a standard deviation above the mean). And, within that group, there is variance of course. Women overwhelmingly beat men in terms of educational attainment, yet they study useless shit (social work, psychology). So, take it as you will.
>... and the most technological innovation
What does this even mean? It has nothing to do with technological innovation and more to do with demographics. Cities are a melting pot of different cultures, religions, and whites have all but fled them in exchange for suburban life. Simply put, even if a city is "technological innovation" hub, I am hardpressed to believe that correlates with how you will vote at all (unless the businesses in the area are rent-seeking or lobbying the government for certain policies like Silicon Valley).
In short, fuck you. I have two graduate degrees and voted for Trump. MAGA faggots.
>webm related: "city life"
> Implying the reason Commiefornia has such a high GDP isn't because the Millions of Trump supporters that live there and instead owed to the spics and numale trash
The state is blue, but not ALL blue. OP doesn't have any evidence related to who is doing what within these places.
IL is red in something like 108 of the counties with the Chicago, Peoria, and St. Louis areas going blue, plus the counties that have the University of Illinois, Northern Illinois University, and Southern Illinois University. Outside of that even Rockford (basically Flint with less niggers) go red.
because obsessing over technology leads people to obsess over politics that panders to their beliefs
so the democrats inject themselves into tech companies (e.g. Eric Schmitt, Apple) and appear to be the champions of innovation when all they are are conniving scam artists out to give themselves power and money
>le Texas economy is only oil meme
We have the largest medical center in the world faggot.
>educated people live here.
Awesome double think you have there. To bad for you that this is reality.
Has Minnesota ever voted Republican?
Last time was Nixon in 1972. The next time will be Trump 2020.
Of course they didn't publish it. The science, however, is well understood enough to replicate it (on paper--or for real if you can find the right materials) with a simple google search.
Minnesota will soon be red brother. This past election was a lot closer than expected there. Keep fighting the good fight.
Texas has a very large IT sector, and is well known in and represented in every field.
California, is home to many companies that support 3rd world labor laws, like Apple. They have a vested interest in making sure trump doesn't raise taxes on them for sending jobs to China.
I'd say the states that have corporations with heavy investment in China lean left.
>>look at all my empty land :^)
empty land with 150+ million people is not so empty.. we just don't stack up like cockroaches
>Id like to see how educated voters stack up if we exclude some of the liberal educated voters
What does New Mexico contribute?
You can't fight, bitch. Shut the fuck up.
If you can't defend your beliefs with your fists, they're not worth shit.
Might makes right, pussy.
Underwater basket weaving is not a real education senpai
A gap for illegals to stream in. Plus nuclear testing sites
>the most technological innovation
sub-saharan africans did not use the wheel until the late 19th century when it was introduced to them by europeans
It was almost red this year
The whole point is a man who didn't go to college was able to understand and build something most would consider complex and need advanced schooling to understand.
I think the man deserves a non sarcastic 'wow'.
Tech industry gets govt subsidies from dem programs and they voted for more subsidies?
Color me surprised.
States with the most active duty and reserve members as of 05/16 are:
CA (D)
TX (R)
NC (D)
FL (R)
GA (R)
WA (D)
NY (D)
SC (R)
HA (D)
MD (D)
huh... Mostly dems there.
>active duty and reserve members
>liberals
lmao
>Empty land
>Includes one of the six largest cities in the USA
Pick one retard.
NC is RED, fag
No food no nation, dumbass, red states make most of the food that you eat, you big moron
I live in California. I run an IT company and do computer programming daily.
I support Trump (especially over Hillary), and a lot of the people I know do, as well. I think the idea that "California is blue and thus voting is pointless" is rather prevalent among people here.
>NC (D)
>I think the man deserves a non sarcastic 'wow'.
It's honestly not that impressive.
Would you say the same about N. Korea, Pakistan, et al.?
Not necessarily . I live in NJ . My County went Red. The reason NJ goes blue is because of Newark and Camden and Patterson. You know why...
See Above.
>Based OK
>Based WV
No because those are government funded and in a lot of cases their scientists went to American colleges.
Texas is best state in the US, that Lone Star beauty.
Be fair, Texas is lower-middle ranked among the states in education.
Negroes is what makes a blue state a blue state. The educated people in those blue states vote Republican.
Whoops. My bad. NC is definitely red.