Could actual Communism work in practice?

Could actual Communism work in practice?

Why or why not?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz
thevenusproject.com/resource-based-economy/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

If it fails it's not real communism

t. average commie

Technically real communism has literally never been tried. The road to Communism has always ended in failure at the socialist stage due to a variety of reasons.

But if all labour were to be automated, could an actual Communist society ever be functional?

>Communism
>work

o i'm laffin

We're not talking about the flawed result of Communism, Communism is defective by design.

>communism
Some Marxist ideas are intriguing except they cannot come to fruition except in vacuum. In a 'Walking Dead' scenario...maybe.

Ever done a group project in class? 1 person ends up doing the work of 3 because the other 3 are lazy. Communism is just a group project where a whole country is a group.

No. Dunbar's number.

Nope. Humans are too shitty desu. Perfection doesn't exist.

On a very small scale, i.e. less than ~1000 people, yes. But, after that Communism's flaws begin to show and it begins to collapse in on its self.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz

would require infinite resources (perfected space travel, space shipping, and resource collection) and advanced automation.

if life goes well, maybe humans can be fat slobs in space binging on entertainment for all of eternity.

No because it's not real Communism.

No. incentives. Case closed.

No you Commie Canacuck

Where in Sweden is this from?

...

Only if (((money))) were eliminated

thevenusproject.com/resource-based-economy/
>thevenusproject.com/resource-based-economy/

>small collectives
you are thinking about anarchism bob

what does he know Sup Forums?

If the road to communism is unobtainable wouldn't that mean communism doesn't work in practice?

Yes. The truth behind the Soviet Union was that they were never aiming for helping the workers. It always was just a scam to prop up a dictatorship. What about all the other times? 99% were just soviet puppets so of course they were the same. If we actually tried to achieve something like Communism it might work, but most supposed communist parties are just greedy dictators trying to drum up some useful idiots. Communism can work but only when well managed and placed under good leadership.

George Soros's most trusted countries:

1. Sweden: 65 percent Soros-trusted (13 of 20 members)
2. Ireland: 54.5 percent (6 of 11)
3. Finland: 53.8 percent (7 of 13)
4. Belgium: 52.3 percent (11 of 21)
5. Cyprus: 50 percent (3 of 6)
6. Luxembourg: 50 percent (3 of 6)
7. Malta: 50 percent (3 of 6)
8. Croatia: 45.4 percent (5 of 11)
9. Spain: 44.4 percent (24 of 54)
10. Bulgaria: 41.1 percent (7 of 17)
11. Netherlands: 38.4 percent (10 of 26)
12. Portugal: 38.1 percent (8 of 21)
13. Romania: 37.5 percent (12 of 32)
14. Estonia: 33.3 percent (2 of 6)
15. Greece: 33.3 percent (7 of 21)
16. Austria: 33.3 percent (6 of 18)
17. Germany: 31.25 percent (30 of 96)
18. United Kingdom: 27.3 percent (20 of 73)
19. Slovenia: 25 percent (2 of 8)
20. Denmark: 23.07 percent (3 of 13)
21. Slovakia: 23.07 percent (3 of 13)
22. France: 21.6 percent (16 of 74)
23. Italy: 19.1 percent (14 of 73)
24. Poland: 11.7 percent (6 of 51)
25. Czech Republic: 9.5 percent (2 of 21)
26. Lithuania: 9 percent (1 of 11)
27. Hungary: 4.7 percent (1 of 21)
28. Latvia: 0 percent (0 of 8 members)

List about politicians.

/thread

VOMIT
CHING CHONG
COMET
PING PONG

Why would anyone want to live in a society that does not reward success. We are not all born equal, why treat everyone as if they are. A rocket scientist does not have the same function in society as a service rep at a mansplaining hotline.

Why bother working your ass off becoming a civil engineer when you can grow potatoes for the same quality of life and less work. This only really benefits the plebs and why they're always pushing for it.

Overthrowing the government and burning everything down really worked out well for Russia.

The problem is not communism. Rather, it's us.

As communism states that working any harder than anyone else will not result in any benefits, we would not work hard and we would not adapt to anything because there would be no reason to. As a result, we would not accomplish very much .

That's why it would work if we motivated ourselves to do things without any external pressure.

This is kind of what Nietzsche was alluding by ubermensch: people that were at that their maximum potential due to understanding what is relevant and what is logical.

Unfortunately, the amount of degenerates in this world will never allow this to occur. :(

Maybe we should all convert to that cuck Athene's new "revolutionary" movement. If you believe in logic 100% and make it our core value, all the problems will disappear.

Cults are cool.

>Athene's new "revolutionary" movement
Who's Athene?

Jews did 9/11

Some faggot who's been trolling everyone on the internet for years. Self proclaimed best gamer in the world. Does charity shit and is now apparently a messiah of some logic movement.

No one really relevant on any meaningful level.

Why are people still memeing communism?

What part of "it doesn't work" do you not understand?

You would think after a century and millions of deaths you would figure it out.

rare?

This guy sound like a weirdo.

Medium rare.

Why is this /leftypol/ shit being spammed again.
Go back to your crippleboard you fucking kids.

They're emotionally stunted or children, or both.

A child lives life with a giant authority figure that feeds it, shelters it, clothes it, educates it, and punishes it. Children who either were neglected or suffered some other form of trauma seek out this attachment throughout their adult life if they lack intelligence and self knowledge to see this.

It is natural for someone with a child-like mentality to seek an authority figure to look after their needs.

fpbp

No. Common ownership is impossible. If 5 people are to own an apple, who owns what part of the apple?

Under common ownership, they all own the apple. But the problem is, there is only one apple. If one person eats the apple, did that person steal it from the others who also owned it? That could not be true, because he was also one of the owners of the apple. The same would apply to any of the other owners of the apple. The only way this common ownership would make sense is if the people agreed to each individually own a part of the apple, because then the aforementioned common ownership problem would not be introduced. It can be reasonably argued, however, that the apple was nobody's, and then it became the property of the person who took and ate it as it was being eaten because he bestowed labor unto it when nobody else did (or he bestowed more labor unto it than everyone else, since we are assuming communism and everyone does an equal amount of work for an equal amount of ownership).

Only individual ownership is possible. Communism hence could not work in practice because common ownership is impossible. One person owns something, or no person owns something.