Explain to me why globalism is a bad idea without mentioning:

Explain to me why globalism is a bad idea without mentioning:
1. Hitler
2. Culture

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bx7tF1Ov8Vs
youtube.com/watch?v=aR4MvD9IEAE&t=11m4s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Explain to me why it's good first

niggers.

niggers

Muslims

niggers

A single government controlling all of humanity.

sandniggers

Hitler was a globalist.

jews

niggers

>excluding valid arguments
Stefan would like to have a word with you.

Muslim niggers.

Googles & Slimes

Abrogation of sovereignty in favor of centralized beaureucracies that rule over vast swaths of land. Also niggers

niggers

Niggers.

the more local the government the more control you have over your life

Its destroys cultures both white and nonwhite and turns the world into a giant shopping mall for schlomo

Goes against basic tribalistic human instinct and destabilizes societies undergoing the process as a result, leading to inevitable collapse/takeover

niggers

youtube.com/watch?v=bx7tF1Ov8Vs

The endgame of globalism is every city in the world becoming Detroit.

Uhm it is because Hitler and culture.
Also Hitler said that culture is very important in a culture !

Because why would you want some cunt on the other side of the world dictating what happens in your life.

They don't care about your local issues or anything about you.

it is inefficient and environmentally disastrous to move non-essential goods on a global scale and any attempt at governance of the same is sure to lead to the rise of those who would abuse its power.

Also, niggers.

The filthy Jews mate.

Globalism is socialism on a global scale.

youtube.com/watch?v=aR4MvD9IEAE&t=11m4s

economics. globalism serves to drive labor and material costs down and intellectual property values up, making the wealth gap progressively wider. This is inherently unstable, and will eventually lead to there being an insufficient market to support production, resulting in a global crash.

Dilution of everything that makes different countries unique, loss of identity of individuals and communities, loss of a voice for individuals and communities (loss and lack of proper representation) even more power to coperations (who don't represent the people at all)... that's just off the top of my head. The whole reason NZ exists is because globalisation is a shit

Basically it's sucks for everyone who isn't selfish/self centred

Communism

What kind of fallback mechanism will globalism have when it fails? We bicker among each other all the time, it'll inevitably fail. What happens then?

with one government corruption would be more prevelant and more damaging.
the same laws could not work evenly well everywhere, not only for cultural reasons but enviormental.
everyone should have the right to self determination.

It destroys the middle class, everywhere

Explain to me why medicine is important without mentioning

1. People
2. Lives

Jobs.

>Globalism leads to free trade and corporatism

>Government policy helps private companies more than national citizens

>Jobs go to where wages are cheapest - the third world - resulting in job losses in the original nation

>Unemployment goes up, social disaffection goes up, quality of life for bottom 25% goes down

>Companies post record profits then send profits to overseas tax havens, so the original nation doesn't benefit from private profit

Globalism is great for business and the politicians they buy, but exploitative of third worlders willing to work for $2 an hour, and totally destroys the working and lower middle class in Western nations, while also fucking the Middle and Upper class by not reinjecting the profits made into the original nation.

"Globalism" has many different meanings. It is most often considered to be an extension of neoliberal ideology--- as opposed to "internationalist" communism (which some argue are two sides of the same coin). I will address neoliberal globalism--- the ideology supported by such persons as G.W. Bush, Obama, Merkel, Hillary Clinton, and so on.

Globalism appears to be good. Free trade between free peoples. Is this good? Could it be good? Maybe. But we do not have this. We do not have free trade or free peoples.

What we have is the exploitation of the working poor and middle classes to the benefit of wealthy and nonworking poor.

Globalism as such is clearly an evil. We can not discuss an ideal form of globalism, i call this Star Trek globalism, until we have dealt with our current crop of globalists, and so on.

Intelligence dips greatly and it increases poverty levels to be globalist.

In fact, globalism is alright but only under strict regulations. Right now globalism is running wild and raping humanity in more ways than culturally. It's doing so economically, socially, and physically as well.

Globalism has caused thousands of rapes, entire economies to collapse as well as our current economic climate world wide, people are intimidated into silence in regards to preservation of heratige.

True globalism will never succeed in the first place. Thinking that you're ever going to get the world on roughly the same page and playing nicely together save for some massive, extra-planetary threat that clearly endangers our entire species at once is absolutely naive. There's always going to be some nation(s) out there that want to run shit on their own and are powerful enough to fight for the ability to do so.

M A R X I S M
A
R
X
I
S
M

Niggers

>oh yeah then what's 2+2 and dont give me any of that 4 shit

Concentration of power. Lack of competition between nations

False flags attacks like what you see in Kikebook about libcucks being attacked by pro-trump thus inciting civil unrest then jew-funded civil war.

Globalism isn't a bad idea, it is an inevitability, the problem is it needs to arise naturally from the bottom-up or else it isn't actually globalism at all, and rather just same-old conquest in a new cloth.

Still not a single good response.

Brainwashing the masses will be easier because we will have eliminated their separate beliefs.
The economic collapse that you all speak are assuming that this will be a socialist or communist society. Wrong.
Those screaming "niggers" and "muslims" have to cope with the fact that the white man lost. Sorry.

First-world civilizations and cities are a minority around the world. Globalization causes the slow trend toward a global average standard of living, which is far below the standard of living we currently enjoy. Imagine taking our IQ and Africa's IQ, and averaging the two together. That's what will happen with unrestricted third-world immigration. Retarded, emotional liberal faggots in our country think we can help people by bringing them here, and that's true, but housing, infrastructure, resources and land don't spring up in their wake. They take these things from society as a whole. The cheap apartments for rent our kids should be moving into when they move out when they turn 18, well a dirt-poor Somali family moved in there instead. And nobody else wants to move there because there's an increase of crime in the area. Liberals tell you it's because these people are poor, well no fucking shit you stupid idiots. They were poor in their home countries and they came here with fucking nothing. How the hell do you expect to defeat poverty as long as you're bringing in millions and millions of impoverished people? And there's no way we're going to save the world by bringing them all here. 5 BILLION people on Earth are as poor or poorer than the Mexicans moving here, and every year there's 84 million more of them due to birth rates.

The problem with globalism is that in it's current, liberal-driven form it's unsustainable, it's completely emotionally driven. I wouldn't be opposed to a form of globalism that takes on a tone of colonialism, where we reach out to the third-world, conquer them once again, reign in their exploding populations, and then bend them to our will so that we can be their rulers.

Globalism is another word for global communism.

because I don't want to be cattle for jews

Explain to me why globalism is good without mentioning:
1. Economy
2. Unity

So you agree that it can be done, but you believe it will trigger a white genocide of sorts.
Colonialism is possible and probable.
The third world will be utilized and integrated.

Sorry you have to pay for Hitler's failure.
Sucks to be you.

Power attracts evil. Centralised power allows centralised evil.

People from other cultures come here and don't assimilate. They create communities within communities. Look at Europe, its overran with muslims bringing sharia into places like London for example. These people don't come to america to make it better, they come here to defile it and make it as shitty as the nation they fled.

>why globalism is bad

Sure
>far removed power abstracted from locals
>epic violence as a result of said removed power
>rise of extremist parties who oppose said removed power and promise local authority
>man with toothbrush moustache seizes power
>declares war on Europe and North America
>allies with Japan and Italy
>almost wins
>almost destroys entire planet

Oh fuck I mentioned Hitler

Nope.

Already are.

Not my fault your redpill is a linear stream of information that alienates most people who have not been on this website.

Fair point, but corruption already is the driving force of a lot going on today.
Russia might be the only country acting purely in a self preserving manner.

You don't understand.
I am a nationalist who believes in economic freedom. Up right.
That was meant to be a challenge.

Well done.
I agree.
Hitler was a response. A last resort that failed.

The common defense of (((globalism))) is that local disenfranchised groups can appeal to things like the EU/UN in order to force their shitty local governments to listen to them.

The reality is that all power brokering is being done behind closed doors by a cabal of elites who have never once set foot in their country, let alone their community. For certain things, the local disenfranchised will win, but for other things like (((economy))) they will get absolutely fisted raw in the anus by that cockmaster Juncker or Merkel or Ban Ki Moon or whatever other centralized unelected king we appoint to rule over vast dominions.

So you admit that we have already step foot into globalism.

We already lost.
We were never meant to win.

Read the book "The Collapse of Globalism" by (((John Ralston Saul))) it's an excellent destruction of the entire idea of Globalism and gives it's history. It's been tried and failed since the 1800s and keeps rearing it's ugly head. We can never totally kill it because the idea of a global government with unlimited abstract power is a pretty strong motivator.

The mass outsourcing of jobs that negatively impacts the working class.

Shits weird brah

Can't.

I have Nietzsche and Sun Tzu on my reading list at the moment.
Finishing up 1984 at the moment.

I would love to read your book, but it seems to ignore the power of modern technology, something which I believe will be crucial in achieving a "New World Order" and cultural marxism along with it.

You care about the proles?
Nice.

It's like I don't even know what world I live in anymore.

This

Gee, what could possibly go wrong?...

bah u're right.
my country's traditional value have been replaced with poop-culture and shopping malls.
every normies idolize k-poop idols :((((

You're gay

suuuuuuuure

>wanting your salary lower
moron

Correct.

No such thing as big, small salaries. Only big, small mouths.

Sun Tzu is a 10 minute read.
Nietzsche his best material was his lectures given about the shit state of education and how it only serves the state (at the time, globalist in his era).

Ralston (((saul's))) book is all about technology, specifically technocrats and their love of it to implement the globalist world order.

I'm reading the art of war with extensive commentary from other chinese writers.
i'm reading thus spoke zarathustra.

now that you say that i might give it a go after the nietzche and save the art of war for another day.

The Jews.

I meant you're gay as in you are a fag but the fact that you are a literal fag only proves my point.


Shut your dumb mouth. You don't get to have opinions.

Ok.
Takes one to spot one.

Yeah I'm one of something. Not a fag like you. Loser.

Messing with the wrong guy buddy.
I will gulag you like theres no tomorrow.

The way we're going it'll make everyone stupid instead of only half of us stupid.

Its more complicated than that, but to sum the important parts up, its basically what I just said.

>explain why HIV is bad without mentioning death or the immune system

Okay fag go suck a cock about it fag.

Then come back here and pretend like you can have opinions as you wipe you cum off your lips.

You annoying fucking shithead.

Gays have it.
Gays distribute it.
Gays should be destroyed along with their faggoty disease.

It's only good for globalists elites and international business, for average person it's just more competition. Not to mention crime, and terrorism.

I will c00m in your mom.

Also, this, Hitler had a plan for united Europe, and look at multinational organization that SS was.

Why are you asking when you already know the answer.

And all the people pushing this globalist shit want to impose some form of socialism or communism on the masses, so don't tell me it will be anything else.

A reasonable man.

I agree.
His plan was not as culturally globalist though.

Because good people die, and bad people lie. Even in the event where the globe is under a benevolent rule, that rule will eventually be replaced with bad people who lied themselves into power, and that amount of power in the wrong hands will prove catastrophic.

I see you have personal relations with Georgie-boy. Tell him I said Sieg Heil.

When the world is a nation, whites are the new niggers.

So it is doomed to fail.
I agree.
But what about all that genetic purity we will lose in the process?
You being a descendant of the Visigoths and all, does that not bother you?

If I ever am so down on my luck as to want to kill myself, that devilspawn and his kin will be the first ones to know the day of the oven.

Why are there so many Globalism shill threads lately?

Globalism is only good for large multi-national corporations.

its good.

A FUCKING MEN.

Already are. Cross the Southern border and see for yourself.

I'm not. I just like debating people.

anecdotal, but fuck you.

6 years ago a 100g of parma prosciutto was $8.99
now it is around $4.99 per 100g. Fucking prosciutto is worth it alone.

I don't know everyone is so excited about the rake, that was fucking hilarious.
Inflation will be temporary. I promise.
The genetic and cultural confusion won't.

This needs that badly drawn libshit meme 'prove me wrong using an arbitrary set of rules that a priori preclude your argument'

Globalisms effect on culture is the main fucking reason its so destructive. Its like saying explain why burning fossil fuels is bad without mentioning pollution.

Tl;Dr your a fucking idiot

SHUT UP NIGGER.

>globalism
>without mentioning culture

OP is a gigantic idiot.

What's next?
Explain to me why pizza is good without mentioning taste.

Its usually unhealthy junk food.

You can do it without culture, but trough economy and class warfare, but why not both.

Immigrants

is this something new?