£370 million repairs of buckingham palace from taxpayers

>£370 million repairs of buckingham palace from taxpayers

Why is this allowed?

They are not a net loss from the treasury. Also we should maintain places such as this instead of letting them wither away you godless communist.

Even if you abolish the monarchy, are you just going to let the historic palaces disintegrate? You can still make money off those even without a king or queen.

Know you place, lower class scum.

>monarchy is profitable
>spend money to keep them profitable

Literally nothing wrong with this

They get plenty of money from tourism. Absolutely no need for anyone else to pay for it.

>Why does my government benefit my monarch
Boy has the power of the British Crown diminished

>having a family German Jews live off welfare because "WE HAD KANGZ N SHEEEEEIT" literal third world tier

Where do you think tourist money ends up? The treasury.

Use that money then.

KICK THOSE RICH POMPOUS FUCKS OUT AND TURN IT INTO A HOSTEL FOR THE HOMELESS FFS

A socialist's dream

Fuck history, traditions, institutions and shiieeeyyytttt. We need to fill the palace with drug addict tramps

Because it generates far more from tourism you numpty.

wow think about the amount of ammunition we could have sent to africa for this money.
#Bernie2020

I believe you actually earn money on the Royal family in terms of tourism.

yeah, help thousands instead of it all going to a select group. hope you need help one day

Take it from their benefit money.

gotta keep one of the star attractions of our nations looking nice

>(((new zealand)))

she is part of the unique culture that the marxists claim UK doesnt have

shut up and pay, peasant.

>hurrr I have no idea how the UK operates
It's "from taxpayers", dummy.

The government taking 370 million from the people for useless shit is exactly what communism is, stupid chav. fuck that old hag and fuck britain

Shes evil you fucktards

No one other than the crown estate is paying for it. The crown estate is privately owned.
You're a retard.

.. What do you think they're doing, you stupid cunt?

The royals cost less than they bring in. Factor in the sensitive diplomatic work they do for trade and they are fundamentally an asset to England.

>hurrrr dey cost us millions of pounds

Totally agree. Makes me sick I have to pay 50p a year to keep this saggy bitch and her comrades comfy.

>taking 370 million from the people
It isn't though.

billionaire gets people to pay for her house
>lol

>billionaire pays for own house
ftfy

If there was no Monarchy, the Palace would be owned by the National Trust, and they would be restoring it. With tax payers money.

>Also we should maintain places such as this instead of letting them wither away you godless communist.

As long as it's "other peoples money."

sorry i forgot money came out of thin air

It came from the crown estate.

This burger makes sense, people.

/thread

So what would you have happen with places like castles leave them to fall apart and not only that the money that our royal family brings in is huge

money is created when someone signs for a loan. the government sign the loan and responsibility when they accept "refugees". 370 million pound is equivalent to about 370 paki immigrants.

This.

>Royal family's property/assets puts a net total of £200m a year into the treasury, without even considering the tourism benefits

God save the Queen

Because this is important to culture.

Having a nigga run your country literally third world

Come on m8 you can shitpost better than this

because it's buttons and we get the money back dumbfuck

Listen up Liam, people go to London to see places like the Buckingham palace, not to see and get enriched by your pakis and niggers.
It literally pays itself.
If you want mo money for dem programs be advised that's short sighted.

how much does that castle cost if you need 1/3 billion to repair it

THE PEOPLE WORK FOR THE QUEEN

NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND YOU PEASANT

Kinda defeats the purpose of them though. Sure people would visit an empty Buckingham Palace, but it wouldn't hold the same appeal. The reason there's crowds of tourists outside Buckingham Palace every day of the year is because it still houses an actual monarch. The changing of the guard isn't just a bunch of actors putting on a show, they are actual guardsmen carrying out real ceremonial duties. The royals are profitable and useful, it would make absolutely no sense to get rid of them.

tourism from buckingham palace and tours creates jobs. Royalty being funded creates more tourism. Jobs and wealth created

Plus royalty are like rich businessmen that go around the world promoting UK businesses and image. Leading to more money investments and jobs.

Overall they aren't a net loss for your country.

>take 85% of the revenue generated by the crown estate
>hurrr you can't use the other 15% to repair the crown estate

lots

Why do you bongs even care about the monarchy anymore?

Even their genes are potato tier.

Can you imagine the royals being forced to house illegal migrants in the palace?

>how much does that castle cost if the government takes 85% of the revenue generated by it and still bitches about you using the 15% left over to repair it

How could you enforce such a thing, dummy?

Will never happen

Yeah, 370 million quid could pay for a lot of mosques there chap

It's interesting that most of the people that turn up to events in the UK involving the royal family are white. It's a stark contrast to the photos you see of London being full of immigrant scum.

What do you mean will never happen.
That's currently the deal under the sovereign grants act, continuing from the deal made under king george III.

Christ, the amount of people what just start screaming hysterically without knowing the first thing about the matter at hand.

>So we were going to have a responsible government but we decided we needed a genetic god king because tourism is important to an economy that makes its money off banking

hahaha i fucking hate english cucks

>Why is this allowed?
required renovation, for when they snatch the Kaaba and put it in w/ the Crown Jewels

If we had no royal family, the palace would fall under the national trust as a historic building, and its repair work and upkeep would be paid for by the taxpayer anyway.

Right now we can justify it because the royals are a net profit to our country, and sometimes you need to spend a bit of money to make a profit.

Because she owns the country

Even if noone lived there, we should keep Buckingham Palace maintained. Our history is one of the only things we have.

If the British people want to continue supporting their monarch, what should we stop them?

Mock them, hell yes. But not stop them

>they

Who is 'they' exactly? You do understand the difference between the Crown and the queen, dont you? The difference was commonly understood prior to the 12th century. These are Crown estates, you fucking pleb.

If you think that's over the top, just wait for the Washington DC renovations

This

the monarchy has over 80% support

we are about 20% immigrant

respect our right to self-determination

kek what a dumbass

>If the British people want to continue supporting their monarch, what should we stop them?
So at what rate should we tax them? They're already taxed at 85%, should the government just steal privately owned property perhaps?
There was me thinking Americans didn't like governments stealing property.

Most people who start screaming about the monarchy have next to no idea what they're talking about.

Mate her family brings that in from tourism and all the relations shit they do to other countries. Also Buckingham Palace is a piece of our history so of course we're going to maintain it.

They don't get money from tourism you fucking idiot. We get tourism money because of them.

Nice attempt at side-stepping the question, dumbass.

What question? You didn't ask me a question.

They come to see the locations, not the Queen. The palace of Versailles in France generates far more tourist income than Buckingham Palace and they cut their king's head off years ago. Our palaces and castles would make more income if tourists were allowed to go inside them more often but instead they house these spongers.

All that will be under budget and ahead of schedule.

ezpz

Clearly you have no concept of crown estates and the civil list payment.

Understand what you are on about before talking shit.

...

The royal family are the uk^s national spies u cunt.

This is just their payment

Lel muh economic education

SAY IT LOUD

Tourists mate.

But less money.

They need to make Republicanism a crime. I used to disagree with the death penalty until I met people who unironically don't see the Constitutional Monarchy as being the world's most tried and tested, perfect, stable and most benevolent system of government.

God save the Queen!

This.
Freeman style fudalisism should make a come back. It actually makes the most Econmic sense

>They get plenty of money from tourism

Yes. I'm sure they sell gorrilions of these. At least 370£ million of it.