Ha, so true

Ha, so true.

Attached: E4402B76-E57E-435E-AA5B-7F4B44BB4AC3.jpg (676x960, 161K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Dirlewanger
theatlantic.com/photo/2017/06/american-nazis-in-the-1930sthe-german-american-bund/529185/
thehistoryreader.com/modern-history/6-things-may-known-nazis-america/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I’m so confused. These people hold onto the Confederacy because “muh grandpappy!” so do they just ignore the one who fought the Nazis? Why?

Because he was a soyboy cuck and Hitler was right. XD kek

Bigotry has always been about ignoring certain parts of your forefathers' legacy. You just pick and choose what you like and ignore the rest.

Attached: this-is-so-deep-talent-explore-me-mom-dad-el-3202255.png (500x740, 213K)

i think the guy thought his grandpa was a nazi and was just making him proud out of ignorance.

Attached: my-fur-not-yours-this-is-so-deep-https-t-co-nujqhoza4p-24390236.png (500x671, 201K)

Attached: 12472504_1330384106990165_3660926041587901455_n.jpg (700x700, 182K)

I disagree. The nature of history and culture is about choosing what to pass on and what to leave behind. This is completely independent of bigotry or lack thereof. There's no requirement for self flagelation of your ancestor's history to accept the outgroup.

So fucking deep.
Don't you know that your racist, misogynist grandpa.fought da nazis because he hated racism?

>your racist, misogynist grandpa
Making a lot of assumption there.

> There's no requirement for self flagelation of your ancestor's history
Recognizing that the confederacy was shit for everyone in it except for a tiny handful of wealthy planter aristocrats isn't self-flagellation.

No they'd be German instead but it'd be ok because they're white.

I dont get the people who make the "we fought against nazis" argument.

Like, just cause two kingdoms fought eachother didn't make one go "yeah, fuck those feudalists". We've invaded other democratic countries before.

We didn't get into a war with germany because anyone was opposed to nazism or even racial supremacy, it's because Hitler broke an anti aggression pact that tied into the US getting bombed, it was a completely beurocratic technicality that the propaganda of the war then successfully attempted to paint as an ideological war. Even though Americans were objectively way more racist than Nazi Germany and about as equally anti Semitic.

Most Americans were pretty much okay with national socialism as an economic model and some even admired it, at least more than the russian communist or italo fascist models.

No, they would be replaced with entitled, privileged young SS German boys, seeing it's their duty to Germanize the Anglo-Saxon race

The majority of americans at the time of the war were segregationalists.
There's very little doubt the soldiers fit into that majority.

have you really been that brainwashed by the "ebil nazi" propaganda

I'm pretty sure nazi germany wasn't into raping white children
Seems sort of the opposite of their whole philosophy

Yes.
Hitler had a serious fascination for islam and admired its expansionist and imperialist nature.

>We didn't get into a war with germany because anyone was opposed to nazism or even racial supremacy

Source?

>Even though Americans were objectively way more racist than Nazi Germany and about as equally anti Semitic.

Source?

>Most Americans were pretty much okay with national socialism as an economic model and some even admired it, at least more than the russian communist or italo fascist models.

Source?

Yes cause Adolf was OK with arabs :^)

Assumptions.

>it's another "we must secure a future for our white children is propaganda" episode

Yes soldiers have never raped anyone. Especially the Nazis.

Its ok if its within the (white) family

>We didn't get into a war with germany because anyone was opposed to nazism or even racial supremacy

funny, the propaganda of the time said otherwise

Only thing that rly makes u think more is when anti-fur folks start talking about sheeps.

>248 posts and 73 image replies omitted.

Attached: 1497582009265.png (1919x1155, 216K)

>Seems sort of the opposite of their whole philosophy
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Dirlewanger

When we won did we do that?
Did we make them all speak english?

You have a childs cartoon view of the world if you think Germany winning meant they would have made us speak german and taken all our women

Hitler called for peace many times and Churchill said no because it didn't sit well with his jewish financers

Hitler liked Islam a lot more than Christianity, because in his eyes Christianity was insufficiently bloodthirsty. He saw Christianity as a religion of the weak, cowards, beggars, and degenerates because it doesn't support wars of conquest and extermination.

[Citation Not From Stormfront Needed]

>Hitler called for peace many times and Churchill said no because it didn't sit well with his jewish financers

Oh here we go.

there are american soldiers that rape people too
but you wouldnt say its our goal to do that, you wouldnt say if we win we are going to invade and rape them all

I never said any of what you said you projecting soyboy
SS boys raping non Aryan British women is not the same as making them speak German. You seriously need a good beating.

>When we won did we do that?
We weren't the nazis tho

I can't help him with the "most Americans" claim but Nazism was popular enough...
theatlantic.com/photo/2017/06/american-nazis-in-the-1930sthe-german-american-bund/529185/
thehistoryreader.com/modern-history/6-things-may-known-nazis-america/

So historians and the government put it at the high tens if thousands or the low hundreds of thousands of Nazis or Nazis-supporting people.

I don't know if America was "objectively way more racist than Nazi Germany" but I do know that legally, Jews could hold any office while in Nazi Germany Jews couldn't hold many public offices. So "objectively", at least the government was not as racist as Nazi Germany.

Now why the US "went to war" is a complex question with one direct answer - Pearl Harbor.

Overall I'd rate that user's post about 30% true, 70% false.

Attached: arturo.jpg (500x500, 55K)

I guess that's why it was only propoganda.

It is now.

Except the US didn't fight Germany to conquer Europe you stupid fuck.

im talking about when they rape middle eastern women

That was a mistake.

Pearl Harbor? The war predominantly being a retaliation against the japanese? The KKK and japanese internment camps and Jim Crow? The american national socialist party and Hitler being named man of the year?

Like nigga this isn't fringe stormfront shit, this is basic fucking history

>the propaganda of the time said otherwise
>in response to a post claiming the propaganda was a different story from the actual reason

I bet you still think the weapons of mass destruction thing is total propaganda though, and totally a contemporary invention, no way the government would invent similar narratives for anything else.

Attached: 1469236084514.gif (155x173, 949K)

Yes, without a doubt.

Ok so you proved my initial point here I guarantee the Nazis raped many European women because thats what always happens in wars. And it would have gotten worse if Hitler accomplished his goal of conquering Europe.

It seems to me that you just got directly contradicted.

You know, when a thread goes off the rails this hard, it makes me consider posting good Sup Forums shit that we rarely talk about, preferably tangetnally related. Maybe Bone, or Sandman.

Attached: 1482516790243.gif (400x400, 499K)

>soldiers
>not raping

Attached: 46a[1].png (645x729, 90K)

There was already a mosque shooting in canada by a Sup Forumstard. He even asked around on Sup Forums as to what his target should be and when he should do it.

My great-great uncle fought against the far better interests of his and their nations, for a war that only benefitted the enemies of the west.
I don't think he was a bad person, but the war he fought in was wrong, and we were on the wrong side.
How is that hard?

Directly from the atlantic article you linked to
>The rally...was protested by huge crowds of anti-Nazis
>As World War II began in 1939, the German American Bund fell apart,
Seems to me that we didn't really like these american nazis.

Or you can go the complete opposite route either one up the derailment with another one

No, it's just recognizing that building a whole society around plantation slavery was really awful. That's the way of life that the confederacy was fighting to preserve, and it sucked for everyone except for the planter aristocrats.