Capitalism doesn't work

Capitalism doesn't work.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RQVIeTLqgOw&t=65s
youtu.be/LyOlDSI2LK0
youtube.com/watch?v=dvTLRYhSaDU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Money*
Fixed that for you.

communism doesn't work

...

what are you trying to say OP? that with hard work any capitalist can aquire your picrelated riches?

Would you rather be poor in America or Venezuela?

You're right. It doesn't. 3/4 of the citizens are near or below the poverty line, while we have more billionaires than any other country. Welcome to Brazil II.

the only thing wrong with these things, besides their ephemeral nature, is the envy of poorfags

>the people that make those stuff will never have those stuff

It works for some at least.

>Cohiba

Enjoy your fucking meme cigar you faggot

Zeno Platinum EDC.

Tell that to China. Pretty much as soon as they adopted a capitalistic economic system they started their rapid rise in economic power and eclipsed Japan as number two in the world.

...

Would you rather be poor in america or poor in brazil?

...he typed from the computer he bought.

/o/ fags, what car is this? I'm really into old coupes/sedans.

Have you tried the reverse image search?

"Capitalism doesn't work."

More appropriately, "Capitalism doesn't work if everyone is rich because there's no roach class until we have robot/ cyborg tier working class society like Big O."

Pseudo intellectuals...

Why don't you equate nice frivolous things with a nice system of government?

even your military says we are your future

>São Paulo is a city defined by rapid growth and separation. It is a dual-built environment, where the over 30,000 millionaires that inhabit the developed core and southwest suburbs of the city travel in armored cars or private helicopters over an impoverished periphery composed of over 1,600 informal communities (favelas) and 61,000 boarding houses (cortiços). 40 The proximity of extreme wealth and poverty in this city has generated instability, and rapid growth has outstripped the city’s ability to manage.

>Like Rio, São Paulo is a moderately-integrated city. It exemplifies what future megacities could resemble: economically vibrant and vital while at the same time internally unstable.

Why don't you answer the question you fucking asswipe.

I'm not even the dude that asked, but that response is literally something I would punch you flat out in the face for. You fucking faggot.

Capitalism might be a shit system, but it's still the least shitty of them all.

>Why don't you answer the question you fucking asswipe.
Because the answer is readily available for all but the terminally lazy.

Why are you getting so worked up over something that doesn't even involve you?

really makes you think

You know, I'm not sure.
Quality of life is about the same for some people I've seen (and worse, if you want to talk about the crazy fucks who trash their houses).
The worst of the misery is, unfortunately, voluntary. That comes down to the collapse of the family structure and the way it's poisoned the minds of many young men and women.

There's also that whole "diversity" thing in America. Sounds great, right? Nah. Turns out the more "diverse" a society becomes, the more alienating it becomes. When you gather a shit-ton of people together and they have literally no shared characteristics, the individual becomes as a termite. If a termite isn't doing well somewhere, then...well, there are plenty of termites who are!

Granted, Brazil didn't just vote Trump into office.
I imagine that Trump wasn't "just" a repudiation of the two major political parties and the toxic bullshit within them. He embodies that peculiar spirit of America . Eccentric, bold, and eager to charge a shit load of money for useless degrees.

Your fucking attitude.
I am pretty sure you are under the age of 25 and live with your parents.
For the record, I would still smack you.

Compare these to a single malt.

Are they similar?

>Your fucking attitude.
What attitude would that be? I informed him of a simple solution to his question, one that is available and easily overlooked.

If you want to talk about attitude let's look at yours. A simple question was answered an a solution was presented. Then you come storming in like some SJW white knight. And you have the hypocrisy to make remarks about anyone else's attitude?

You really are a twat

>A simple question was *asked an a solution was presented.
Fixed!

diversity is fine as long as you maintain a you are american first narrative. The progressives have been eroding that thought process and now people are beginning to balkanize into their ethnic communities

Yes capitalism does work, but it exploits people, and that's just not nice.

NO FUCKING WAY YOU FILTHY DIRTY KIKE!

bourbon is at least 51% CORN single malt is 100% MALTED BARELY

Jesus, what the fuck do you kikes drink out there? Boxed manischewitz? Disgusting dude.

But as far as flavor profile, a corn whiskey will be sweeter. A Scotch Whisky is going to have a more pronounced forage / oat / sweetness to it. Its more robust, a little earthy. Depending on what scotch you're drinking. Many different styles friend. I'm afraid I can't get into all of the details cause I am about to get my dick sucked.

youtube.com/watch?v=RQVIeTLqgOw&t=65s

Why are americans so self hating when it comes to whisky?

AMERICAN BOURBON FOR AMERICAN DRINKERS

niggers don't work either but that doesn't mean we can just get rid of them

What if the dude didn't know what "reverse image" was? You automatically assumed the poster should have know what that tool was, therefore placing yourself as some erudite elitist. That is my problem with you.
Fuck niggers, fuck jews, fuck the media, fuck peoples feelings, ZULU fucks given. Mattis SEC DEF.

so he humbly gave him that knowledge, and wasn't even thanked in reverse(

It's a Russian land based personnel carrier.

>What if the dude didn't know what "reverse image" was?
Then I would expect he would ask how to use a reverse image search and then I would tell him.

>You automatically assumed the poster should have know what that tool was,
It is a commonly used tool that has been around for years so why should I assume he doesn't know how to use it? It seems you believe it is less rude to consider a poster a completely ignorant moron than to extend the benefit of the doubt that the poster merely forgot that there is a reverse image search tool.

Might I suggest you go put some ointment on your itchy cunt before you post on Sup Forums again? You are only making yourself look like a twat.

Go ahead Brit, Look up how popular Bourbon whiskey is world wide.

I don't know why its so popular. Its flavor profile is nice, but I would just rather have a shot of it.

As far as I know historically, the Brits really fucked themselves. Taxed USA for sugar to make rum... Fought the Dutch and discovered Genever (you then turned into London Dry Gin) You really never made anything for yourselves. Literally, you made gin. That is it. Maybe perhaps the IPA, but know one really knows about that.

You're both retarded.

>simply ask about something because I was in the middle of a match and the Steam browser crashes when I reverse image search
>people sperg out on both sides and act like faggots
Welp. Thank you even if you were a dick about it.

...

>Steam browser
All of my why

Or, if you were a fucking person of any worth, you would have responded, "The car is XXXYYY. However, if you have a question about an image, please refer to "reverse image search in advance." Easy solution. Your way of going about it was so crass and cringe worthy. As if not even really wanting to help the other user out.

>in a match
>don't feel like alt+tabbing just to browse Sup Forums
Yeah, it's fucking horrible and it crashes if I try to load a picture larger than 250x250.

>if you were a fucking person of any worth
You are clearly a poor judge of a person's worth given how you are incapable of addressing the point "you think it is less rude to conclude an user is a completely ignorant moron." Your only tool of persuasion seems to be insult after insult after insult.

I don't condemn the purpose of your posts as it seems you want posters to be helpful but the way you go about it is completely wrong and it seems you are determined to stay wrongheaded regardless of anything.

we have to help people to evolve instead of indulging to their disadvantages

Man can you fucking imagine living that life? Get the wear only the best and comfortable suits, have a shower with 6 fucking shower heads, have a house tailored to your sense of style, live only in the best upperclass white neighborhood, bang hot exotic women on the reg....

But then it all fades away with time. All of it. None of it leaves an impression of lasting happiness, only temporary pleasures. Because one day, you will die. None of it will have meant anything. Your beautiful house will eventually turn to ash. Those nice suits will suffer a similar fate. Those girls are also dead, with you not even being a memory worth savoring.

>don't feel like alt+tabbing just to browse Sup Forums
Wouldn't that fit in the category of what was referred to previously as "the terminally lazy?"

With hard work, can they?
youtu.be/LyOlDSI2LK0

But does it take into account the low cost, sophistication and wide supply of products available to everyone today? In the 50s I believe a TV set cost two full average monthly wages. It's like a tenth of that today.

Capitalism doesn't work because we all work for capitalism...

>Capitalism doesn't work
>Posts pictures of capitalism working

Every single thing in that picture was provided by someone. Jobs were created, families fed, every single time anything in those photos was made.

Nah that just sounds gay, I agree with you that people that don't provide sauce when they know it are cunts, but chances are I probably would have image searched after my session.

there has to be losers for there to be winners.

if everyone 'wins', nobody does

Probably, but there's a difference between laziness and convienience.

Literally SJW

As I have been Devil's Advocate

"worth" is subjective at my end. I bet you are a NEET American. Currently unemployed. How does that feel?

It seems even open overtures to playing nice is wasted on you as you are determined wave your bleeding cunt in everyone's face on a public forum.

Fun fact - No one here owes anyone anything. Even posting about the reverse image search was an act of being helpful. But clearly you demand everything being spoonfed which is complete and utter bullshit. If you want that, I suggest you try Reddit where such conduct is incentivized by upvoting. But here where anonymity is cherished, we don't consider the niceties that are standard IRL as applicable. Trolling is fun and all but basing it on a ridiculous notion of "personal worth" only demonstrates how out of touch with Sup Forums you are.

tl;dr version: GTFO out of Sup Forums with your idiotic white knighting bullshit.

thats like posting pics of Stalin's summer homes and saying Communism doesn't work.

Kek if you're trying to get at being poor in Venezuela is horrible, remember that they're a socialist country and look how thats going for them

taht face when this is an actual argument

youre a living meme

That's what I'm hoping Trump will inspire in people.

What is inflation

You tell me.

Without understanding fractional reserve banking and history of money you can't talk about capitalism. It would be great but it got perverted right around the time money was needed for first great war. If not for this money created out of air the war would have been starved after a year and people would go home. This 'capitalism' we have now goes just like the communist manifesto and it's pure (((coincidence))).

Every time I try and give sauce I'm instantly branded as a spoonfeeder. Now I just tell people to fuck off.

>Overtures

I want more banter from your fucking side man. You seem the type to be a pseudo intellectual.


I classify people in two realms here; Those who have been to the Opera, and those who have NOT.

How do you identify?

youtube.com/watch?v=dvTLRYhSaDU

>basic

Good, need to be everyday reminder.

After all, we are National *Socialists* :)

>I want more banter from your side man
How about this? Fuck off. I don't care what you want or what you like. I tried to be helpful and all you've done is be a dick.

No.
National socialism exists

I would kill everyone in this thread for those 6 panels to be snapshots of my existence.

Who here can honestly not say the same?

>t. The 1%

>Capitalism doesn't work
>Posts every example of what capitalism has brought us

M'kay

imbecile

It works perfectly

But would you work for it?

>pretending political corruption isn't the cause of Brazil's inequality

Many countries are more economically-free than Brazil and less segregated, political power has the potential to generate much greater gaps than market competition.

Brought us? What do you mean us?

It has only brought good things to the lucky. Not to the rest.

Looks like a Lada; don't bother with one if you're into cars, they're the laughing stock of the car universe.

Hard work isn't the important thing to get these things.

To be very succesful you need hard work, that's non-debatable. It's the necessary condition. But you also need luck or good starting point. So while hard work is necessary, it's not sufficient to ensure this. Therefore hard work is for retards.

Idubbbz gets double dubbbz

The median income earner used to have a slightly larger rice farm than everyone else, now he has a house, a car and an iPad; just because you haven't moved moved up relative to others doesn't mean you haven't moved up.

The "lucky" (producers) can only buy Lamborghinis because they've generated enough wealth to do so; don't act like the world in enslaved to produce more Lamborghinis for the "lucky" few.

If you prohibit those people from keep their money, they either leave or stop producing; how do you think an economy works?

works for the """smart""" ones

Oh boy, the old "compared to middle ages we live as kangs nao!" retarded argument.

>The "lucky" (producers) can only buy Lamborghinis because they've generated enough wealth to do so
Through luck.

>If you prohibit those people from keep their money, they either leave or stop producing; how do you think an economy works?
Whatever. They didn't earn their money, they just got lucky.

Shit. I'll bet dollars to chicken feet that you've never been more than 200 miles from where you were born. WTF do you know?

They are smart; if it's so easy to multiply capital why don't you do it?

Many billionaires started with nothing, can you call them anything but smart? Even those who start with millions of dollars, they're just as successful as long as they multiply their initial investment.

>but muh Trump had a $1,000,000 loan

I don't give a shit if it was $200,000,000, he turned it into (almost) ten billion; if that's so easy, why don't you turn $100 into $1,000,000?

The poor of today are pretty much as wealthy as the kings of medieval europe, ya dingus.

Everyone can eat meat whenever they want
Everyone can travel to a foreign land hundreds/thousands of km away just for fun
Everyone has electricity, running water, and heat in the winter

When was the last time you heard of someone who starved to death?

>The poor of today are pretty much as wealthy as the kings of medieval europe, ya dingus.
So what? It's relative measure which matters.

What are your questions supposed to mean? I'm just saying that it's unfair that some people get to enjoy so much (thanks to luck) while many live much worse lives (relatively). That's all. And system that perpetuates such unfairness is bad as far as I am concerned.

>They didn't earn their money, they just got lucky.

Holy shit this is entertaining.

How exactly did luck bring their wealth? Luck didn't make them better than their competition, hard work & skill did.

If you want to ban wealth in an effort to 'distribute' the wealth more evenly, good luck. Even if you think they didn't earn it, they own it and they will happily leave with it if you try to take it.

Free markets are wonderful, you just have to keep Jews away from them

Not really. The people at the top all work hard, but the ones who get lucky or get born more intelligent (which is also luck) win. So yeah, you have to work hard, but once you start working hard, your success is mostly down to luck.

>Even if you think they didn't earn it, they own it and they will happily leave with it if you try to take it.
Yeah, this alone shows that for you it's not about justice. And it also shows that any move that hurts the rich is completely justified.

Why do you cuck yourself so much? Do you really believe that you can one day also be filthy rich of you "work hard"? LOL.

Daily reminder that Sup Forums is a capitalist board.

Any form of socialism (yes, including "socialism of the nationalist variety") is not welcome here.

It doesn't matter though OP, there are plenty of places for you to go.

I implore you to go here:
>>>/reddit/
it will be right up your alley.

I have to say drinking Jim Beam shifted my palette to enjoy sweet whiskeys/bourbons.

But single malt has a great oily flavor which I love.

Ill save your image to buy one of these later on.

Enjoy the dick sucking

>once you start working hard, your success is mostly down to luck

I'll be honest I lost it here; you're saying that hard work promotes luck? Why isn't this effect visible within the majority of hard working people?

Some people are born into wealth, without doubt, but even they need to manage it at least as well as their parents or they lose it.

And you're missing the point; people become wealthy when they're given the opportunity to; the prospect of future luxury is the incentive to work. If you prohibit people from keeping any wealth they create, they have no incentive to create it in the first place. You're effectively driving-out existing wealth and inhibiting anyone from creating wealth in the future; if that's what you want, go for it.

My parents worked their way from the middle class to the upper class and I refuse to believe their accomplishments were a result of "luck". They've taught me a valuable lesson that drives me to do the same for my children, and it wont be out of "luck".

>I'll be honest I lost it here; you're saying that hard work promotes luck? Why isn't this effect visible within the majority of hard working people?
No. I'm saying that many people work hard. But the ones who are really succesful are the ones who were also lucky, while working hard. By lucky I mean either good starting position or right time, right place kinda deal.

>You're effectively driving-out existing wealth and inhibiting anyone from creating wealth in the future; if that's what you want, go for it.
It's much better than giving people false hope and pretending that "hard work" is enough to be succesful when it quite clearly isn't. I'd rather hurt a few than lie to most.

>My parents worked their way from the middle class to the upper class and I refuse to believe their accomplishments were a result of "luck".
Yeah this is typical for cucks of your kind. You think that hard work is the most important. I bet you also believe that good things happen to good people and vice versa. There is even a name for this.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis

Except world doesn't work like that.

The best economic system. I am a 24 year old businessman who makes around 8k a month and growing rapidly. ama

wtf i want taxes now

Fuck that. I'm content to be just floating near the poverty line, free to disappear whenever I want. Material prisons are for insecure chumps.