Why is communism always associated with multiculturalism...

Why is communism always associated with multiculturalism, it was never like that until liberals decided they thought communism is cool. Why does the left have to ruin everything?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lusotropicalism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_Mozambique
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluricontinentalism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilizing_mission
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Cultural marxism tbqhwyfam

The reason is because communism is globalist by nature. Different cultures, traditions, religions, races, none of this is allowed to exist in Communism.

Communism literally just exists to destroy western civilization are you really surprised that they incorporated something which is incredibly destructive to western civilization into their ideology?

>liberals
you mean international socialists
your history is shit

>communism exists just to destroy western civilization

How? I think western civilization has destroyed itself. In the West we have to much freedom, it has allowed new degenaracys to devolope

>Why is communism always associated with multiculturalism
It's not, you retarded Sup Forumstards always try to strawman with that meme. Why is it that former communist countries don't have multiculturalism problem?

That isn't marxism at all

this is probably one of those russian niggers subverting the board

pre-1930s Multiracialism was to expand Empires

1940-1970 Multiracialism was promoted by USSR to diminish the power of Anglos

1980-present Multiracialism is to expand the power of western imperialism

Multiracialism in the Portuguese Empire was practiced on a deep level of social integration, miscegenation and social promotion based in skill and human qualities of each individual, rather than in the ethnic background, which was coined lusotropicalismo and had been a major feature of the Portuguese Empire throughout history.

Portugal was by far the European colonial power with the oldest territorial presence overseas; in some cases its territories had been continuously settled and ruled by the Portuguese throughout five centuries. It celebrated both actual and mythological elements of racial democracy and civilizing mission in the Portuguese Empire, encompassing a pro-miscegenation attitude toward the colonies/overseas territories

With origins as early as the 14th century, Pluricontinentalism was a geopolitical concept that Portugal was a unified nation-state that spread multiple continents.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lusotropicalism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_Mozambique
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluricontinentalism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilizing_mission

Communism is just systematized degeneracy.

yeah it was. have you ever even read Marx?
racism and colonialism are the mother of capitalism, all wealth should be shared, skin color is irrelevant etc

Western civilization is still alive. What the fuck are you talking about?

even if communism worked it would still be dysgenic

I mean western civilization is destroying itself, it doesn't need any help from communism to do so

Nothing's perfect

>Why is communism always associated with multiculturalism, it was never like that
but it was. USSR tried super hard to erase the cultural identities of its constituent nations. no more russian, ukrainian, baltic, kazakh or chechen man. only soviet man now.

of course it didnt work out and as soon as the soviet oppression went away people reverted to their old national identities

>muh human nature

>it was never like that
It was actually. Equality and social justice shit always was a part of communism, at least in USSR it was.

and democracy not.

With the exception of Stalinism, Communism has the ultimate goal of a One World Government that destroys the the concepts of Borders and Nations.

Multiculturalism destroys the Nation.

>if I dont understand IQ and neuroscience it doesn't exist!

Every nation does that, in America we are all Americans and with the refugees in Germany they are all germans

>too much freedom
no such thing

why is it that the largest proponents of communism today would all fall under the category of bourgeoisie? Do these people studying Ba's at university seriously consider themselves working class

Yes, yes there is

Where do you think the people who are destroying western civilization are getting their ideas from?

That was not what I was saying. But saying this and that is human nature is literally the same argument like "it's god".

Communism sees the history as the fight of the working class against the bourgeois class. This notion is transnational. To be efficient, the working class of different countries should associate to make their rights stronger.

Liberals have taken this global notions and transformed it into multiculturalism. That's right, this modern version is quite different from the previous one and doesn't really fit in the communism ideology.

Western leaders

I never mentioned human nature

Behold the glorious Slavic nations now.

Btw what you described wasn't multiculturalism, like, at all.

Thank you for an actual answer that's not autistic

Communism is a globalist ideology
so is multiculturalism.

both seek to destroy sovereign nations and their culture and instead mash all peoples together until only no sense of identity left.

Marxism is the most cancerous idea ever formed by humanity.

>saying a society would be "dysgenic"
>not at all a reference to "human nature"

>multiculturalism
Not quite. In a communist society there is only one culture and one "ethnic group". In the USSR, for example, it was called "soviet people". All other individual cultures were to be destroyed.

Communism is democratic.

Communism isn't a 21st century invention.

gonna ask again:

Do any of you faggits here read anything? I'm reading pic related. This cuck friend of mine stumped me by saying it's wrong to be a racist and explained how you can't be racist towards white people. Can someone disprove this book?

It uses couple of terms such as:
>unruliness

the inability of the sovereign state to rule over a certain population thus making that population being labeled as "unruly"

>racialization

the classification of people by some visible characteristic in order for the sovereign state to protect itself from this unruly group and at the same time keep strong hold on its own population by saying "these blacks/muslims/jews/homosexuals/transsexuals/ are coming to rape/murder/destroy/use your batrhom/ you "

So racialization is a discriminatory classification used by those in power to squash the unruly, or to create a fake threat in order to rule their own population.

Also, he said that if you look at the IQ bell curves of whites and blacks there is a significant overlap, and then he asked if it was right to be racist towards blacks who are as intelligent as whites, who commit the same amount of crime as whites, who contribute the same amount to society as whites. This right here stumped me, because there's a significant part of white population that is also not intelligent just as much as an average black is but because we have blacks/muslims/homosexuals around we aren't singling them out because we have others to single out. But if we lived in a world that's only whites, the stupid ones would be probably racialized and labeled as the "other" as the threat.

What do you think about this Sup Forums? I'm kind of stumped on it because it shows that it doesn't really matter if blacks on average are really inferior when there are plenty of blacks who are just as superior to the average blacks as whites are. So basically if someone doesn't come here and explains how this is all wrong I'll have to return my racist club card.

That's capitalism. Globalism is capitalism. It's global capital that tears down borders and turns every culture into consumerist bullshit.

The word you are looking for is Internationalism. Socialists are internationalists because it would be stupid to ignore that the contradictions of capitalism could be overcome within the narrow operational base of just one country.

Globalism isn't Internationalism.

Communism is a reactionary globalist
Communism as a global phenomenon is a reaction to global oppression under capitalism
Communism is globalist inasmuch as to repeal capitalism and repair the damages

You have to destroy the countries worth before you can remodel it.

Never said it was, the West is killing itself and somehow you are blaming communism? You a immigrant from the US? Cause only people here are that brainwashed about communism

I would consider dysgenics to be lowering the quality in the way people think, not how they think.

Because after being treated like shit for decades they decided to not trust any left wing cunts.

Because communism is a globalist jew apparatus designed to have niggers overthrow their betters. Started with the vodka niggers and they spread it to rice niggers, jungle niggers, and nigger niggers until America crushed the soviets.

Now they've subverted the American population of gender niggers, gibs nigger niggers, and the rest of the nigger spectrum.

kys faggot

Communism is about the erasure of class and rank a society where evrybody's ''equal'' sadly it destroys evrything it touches.

was that a rebuttal?

>maybe if I say nigger enough people will take me seriously

>Western civilization
>alive
>German speaking
No thanks to your kind

>"capitalists" are the real globalists!

if communists seek to abolish private property, they can't achieve that if they only affect one or a few nations.

"Proletarians of all countries, unite!"

Private markets exists independently of this ideological nonsense and works within nations and across nations.

>doesn't know about Yuri Bezmenov
How fucking new are you, newfag?

But capitalism does the same thing.

Besides, all the intellectual material and art that emerged from the Soviet Union would disprove your point. After all, it was the Soviets who went to space first and the US just responded to that. In capitalism, everybody is forced to think: "Is artwork XY or research YX monetarily profitable? If it isn't, I should probably drop it." That significantly lowers the freedom of thought and creation.

"repair'' you mean waiting in a breadline for a day and getting trown into the gulag is repairing? Shlomo

this.
modern western values are cancer.
Worst part is these self destructive values are being exported at an incrising rate to non-western country.
Soon the whole world will be plagued by western degeneracy

I don't think you understand what dysgenics is then. Multiple generations of communism would lower the pop iq distribution, unless you have a eugenics system in place

>all wealth should be shared
Why should I share my money? If some niggers/gypsies/cucks/numales can't fucking find a job then that's their problem not mine.

>"What is ideological subversion?"

You must be new here.

Communism was always ruined

Thanks to our "freedom" mental cases like pic related are encouraged that they are normal

You need a strong protectionist state to keep the expanding capital at bay. Capitalism seeks to unlock new markets constantly, otherwise the profit rate will tend to zero unless there is a constant stream of innovation. Globalism is capitalist. To say it was Socialism which invented that is pure intellectual dishonesty, after all, it were the Socialist Nations with protectionist policies and strong border control.

Again, Internationalism doesn't mean "open borders" and "refugees welcome". That's liberal identy politics which is despised by true socialists.

Yes it is you dumb newfag. Merkel has caused an acceleration of its death but it's still alive.

>Muh communists are behind it all.
no it's neoliberal globalists, bankers.
I'm not a leftist but i recognice the i as a right wing nationalist share many of my enemies with the radical left.
We stop these divide and conquer and focus on the main problem.

reminder that communism is a spook

>newfag
Nope

>still alive
In the same way being on life support is alive, sure. No thanks to your kind, still.

Eliminating existing culture to make one new culture/state of no culture (however you want to look at it) is doing the same thing as multiculturalism retard. You can look at it anyway you want, but it's hated for exactly the same reasons in the end. Get fucked commie

*We should
>the
*that

how did you come up with that money? you earned it you say? Did you start from nothing? Or were you given something at the start? Something by your parents? Like a home, 3 meals every day, money for education, money for medication, money for transportation. You didn't just appear in this world with ZERO wealth and then created something from nothing. You started with SOMETHING, a NON-ZERO wealth. It doesn't matter how much that was, but it wasn't zero. And then the question arises, did your parents start from the zero? Of course they didn't! And if you trace any wealth you have you will always find violence as the mother of it, sooner or later...

All capital, all private property was born in violence, in colonialism, in slavery and exploitation one way or the other, at this or that time in history.

So you have no ethical argument to make. If you live in the west you are the oppressor by birth because your ancestors stole from the world.

It's easy to ignore all that when you just focus on your own life. "Oh yeah, I'm a self made man!!1! All this money my parents gave me, all this food, housing, education, that all came from nothing !"

Why? People have been breeding arbitrary for the last 100k years, stupid people mate with smart people and vice versa.

Why would the human breeding behavior be different in a socialist society?

If you really want to blame everything that's killing the West on a dead idelogy then your fucking retarded

>I'll have to return my racist club card.
k

cya next week.

removing competition = more stupid people breed because stupid and low impulse control go hand in hand.

thank you for the extensive argumentation backing your political opinions, it truly gives validity to those same political opinions

Former marxist countries don't tolerate multiculturalism because they don't have a high enough standard of living that they're willing to turn a blind eye to millions of illegal workers preforming menial jobs for pay so low that a citizen couldn't legally work for it.

In the west we're literally willing to sell out our neighbours so we can have cheap shit. Multiculturalism and diversity is our collective rationalization.

Countries trading amongst each other would actually just be called "internationalism". Not every country trades with every single other country all the time.

Against you keep attacking "capitalism" while ignoring the fact that communism by its nature and goals must be effective globally. As you admit, nations can be more or less protectionists and be economically based on private property and markets.

And how exactly are they destroying western civilization?

Thanks to my kind? Do you really think that the refugee crisis killed the west?

t. leftypol
cultural marxism is a conspiracy theory right?

This isn't your forum, shill.

>it's the immigrants!!
>it's the jews!!!
>it must be cultural marxism!
>wait... could it be that the whole system is fucked and these are just symptoms of the failure of the contemporary socio-economic concepts??! nah, i will continue to blame SJW university students and mexican construction workers

These people have their minds clouded in ideology.

she's all good m8

>dead ideology

It just has other names now.

It's done a damn good job so far

How dumb are you?

Your kind have been responsible for ruining Europe throughout history.

Vandals, Reformation, WWI, WWII, Merkel...

>All capital, all private property, was born in violence, in colonialism, in slavery, and exploitation
So you're saying that there's no honest way to make money? If so doesn't that make us all equally culprit? Doesn't that mean we are all still CURRENTLY perpetuating a slavery system?

Your argument implies we shouldn't work at all because it is immoral. It also suggests that just because our money's origin isn't ethical that its our fault to begin with. What sort of obligation do we have to society to share wealth?

You talk about the beginning of our wealth (assuming it is immoral it's irrelevent either way). You talk about our current state but leave out the middle. The fact of the matter is over time money devolves to the people that DESERVE it. A free market (which is the system the West has developed since the Middle Ages) serves as a meritocracy. Part of "earning your wage" entails the privilege to pass it on to your children and improve their lives as well. Actually, many people would say that this is one the primary reasons for working.

Nice reblog though.

>And how exactly are they destroying western civilization?
liberalism, free market fundamentalism
>muh cultural marxism
literally a meme

Isn't this the book Sargon of Akkad recommended? is this why you said your "Cuck friend stumped" you?

not dumb enough to think ad hominem is an argument

Such as?

Subversion.

It's in the interests of the elite to make Marxism, socialism or any sort of economic populism as anti-white as possible so that whites don't or can't support those causes.

They realised this with Sweden in the 1970s after they realised a near perfect, egalitarian, all-white society that was perfect for them but terrible for the financial elites who wanted to profit from exploitation and division. The answer has been to then subvert those same values into something that means multiculturalism by default. Now decades later you can't vote for your economic best interests without voting against your ethnic best interests. Yes you can have economic equality, but then your country's going to get a lot browner if you do that.

The only choice they leave us now is vote against our economic best interests but in doing so to keep things homogeneous or at least palatable. Race will always come above economic needs so the foreseeable future will end up being shaped that way. That's why they're allowing nationalism to flourish again despite the token displays of resistance. The West will stay white, but get poorer and never able to compete with the kikes on economic terms. Any attempt to break from that will end in more 'diversity'. The new nationalism in reality is the new deal, that we accept being poorer in exchange for social cohesion and retaining an identity.

itt: gays

Watch out for those commies, their out to get you with their cultural Marxism

Multicultiralism is the destruction of the capitalist superstructure.

Thats basically it.

>So you're saying that there's no honest way to make money?

no

>If so doesn't that make us all equally culprit?

yup

> Doesn't that mean we are all still CURRENTLY perpetuating a slavery system?

yes.

>Your argument implies we shouldn't work at all because it is immoral.

you can work all you want but you can't ever make an ethical argument against wealth redistribution. It would be like a murderer making an ethical argument against cutting someone's fingers off.

idk didn't watch Sargon, yeah but it's all from the book, he didn't come up with this shit on his own he just read the book

No it hasn't. It's only strengthened nationalistic ideologies.

>Reformation ruined Europe

That's an incredibly simplistic answer. What do you even mean by that?

>Multicultiralism is the destruction of the capitalist superstructure.
On the contrary multiculturalism is perfect for capitalism to thrive.

Commies fight for their women to become slaves, just like the men. The hammer of the factory hell, and the sickle of the collective farm. Domesticated fools that yearn to be told what to do, and what to think. The entire Human experience reduced to quotas and drudgery. Not so unlike the capitalist West. 'Mother' is superior to 'Worker' in every way. That's what Communism did to them.

That's capitalism. Do you think Kanye West is an intelligent, competitive human being or just a narcissistic retarded that got promoted by the media? Do you think a shareholder in Saudi-Arabia who cashes in all the profits of a company which are produced by actually hard-working people deserves to be on top of the foodchain and therefore has a prerogative to breed with a harem? Do you think a successful hedge funds manager displays preferable genetic features for breeding?

I hardly think so. Second, Socialism doesn't make everybody equal. It's supposed to be a society where the fruits of your labor are actually owned by you. I can not fathom how you'd say that it would eliminate competitive breeding behaviour. It didn't in the Soviet Union for sure - guess how abysmal the average IQ must have been in the Tsarist Empire.

In fact, once you eliminate the privileges of rich fags who can be dumb and fat and still score hot chicks, features like intelligence and attractiveness will be even more important.

>implying it didn't
It split Christianity up the way it did and created retarded Protestant Baptist "Non-denominational" types.

Luther should've just become Orthodox.

>lets play the oppressed vs the oppressors the same way the proletariat were played against the bourgeoisie with the end logical goal of state control all employers for the purpose of equal wealth distribution, totally not communism though

Kek, only a German would say the refugee crisis has helped anything.

>muh-muh strengthened nationalist ideology

What does that matter when whites are minorities in our own countries? Strengthened nationlism means jack shit when the nationalists are massively out numberd

Daily reminder that this place is under siege from /leftypol/ raids.

It's easy to brush things you don't like off, as conspiracy theories
>the bourgeoisie don't oppress the classes, that's a tinfoil argument
See.

>And if you trace any wealth you have you will always find violence as the mother of it, sooner or later...
That's very presumptuous
.
>All capital, all private property was born in violence, in colonialism, in slavery and exploitation one way or the other, at this or that time in history.
That's humans being humans. Marx advocated violence too.

>So you have no ethical argument to make
But ethics are spooks

>If you live in the west you are the oppressor by birth because your ancestors stole from the world.
Nice. Trying to perpetuate collective guilt.

Globalism and internationalism are two peas in the same pod.

The conditions of consumerism in liberal capitalism is perpetuated by moral nihilism. The destruction of the nuclear family, nationalism and religion. All things that Marxists disapprove of too.