How is it even a debate that the white race is superior...

How is it even a debate that the white race is superior? A single movement in a Beethoven sonata has more vitality than all the shitskin "achievements" put together. And whites have a Beethoven in every single field or art and science.

Other urls found in this thread:

nairaland.com/955076/black-african-nobility-ancient-europe
youtube.com/watch?v=tKZBmMu06Fg
youtube.com/watch?v=9foi342LXQE
washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-nearly-forgotten-story-of-the-black-women-who-helped-land-a-man-on-the-moon/2016/09/12/95f2d356-7504-11e6-8149-b8d05321db62_story.html
youtube.com/watch?v=40HZigDSaV8
youtube.com/watch?v=Gs0FVs74gT8
youtube.com/watch?v=QzvOpiBL9hg
youtube.com/watch?v=W3CIvR0NsGw&t=636s
youtube.com/watch?v=7mq0JkRk25M&t=
youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Og5aECH3Y&t=
youtube.com/watch?v=ZpA0l2WB86E
youtube.com/watch?v=Xs8eZPaaLh4
youtu.be/4Tr0otuiQuU
youtube.com/watch?v=Xc39YRO8HM4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Beethoven was black

It isn't a debate. They can't let it be a debate.

Ya don't think... ya know, a bit racist much? Your litteraly a racist pice of shit garbage trash. Llaalalalalalala hiding this thread right now BYEEEEEEEEEEEE ASSHOLE!!!!!

how can white men even compete?

I often wonder, these great inventors, philosophers, scientists etc....

Did they consider their achievements just their own? Or did they go further and consider it an achievement for their nation, their race, or even humanity in general?

Idk man at the end of it all these are all rare few great individuals, the rest are just stupid plebs who exist to reproduce (and some fail even at that). Can the masses really take pride in the achievements of the greats?

>citing beethoven when bach exists
but no, the western musical tradition was a system which fueled creativity by inventing useful notation. This was what allowed musical ideas to be passed on from composer to composer and developed from generation to generation. The individual compsoers are meaningless without the invention of notation

Ayo hol up. So you white crackas be sayin Beethoven was white lol?
Go educate yourself, be woke. #100

How are you related to Beethoven exactly?

Bach approached the divine but Beethoven captured the essence of the human soul.

Of course the masses should take pride because these are men that managed to achieve what every human strives for i.e. transcend the human condition.

well Britain was pretty much the biggest scientific centers ever, a shit ton of great individuals came from those countries

now there has to be a reason as to why Britain was so intelectually superior (alongside France, Germany and Italy for a while), this was either
>their cared a lot about science so they betted on science (achievement of the nation)
or
>the brittish people are genetically superior which results in a bigger concentration of geniuses (achievement of the race)

Now that's a moor nose if I've ever seen one.

*well Britain was pretty much the biggest scientific center ever, a shit ton of great individuals came from there

*they cared

>scientists
>british scientists
>"great men"

*so they betted on infrastructure to create good schools

holy shit

they have shit food, shit teeth and shit women but hey, they are pretty good at science stuff

I don't think it's just genetic superiority otherwise Britain would have always been more scientifically advanced than anyone else in the world.

It's a combination of many things.

>Of course the masses should take pride because these are men that managed to achieve what every human strives for i.e. transcend the human condition.
But their achievement are theirs not yours or mine.

Think of this rationally. Sharing the same nationality with some great inventor does not bring any value to you personally.

>good at science
>sole qualifier of greatness

Taken as a whole Britain is probably second to Ancient Greece for volume and quality of contributions to humanity.

read pic related.

It's irrelevant whether or not race is a social construct. Or if it's biological. What is relevant is that the racialization of peoples happens only as the instrument of power. Race is a construction of power used to exclude the "unruly" ones.

>mocks British scientists
>posts comment with computer

Good one Sven

nairaland.com/955076/black-african-nobility-ancient-europe

WE

How can we be proud of our ancestor's achievements, whilst not paying reparations for damages caused by colonialism and the slave trade?

I'm proud of the British Empire, but I didn't personally contribute to it

WE

well yeah that's why I said it's culture, which every Brittish person is part of

well they were also pretty good at pretty much any other intelectual field, Italy is still culturally superior to everyone else but Britain is still pretty good

lol, white folks was in the caves while the black man was building Empires...
They taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.

>implying Beethoven was anywhere near as good as Schubert

Beethoven, Mozart Chopin Abraham Lincoln all them was black whteboy

oh a classic music cuck listening to the music of a deaf man.

>Lincoln

Lincoon.

Ex-fucking-catly.

White people make minorities represent the absolute worst of their culture, and never consider the best.

While they themselves only acknowledge their best and never own up to their absolute worst.

If you want to feel pride for being white, then you also have to feel guilt for it too.

Jazz is pretty good and probably the only thing of real worth blacks ever produced. It's certainly better than all pop music, but nowhere near classical.

Good point about notation. Western notation only came about through the church, so once again, Christianity is behind the white man's success.

all those scientists were black

schubert was black

Looks autistic but still hot

Also the irony is that all of jazz is but a footnote in Beethoven's last sonata.

u sure?

Have a listen
>youtube.com/watch?v=tKZBmMu06Fg

so he stole it from black people?

The vast, vast, vast majority of slave trade was controled by muslims - INCLUDING the (sex) enslavement, raiding and torture of white Europeans. Second were the Jews. The same holds true for the opimium wars. - You never hear about these two groups in this regard. I wonder why...

Also: colonialism brought science, technology, industry, infrastructure and education systems into shitholes. Complaing about it is like complaining about the Roman Empire. youtube.com/watch?v=9foi342LXQE

There are real atrocities, like the Beglian King in the Congo, but they are not representative. Needless to say: an individual like Beethoven is not representative of all of Germany in all times or the white race as a whole.

Good answer.

...

most retarded shit theory ever so far ...

Can only be made up by a leftist.

Is there any concrete evidence (irrefutable statistics) to prove white superiority? I need some material to red pill people

...

Actually.

washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-nearly-forgotten-story-of-the-black-women-who-helped-land-a-man-on-the-moon/2016/09/12/95f2d356-7504-11e6-8149-b8d05321db62_story.html

...

The fact they always point to some "forgotten" peon who played a small role only proves their inferiority.

black people just win everytime

>whites didnt exist before 1400
the only thing this chart proves is historical dominance in the last 6 centuries, nothing more

...

rec me some schubert?

And who do you think dominated before that?

There was a small timespan between 8th and 13th centuries wen the Arabs were dominant in the fields of art and science. But Arabs are basically white too. Before that there were the Greeks and Romans.

Face it whites are the undisputed kings.

>How is it even a debate that the white race is superior?
Civilization was born around equatorial regions which is populated by brown-skinned people. Northern Europeans were once savages on the same level as sub-Saharan blacks. The Roman Empire forced European savages to learn and adapt. The only reason African savages didn't grow like their pale cousins is because Rome could not reach them.

Blacks = Whites - Roman influence.

...

Mohammed, you're honestly just embarassing yourself. Go enrich some swedish sluts.

...

99% of interracial crimes in america were committed by whites a hundred years ago

youtube.com/watch?v=40HZigDSaV8

Musicfag here, shitskins are really fucking good at music. The Jazz is musically the most advanced genre and its from the black people. Some jazz is so fucking complex its crazy, comparing to the C-sharp minor moonlight sonata (which is still hard and beuatiful af).

minor correction :
Arabs didnt accomplish anything.
Their indian and indio-german slave-scientists did. For example maths, scripture, medicine, etc, etc, etc ...

>arabs were white
>greco romans dominated the world

Symphony 9
>youtube.com/watch?v=Gs0FVs74gT8
>youtube.com/watch?v=QzvOpiBL9hg
Symphony 8
>youtube.com/watch?v=W3CIvR0NsGw&t=636s
Trout Quinet
>youtube.com/watch?v=7mq0JkRk25M&t=
Piano Trio 2
>youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Og5aECH3Y&t=
Serenade
>youtube.com/watch?v=ZpA0l2WB86E

All of my favorite pieces are Schubert

>what is: hair discolouration

sorry, but complete bullshit.

btw : facts ? prove ? i.c. there are none, because u just made that up, sweetheart. Too sad for you :)

All the blue is Caucasian aka white.

99% of everything of value in history has come out of there.

It isn't a debate. Why do you think leftists went post modern? They have to deny beauty.

thanks satan

>we wuz map

>north africans are white
>yet turks (from turkey) are gooks because magic language theory
in the sin bin

> classical music
> good

fucking kek. it's just a bunch of simple scales and variations. black man made blues and jazz and all modern music. black man is god. white man's music is dead and buried.

youre putting scandinavia to shame, gustav svensson.

North africans are white, everyone look!

Ehre sei Kek in der Höhe!
youtube.com/watch?v=Xs8eZPaaLh4

>Sweden
Don't you have a black bull to prep for your wife?

This map is absolutely retarded.

Balts are the whitest peoples in the world.

white doesn't mean literally white skin you dummies it means indo european heritage

Underrated

There were advanced civilisations in Mesopotamia earlier than Egypt and the people were non-semitic.

>all Caucasians are white
Except Hamites, and Semites

US slave trade

>white doesnt literally mean white
>non whites can be white too

>Arabs

the science and philosophy was Indian and Greek and most of the scientists were Persians

and btw the chins were pretty fucking good at that time

Then why aren't the baltic countries and western asian/eastern european countries the "whitest" since they have more actual indo european influence ethnically and linguistically

yes, arabs where whites; OK, t be precise : Not all arabs, but white, caucasian-style ppl, who lived all over the planet ( proven by mummies with red and blond hair avery where), of which those in the arab region were called "aryans", and nowadays still call themselves so ( in arab: a'yran , commonly known as : 'iran ), which have nowadays much afro-arab and turkish influx tho ( see for example MIX-creatures like Ahmadinedschad), since and because the U.S.-initiated coup d'etat ( aka iranian revolution ) in the 80ties

Mind blown ?

...

>U.K

Look whos talking

>iranians
>arab
i dare you to call an iranian and arab

Music of the gods
youtu.be/4Tr0otuiQuU

The 19th and 20th century british certainly saw their accomploshments through the eyes of racial superiority. They constantly harped on how much better they were than the barbarians they were conquering and how every time they achieved something spectacular it only increased the gap betweeb the White Man and everyone else.

Though by that time racialism was risong in basically every European country. Not sure how the ancients thought about it.

...

sry, was trying to explain to the non-edicated, western 'normie' :-/

My auditory heroin.

youtube.com/watch?v=Xc39YRO8HM4

>"I love you, dad"
ok. i kek.

This is how I always phrase.

Yes, there is no doubt that some non-whites played a role in the advancement of science, technology, engineering, philosophy, music, writing, etc...inside Western Civilization. The difference is that their accomplishments could easily have been achieved by a white counter-part if they had not done it themselves. Very little progress would have been lost. It's nice that they helped but their contributions, in the end, are muteable.

The same cannot be said of Whites. Without Whites there is no Western Civilization. And while it's possible the North Africans, West Asians, and North East Asians would have picked up some of the slack left behind there is no doubt that the entirety of world progress would be massively affected in a way that we cannot even fathom.

White contributions are, quote on quote, immutable. There is simply too many achievements attributeable to white people to confodently say that society would have adapted without them. Who knows how long it wpuld have taken for a non-white Newton, Plato, Wright, Graham Bell, etc....to come around. Possibly never.

The only real exceptions are Ashkenazi Jews in the past 200 or so years. Say what you will abput the Jews, there is no doubt that they have been a tremendously productive people when it comes to the sciences these past two centuries. And while I still think that whites would have some-what easily filled in whatever their abscence left it cannot be doubted that their contributions have been rather significant. Yes, sometimes they are overblown. Einstein isn't quite as groundbreaking as many make him out to be but they still have some pretty solid achievements under their belt that we all benefit from and would have taken at least a few years/decades for whites to have accomplished of they hadn't been able to.

In otherwords, yes, she may have helped. But she didn't have to. And that's the difference between their contributions and Whites. Whites are the bedrock.

I don't care if we're superior or not. I just want Europe to stay for Europeans AT LEAST. North America should get its own white ethnostate too.

Dammit wrong reply

Meant to send it here:

>bullshit: the post

You need to be more obvious now that we are flooded with low IQ normies, they won't know you are quoting Al Sharpton and being sarcastic.

This comment is relatively retarded.